CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0019 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0019.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
df71c54278df0af0eb6672f9e3f558ce
SELinux is preventing qemu-kvm (qemu_t) execute to /dev/zero
(zero_device_t).
(full alert below)
I thought that maybe the latest selinux-policy update would fix this,
but after updating and 'sudo /sbin/restorecon -v /dev/zero' again, I
still have the same SELinux denial.
I browsed the CentOS
Hi Guys,
There are a fair few issues reported at bugs.centos.org around virt
issues, Xen / KVM and even VMware stuff. And I know there is a lot of
knowledge and talent around those areas here on this list.
Just wondering if some of the people here might be able to help with
those issues on
I think 5.4 version of python-virtinst added some fixes aswell..
so maybe you need to upgrade to that for F12 installation to work.
Also please try running xm console for the guest and see what it does
and where it crashes..
If I do xm create -c f12domU.cfg it says Starting Domain
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 09:38 -0500, Tait Clarridge wrote:
I think 5.4 version of python-virtinst added some fixes aswell..
so maybe you need to upgrade to that for F12 installation to work.
Also please try running xm console for the guest and see what it does
and where it crashes..
Hi
Not sure if you have done this already but install multipath as the os
sees multiple presented luns which needs to be tied up to one by
multipath also do not use the rh drivers for you qlogic it's not
recommended at all for any storage solutions.
Per
At Fredag, 08-01-2010 on 6:29 Paras
Hi
Not sure if you have done this already but install multipath as the os
sees multiple presented luns which needs to be tied up to one by
multipath also do not use the rh drivers for you qlogic it's not
recommended at all for any storage solutions.
Per
Dear Per,
can you please elaborate
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I need to do some testing with 5.3 as its suggested that 5.4 has
some bugs in the toolchain and libc.
Suggested by whom and where are the bug reports?
That being the case, I can
install with a url and repo line
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:49:30PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
...
zfs on *solaris *bsd is getting off topic,
if you need to fight, please take that somewhere else.
Thanks,
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64
Hi
For sure no problems, I see this about everyday, the major reason is
that the rh driver is not certified for use with Dell,HP or IBM for
that matter, if we get a support request where I work and the RH
driver is used for the qlogic card then customer must install the
certified driver from the
Christopher Chan schrieb:
cause when I did - the x45xx's/zfs were between 18 to 20% slower on disk
i/o alone compared with a supermicro box with dual areca 1220/xfs.
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online high density storage.
Speaking of
James B. Byrne wrote:
CentOS-5+
Your system suggestions, both for hardware and OS, are most welcome.
Hi
The Dell Precision line can come with RHEL 5, so will work fine with
CentOS. I'm sure about M4400.
Regards
mg.
___
CentOS mailing list
On 01/08/2010 01:58 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online high density storage.
I wonder how much that would change with a bbu NVRAM card for an
external journal for ext4 and the disks on md. Unless one cannot add a
bbu NVRAM
Karanbir Singh schrieb:
On 01/08/2010 01:58 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online high density storage.
I wonder how much that would change with a bbu NVRAM card for an
external journal for ext4 and the disks on
Quoting Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de:
Maximum 3.5 hot-swap drives density 36x (24 front + 12 rear) HDD bays
http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/847/SC847A-R1400.cfm
Did anybody else think WTF? when you saw that picture?
I have seen crazy stuff, but that one is pretty
On 01/08/2010 02:25 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Is it simple enough to just manually set '$releasever' to 5.3 in the
repo file or do I need to do anything else?
Just keep in mind that you will neither get any security updates or
bugfix's in 5.3
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK|
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I need to do some testing with 5.3 as its suggested that 5.4 has
some bugs in the toolchain and libc. That being the case, I can
install with a url and repo line pointing to a mirror with 5.3 still
but how does
Suggested by whom and where are the bug reports?
Well, I should more accurately say a projects software
isn't compatible with 5.4, not that 5.4 is faulted:)
$releasever is 5 and centos/5/ is a link to centos/5.4/ on the mirrors.
