Im curious ?
When I click on the logo in upper left corner on wiki.centos.org then
I get to the wiki frontpage, not the www.centos.org page!?!
This is a bit redundant IMHO, I already have the frontpage menu, but
there is no way to navigate back to www from the wiki as I can see.
And thats the
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mats Karlsson wrote:
Im curious ?
When I click on the logo in upper left corner on wiki.centos.org then
I get to the wiki frontpage, not the www.centos.org page!?!
This is a bit redundant IMHO, I already have the frontpage menu, but
there is no way to navigate back to
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
2009/5/14 Dag Wieers d...@centos.org:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mats Karlsson wrote:
Im curious ?
When I click on the logo in upper left corner on wiki.centos.org then
I get to the wiki frontpage, not the www.centos.org page!?!
This is a bit
I created both English and French release notes pages for the upcoming
CentOS LiveCD
5.3:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3/French
The content is quite similar to the one from the CentOS LiveCD 5.2
except
Buenas chicos!!
Yo aquí con mis problemas.
Estoy instalando máquinas preparadas en Vbox.
En todos los equipos funciona perfectamente menos en 1.
En ese 1 lo que pasa es qeu cuando en la interfaz de red le pongo Bridged
adapter, que es como tendría qeu funcionar, pues no le coge IP.
Y le
y porque no pruevas a usar ip fijo
2009/5/14 Monica BM monica...@yahoo.es
Buenas chicos!!
Yo aquí con mis problemas.
Estoy instalando máquinas preparadas en Vbox.
En todos los equipos funciona perfectamente menos en 1.
En ese 1 lo que pasa es qeu cuando en la interfaz de red le pongo
Por que no trabajas en un cluster, para modelos matematicos o algo aducativo
propio de la universidad, puede ser ocupando lo sequipos de la uni o equipos
algo obsoletos y que puedan sacarle un provecho...
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kaplan, Andrew H.
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:24 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Network Install Procedure Question
I wanted to do a netinstall of the 5.3 release, and the
James Pearson wrote:
- [fs] xfs: backport to rhel5.4 kernel (Eric Sandeen ) [470845]
- [fs] xfs: update to 2.6.28.6 codebase (Eric Sandeen ) [470845]
Eric Sandeen is ex-SGI and I guess the experienced XFS engineer
mentioned ...
No, Eric is doing ext4 (and has been for quite some while
Dear all,
I have a mail server based on a CentOS 5.3 machine with postfix.
Most of our users are on LDAP (on localhost) but we also have some local
users and we are using PAM for authentication.
Sometimes emails are not delivered to an user (happens either with users on
LDAP or
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
- [fs] xfs: backport to rhel5.4 kernel (Eric Sandeen ) [470845]
- [fs] xfs: update to 2.6.28.6 codebase (Eric Sandeen ) [470845]
Eric Sandeen is ex-SGI and I guess the experienced XFS engineer
mentioned ...
No, Eric is doing ext4 (and has been
I have written my script but I wanted to add this on before and after
the update to see the difference but all it returns are zeros? Anyone
have any idea why?
#!/bin/sh
f=0 #Folder count
d=0 #Domains count (one per line in each file)
u=0 #Url count (one per line in each file)
t=0 #Total of
Just a quick ping to the general m/l.
Is there a SAN expert out there who could spare some time to have a
look at this forum post, please?
URL -- http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20273forum=39
Alan.
___
CentOS mailing list
Find the `spiff' utility. It will compare files word by word and
highlight ONLY the word differences. One can also compare numbers and change
the resolution of the comparison. This lets the text 1.0 equally compare to
0.1e+1 or even 0.9, if the fudge factor is large enough in the
Update: these lines should be:
+ $X
d=`expr $d + 1`
and
snip
u=`expr $u + 1`
fi
done
James ;)
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/U dpu s: a-- C++$ U+ L++ B- P+ E? W+++$ N K W++ O M++$ V-
PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R- tv+ b+ DI D+++
Try with the soft option.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Casey michaelcase...@gmail.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:06:31 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: [CentOS] if no NFS server clients are waiting..
