[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0315 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) firefox - security update

2009-03-07 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0315 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0315.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/firefox-3.0.7-1.el4.centos.s390.rpm s390x:

[CentOS-es] Problemas

2009-03-07 Thread Antonio Hernandez Benitez
Hace unos dias postee un problema al cual a un no le encuentro solucion, pero fijandome un poco mas el problema sucede al momento de cargar udev, cuando esta en el paso de starting udev, si no pasa ese paso correctamente me manda a un kernel panic, alguien a tenido este problema

[CentOS-es] Roundcube Webmail

2009-03-07 Thread luisito
Hola Estoy intentando instalar Roundcubemail-0.2-stable en mi CentOS 5.2 y me dice que necesita el php 5.2, mi internet es limitadisima, les pido por favor me ayuden a encontrar desde donde descargar el PHP 5.2 en rpm. Desde ya, gracias salu2 luisito

Re: [CentOS-es] Roundcube Webmail

2009-03-07 Thread César Sepúlveda
El Saturday 07 March 2009 11:27:36 luisito escribió: Hola Estoy intentando instalar Roundcubemail-0.2-stable en mi CentOS 5.2 y me dice que necesita el php 5.2, mi internet es limitadisima, les pido por favor me ayuden a encontrar desde donde descargar el PHP 5.2 en rpm. Desde ya, gracias

[CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread James Pifer
I'm not sure why this started, but apparently I'm having a DNS problem. Yesterday mail started bouncing with this error: 450 Unable to find obrien-pifer.com I think the messages eventually get delivered, but not sure. I guess I'll see if this one makes the list. I checked my domain using

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread Mogens Kjaer
James Pifer wrote: ... Anyone see any problems in my DNS records? Doesn't look right to me: $ nslookup set type=mx obrien-pifer.com Server: 127.0.0.1 Address:127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: *** Can't find obrien-pifer.com: No answer Authoritative answers can be

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread Louis Lagendijk
hi James there is a MX recond for mail.obrien-pifer.com, not for obrien-pifer.com: bash-3.2$ dig obrien-pifer.com any ; DiG 9.5.1-P1-RedHat-9.5.1-1.P1.fc10 obrien-pifer.com any ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10894 ;; flags: qr rd ra;

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread Joebstl Thomas
Hi James, MX-records must point to A-records and not to IP adresses. A dig -t AXFR obrien-pifer.com @ns1.obrien-pifer.com | grep MX returns: mail.obrien-pifer.com. 38400 IN MX 1 70.62.90.185.obrien-pifer.com. Whereas you list mail.obrien-pifer.com.INMX1 70.62.90.185 in

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert Heller napsal(a): I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in the mkinitrd package that causes it to

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread James Pifer
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 14:01 +0100, Joebstl Thomas wrote: Hi James, MX-records must point to A-records and not to IP adresses. A dig -t AXFR obrien-pifer.com @ns1.obrien-pifer.com | grep MX returns: mail.obrien-pifer.com. 38400 IN MX 1 70.62.90.185.obrien-pifer.com. Whereas

[CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Robert Heller wrote: At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: I am also not sure if I need to update any of the files the installer uses to install the system -- is it enough to just drop the alternitive mkinitrd rpm? Do I need to

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Richard Karhuse
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote This seems overly complex for my needs.  I don't want (or need) to rebuild all 6 of the install CDs.  I just want to *replace* one RPM on the first CD.  I have copied the CD's directory tree to a writable file system and

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 3

2009-03-07 Thread centos-announce-request
://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090307/3768431a/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 8 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:25:15 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0325 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 seamonkey - security

Re: [CentOS] I have a test system that hangs hard...

2009-03-07 Thread Kay Diederichs
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have a test system: Centos 5.2 on an OQO, that has been hanging hard. I have to unplug it and pull the battery so I can then cold start it. This last time all I did was open a terminal window and SU to root, then start the lastest build of SIP Communicator

Re: [CentOS] I have a test system that hangs hard...

