Dear Ralph,
Can I obtain write permission to my home page on the wiki? My username
is TimothyLee. Thanks!
Regards,
Timothy
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Dear Ralph,
I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the
zh page and give me write permission?
Regards,
Timothy
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Timothy Lee wrote:
Dear Ralph,
I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the
zh page and give me write permission?
Do we have anyone here willing to help with that? Because that looks
like a mean feat, when you try do to that alone - no idea how much time
you have on
Timothy Lee wrote:
Dear Ralph,
Can I obtain write permission to my home page on the wiki? My username
is TimothyLee. Thanks!
Done.
Ralph
pgpbAAGw7uj6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
hi,
Could we have something like this for people who dont have edit rights :
- people can make an 'edit' - but the edit is handled either as a patch
emailed to the page maintainer / edit group / editorial group / this
list ? but not displayed till its 'accepted / approved '
--
Karanbir
On 04/02/2009 05:00 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Timothy Lee wrote:
I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the
zh page and give me write permission?
Do we have anyone here willing to help with that? Because that looks
like a mean feat, when you try do to that
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0406
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0406.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
213ceda164ed20d9db0da91e7f0ca71e
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0406
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0406.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a967b52d038dfa696d2e1f278b4498ec
Para probar instalé la distro CentOS 5.1, pero no muestra el puntero
del mouse.
Gracias.
atte
begin:vcard
fn:John Drummond Aravena
n:Drummond Aravena;John
org:ADM-Planning Consultores;Area Apoyo TI
email;internet:jdrumm...@adm-planning.cl
title:Analista Sistemas Computacionales
Hola a todos;
Instale un Darwin Streaming server (dss) en un centos 5.2, todo parecia
funcionar bien, el panel de administracion, el arranque del servicio pero a
la hora de querer llamar un archivo en el servidor recibo el error que se
puede apreciar en este ticket;
Hola a todos
Necesito un manual para GIMP básico, para poder manipular las imágenes sin
importar en que capa estén, por que tengo el problema que si es un objeto
agregado antes que otros u otro yano lo puedo manipular de ninguna manera.
De antemano gracias
Aqui tienes uno: http://docs.gimp.org/es/
-
Un Saludo
Solucions Informatiques JM, S.L.
i...@redesjm.com
tie...@tiendajm.com
i...@manualeslinux.com
http://www.redesjm.com
http://www.tiendajm.com
http://www.manualeslinux.com
Fax: 96 112 82 30
-Mensaje original-
De: Mario Villela
http://docs.gimp.org/es/index.html
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:41:39 -0600, Mario Villela Larraza wrote
Hola a todos
Necesito un manual para GIMP básico, para poder manipular las imágenes sin
importar en que capa estén, por que tengo el problema que si es un objeto
agregado antes que otros u
Hola,
Que version estas usando de Darwin?
Yo tuve muchos problemas con la version 6, por lo que termine usando
la 5.6 y todo me funciona de maravillas.
Especificamente esta: DarwinStreamingServer-5.6.0.498-4.el4.pp.i386.rpm
Podes descargarlo desde aca:
Ok, muchas gracias por tu respuesta, voy a probar este rpm.
El error que tenias era el mismo que comente yo ?
Saludos y gracias nuevamente!.
Guillermo
El 2 de abril de 2009 19:26, Alejandro cdgr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola,
Que version estas usando de Darwin?
Yo tuve muchos problemas con
hola comunidad tengo problemas en agregar usuarios y no con el root
si no que quiero asignar a un usuario especial pepe esta tarea de
poder agregar usuarios, y como no quiero que tenga permisos de root
como puedo hacer esto?
gracias
___
CentOS-es
killerfs wrote:
hola comunidad tengo problemas en agregar usuarios y no con el root
si no que quiero asignar a un usuario especial pepe esta tarea de
poder agregar usuarios, y como no quiero que tenga permisos de root
como puedo hacer esto?
gracias
intenta con sudo
saludos!
epe
El tipico problema de su.