What can I
I tried ls --color=never
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468049
it still waits
I tried on the client side with other mount options: intr, soft
it still waits
update :D :
I turn the NFS server down
Clients hang
reboot client
client cant see the NFS share, but at least it doesn't
Johan Swensson wrote:
Try with the soft option.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Casey michaelcase...@gmail.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:06:31 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern
/ Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: [CentOS] if no NFS server
the fstab entry is this
vim /etc/fstab
192.168.1.1:/mnt/share/ /home/user/Desktop/Share/ nfs
defaults,ro,nfsvers=3,nolock 0 0
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On May 14, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Just a quick ping to the general m/l.
Is there a SAN expert out there who could spare some time to have a
look at this forum post, please?
URL --
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just a quick ping to the general m/l.
Is there a SAN expert out there who could spare some time to have a
look at this forum post, please?
URL --
Jim Perrin wrote:
This is where LVM shines, because you can simply add another lun, add
it to your lvm setup, and expand the filesystem on the fly.
Just hope that $guru didnt use fdisk to setup things, when you need to
grow the LUN a bit.
- KB
___
Hi all,
You know how I asked about procedures to build a dual-boot system with
CentOS and WinXP a while ago? Well, I I've begun with a test machine.
What I had from start was a working CentOS 5.3 32b system. What I did was to
just add another empty drive configured as slave and then boot from
Manuel Monteiro wrote:
Dear all,
I have a mail server based on a CentOS 5.3 machine with postfix.
Most of our users are on LDAP (on localhost) but we also have some local
users and we are using PAM for authentication.
Are you running nscd on the server? That should smooth out LDAP
Jim Perrin wrote:
This is where LVM shines, because you can simply add another lun, add
it to your lvm setup, and expand the filesystem on the fly.
Also the OP should look into thin provisioning software that may
be available for his EMC array. In some situations this can eliminate
the need
I've been using kickstart successfully with a local mirror going back
to CentOS 4.X. I'm trying to install CentOS 5.3 via kickstart on a
new system (which happens to be different than most other systems
I've installed on), and the install process always hangs shortly
after the partitions
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
You know how I asked about procedures to build a dual-boot system with
CentOS and WinXP a while ago? Well, I I've begun with a test machine.
What I had from start was a working CentOS 5.3 32b system. What I did was to
just add another empty drive configured as
Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was
hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was
only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect to our pop3 service.
We have long had an IP throttle on ssh connections to discourage
this sort of thing. But I had not
At Thu, 14 May 2009 15:41:02 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
You know how I asked about procedures to build a dual-boot system with
CentOS and WinXP a while ago? Well, I I've begun with a test machine.
What I had from start was a
On May 14, 2009, at 9:46 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
2. Moving pass the obvious and unhelpful everything, what services
are particularly vulnerable to these types of attacks? Does a list
exist anywhere?
If it's reachable over the 'net, it will eventually get pounded.
POP, IMAP, SMTP Auth,
Alfred von Campe wrote:
I've been using kickstart successfully with a local mirror going back
to CentOS 4.X. I'm trying to install CentOS 5.3 via kickstart on a
new system (which happens to be different than most other systems
I've installed on), and the install process always hangs shortly
Dear all,
I have a mail server based on a CentOS 5.3 machine with postfix.
Most of our users are on LDAP (on localhost) but we also have some local
users and we are using PAM for authentication.
Are you running nscd on the server? That should smooth out LDAP
blips, though I would disable
Hi there --
That was it...thanks for the help. The netinstall worked without problems.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Tim Shubitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 5:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS]
How long does it hang? CentOS 5.x takes much longer to get to the
point where it is installing packages than 4.x, probably a good 3-4
minutes more, perhaps longer if your mirror is over a WAN connection,
my mirror is on the local LAN and it does take a long time as well
though it always
Hi!
I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my
experience with our current fileserver is
On Thu, May 14, 2009, James B. Byrne wrote:
Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was
hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was
only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect to our pop3 service.
You might look at fail2ban which can automatically create
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:44:11PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted
2009/5/14 Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at:
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3.
Yes, using ext3 is a real pain especially on such large partitions. I
advice you to switch to XFS.
