Am 30.08.09 22:39, schrieb Richard Bronosky:
I had already created that account, but could not do the step of
creating the homepage because of permissions.
Yes. Because you may not yet write anywhere. So I guess the account is
RichardBronosky?
Ralph
Yes
On 8/31/09, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 30.08.09 22:39, schrieb Richard Bronosky:
I had already created that account, but could not do the step of
creating the homepage because of permissions.
Yes. Because you may not yet write anywhere. So I guess the account is
On 31/08/2009, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
--# Sent with ten fingers and a brain #--
Ah, that explains things.
I've only got eight fingers, two thumbs and a brain. :-)
Alan. (Who now goes to hide.)
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
On 31/08/2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
On 31/08/2009, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
--# Sent with ten fingers and a brain #--
Ah, that explains things.
I've only got eight fingers, two
Confío en que siempre se puede contestar mejor.
He preguntado en varios sitios y entre ellos, esta lista es uno de los lugares
donde suelo preguntar.
No es para una solución, era simplemente por si a alguien le había pasado o
había alguna idea de algún problema entre CentOS 5.2 y la última
2009/8/31 Monica BM monica...@yahoo.es:
Confío en que siempre se puede contestar mejor.
He preguntado en varios sitios y entre ellos, esta lista es uno de los
lugares donde suelo preguntar.
No es para una solución, era simplemente por si a alguien le había pasado o
había alguna idea de
No son los mismos equipos físicos, pero ambos tienen 2 GB de ram.
Y la máquina se creó de la misma manera y siguiendo los mismo pasos, 512 de ram.
En mi equipo había creado ya varias máquinas de 10 Gb pero esta pro la razón
qeu sea no iba bien.
La otra diferencia entre los 2 equipos físicos es
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:46:26PM +0200, frank.brodb...@klingel.de wrote:
Hi
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com schrieb am 26.08.2009 13:31:22:
Ivan Varbanov wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:10:27 +0300:
It will not work if the drives are in raid
Don't know if that is really true
You're getting that because -ucountry isn't a valid flag for
mysqladmin. Did you mean to log into the MySQL server as user
country? If so put a space after the -u
mind the difference between mysqladmin and mysql itself.
t
___
CentOS mailing list
Hi,
I am having some difficulties installing centos 5.3 on the gigabyte
GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard.
Has anyone got centos booting on this motherboard?
so far I have tried the following.
+ disabled the jmicron controller as this caused errors on booting
JMB363 bad irq(0): will probe
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Heller
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 12:23 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] using Linux as a NAS / SAN device
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009
Hi
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:41 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and Adjacent country groups
On 8/25/09, Rainer Duffner
From: Morrien, Rob rob.morr...@eds.com
If I have a pc running with centos which I updated from centos 5.2 to 5.3
with yum update some weeks ago, and I use the same repo config files
from the local deployed repo server . But I get now evrytime an url error.
And the error is telling me that
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 05:08:18PM +1000, Nathan Norton wrote:
Hi,
I am having some difficulties installing centos 5.3 on the gigabyte
GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard.
Not that it will help you any, but Ive got Centos 5.3 on my Gigabyte
MA770-UD3 board. Probably different enough that it's not
Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install a package that requires the gtk+-2.1.x
package. I've installed the following groups in preparation, development
tools, gnome-desktop, and am not seeing the rpm, i thought it was contained
within another. Does anyone know where i can obtain this
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. I tried the 1.x rpm and it isn't happy. I'm
trying to make an rpm package for the gigolo program and it is not finding
gtk2.
Thanks.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Lee Perez
Miguel Medalha wrote:
You might be interested in this article:
Why is RAID 1+0 better than RAID 0+1?
http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
The whole raid1+0 or raid0+1 argument was really only relevant in the
days of pata when one disk dying on one channel might take out the
Has anyone been able to get the scroll wheel to work?
Most of the other functions are fine, however xev does not show any
events when the scroll wheel
or the fourth button is pushed. Other than that it is a nice mouse but
I would like the scroll wheel to work.
My system:
[ro...@rwells-cts
MontyRee wrote:
Hello, all.
I found that so many unnessary queue files are saved at
/var/spool/clientmqueue/ directory.
How do you know they are unnecessary?
I tested two way to delete these files.
1.
# rm -rf /var/spool/clientmqueue/*
2.
# cd
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 10:41 -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. I tried the 1.x rpm and it isn't happy. I'm
trying to make an rpm package for the gigolo program and it is not finding
gtk2.
I guess that you are missing the corresponding gtk2-devel package ...
Ralph
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Oh sorry, I have never argued about eight drive systems years ago
(didn't have them then, too poor) and there is no argument about raid1+0
being the way to do it beyond four drives. It is too obvious that
stripping three drives and then mirroring them is
Does anyone know where I can get an RPM of Conntrack-tools,
libnetfilter_conntrack and libnfnetlink that work with CentOS 4.8?
-matt
http://www.sysadminvalley.com
http://www.beantownhost.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattboston
Stephen
Hi,
Thanks. No, i have that one installed. The package is needing 2.1 of
gtk but 2.0 is installed, are there rpms for 2.1?