1.- Logeate con tu usuario
2.- Luego escribes: # su -
3.- Como root, escribes porsiaca su -
4.- Luego creas tu usuario: useradd pepito
Saludos
El 2 de abril de 2009 19:02, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
cen...@nuestroserver.com escribió:
killerfs wrote:
hola comunidad
On 04/02/2009 03:29 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael Liang wrote:
Hello,
I think the links should be useful for someone who looking for PHP
5.2 RPM using at CentOS. Have fun!
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/
Overview
This project supplies PHP 5.2.9 RPM packages built
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Timo Schoeler
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:42 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:26 AM
To: CentOS General List
Subject: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
For those who may forget, usin torrents to
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:29 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
I suppose I should move to the new way that relinks it
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates)
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
vs
http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
this is what is causing the nss/nss-devel error when doing a yum update
Transaction Check Error:
package
Hello,
I have a very weird problem on a CentOS 5.2 system. A few months ago, encrypted
passwords in the shadow file were MD5'ed - allowing for long passwords, rather
than only 8 characters max.
Today, passwords are 3DES'ed only. No way to find how the system reverted to
DES-encrypting. But
Thomas Dukes wrote on Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:04:02 -0400:
Changed all references in repo file to baseurl from mirror
Please don't do that. If you want to hardcode the mirror then look for a
mirror that you like and use that one, but not the central CentOS
distribution base.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
Kingsly John wrote:
centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates)
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
you should really be getting in touch with the admin of that mirror -
almost none of the mirrors admins will be on this list.
- KB
MHR wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
package subversion-1.4.6-0.1.el5.rf (which is newer than
subversion-1.4.2-4.el5) is already installed
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5 conflicts with file from package
Frédérique Da Luene wrote:
pam_unix is always enabled
shadow passwords are enabled
password hashing algorithm is md5
Check /etc/sysconfig/authconfig for
USEMD5=yes
If that is there and you still get 3DES passwords, then, ummm, check
that your /usr/bin/passwd is the one which is shipped
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Mufit Eribol wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Thomas Dukes wrote:
The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was:
Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by
package
nss-devel
Yes, that will do it - devel
2009/4/2 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
Kingsly John wrote:
centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates)
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
you should really be getting in touch with the admin of that mirror -
almost none of the mirrors admins
Hello,
I have a very weird problem on a CentOS 5.2 system. A few months ago,
encrypted passwords in the shadow file were MD5'ed - allowing for long
passwords, rather than only 8 characters max.
Today, passwords are 3DES'ed only. No way to find how the system reverted to
DES-encrypting.
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:14 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
snip
Hi there,
there's really some traffic going on torrent-wise:
[View: main]
CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD
done 3787,1 MB Rate: 928,2 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 142450,0 MB
[View: main]
CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD
done 4346,3 MB
D Tucny wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the mirror admins aren't listed anywhere
are they? I couldn't see any mention in the mirror list pages, in the
mirror status pages or on the mirror itself that suggested who the admin
of that server was... Maybe John has access to a list, but, if
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:29 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
I suppose I should move to the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
For those who are insatiably curious,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Michael A. Peters
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:50 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
I suppose I should move to the new way that relinks it
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Steve Huff
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:03 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Automagically?
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful
mechanism to
me.
it's very useful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support
$ man dkms
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install nvidia-x11-drv
$ sudo reboot
...
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey,
Sorin Srbu wrote:
On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary
Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge? Specifically, we use
the
proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they
support stereo-3D. When our former
Sorin Srbu wrote:
That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to
0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if
the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to
do with this. Hmm...
the machines seeding at
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
Sorin Srbu wrote:
On a related sidetrack; is there any
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote:
That's dedication... I
I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster
httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to
configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the
same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2.
We successfully do this
Hi Barry
--- En date de : Jeu 2.4.09, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org a écrit :
De: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org
Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck
and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group
/etc/shadow /etc/gshadow.
I have just checked, and
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
It is EOLed. That is all fixes to 5.2 are 5.3.
So there is little choice unless you take on the whole management issue.
