Re: [CentOS-docs] permission for wiki editing

2009-03-19 Thread Ralph Angenendt
shantanu pavgi wrote: Dear Admin, I would likr to edit following article: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Subversion . There is a flaw in the mentioned steps as follows- mismatch in SVNPath (Section: 2b), the repository created using svnadmin (Section: 2c), and svn import path (Section: 3b).

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0355 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) evolution and evolution-data-server - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0355 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0355.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/evolution-2.0.2-41.el4_7.2.s390.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0354 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) evolution-data-server - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0354 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0354.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/evolution28-evolution-data-server-1.8.0-37.el4_7.2.s390.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) evolution - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0358 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.s390.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0341 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 curl - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0341 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0341.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/curl-7.10.6-9.rhel3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/curl-devel-7.10.6-9.rhel3.ia64.rpm --

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0341 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 curl - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0341 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0341.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/curl-7.12.1-11.1.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/curl-devel-7.12.1-11.1.c4.1.ia64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0345 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 ghostscript - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-7.05-32.1.17.ia64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0345 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 ghostscript - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0345 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ghostscript-7.07-33.2.c4.5.ia64.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0341 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) curl - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0341 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0341.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/curl-7.12.1-11.1.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/curl-devel-7.12.1-11.1.c4.1.s390.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0341 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 curl - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0341 curl security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0341.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/curl-7.10.6-9.rhel3.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0345 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 ghostscript - security update

2009-03-19 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0345 ghostscript security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0345.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64:

[CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread German Gomez
Señores les queria solicitar su ayuda. El tema es que tengo un PC con Centos 5.2, y deseo enviar comandos a esta maquina via comandos rsh o rexec (cualquiera de los dos que me funcione), desde windows. El punto es que al escribir el comando: rsh xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -lusuario ls en donde

Re: [CentOS-es] [OT] Paneles de control para hosting

2009-03-19 Thread Sergio
mediocremente servidas No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1974 - Release Date: 02/26/09 14:51:00 __ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de firmas de virus 3948 (20090319) __ ESET Smart

Re: [CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread Mario Villela Larraza
Buen Dia: Yo usaria una forma distinta para realisar esta conexion, bajate el programa Putty de la pagina http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html con el puedes hacer una conexion a linea de comando o realizar incluso un tunel y apoyado con el UVNC realizar una conexion

Re: [CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread Fernando Rojas
El putty en general ssh es una chulada Sobre lo del vnc sobre tunel, me gustaría ahondar más en el tema... a mi no me ha funcionado y los detalles son muy curiosos y me interesa utilizar mejor el encriptado por ssh que usar la encriptación que trae el uvnc... no se... no me da la seguridad

Re: [CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread Mario Villela Larraza
El UVNC a mi tampoco me a funcionado bien corriendo en Wni Vista ( Que cosa corre bien es eso!!!) pero con Win XP Pro y Centos 5.2 me a funcionado bastante bien. El 19 de marzo de 2009 11:39, Fernando Rojas fernandoro...@eneut.orgescribió: El putty en general ssh es una chulada Sobre lo

Re: [CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread Fernando Rojas
Chulada, en el sentido coloquial, 'cosa linda' http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltConsulta?TIPO_BUS=3LEMA=chulada ¿has hecho tuneles por localhost utilizando putty para comunicarse a algún servidor vnc mediante dnat con iptables? mensaje original- De: Mario

Re: [CentOS-es] Configurar PHP 5.2.x

2009-03-19 Thread Victor Ramirez
Hola que tal yo acabo de configurar php con exito solo te falta habilitar el repo a la hora de correr yum a mi me funciono asi. yum --enablerepo=remi update mysql y despues de eso yum --enablerepo=remi update php despues instale algunos modulos que hacian falta y listo. Espero te sirva de

Re: [CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread Mario Villela Larraza
No la verdad una conexion con esas especificaciones no la e intentado El 19 de marzo de 2009 12:20, Fernando Rojas fernandoro...@eneut.orgescribió: Chulada, en el sentido coloquial, 'cosa linda' http://buscon.rae.es/draeI/SrvltConsulta?TIPO_BUS=3LEMA=chulada ¿has hecho tuneles por