Thanks.
Dave.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ralph Angenendt
Sent: Monday, August 31,
Hello,
I've been asked to look in to deploying an ifolder server on Centos
5.x. The individual would like a clean system, so that means rpms using or
making. I am concerned about this the latst time i tried it i was unable to
get it working and the docs and site links were extremely
Dave wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. No, i have that one installed. The package is needing 2.1 of
gtk but 2.0 is installed, are there rpms for 2.1?
CentOS 5.3 has gtk2-2.10.4-20.el5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi,
my users were recently moved from a uw-imap on HPUX to dovecot on EL5.
Their sent items and folders went from a ~/Sent mbox file (when using
SquirrelMail and Apple Mail both) to ~/mail/Sent for SquirrelMail and
~/mail/Sent Messages for other imap
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm installing Openfiler 2.3, which looks very very similar to the
CentOS installer. My reason for RAID 1+0 (like I said it doesn't
support RAID10) is for the higher level of redundancy speed, and I
would like to utilize the drives to their max,
Note that the 'speed'
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi,
my users were recently moved from a uw-imap on HPUX to dovecot on EL5.
Their sent items and folders went from a ~/Sent mbox file (when using
SquirrelMail and Apple Mail both) to ~/mail/Sent for SquirrelMail and
~/mail/Sent Messages for other imap
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi,
my users were recently moved from a uw-imap on HPUX to dovecot on EL5.
Their sent items and folders went from a ~/Sent mbox file (when using
SquirrelMail and Apple Mail both) to ~/mail/Sent for
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have experience with linux tools to parse the text from
common non-text file formats for searching? I'm trying to use the
kinosearch add-on for twiki which is fine
On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
How would one setup RAID 1+0 (i.e. 2x mirror'ed RAID1's and then a
RAID 0 on top of it) on say CentOS 4.6 ?
Setup both RAID-1 arrays then stripe them with LVM?
Greetings.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't that have to be run under windows?
Indeed. That was where that particular requirement was. One app wanted
fulltext search on a bunch of .doc, etc. files
But I demonstrated the POC using Centos
On Monday 31 August 2009 17:45:21 Bill Campbell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi,
my users were recently moved from a uw-imap on HPUX to dovecot on EL5.
Their sent items and folders went from a ~/Sent mbox file (when
On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Oh sorry, I have never argued about eight drive systems years ago
(didn't have them then, too poor) and there is no argument about
raid1+0
being the way to do it beyond four
Les Mikesell wrote:
But note that drive capacity has gone up too, often eliminating the need
for many-disk arrays. For example, you can go up to 2TB on a single
drive, so a simple RAID1 mirror may be all you need, and if you can
arrange the mount points to match the use pattern you may get
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Christopher
Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Security...no...performance...is that with regards to the rest of the os
or the program or in comparison with having Windows in a sandbox like
Virtualbox?
Good. I wanted to make sure I wasn't introducing
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:39 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:41 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Mirrors and
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ron Blizzardrb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
VirtualBox works great but, since I only really use one Windows
program (an older, specialized word processor called Movie Magic
Screenwriter), I'm thinking of using Wine to run it in CentOS and
getting rid of the Windows
MontyRee wrote:
What is the best way to delete fast without too much load?
If you put /var on another file system you could:
- go to single user mode
- copy all files off of /var except those in the queue directory
- re-format the file system
- copy all the files back
- go to multi user mode
Heh - I always preferred the indirect approach. Move the dir out of the
way, recreate it, and delete in your own time...
# service sendmail stop
# cd /var/spool
# mv clientmqueue clientmqueue-todelete
# mkdir clientmqueue
# chown --reference=clientmqueue-todelete clientmqueue
# chmod
Is there a CentOS equivalent to config-system-firewall in Fedora,
allowing specified services to pass through?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Is there a CentOS equivalent to config-system-firewall in Fedora,
allowing specified services to pass through?
I don't know if it is the same as in Fedora, but there is firewall
configuration available in system-config-securitylevel
Barry
___
CentOS
Ross Walker wrote:
On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
How would one setup RAID 1+0 (i.e. 2x mirror'ed RAID1's and then a
RAID 0 on top of it) on say CentOS 4.6 ?
Setup both RAID-1 arrays then stripe them with LVM?
But note that drive capacity has gone up too, often eliminating the need
for many-disk arrays. For example, you can go up to 2TB on a single
drive, so a simple RAID1 mirror may be all you need, and if you can
arrange the mount points to match the use pattern you may get better
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Lanny Marcuslmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, Google's Picasa for Linux runs on a Google customized version of
WINE. I haven' seen any issues with Picasa on CentOS 5.3 (32 bit).
YMMV
I've never used it, but I'm glad it works well. I haven't had time to
try
The access speed seems to depend more on the IMAP client than on
the server. The current version of squirrelmail surprised me
with its speed while horde/imp is pretty sluggish. Apple's
Mail.app is quite a bit slower than Thunderbird on the same
folders.
Not that I am advocating using
46 matches
Mail list logo
