O que é CentOS?
CentOS Enterprise Linux é uma distribuição baseada no Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. CentOS Cada versão é suportada por 7 anos (por meio
de atualizações de segurança). CentOS Uma nova versão é liberada a
cada 2 anos, e cada versão CentOS é actualizado regularmente (a cada 6
meses) para
There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter
regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since
the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available
at the links below.
FWN/Issue161:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:36 +, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Steve,
The first thing to get right is the name of the upstream company. It
is (and here I am quoting from upstream themselves) Red Hat.
Two three letter words, the first letter of each in upper case.
Alan.
I knew someone would
The files have been signed and uploaded :)
Thanks John,
Tru
- Forwarded message from John Newbigin jnewbi...@ict.swin.edu.au -
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:03:21 +1100
From: John Newbigin jnewbi...@ict.swin.edu.au
Subject: GFS Update for CentOS 3 kernel 2.4.21-58.EL
New GFS packages for
alguno de ustedes ha conseguido instalar mysql 3.2 o algun contemporáneo en
centos5?
algun tip que me puedan dar para saber donde comenzar? san google no me ha
sacado de muchos apuros.___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
On Monday 02 February 2009 21:51:31 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Here's your problem. :)
Microsoft do things their own way and assume that's how everybody likes
it.
That's funny, I am using OL as well, and I don't have a problem with
headers/footers or Microsoft trying to tell me to do
Timothy Kesten wrote on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:59:56 +0100:
Don't know why not with glibc-common.
tried again?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Les Mikesell
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
I've been buying from the Smart-UPS and Back-UPS range. Those
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
Oh, didn't know about Best Power. Is that something like
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Morten Torstensen
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:56 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Port Forwarding
John wrote:
I am an open source person but when it comes
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
Sorin Srbu wrote:
I've been buying from the Smart-UPS and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Spiro Harvey
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:47 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] unsubscribe
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Here's your problem. :)
Microsoft do
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 08:51:32 Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds, initializes
and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can try to have Linux
initialize all 4 cores?
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Tuesday 03
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
You're probably booting the single CPU kernel.
Try booting the kernel ending with
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I have CentOS 5.2 installed on a computer (the same one that I just posted
a message on: Intel DG33BU motherboard) and for even though audio is
reported to be found and working Linux just doesn't play anything through
the speakers. The computer dual boots
Agile Aspect wrote:
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
You're probably booting the single CPU kernel.
Try
Hi Agile
There's no non SMP kernel in CentOS 5.x (check out:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-d70935212ce3b7b072b0075c1807a4bd3ea175b7).
dmesg boot output (taken from /var/log/dmesg) shows the following lines:
Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 (mockbu...@builder16.centos.org) (gcc
Hi Ralph
Which brings me back to my original post: how do I enable multicore on a
DG33BU motherboard, booting with pci=nommconf didn't change the situation
:-(
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Ralph Angenendt
ra+cen...@br-online.dera%2bcen...@br-online.de
wrote:
Agile
Paolo Supino wrote:
Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ acpi=off
Unfortunately I still have only 1 core used ...
As said: Try with pci=nommconf only. And please trim your mails :)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpKcASV1Mq5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi
I have CentOS 5.2 installed on a computer (the same one that I just posted
a message on: Intel DG33BU motherboard) and for even though audio is
reported to be found and working Linux just doesn't play anything through
the speakers. The computer dual boots Linux/Windows and when in Windows
Am Tuesday 03 February 2009 09:31:42 schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
Timothy Kesten wrote on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:59:56 +0100:
Don't know why not with glibc-common.
tried again?
I tried it quite often. Always the same result.
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi Ralph
You're right and I'm partially wrong: I changed /boot/grub/menu.lst from
acpi=off to pci=nommconf and rebooted the system expecting it to come up
with the new command line parameters. As you've shown me in the paste of the
dmesg output I posted this isn't the case. Which makes me
Hi
Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg.
# root
Hello list,
I try to do an automated network installation of centos 5.2, following
the redat documentation at
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/sysadmin-guide/pt-install-info.html
However, when installing I get promptet for various things, like which
network interface I
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Peter
The symlinks aren't broken: the grub.conf file is located in
/boot/grub/. /etc/grub/menu.lst points to it and so does /etc/grub.conf ...
