Hola amigos de la comunidad,
Estoy realizando una instalación de distintos programas en un servidor que
tiene instalado CentOS 5.3 64 bit, necesito que me ayuden con algunos
comandos básicos para realizar las siguientes acciones:
- Montar un CD
- Descomprimir una archivo
Montar un CD
#mount /dev/cdrom /mnt
Descomprimir una archivo .ZIP
#unzip archivo.zip
Donde debería descomprimirlos?? En home?
normalmente en /usr/local o tambien /opt
Con que comando instalo un programa ?
#pm -ivh archivo.rpm
#pm -Uvh archivo.rpm
#um install httpd por
correccion
Montar un CD
#mount /dev/cdrom /mnt
Descomprimir una archivo .ZIP
#unzip archivo.zip
Donde debería descomprimirlos?? En home?
normalmente en /usr/local o tambien /opt
Con que comando instalo un programa ?
#rpm -ivh archivo.rpm
#rpm -Uvh archivo.rpm
#yum install httpd
Las reglas correctas son:
acl msn_mime rep_mime_type -i ^application/x-msn-messenger$
acl msn_dll urlpath_regex -i gateway.dll
--
http_access deny msn_mime
http_access deny msn_dll
saludos
El 13 de julio de 2009 18:51, Eduardo Atenas eduardo.ate...@gmail.comescribió:
amigos.
se que
Estoy intentando instalar centos en un ibm pseries (64 bits) pero cuando
llega a la configuracion del idioma, se congela. Alqjuien que por favor me
de una ayuda. Gracias
Jesus Rudas S
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
he cambiado las directivas y agregue las sgtes, efectivamente logre bloquear la
pagina de hotmail.com pero no logro bloquear el live messenger 2009
estas son algunas de las líneas de mi configuración :
alguna otra idea
saludos
acl privilegiados src /etc/squid/privilegiados
acl
I got itchy fingers over the weekend and decided to fix what wasn't
broken and upgraded one of the older servers from Centos 5.2 to Centos
5.3. Following the recommended process of updating glibc and such
before the rest, it appeared to work perfectly and rebooted without
problem.
However, MRTG
If so
How to solve all dependies?
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För
Karanbir Singh
Skickat: den 13 juli 2009 01:19
Till: CentOS mailing list
Ämne: Re: [CentOS] lyris list manager
On 07/12/2009 01:56 PM, mattias wrote:
On 07/13/2009 08:57 AM, mattias wrote:
If so
How to solve all dependies?
what are you struggling with ? it only needs postgres and tcl mostly
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
In article 667c2e1e0907122340vc63cf71t506fd0f1f8832...@mail.gmail.com,
Noob Centos Admin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
I got itchy fingers over the weekend and decided to fix what wasn't
broken and upgraded one of the older servers from Centos 5.2 to Centos
5.3. Following the recommended
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Heller
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 12:30 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) and/or
putty-tools
sftp is
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:02 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit)
and/orputty-tools
What about FileZilla?
Doesn't
Sorin Srbu schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:02 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] sFTP (client) RPM for CentOS 5.3 (32 bit)
and/orputty-tools
What
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Lanny Marcuslmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
find putty-tools. Is there an RPM for a client program for gFTP or
putty-tools? If so, in which repository? TIA!
aah well, have you tried konqurer with one tab
Hello all,
I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
SATAs
This is the partition structure on both disks:
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Coert
Waagmeesterlgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
SATAs
This is the partition structure on both disks:
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401
Just my two pence;
So just to confirm do you have 3 physical raid 1 arrays you want to
merge into 1? Or are these 3 partitions on a single physical raid
1array;
If its the later I find the easiest way (providing your hardware
supports this) is to set one drive as off line (so you are now in
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:20 +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Coert
Waagmeesterlgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB
SATAs
This is the partition structure on both disks:
Disk /dev/sda:
Hi,
Perhaps the OIDs changed for the interfaces you are monitoring.
Have you tried re-running cfgmaker to regenerate mrtg.cfg? It should
pick up the correct OIDs again.
Yes I did, however the default MRTG configuration appears to contain
almost nothing. Consulting with others. it seems to be
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps the OIDs changed for the interfaces you are monitoring.
