Dear all,
I would like to help translate the CentOS 5.3 Release Notes into
Chinese. Can you create the Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.3/Chinese page?
My user name is TimothyLee on the wiki.
Regards,
Timothy Lee
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
Yes.
/Jd
--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Hristo Benev f...@abv.bg wrote:
From: Hristo Benev f...@abv.bg
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] ConVirt 1.0 released
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 5:20 AM
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: jd
Subject:
Hola lista.
Llevo horas con mi problema en mis servidores de correo.
Debo aplicar filtros de correo a algunos usuarios de mi red, y he usado
las siguientes combinaciones.
# vim /etc/postfix/main.cf
***
# FILTER SENDING
the crash-hat ftp server for clamav has been older version behind the
times for a long time now.
better to roll you own clamav or get it from sourceforge via dag and dries
etc
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi,
I am trying to find out if there are any Linux based “form to mail” php script
generators available,
that would generate the script needed to profess web mail forms such as a
“contact us” page or a
“mail us” page on a web site.
There was one in patricular I was looking at that is
Hi,
Since the release of CentOS 5.3 is imminent(?) I'd like to ask a question
regarding why did it took so long to be released and, more important,
suggest some actions in order to reduce this time if I can assume what
caused this delay.
First I'd like to make sure I am not complaining about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mbneto wrote:
So, if this is really the case I'd suggest making some sort of campaign
to raise money and provide the necessary resources in order to speed
things up. If RH maintains the 4-6 month schedule it can happen again
in less than three
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
Since the release of CentOS 5.3 is imminent(?) I'd like to ask a
question regarding why did it took so long to be released and, more
important, suggest some actions in order to reduce this time if I can
assume what caused this delay.
First I'd like to make sure I am
Barry L. Kline wrote:
So, if this is really the case I'd suggest making some sort of campaign
to raise money and provide the necessary resources in order to speed
things up. If RH maintains the 4-6 month schedule it can happen again
in less than three months.
There is already a donate link
Hi Barry,
I know but if this campaign comes from CentOS itself it will no appear as a
hoax or some sort of scam.
There is already a donate link on the centos.org web page. You could
easily start that campaign and herd people to the site to make donations.
Barry
-BEGIN PGP
Hi,
There were some unusual situations with core developers this time around.
This is something that we should address don't you think?
Some additional resources could help but since CentOS developers are
unpaid, raising money for human resources may not be the correct
approach. Beefing
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:46:49AM -0400, mbneto wrote:
So, if this is really the case I'd suggest making some sort of campaign to
raise money and provide the necessary resources in order to speed things
up.� If RH maintains the 4-6 month schedule it can happen again in less
than
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
There were some unusual situations with core developers this time
around.
This is something that we should address don't you think?
Well, Karanbir has already weighed in on the thread. If he needs help
I'm sure he knows where to ask.
Some additional
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
would be a major upgrade from the cheap unmanaged things we currently
have. Basically, just users, servers, and other simple network devices
will be plugged into them but I'd like to start doing some testing with
iSCSI for
2009/3/23 mbneto mbn...@gmail.com:
There were some unusual situations with core developers this time around.
This is something that we should address don't you think?
If someone has a medical problem and someone else is getting married,
how will you address that? Everyone has a personal life
Scott McClanahan schrieb:
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
HP procurve?
Or refurbished Cisco.
The HP procurve switches have a good reputation, though.
I'm not sure if they do everything on your list, though.
Rainer
hi all,
below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU utilization.
my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user utilization,
when there are just these 8 processes saying they're using 25% of a CPU each,
and no other processes showing up taking any
Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) wrote:
hi all,
below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU
utilization.
my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user
utilization, when there are just these 8 processes saying they're
using 25% of a CPU each, and no other
below is the output of top off a machine i have, sorted by CPU
utilization.
my question is, how can all 8 CPUs say they're pegged at 100% user
utilization, when there are just these 8 processes saying they're
using 25% of a CPU each, and no other processes showing up taking any
Hi all,
I'm setting up a DNS server on CentOS 5.2, but can't get it to listen
to the outside IP address for DNS queries. There's no firewall
installed yet.
Here's the BIND config options:
options {
/* make named use port 53 for the source of all queries, to allow
* firewalls to
From: Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com
I'm setting up a DNS server on CentOS 5.2, but can't get it to listen
to the outside IP address for DNS queries. There's no firewall
installed yet.
Here's the BIND config options:
options {
/* make named use port 53 for the source of all
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a DNS server on CentOS 5.2, but can't get it to listen
to the outside IP address for DNS queries. There's no firewall
installed yet.
