[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0308 Important CentOS 4 ia64 cups - security update

2009-02-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0308 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0308.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.56.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.56.ia64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0275 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 imap - security update

2009-02-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0275 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/imap-2002d-15.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/imap-devel-2002d-15.ia64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0275 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 imap - security update

2009-02-19 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0275 imap security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/imap-2002d-15.i386.rpm

[CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1

2009-02-19 Thread Sergio
Hola a todos, Solo quería confirmar si esta configuración de mi interfaz de red esta bien creada antes de ponerla en marcha. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ ifcfg-eth0 ifcfg-eth0:0 ifcfg-eth0:1 ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255

Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1

2009-02-19 Thread Luis J Feo
Me parece que está bien. Sin embargo que via comandos puedes hacerlo con el comando ifconfig eth0:0 [ip] netmask [].. etc y debería configurarse automáticamente. Con esto quizás pudieras chequear por tí mismo. From: listas-li...@cherrytel.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009

Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1

2009-02-19 Thread Luis J Feo
Encontré esta dirección que te va a ayudar: http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2005/05/setting-up-multiple-ip-addresses-on.html Lo que pasa es que yo últimamente he estado trabajando con Debian y es un poco diferente. Cada IP virtual debe tener un archivo de configuración asociado.

Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1

2009-02-19 Thread Christian Araquistain
Para configurar virtuales te paso una config de una /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 DEVICE=eth0:1 BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=192.1.1.12 BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 GATEWAY=192.1.1.1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet 2009/2/19 Luis J Feo geoquim...@hotmail.es

[CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red

2009-02-19 Thread Henry Villavicencio
Estimados: Tengo instalado centos 5.2, tengo una tarjeta de red davicom, la configure, no me sale error pero no tengo acceso a la red. Me sale en la consola: eth0: Tx timeout - resetting Saludos, _ Connect to the next

Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red

2009-02-19 Thread Henry Villavicencio
From: geoquim...@hotmail.es To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:05:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red Revisa esta dirección: http://www.kitiara.org/Lists-Archives/l-linux-0603/msg00592.html --- Ya lo revise y nada. Pero descubri

Re: [CentOS] realtime backup

2009-02-19 Thread Rainer Duffner
CentOS List schrieb: For a speedy backup, could put the db on LVM. Then your procedure would be shutdown/freeze db, make lv snapshot, startup/unfreeze db, rsync/backup data, remove snapshot. That's what I'd suggest too, but be warned that performance on that

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

2009-02-19 Thread John Doe
From: James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca I have a USB meory key (Kingston) that I formally used with a CentOS-5.2 (32bit) system. When I plug it into a connector slot the light on the key comes on but there are no entries created in /media and no entries made to the /var/log/messages file.

Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start

2009-02-19 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 23:36:33 Lanny Marcus wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:25:44 Lanny Marcus wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)

2009-02-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 14:09, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: removing all my centos+ kernels and using kmod on top of redhat kernels fix my nfs lock problem. Do you mean you replaced the CentOS-Plus kernel with a kernel from RedHat? Or are you using a CentOS-Base (instead

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap

2009-02-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET ju...@knet.es wrote: I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new SATA disk, the system don't detects it . Any idea of what the problem is? Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

2009-02-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. :-( Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

2009-02-19 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. Any thoughts? Do you have SELinux enabled? Have you checked

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

2009-02-19 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis geisj at pagestation.com http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote: / I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) // this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. // hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device.

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

2009-02-19 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. Not the same at all. You try doing a recovery from a screwed-up windows registry. I

Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars

2009-02-19 Thread Michael Simpson
On 19/02/2009, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. Not the same at all.

[CentOS] help with alternatives

2009-02-19 Thread Tony Schreiner
I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set itself up as an alternative? But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is

Re: [CentOS] help with alternatives

2009-02-19 Thread Tony Schreiner
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set itself up as an alternative? But

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for abackup server?

2009-02-19 Thread Bob Hoffman
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for abackup server? Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

2009-02-19 Thread James B. Byrne
Message-ID: 499cc7d9.9050...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:15:45 +0530, partha chowdhury kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote: what do /sbin/lsusb and fdisk -l show ? [r...@inet04 ~]# /sbin/lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID : Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 007 Device 001: ID :

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

2009-02-19 Thread James B. Byrne
Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb ports but it matters not so long as I can mount it. Thanks for

[CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings list- I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementioned permissions require the user to have write access to the

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

2009-02-19 Thread William L. Maltby
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:31 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 2-19-2009 11:54 AM Tim Nelson spake the following: Greetings list- I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementioned

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread nate
Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from

Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized

2009-02-19 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:31:26 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread MHR
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Tim Nelson
- MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not.

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Tim Nelson
- Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 2-19-2009 1:53 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Alex H. Vandenham
On Thursday 19 February 2009 04:29:03 pm MHR wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible

[CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Dick Holland
I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? -- Dick Holland ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check

2009-02-19 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Tim Nelson wrote on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:41 -0600 (CST): I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. Not samba-specific. The sticky bit could help in this if I recall right. If you regularly

[CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Ian Forde
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:46 -0600, ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Barry Brimer
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm

[CentOS] ip6tables forwarding rule

2009-02-19 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I have 2 boxes that act as IPv6 routers. One with 2 physical interfaces, the other with 6 vlan 'interfaces' on one physical interface plus a second physical interface. On both systems I have in /etc/sysconfig/network IPV6FORWARDING=yes But if I have my 'basic' ip6tables service running,

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org]

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? That 965 mobo uses the X3000 IGA, so you can prolly add rpmforge and install

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Jake
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. While i haven't done this before, i believe the answer you're looking for lies in

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Barry Brimer
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. I assume that you are not

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
There are a few on there and I'm telnetting from a different box on that network. I'll dig around some more and eventually figure it out. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2009-02-19 Thread Spook ZA
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com

[CentOS] testing

2009-02-19 Thread bruce
test.. please ignore.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?

2009-02-19 Thread Noob Centos Admin
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote: The other side of the coin (as I think you mentioned) is that many are not comfortable having LVM handle the mirroring. Are its mirroring abilities as mature or fast as md? It's certainly not documented as well at the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:32 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution? That 965 mobo

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:12 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution? I'm trying to find a

Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock

2009-02-19 Thread nate
Jerry Geis wrote: after running hwclock --debug the two files you mentioned above did not have anything extra added. Just curious, you are running this on real hardware right not a virtual machine? nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Dick Holland
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 08:12 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Dick Holland Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:26 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?

2009-02-19 Thread Dick Holland
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:32 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? That 965