Have you tried re-running cfgmaker to regenerate mrtg.cfg? It should
pick up the correct OIDs again.
Yes I did, however the default MRTG configuration appears to contain
almost nothing.
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:49 +, o wrote:
It is 1024 chars long. Witch want still help.
I'm usng mysam and according to:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/myisam-storage-engine.html
The maximum key length is 1000 bytes. This can also be changed by changing
JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 05:49 +, o wrote:
It is 1024 chars long. Witch want still help.
I'm usng mysam and according to:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/myisam-storage-engine.html
The maximum key length is 1000 bytes. This can also be changed
I know that I have asked this before of the list. However we just changed
ISP and ip's and I'm having this issue again. I have a linux firewall
using iptables with the following config
eth0 = WAN 1
eth1 = LAN 1
eth2 = WAN 2
I'm trying to forward all traffic that makes a request from eth2 to an
Hi All,
I have an nfs mount from my CentOS 5.3 client to a CentOS5.3 server.
This has been functioning correctly for some years.
Beginning last week I had problems saving OpenOffice documents onto the
nfs mounted volume.
OpenOffice just times out with a file io error.
So I tried just a simple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
My suspicion is that it has to do with the language packs, since the
same src.rpm built w/o disabling language packs doesn't crash in
CentOS 5.3 on either arch.
I doubt that is the case. The
Rob Kampen wrote:
[rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
Password:
chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
yet using gnome file browser I can change permissions on these nfs
mounted files just fine - go figure.
This did work in the past - so
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 15:47 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi All,
I have an nfs mount from my CentOS 5.3 client to a CentOS5.3 server.
This has been functioning correctly for some years.
Beginning last week I had problems saving OpenOffice documents onto the
nfs mounted volume.
OpenOffice just
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
[rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
Password:
chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
yet using gnome file browser I can change permissions on these nfs
mounted files just fine - go figure.
This did work in the
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:32, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
BTW
chmod +w file.doc
only changes permissions for owner and group - world is left untouched, not
what I remembered, I guess some man reading coming my way.
From man chmod:
If none of these are given, the effect is as
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:32, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
BTW
chmod +w file.doc
only changes permissions for owner and group - world is left untouched, not
what I remembered, I guess some man reading coming my way.
From man chmod:
If none
on 6-28-2009 3:12 PM mcclnx mcc spake the following:
we have DELL R900 with CENTOS 5.3 in it. This DELL R900 come with one
integrate PERC6/I and two PERC6/E card. DELL 6/I control 5 internal disks.
The original disk sequence are:
/dev/sda1 /boot
/dev/sda2 /
/dev/sdb1 swap
...
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 16:32 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
nate wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
[rkam...@robsws p_494]$ sudo chmod +w 5887_cover.pdf
Password:
chmod: changing permissions of `5887_cover.pdf': Operation not permitted
yet using gnome file browser I can change permissions on
William Warren wrote:
for some reason cent 5 now wants cd 3 as well as 1. I make sure to
uncheck everything and instlal only the base system. Bad iso or new
default?
Sincerely,
William Warren
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
de-selecting everything except Base and Editors (you might not need this
option) in the Customize
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Julian Thomasj...@jt-mj.net wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
de-selecting everything except
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Julian Thomasj...@jt-mj.net wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:35:07 -0700 Mark Tomandl wrote:
I've had this issue with the 5.3 install as well. I found that using the
text interface (as opposed to the default graphical interface) and
Rob Kampen wrote:
Is there any way to know what level (version) of nfs is in use?
I know how to distinguish between v4 and the rest (the mount uses nfs4
rather than just nfs) but how about the lower levels?
nfsstat should tell you
nate
___
CentOS
Hi,
Did the update overwrite your snmpd.conf file? The 'view' on the default one
may not permit access to the things mrtg needs to see. Try changing it to .1
to
expose everything.
It might have done so. To be honest I have no idea since I've never
touched the SNMP configuration before
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 16:32 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
snip
So now it seems what I have is an Openoffice problem. It writes odt
files just fine via nfs but not doc files.
Must be a micro$oft conspiracy.
I'll take this off list as it does not appear to be a CentOS issue.
---
39 matches
Mail list logo