--
With best
Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my
experience
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start anew: use
XFS. This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the
standard-kernel which option offers the smoothest sailing
Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:23, Bernhard Gschaider
bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
which option offers the smoothest sailing
(especially during kernel-updates):
- kernel from centosplus
- kmod-xfs from centosplus
- kmod-xfs from extras
Use kmod-xfs from extras (it should be already
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009, James B. Byrne wrote:
Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was
hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was
only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Use kmod-xfs from extras (it should be already enabled in your yum
config) unless you already need the centosplus kernel for another
reason.
See here:
James B. Byrne byrn...@... writes:
Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was
hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was
only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect to our pop3 service.
We have long had an IP throttle on ssh connections to
I am absolutely thrilled and delighted to report that the problem I
have been having on CentOS since I first started using it, back in
4.4, of having all images (graphics) print out from the image viewer
as all-black pages appears to be gone!
I just printed 13 graphics from the image viewer
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:46 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
Over the weekend one of our servers at a remote location was
hammered by an IP originating in mainland China. This attack was
only noteworthy in that it attempted to connect to our pop3 service.
About 6 years ago,
On: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:48:36 -0700, Bill Campbell
cen...@celestial.com wrote:
You might look at fail2ban which can automatically create
iptables blocks when things like this happen.
I went to the source forge website, but the rh rpm is inaccessible.
I really do not wish to join yet another
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.cawrote:
I went to the source forge website, but the rh rpm is inaccessible.
I really do not wish to join yet another mailing list simply to
report this so if anyone here is a member there as well please let
them know.
James B. Byrne wrote:
I went to the source forge website, but the rh rpm is inaccessible.
I really do not wish to join yet another mailing list simply to
report this so if anyone here is a member there as well please let
them know.
looks like they already know..
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3.
An option I haven't seen suggested yet is to split this into several
filesystems that
on 5-14-2009 11:46 AM James B. Byrne spake the following:
On: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:48:36 -0700, Bill Campbell
cen...@celestial.com wrote:
You might look at fail2ban which can automatically create
iptables blocks when things like this happen.
I went to the source forge website, but the rh
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start anew: use
XFS. This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included
on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start anew: use
XFS. This
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
It seems XFS might be added as a default to RHEL 5.4..
Probably not a default, but an option.
I wonder which high-end customer *finally* drove them to do this (if,
indeed,
Am 14.05.2009 um 21:25 schrieb Bart Schaefer:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3.
An option I haven't seen suggested
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start
on 5-14-2009 2:21 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have
corresponding kmod-xfs. You need to wait for CentOS devs to build
those kmods or to supply a kernel version independent kmod.
I have just pushed the latest .22
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 17:21, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this a reasonable choice on a 32 bit machine? I thought 4k stacks
were a problem.
Oh yeah, I failed to mention in my previous e-mail that all the
machines I have running XFS are using x86_64 versions of CentOS.
I
On Thu, 14 May 2009 12:35:13 +0100
James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Update: these lines should be:
+ $X
that should be lower case.
My guess is that because your variables all equal zero, it's possible
that something is wrong with:
find /usr/local/squidGuard/db -maxdepth 1 -type d |
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:17:21AM +1200, Spiro Harvey wrote:
My guess is that because your variables all equal zero, it's possible
that something is wrong with:
find /usr/local/squidGuard/db -maxdepth 1 -type d | while read FOLDER;
More likely he's using a shell that runs the while loop in
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:51:20AM -0700, MHR wrote:
I am absolutely thrilled and delighted to report that the problem I
have been having on CentOS since I first started using it, back in
4.4, of having all images (graphics) print out from the image viewer
as all-black pages appears to be
At Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:09 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
on 5-14-2009 11:46 AM James B. Byrne spake the following:
On: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:48:36 -0700, Bill Campbell
cen...@celestial.com wrote:
You might look at fail2ban which can automatically create
Alfred von Campe wrote:
I waited overnight and it was still hung in the morning. My local
mirror is on the LAN, so it's not a network issue.
hmm, is your package selection particularly complex? In my case
I list hundreds of packages in my %packages section I don't have
groups and stuff. I
64 matches
Mail list logo
