Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2009, 16:44 +0100 schrieb Scott Robbins:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:23:01AM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Scott Robbins wrote:
I have put the article on the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/vpnc
The article asserts clear packaging
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 05:13:27PM +0100, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2009, 16:44 +0100 schrieb Scott Robbins:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:23:01AM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Scott Robbins wrote:
The article asserts clear packaging permissions
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0261
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0261.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/vnc-4.0-12.c4.1.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/vnc-server-4.0-12.c4.1.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0012
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0012.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/netpbm-10.25-2.1.c4.4.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/netpbm-devel-10.25-2.1.c4.4.ia64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0261
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0261.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/vnc-4.0-0.beta4.1.8.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/vnc-server-4.0-0.beta4.1.8.s390.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0012
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0012.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/netpbm-10.25-2.1.c4.4.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/netpbm-devel-10.25-2.1.c4.4.s390.rpm
César Sepúlveda wrote:
La ruta la elimino con:
route del -net 169.254.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0
echo NOZEROCONF=yes /etc/sysconfig/network
con eso no te debe salir esa ruta.
saludos
epe
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Hector Herrera wrote:
...
After about 2-3 days, the kernel complains about dst cache overflow and
even thought it hasn't crashed, the network is
un-responsive. All IP forwarding stops and the server cannot be reached
from any network interfaces.
...
According
According to
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2005-07/1175.html this is
a known bug that was fixed in 2.6.11, however, I'm running 2.6.18 (as
updated with `yum update`)
It could be something new. I got dst cache overflows before and it was a
while before they finally
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks
it as a spy site. I wonder why it thinks so.
And I wonder why you use ZA at all.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Kai Schaetzl schrieb:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC):
If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks
it as a spy site. I wonder why it thinks so.
And I wonder why you use ZA at all.
Or Windows, for that matter.
;-)
Rainer
From: ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com
I’ve pulled this down with Firefox, wget, a bittorrent
client and an ftp client using Windows as well as Linux hosts. Is something
wrong with the distributed DVD image? It has failed an MD5 check every time
I’ve
pulled it
ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
I've pulled this down with Firefox, wget, a bittorrent client and an ftp
client using Windows as well as Linux hosts. Is something wrong with the
distributed DVD image? It has failed an MD5 check every time I've pulled
it down.
[r...@centos x86_64]#
Dear Fabian,
Thanks for ur reply..
i will check it out
regards
fabian
fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I have 2 server with almost identical configuration nd would like to
mirror them
bascillay i would like to use it as a firewall.
i was thinking of linux HA but could not really find
Les Mikesell пишет:
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
nginx http_proxy module is universal complex solution. Also apache
working in prefork mode (in general cases), I don't know does
mod_jk\mod_proxy_ajp works in the worker-MPM mode...
In the preforking mode apache create a child on each incoming
Seeing upstream has an update for glibc
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html
I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and
it produced the following rpms :-
glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm
glibc-debuginfo-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:05:09PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Logrotate is checked every day by cron.daily, right?
I notice in logrotate.conf by default it's weekly.
If I change it into monthly (now, on 12 of Feb), when will it do the
monthly rotation?
a. On 12 of March or
b. On 1st of
CentOS User wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:08:11 +0100 (CET):
Is an official CentOS update going to be
made of the glibc from Red Hat?
This question is rethorical, right?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
I had tried from a couple different mirrors listed on the CentOS page, I
eventually recalled that ANL mirrors everything and pulled it down from there.
No issues with the ANL download.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
We are finally going to replace our VHS-C Camcorder, with a Digital
Camcorder, tomorrow. Looking for suggestions,
for Digital Video Editor to use on
Puneet Goel wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have few questions.
1. I have a device on which I have installed CentOS 5.2 as an operating
system. Now I want to sell this device. Will there be any issue ?
No issues.
You can sell GPL software. In fact that's part of the freedom GPL
guarantees.
You
I have a possible customer in canada.
Can I export a machine pre-loaded with centos to canada?
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:08:24PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi Fajar, re logrotate and crontab: I was speaking from instinct
knowing that crontab and a simple script to do the actual
rotation is all that is needed. What I didn't expect was that
someone had actually reinvented all the
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:41:38AM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have a possible customer in canada.
Can I export a machine pre-loaded with centos to canada?
Jerry
Yes.
You might want to use one of the shipping companies that
provides specific border/customs services. DHL used to do that
but
DISCLAIMER: I'm not a lawyer and I'm not your lawyer.
I presume you mean due to restrictions on cryptographic software.