[r...@server grub]# ls -l /etc/grub.conf /boot/grub/menu.lst
/boot/grub/grub.conf
-rw--- 1 root root 974 Feb 3
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Isaac Hailperin
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:46 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] kickstart won't kick-off via network
What I did:
First a manual install form DVD. I then used
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:39 +0200, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
Here's my /boot/grub/grub.conf content:
grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this
file
# NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that
# all
Hi William
You're right ... I do have 2 HDs and my root is not what I thought it is!
Here is what is happening with this system:
It has a SIL SATA RAID0/1 card installed with 2x 160GB SATA HDs connected to
it. The card is configured to mirror between the HDs (RAID1). But as I saw
now Linux
the sil is fraid or fakeraid..it's actually software raid done by a
binary often proprietary driver,..if you want to do raid one buy a real
hardware raid card or use the linux mdraid.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi
I can't wait until CentOS 5.3 is released :-( The bigger issue is that I
also have windows xp running as a guest inside a vmware server (version 2)
and since vmware doesn't discover the audio devices properlly (because linux
claims to not have them), there's no sound in Windows ...
--
TIA
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:17 +0200, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi William
I didn't trun acpi back on (it's a sure way to freeze the computer).
I did however find out that Linux ignores the RAID1 that is set by the
SIL SATA card I have installed :-( See my last post (just a few
minutes ago) with
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I can't wait until CentOS 5.3 is released :-( The bigger issue is that I
also have windows xp running as a guest inside a vmware server (version 2)
and since vmware doesn't discover the audio devices properlly (because linux
claims to not have them), there's no
Now since I get asked all these questions at boot time, I suspect that
the kickstart file is not there to answer these questions.
It does use it, it just doesn't find the network-block in ks.cfg. Does your
ks.cfg contain some lines for the networking?
Yes:
# Kickstart file automatically
Hey folks!
Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out and if so then I
would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and night coz I heard
that the kernel of centos 5.3 will have inbuilt support for intel pro/wireless
3945 wifi card ( I have been trying to install
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
this is not enough, you have to tell PXE about the
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:57:26PM +, kmadananteshwar.vb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks!
Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out and if so
then I would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for it day and
night coz I heard that the kernel of centos 5.3 will have
Ahh, here we go:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=371341 “upgrade to 5.1
breaks autofs for automounted home directories” – see especially
comment #13 which describes the symptom, and #25 which explains what
the fix is hidden in the records as. Fix appears to be to use kernel
Hi
I've installed CentOS 5.2 (i386) in a computer with a DG33BU motherboard
... When I installed it it crashed because of ACPI issues. Searching Google
I found that I need to turn ACPI off in order to successfully install
CentOS, which I did.
After a while I noticed that because of ACPI is
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
this is not enough, you have to tell PXE about the network, which nic to
use etc. I think there is a tutorial about
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:57 AM, kmadananteshwar.vb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks!
Does any one have an idea as to when centOS 5.3 will be out
Please see
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223forum=37
and if so then I would like to hear from you coz I am waiting for
Hi Ray,
on the URL http://twitter.com/centos you can get some status updates about
centos 5.3 from a centos developer, otherwise wait and see.
best regards
Gregor Gruener
- Original Message -
From: Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 03,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:45 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.wisegeek.com/
* Connection to 174.132.22.20 Failed
First, maybe you should post to the squid mailing list...
Did you check your timeout values?
JD
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
ks=http://9.0.0.1/all/profiles/cluto_centos5.2/cnode/ks.cfg
this is not enough, you have to tell
Hi Peter
The symlinks aren't broken: the grub.conf file is located in /boot/grub/.
/etc/grub/menu.lst points to it and so does /etc/grub.conf ...
[r...@server grub]# ls -l /etc/grub.conf /boot/grub/menu.lst
/boot/grub/grub.conf
-rw--- 1 root root 974 Feb 3 13:59 /boot/grub/grub.conf
Hi William
I didn't trun acpi back on (it's a sure way to freeze the computer). I did
however find out that Linux ignores the RAID1 that is set by the SIL SATA
card I have installed :-( See my last post (just a few minutes ago) with
more details.