BTW, I had some systems that would simply NOT do an install with the 5.2
boot CD. I HAD to install
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Ralph
pgp6YxJiPFgO8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Frédérique Da Luene wrote:
De: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org
Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck
and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group
/etc/shadow /etc/gshadow.
I have just checked, and libuser.conf has :
crypt_style = md5
modules =
Hi,
I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show
up?
1 root 15 0 2064 592 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.40 init [3]
2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0
Melinda Odom wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show
up?
Pretty normal for a system with two CPUs/dual core.
Ralph
Melinda Odom wrote on Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:27:55 -0500:
I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate
commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c?
you did never run top before?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Greetings CentOS Team-
Since the list tends to be filled with things don't work and why did you do
it this way and complaint X, I thought I'd make a small deviation...
I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply
ran 'yum update' and rebooted with no problems.
on 4-2-2009 6:53 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the
following:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
Your hair will fall out and your ears will ring constantly.
You will gain weight that no amount of dieting and exercise will be able to
get rid of.
You will be the laughing stock of all the
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs
fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in the
Hello
I've configured acpid on my laptop to make the powerbutton hibernate the
laptop. I modified /etc/acpid/events/power.conf with the following content:
event=PWRF
action=/usr/bin/pm-hibernate
On the first boot it works like it should, but after the laptop has resumed,
the powerbutton
So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
laptop).
I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
On both laptops, the update ends with a dialog panel (oh, I am using
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs
fixed where in
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-)
I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the
2009/4/2 Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-)
I agree.
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:50:30 Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund.
Hi All,
For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where
by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install
and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with
my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine.
on 4-2-2009 10:40 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the
following:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
rra...@comcast.net wrote:
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2
No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you.
Look at today's
Hi All,
i am getting a cupd-lpd dependancy problem with CentOS 5.3.
package cups-lpd is not installed
Installing cups-lpd ...
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
laptop).
I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
On both laptops, the update ends with a
Hello,
Several machine cannot joint the cluster after a reboot.
Here is a example of the error :
caserta kernel: CMAN: Join request from como.dmz.lexum.pri rejected,
node ID 3 already in use by ancona.dmz.lexum.pri
All cluster.conf are the same (checked with md5sum)
I googled this but did find
on 4-2-2009 11:16 AM James A. Peltier spake the following:
Hi All,
For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where
by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install
and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main
laptop).
I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos
and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command.
On both laptops,
On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:50, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote:
So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such
hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not
a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund.
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
geez, makes me
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount,
and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
--
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any suggestions?
-Jason
--
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS
Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5.
regards
Olaf
___
CentOS mailing
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US,
one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Try network solutions...
No ssh
john
Jason
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
:-)
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with
the filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the workaround suggested by
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
latter, but seriously...
i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers.
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
I've been very happy with http://www.bluehost.com
They offer ssh, rsync,
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:19 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any suggestions?
-Jason
John R Pierce wrote:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
latter, but seriously...
i'd be looking for someone providing either
At Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:21:39 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
In article 49d526bf.7020...@mavin.com,
John Plemons centos@centos.org wrote:
Try network solutions...
I've never found them to be a good solution. There are plenty
around that are a lot better!
--
http://www.spinics.net/lists/
___
CentOS mailing
John R Pierce wrote:
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the
latter, but seriously...
i'd be looking for someone providing
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any suggestions?
now
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with
1: SLA
2: SSH access
3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source.
Would like them to include http/https and email.
Any
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the
filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an
NFS filesystem.
I
In article ceb75a570904010531q7defb281vcc40856a65f3a...@mail.gmail.com,
Hakan Koseoglu centos@centos.org wrote:
yum clean all yum ugrade seems to fix my problem.
I had problems on two systems (both problems different) and doing
yum clean all fixed them. Not sure why but I'm sure glad it
on 4-2-2009 1:36 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early
On Wednesday April 1 2009, Terry Polzin wrote:
Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a
firmware issue?
It would appear that wpa_supplicant has a new option (-u) to enable
functionality with NetworkManager. I found it in
the /etc/sysconfig/wpa_supplicant.rpmnew
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:55 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Can I get some recommendations:
We are looking for a
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