[CentOS-es] comandos R

2009-03-19 Thread German Gomez
Se agradece. Pero si tengo el firewall desactivado y si tengo respuesta de la maquina centos al hacer el ping. tienes el firewall maquina win desactivado ?? , tienes respuesta de PING ?? Señores les queria solicitar su ayuda. El tema es que tengo un PC con Centos 5.2, y deseo enviar

Re: [CentOS] Directory server import

2009-03-19 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Thanks for replying. I have been looking at this one, I have only 2 problems with it: 1. Generate Nis maps I believe that this should be the command nismap create -i 1 -g -y auto.master but i am unsure if this is correct for my exercise since I need to generate for multiple ou, could

[CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread James Bensley
Shadies and Mentlemen; I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep is a sort of low power usage mode. (At this point I would be curious to know the different levels of sleep, what

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

2009-03-19 Thread A. Kirillov
Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Steve Huff
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:13 AM, James Bensley wrote: I would assume it would be possible but I don't know how, does anyone have any idea? http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/ -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Theo Band
James Bensley wrote: Shadies and Mentlemen; I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep is a sort of low power usage mode. (At this point I would be curious to know the

[CentOS] 5.3 and ext4

2009-03-19 Thread Jerry Geis
Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? Has this already been fixed? What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking forward to it. Jerry

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and ext4

2009-03-19 Thread Jim Perrin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? Define 'safe' I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? No. You've read reports about applications that had relied on a feature/bug of ext3 eating data when using ext4. Has

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and ext4

2009-03-19 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Jerry Geis wrote: Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? Has this already been fixed? Like Jim said, not ext4's fault. What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Ext4 (actually ext4dev) in 5.3 will be a preview and

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: James Bensley wrote: Shadies and Mentlemen; I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Theo Band
Robert Heller wrote: At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: James Bensley wrote: Shadies and Mentlemen; I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13 I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep is a sort of low power usage mode. I can not comment on how to do what your asking

[CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

2009-03-19 Thread Marcus Moeller
Hi all, I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: system_u:object_r:var_t Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a different context. So I tried to set e.g.: semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv/samba /sbin/restorecon -v /srv/samba

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:07:33 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Robert Heller wrote: At Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: James Bensley wrote: Shadies and Mentlemen; I am trying to be green and put our

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread Theo Band
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13 I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep is a sort of low power usage mode. I can not

Re: [CentOS] Being Green, Time to make the servers sleep!

2009-03-19 Thread John Hinton
Theo Band wrote: Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: From: James Bensley Sent: March 19, 2009 04:13 I am trying to be green and put our backup servers to sleep during the day and have them wake on LAN and fire back up at night for our nightly backups as sleep is a sort of low power usage

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

2009-03-19 Thread Ned Slider
Marcus Moeller wrote: Hi all, I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: system_u:object_r:var_t Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a different context. So I tried to set e.g.: semanage fcontext -a -t samba_share_t /srv/samba

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

2009-03-19 Thread Ned Slider
Ned Slider wrote: Marcus Moeller wrote: Hi all, I have created a directory /srv with the following SELinux context: system_u:object_r:var_t Now I want to create a subdirectory within /srv which should get a different context. So I tried to set e.g.: semanage fcontext -a -t

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

2009-03-19 Thread Marcus Moeller
Dear Ned. You may also need to manually change the context first: chcon -v --type=samba_share_t /srv/samba chcon did the trick. Thanks a lot Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories

2009-03-19 Thread Ned Slider
Marcus Moeller wrote: Dear Ned. You may also need to manually change the context first: chcon -v --type=samba_share_t /srv/samba chcon did the trick. Thanks a lot Marcus semanage will make the changes persistent through a complete filesystem relabel (chcon will persist through a

Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults

2009-03-19 Thread Rob Kampen
A. Kirillov wrote: Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire

[CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread sumit agarwal
Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300 evrey thing seems to be running very slow. any help would be welcome thanx Sumit ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Thursday 19 March 2009, sumit agarwal wrote: Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300 evrey thing seems to be running very slow. any help would be welcome How did you decide