2009-03-07 Thread David G. Miller
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: See embedded comments. I'm not familiar with the specific package mentioned but these are just a few standard debugging ideas. I have a test system: Centos 5.2 on an OQO, that has been hanging hard. I have to unplug it and pull the battery so I

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
James Pifer wrote on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:07:00 -0500: Can you tell me if it looks better now? It's better, but still: - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX - as all your hosts point to the same IP you can just use a wildcard - as I'm sure you don't change your hosts

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Les Mikesell
R P Herrold wrote: Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS, because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here? Who bears the support load of sorting out what happened when the poor hurt user shows

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 17:59 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd) R P

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread Morten Torstensen
Kai Schaetzl wrote: - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX It is good to always have an MX. - having four ns records all point to the same IP is just, uhm, pointless Can make it easier to separate workloads and move them to different servers later. //Morten

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread John R Pierce
Kai Schaetzl wrote: It's better, but still: - as the MX is the same as your domain name you do not need an MX - as all your hosts point to the same IP you can just use a wildcard - as I'm sure you don't change your hosts several times a day you can up the TTL to a more reasonable time like

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:45:19 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Robert Heller wrote: At Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:31:08 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: I am also not sure if I need to update any of the files the installer uses

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:48:29 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote This seems overly complex for my needs.  I don't want (or need) to rebuild all 6 of the install CDs.  I just want to *replace* one RPM

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: R P Herrold wrote: Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS, because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with just one package replaced'. Who gets the black eye here?

Re: [CentOS] Mail delivery failing with 450

2009-03-07 Thread James Pifer
$ whois obrien-pifer.com ... Domain Name: OBRIEN-PIFER.COM Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, INC. Whois Server: whois.wildwestdomains.com Referral URL: http://www.wildwestdomains.com Name Server: NS1.OBRIEN-PIFER.COM Name Server: NS2.OBRIEN-PIFER.COM Server Name:

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Karanbir Singh
Robert Heller wrote: I don't want (or need) to rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. I just want to *replace* one RPM on the first CD. the installer supports external repo's - at install time. All you then need is to provide a new repo, with a higher EVR for mkinitrd. -- Karanbir Singh :

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:39:00 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert Heller wrote: I don't want (or need) to rebuild all 6 of the install CDs. I just want to *replace* one RPM on the first CD. the installer supports external repo's - at install time. All you then

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Rob Kampen
Robert Heller wrote: At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: R P Herrold wrote: Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS, because she was told by the respinner that it is 'CentOS with just one package replaced'. Who gets

Re: [CentOS] topbanel and bottompanel on gnome

2009-03-07 Thread MHR
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: Or better yet how do I completely disable the top and bottom panels using gconftool-2? Not sure about gconftool-2, but you can delete one panels by right clicking on the panel and selecting the delete panel option. I'm

Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS 5.2 (w/ patched mkinitrd)

2009-03-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:44:46 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert Heller wrote: At Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:59:02 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: R P Herrold wrote: Here is the fallout: The poor end user 'knows' it was CentOS,

[CentOS] Please test kmod packages for CentOS-4

2009-03-07 Thread Akemi Yagi
Hello, There are currently 3 kmod packages in CentOS-4 that require re-installation upon each kernel update: kmod-drbd kmod-drbd82 kmod-xfs CentOS is going to offer a kernel-independent version of these kmod packages. With this version, you install once, and they should survive kernel updates.

[CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card

2009-03-07 Thread Rick
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use the memory I bought? Do I need a new

Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card

2009-03-07 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:00:59AM +, Rick wrote: Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system froze. Is there a way to

Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card

2009-03-07 Thread Luke S Crawford
Rick el...@spinics.net writes: Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use

Re: [CentOS] Hardware compatibility IM-945GC Intel Atom Mini-ITX]

2009-03-07 Thread David Amiel
Le Lun 2 mars 2009 23:39, Jason Pyeron a écrit : Can this MB be used with Centos 4 (or 5)? For reference: http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9832 I don't think we can use this new MB since the Realtek 8111C does not seem to be supported (well)

[CentOS] samsung sata disk pb

2009-03-07 Thread David Amiel
Hi there, I'm running a centos 5.2 (with a centos 5.3 kernel) on a box with a samsung 1To green edition, and this disk looks a bit slow to me and it's not recognized by hdparm : # hdparm -iI /dev/sda /dev/sda: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid

Re: [CentOS] samsung sata disk pb

2009-03-07 Thread John R Pierce
David Amiel wrote: Hi there, I'm running a centos 5.2 (with a centos 5.3 kernel) on a box with a samsung 1To green edition, and this disk looks a bit slow to me and it's not recognized by hdparm more likely to be a problem with support for the specific SATA controller than the drive