My understanding is that even during the bad old days when ITAR
(International Traffic in Arms Regulations) restricted anything with over a
56 bit key as a weapon of war that
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com
wrote:
We are finally going to replace our VHS-C Camcorder, with a Digital
On 2009-02-12 15:47, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:08:24PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi Fajar, re logrotate and crontab: I was speaking from instinct
knowing that crontab and a simple script to do the actual
rotation is all that is needed. What I didn't expect was
Fabian Arrotin napsal(a):
I've already used Heartbeat between two centos machines acting as
gateway/iptables firewall and it worked perfectly.
The only 'problem' is that iptables connection status is of course not
shared between the two nodes.
Never used shorewall though.
Fabian,
there's
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ian Forde wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:01:21 -0800:
locate rpmsave
locate rpmnew
rpmsave is left from *un*installations, rpmnew is the *new* file, there is
no file overwritten. rpm usually doesn't overwrite files if they got
changed.
AFAIK this is not correct, a
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the response.
I tried following command on both servers, and there was nothing coming out:
restorecon -v /etc/services
So the /etc/services file should be ok.
Frank Ling
From: Jay Leafey jay.lea...@mindless.com
To: CentOS mailing list
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ian Forde wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:01:21 -0800:
locate rpmsave
locate rpmnew
rpmsave is left from *un*installations, rpmnew is the *new* file, there is
no file overwritten. rpm usually doesn't overwrite files if
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090212/d6ec5759/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 8
Date
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
In the preforking mode apache create a child on each incoming request,
so it's too much expensive for resource usage.
Have you actually measured this? Preforking apache doesn't fork per
request, it forks enough instances to accept the concurrent connection
Kai wrote
This question is rethorical, right?
What is rethorical my learned friend? Do
you have anything to contribute to the original
topic other than showing that you may need an
English dictionary?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Bill Campbell wrote:
locate rpmsave
locate rpmnew
rpmsave is left from *un*installations, rpmnew is the *new* file, there is
no file overwritten. rpm usually doesn't overwrite files if they got
changed.
AFAIK this is not correct, a package upgrade can create either of these
(or both,
Message-ID: va.36bd.05799...@news.conactive.com
On: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:23 +0100, Kai Schaetzl
mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Ian Forde wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:01:21 -0800:
locate rpmsave
locate rpmnew
rpmsave is left from *un*installations, rpmnew is the *new* file,
there is
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
locate rpmsave
locate rpmnew
rpmsave is left from *un*installations, rpmnew is the *new* file, there is
no file overwritten. rpm usually doesn't overwrite files if they got
changed.
AFAIK this is not correct, a package
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:08 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
That sounds like the kiss of death for any critical service. Can't it
figure out ahead of time that this is going to happen and let the
service keep running unchanged with a warning message about needing the
update instead?
You're
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:12:07PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2009-02-12 15:47, jk...@kinz.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:08:24PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi Fajar, re logrotate and crontab: I was speaking from instinct
knowing that crontab and a simple script to do the
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009, Ian Forde wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:08 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
That sounds like the kiss of death for any critical service. Can't it
figure out ahead of time that this is going to happen and let the
service keep running unchanged with a warning message about
on 2-12-2009 3:08 AM CentOS User spake the following:
Seeing upstream has an update for glibc
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html
I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and
it produced the following rpms :-
glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.i386.rpm
Bill Campbell wrote:
That sounds like the kiss of death for any critical service. Can't it
figure out ahead of time that this is going to happen and let the
service keep running unchanged with a warning message about needing the
update instead?
You're missing the point. If the service
on 2-12-2009 6:41 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
I have a possible customer in canada.
Can I export a machine pre-loaded with centos to canada?
Jerry
It depends on where you are. If you are in the United States, it should be OK.
If you are in Cuba, Afghanistan or Iran, or several
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 2-12-2009 3:08 AM CentOS User spake the following:
Seeing upstream has an update for glibc
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0052.html
I rebuilt the glibc-2.3.4-2.41.el4_7.1.src.rpm and
it produced the following
Hi all,
I have two servers both identical in hardware and I have just done a
clean install of CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on both.
Sometimes (more often than not) when I log in at the physical console
(e.g. tty1, tty2, etc.) I will be logged in and it stops responding even
if the shell is not doing
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
That sounds like the kiss of death for any critical service. Can't it
figure out ahead of time that this is going to happen and let the
service keep running unchanged with a warning message about needing the
update instead?
on 2-12-2009 11:24 AM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Scott Silva
ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org wrote:
on 2-12-2009 3:08 AM CentOS User spake the following:
Seeing upstream has an update for glibc
Bill Campbell wrote:
Of course we don't do things that are likely to take a critical service
down without proper prior planning (often found out the hard way on our own
systems :-). If an update is likely to have an impact on operations, it is
scheduled during a maintenance window.