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread sumit agarwal
HI Peter, thx for the reply. I will update that soon on getting my network or wifi working.but can still not reason why this should be so slow. 2009/3/19 Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se On Thursday 19 March 2009, sumit agarwal wrote: Hi, i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8

2009-03-19 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-19-2009 9:12 AM sumit agarwal spake the following: Hi, �� � �i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . �� � �i have enough ram ie 2 gb and good processor Core 2 duo.2.5 ghz T9300 �� � �evrey thing seems to be running very slow. �� � �any help would be welcome

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread sumit agarwal
hi thinkpad has a SATA drive? Is the bios set to AHCI mode and not emulating PATA? how can i fix this? 2009/3/19 Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com on 3-19-2009 9:12 AM sumit agarwal spake the following: Hi, �� � �i installed Cent Os 4.4 x64 (all packages )on my thinkpad . �� � �i have

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following: hi thinkpad has a SATA drive? Is the bios set to AHCI mode and not emulating PATA? how can i fix this? Are there options in the bios as to how the hard drive is accessed? Which thinkpad do you have? -- MailScanner is like

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread sumit agarwal
i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode currently its on compatibllity modei dont think achi mode is detected. 2009/3/19 Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following: hi thinkpad has a SATA drive? Is the bios set to

Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding

2009-03-19 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this...

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread Victor Padro
2009/3/19 sumit agarwal sumitagarwal.s...@gmail.com i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode currently its on compatibllity modei dont think achi mode is detected. 2009/3/19 Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com on 3-19-2009 11:22 AM sumit agarwal spake the following:

Re: [CentOS] Cent OS 4.4 x64 slow

2009-03-19 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-19-2009 12:03 PM sumit agarwal spake the following: i have R61 7742 -CTO i can set my bios to achi or compatible mode currently its on compatibllity mode i dont think achi mode is detected. If you switch to ACHI, does the windows partition still work? If yes, why not download the 5.2

Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding

2009-03-19 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone will reopen the Trouble Ticket

Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding

2009-03-19 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/19 Tru Huynh t...@centos.org: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope

[CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

2009-03-19 Thread dnk
I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW. Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public one is shared),

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

2009-03-19 Thread Jerry Franz
dnk wrote: I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW. Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

2009-03-19 Thread dnk
On 19-Mar-09, at 4:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: dnk wrote: I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes (with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into the system behind the FW.

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

2009-03-19 Thread russ
Are these on the same ip, but different ports? I suggest setting up two different hostnames. Russ --Original Message-- From: dnk Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS Mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list Sent: Mar 19, 2009 6:53 PM Subject: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports,

[CentOS] Fwd: broken lame/mp3 output (was: Re: Problem with ecasound on CentOS 5.2, x86_64)

2009-03-19 Thread MHR
I posed a question about this a while back, and Kai found the problem and sent this workaround: -- Forwarded message -- From: Kai Vehmanen kvehma...@eca.cx Date: Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM Subject: broken lame/mp3 output (was: Re: Problem with ecasound on CentOS 5.2,

Re: [CentOS] ssh - alternate ports, and host verification

2009-03-19 Thread Dnk
On 19-Mar-09, at 4:07 PM, r...@vshift.com wrote: Are these on the same ip, but different ports? I suggest setting up two different hostnames. Russ --Original Message-- From: dnk Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS Mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list Sent:

[CentOS] pam_ldap and nss_ldap failover

2009-03-19 Thread Paul Heinlein
I'm (finally) getting around to putting a backup LDAP authentication server on my network. The backup uses syncrepl to grab the database, and to my eyes both LDAP servers answer read queries identically. I'm testing the client side of this configuration on virtual CentOS 5 i386 machine.

Re: [CentOS] pam_ldap and nss_ldap failover

2009-03-19 Thread Jeff
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote: I'm (finally) getting around to putting a backup LDAP authentication server on my network. The backup uses syncrepl to grab the database, and to my eyes both LDAP servers answer read queries identically. I'm testing the