Here's the BIND config options:
This might depend on the version of bind that you're using. I don't have
a
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
GRC reports that ports are stealthed
Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
ports
What advantages do they have, in your opinion?
there a better way than opening port
Hi
I use a lot Nortel switches, 4548gt is working like a bomb a bit on the
expensive side but still really good.
Per
On 3/23/09 2:25 PM, Scott McClanahan smcclana...@forterrainc.com wrote:
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
would be a major upgrade from the
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
GRC reports that ports are stealthed
Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open
ports
What advantages do they
Scott McClanahan wrote:
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
would be a major upgrade from the cheap unmanaged things we currently
have. Basically, just users, servers, and other simple network devices
will be plugged into them but I'd like to start doing some
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 03:10:46PM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:46:49AM -0400, mbneto wrote:
So, if this is really the case I'd suggest making some sort of campaign
to
raise money and provide the necessary resources in order to speed things
up.� If
We use Extrem Networks x450 switches, see
http://www.extremenetworks.com/products/summit-x450a.aspx
Scott McClanahan pravi:
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
would be a major upgrade from the cheap unmanaged things we currently
have. Basically, just users,
Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) wrote:
...
The way they interact, I can't really stop them while they're running, but I
can run a configuration where there are only 4 of them running on the node.
Would that give you similar information to what you wanted to see, or not be
worth it?
Hm, another
On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
GRC reports that ports are stealthed
Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:26 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
GRC reports that ports are stealthed
Marko Mernik wrote:
We use Extrem Networks x450 switches, see
http://www.extremenetworks.com/products/summit-x450a.aspx
X450A is my favorite gigE switch as well, with ESRP you
can get layer 3 redundancy with layer 2 loop prevention in
a single protocol and don't need to have other switches
in
Hm, another thing: Have you used the I toggle
in top (IRIX vs. Sun)?
toggling I doesn't give me anything that would explain my confusion.
I have a few dozen systems with exactly matching hardware and exactly matching
OS installations (image based installs). This one system is the only one
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:57:45 JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:26 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 15:29:53 JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:31 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
OK - I'm thick. I've looked at that page and seen only what I'm
already
familiar with. Please, in plain English, how do I set ssh to come
in on port
22022 (service called ext-ssh already set up for that) to be
forwarded to
192.168.0.xx
I was able to get everything working after getting the appropriate
RPM's from EPEL. I'm new to RH/Centos, so I did not know about that
site. I tweaked the config based on what I found here:
http://fedorasolved.org/server-solutions/postfix-mail-server
I know this was not really a Centos
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:33:15 -0700
Linda Stark wrote:
I am trying to find out if there are any Linux based “form to mail” php
script generators available,
that would generate the script needed to profess web mail forms such as a
“contact us” page or a
“mail us” page on a web site.
I
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:37 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Her's another example it will do what you want, your just
misunderstanding it. I have 2 customers that use Netgear routers. I
think your not setting up the Nat - Add Page.
On Monday 23 March 2009 19:33:58 JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:37 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Her's another example it will do what you want, your just
misunderstanding it. I have 2 customers that use Netgear routers. I
think your not setting up the Nat - Add Page.
Michael Peterson wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-11-2009 1:44 PM Michael Peterson spake the following:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
I used google but did not come up with anything current
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Duncan Hutty dhu...@allgoodbits.org wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a DNS server on CentOS 5.2, but can't get it to listen
to the outside IP address for DNS queries. There's no firewall
installed yet.
Here's the BIND config options:
This
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if
there is a work around.
---
What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your
are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip
Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) wrote:
...
From what I can see, this one node is running slow. I don't have any
MCE entries or anything to indicate a hardware fault, it just started
running slow one day, and I when I was investigating saw the top
output and was baffled by it.
Can you swap the disk
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:22 +0100, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) wrote:
...
From what I can see, this one node is running slow. I don't have any
MCE entries or anything to indicate a hardware fault, it just started
running slow one day, and I when I was investigating saw
* vlans
* mstp or some well established form of per vlan spanning tree
* acl's
* port mirroring or what cisco calls span sessions
* snmp
* ssh enabled remote management
* support w/ updates and bugfixes
I need at least 48 ports per device and obviously would like them to be
fast. Most
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 00:39 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
This seems it may be a bad memory issue. When star is running it is
causing a lot of io to be cached putting pressure on regions of memory
that might otherwise go unused.
Think about running a memtest first or just swap the memory
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
There maybe needs to be a community leizon of some sort to help
leverage these types of offers for help. Many of us are willing to
help, but certainly don't have the necessary time cycles to do so as
effectively as
My thoughts exactly
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Noob Centos Admin
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4
snip
So if it's possible, I'd be more
48 matches
Mail list logo