--
TIA
Paolo
Greetings,
I am quite surprised that ericsson was not even mentioned in the UPS thread
Rajagopal
Disclosure: I am not an employee or anyway related to Ericsson except
for asking them for couple of quotations (in India -- yeah _we_ need
UPS the most. NExt to diesel power gnerators fondly
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 11:17 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
Sorin Srbu wrote:
The voltage has been fairly constant here over the years since I started using
UPS and logging the voltage and stuff, 238V more or less constantly. It rarely
drops below 236V or over 240V. We mainly use the UPS:es to have controlled
shutdowns should the power fail entirely
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Ralph
You're right and I'm partially wrong: I changed /boot/grub/menu.lst from
acpi=off to pci=nommconf and rebooted the system expecting it to come up
with the new command line parameters. As you've shown me in the paste of
the dmesg
Anne Wilson wrote:
Actually, I have one box attached to a BackUPS that is about 15 years old,
and
has never had a replacement battery. It holds the box through power
variations, and can supply power for a couple of minutes - enough to allow a
shutdown, since that box is never running
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 15:42 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Isaac Hailperin wrote on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:44 +0100:
append initrd=distro/centos5.2/initrd.img ramdisk_size=7494
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I've installed CentOS 5.2 (i386) in a computer with a DG33BU
motherboard ... When I installed it it crashed because of ACPI issues.
Searching Google I found that I need to turn ACPI off in order to
successfully install CentOS, which I did.
After a while I
On 2/3/2009 6:06 AM, Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Peter
I tried that and it the result is the same: Linux only finds,
initializes and uses only 1 core ... :-( Is there anything else I can
try to have Linux initialize all 4 cores?
--
TIA
Paolo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Peter
No, I only have one mailserver with one domain I'm managing with about
30 users. I think I have the routing working properly now, as well as
the acl's.
I put some route statements on eth2 for the private network and that
seems to have resolved issues.
I do have an authentication issue with ldap,
on 2-3-2009 1:29 AM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 08:51:32 Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing
on 2-1-2009 11:56 PM fabian dacunha spake the following:
Dear All,
I have a Centos 5.2 server used as a squid proxy server for quite sometime
and was workin fine
after a power failure the system refused to boot
i jus see the grub boot load screen n then hangs
so using the space bar
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Paul Johnson pauljoh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
If I use system-config-display or system-config-display --reconfig
:::
shown
Scott Silva wrote:
on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
It is never recommended to upgrade major versions. You might get away with it,
and you might spend
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
I have a system that was originally installed with RHEL 3 x86_64, and
I've since 'updated' it to CentOS 3 via installing yum and
centos-release, then running a yum update.
is there any way I can force -all- installed packages to be replaced
with
I have a system that was originally installed with RHEL 3 x86_64, and
I've since 'updated' it to CentOS 3 via installing yum and
centos-release, then running a yum update.
is there any way I can force -all- installed packages to be replaced
with their centos analogs just to be sure its all
Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
--
-=/Thom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
It is never recommended to upgrade major versions. You might get away with it,
and you might spend even more time chasing
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson pauljoh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
If I use system-config-display or system-config-display --reconfig
although I get a message that I need to log out of GNOME, to have the
new
on 2-3-2009 4:31 PM Christopher Chan spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 2-3-2009 2:35 PM Thom Paine spake the following:
Would this be a good way to go to update to 5?
I would consider this. I have a couple of 3 boxes I'd like to get to 5.
It is never recommended to upgrade major
John R Pierce wrote:
all the BackUPs I've ever seen have been simple relay switched units.
when the power is on, you're getting unfiltered power (except for a MOV
based surge protector), when the power is out, it switches to the
modified square wave inverter output.
John,
There are
tech wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
all the BackUPs I've ever seen have been simple relay switched units.
when the power is on, you're getting unfiltered power (except for a MOV
based surge protector), when the power is out, it switches to the
modified square wave inverter output.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Isaac Hailperin
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:56 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] kickstart won't kick-off via network
Now in conjunction with the kernel parameter
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of
Les Mikesell
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 6:42 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
hospital with power-backups up to yinyang. But it failed
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Scott Silva
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:45 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Emergency rescue help needed
I just had a Back-UPS of about 1998 vintage burst into flames
72 matches
Mail list logo