In other
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0100:
AFAIK this is not correct, a package upgrade can create either of these
(or both, or neither of them despite your having edited a file). And
that's the way it should be, either choice can be justified.
Sure, a apckage can do
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
James B. Byrne wrote on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:31:39 -0500 (EST):
I cannot answer whether this situation is still the case, and I know
that it was not always the case, but on the last but one update to
bind my configuration files were all renamed to .rpmsave and there
were
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
Of course we don't do things that are likely to take a critical service
down without proper prior planning (often found out the hard way on our own
systems :-). If an update is likely to have an impact on operations, it is
Hi there,
I would like to hear some hardware recomendations to connect our smtp
server (postfix) to an external SMS box.
Basically I am looking for a SMS box that takes messages via smtp and
sends them via the SMS part.
Has anyone here implemented a solution like this?
I must use an in house sms
On CentOS version 4 I had to re-compile the kernel in order to add
more serial ports I needed for Halifax. Was version 5 changed so that
you can add more serial ports, I need up to 24 additional, without a
kernel re-compile?
Thanks
John Warren
I am having a problem with setting up diskless clients under CentOS 5.2.
I have everything working under CentOS 4.7. This is an adaptation of
the (somewhat old) Diskless Linux with PXE HOWTO by Gerd v. Egidy,
originally at the URL
http://www.intra2net.com/opensource/diskless-howto/, which is now
Am 12.02.2009 um 22:34 schrieb Erick Perez:
Hi there,
I would like to hear some hardware recomendations to connect our smtp
server (postfix) to an external SMS box.
Basically I am looking for a SMS box that takes messages via smtp and
sends them via the SMS part.
Has anyone here
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Warren
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Serial channels on version 5
On CentOS version 4 I had to re-compile the kernel in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Erick Perez eaper...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to hear some hardware recomendations to connect our smtp
server (postfix) to an external SMS box.
Basically I am looking for a SMS box that takes messages via smtp and
sends them via the SMS part.
Has anyone
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heller
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:15 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Problem with PXEBOOT of diskless client --
fails to mountRAMDISK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Jay Leafey jay.lea...@mindless.com wrote:
Frank Ling wrote:
Hi,
My both CentOS 5 servers have logging problems. Logs such as messages,
boot.log, kernel, spooler, and tallylog in /var/log directory are all 0
size.
[...]
I've had something similar happen a
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
I am having a problem with setting up diskless clients under CentOS 5.2.
I have everything working under CentOS 4.7.
...
RAMDISK: ext2 filesystem found at block 0
RAMDISK: Loading 8192KiB [1 disk] into ram disk... done.
EXT2 fs:
Hi,
Anyone has some ways for the following text processing problem? I have a text
file containing two stanzas attached below. I want to uncomment the stanza with
'host=localhost' line, while left the other stanza unchanged.
...
/* udp_send_channel {
host=localhost
port = 10017
ttl = 1
FWIW, to bring this back to the djbdns topic, the *ONLY* configuration file
in our OpenPKG packaging of djbdns, daemontools, and ucspi-tcp is the
dnsroots.global file used by dnscache. Each server installed is in its own
directory which is not affected by updates.
uscpi-tcp? Where does
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009, Christopher Chan wrote:
FWIW, to bring this back to the djbdns topic, the *ONLY* configuration file
in our OpenPKG packaging of djbdns, daemontools, and ucspi-tcp is the
dnsroots.global file used by dnscache. Each server installed is in its own
directory which is not
uscpi-tcp? Where does that come in? rsyncing of the cdb file?
It's mostly to allow BIND sites to do zone transfers from djbdns sites.
Oh the axfr-dns daemon. This is the answer for the 'djbdns does not
support tcp or zone transfer' nonsense routinely vomited by DJB haters.
Hi Marcelo,
Thanks for the comment. I had SELinux disabled. Anyway I tried your trick, and
it didn't work. Something must went wrong.
Frank
Maybe /var/log context?
restorecon -R -n -v /etc
restorecon -R -n -v /var/log
You can force a global relabel:
touch /.autorelabel
and then
Hi,
Anyone has some ways for the following text processing problem? I have a text
file containing two stanzas attached below. I want to uncomment the stanza
with
'host=localhost' line, while left the other stanza unchanged.
...
/* udp_send_channel {
host=localhost
port =
Thanks for your reply
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM, J Potter jpotter-cen...@codepuppy.comwrote:
Look at pound: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
If you are concerned about traffic volume, you might consider running
squid as a transparent proxy in front of pound. I.e.:
request - squid - pound
67 matches
Mail list logo