Ahh, that makes sense.
Thanks everyone!
jlc
On Friday 08 January 2010, Mufit Eribol wrote:
Dear All,
I use a raid card on my Centos 5.4 server. Whenever I updated the
kernel, I used to compile drivers of the card for the new kernel. I have
done this many times in the past without any problem.
But this time after installing the new
Hi
I installed CentOS-5.4 x86_64 and Acrobat Reader 9.1[1].
When I look a pdf within the browser, I can't search the document, but
if save it, then the search works fine.
Does anyone else have similar problem?
Thanks
marcelo
[1] AdbeRdr9.1.2-1_i486linux_enu.bin
Warren Young wrote:
On 1/6/2010 2:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
we are trying to set
up some storage servers to run under Linux
snip
Serious system administrators are not Linux fans I don't think. I tend
snip
Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
meanwhile,
How about Thinkpad W500 ? It is a bit expensive, but .. with UBuntu or
OpenSUSE os.
--
Eero
I can second this, I recently obtained a Thinkpad W500 and it has been
working flawlessly under Fedora 12. I will hazard a guess that the
wireless may not work out of the box in CentOS, but
I suggest you get a second-hand Sun X4500 if you're feeling cheap,
http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/specs.xml. 48x 500G will do you
nicely with some MD RAID.
Or you can go for the newer X4540 if you're feeling flush.
Regards, Iolaire
On 06/01/2010 22:35, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello
From: Mufit Eribol h...@onart.com.tr
grep: /include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
...
/usr/include/linux/version.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-128.1.1.el5-PAE-i686/include/linux/version.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5-PAE-i686/include/linux/version.h
Quoting Tait Clarridge t...@clarridge.ca:
How about Thinkpad W500 ? It is a bit expensive, but .. with UBuntu or
OpenSUSE os.
--
Eero
I can second this, I recently obtained a Thinkpad W500 and it has been
working flawlessly under Fedora 12. I will hazard a guess that the
wireless may not
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:37:25AM -0600, Paras pradhan wrote:
Per,
Yes I have a device mapper out of my detected LUNS. My storage is Hitachi
OpenV . My multipath.conf files looks like below. Do I need to add anything
to it since failover is not working. When I unplugg the cable in the 1st
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Mufit Eribol h...@onart.com.tr wrote:
Dear All,
make KERNELDIR= /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5PAE/build
grep: /include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
expr: syntax error
../../../inc/linux/Makefile.def:85: *** Only kernel 2.4/2.6 is supported
but
Since I see the following entry
at /usr/share/doc/device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7/multipath.conf.defaults
I am assuming I do not need to add it to multipath.conf but I do not know
exaclty. Also my storage is Hitachi openv and the default one has Product
name as DF.* as you can see below.
So I am
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
meanwhile, ATT, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
CA that I worked for earlier this year, and here at the US NIH, we run
Linux.
Since this is a storage thread.. back in 2004
On 1/7/2010 12:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I also heard that disks above 1TB might have reliability issues.
Maybe it changed since then...
I remember rumors about the early 2TB Seagates.
Personally, I won't RAID SATA drives over 500GB unless they're
enterprise-level ones with the limits
I want to set up a cluster that is used for web hosting (RHCS cluster).
Recently,
I experimented with a 2 node cluster and was able to run it successfully.
However,
I have started facing some issues with Apache, which I had configured as a
service
using the Cluster configuration tool. To do
Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and bash.
When I put on cron job I got error message:
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
any ideal (CENTOS 4 and 5)?
--- 10/1/5 (二)，John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com 寫道：
寄件者: John R Pierce
Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and
bash. When I put on cron job I got error message:
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
any ideal (CENTOS 4 and 5)?
Please read the cron man page. *THOROUGHLY*
A job running from cron
Don't bind it to an IP (so listen shows 0.0.0.0) on either node of the
cluster? When the IP address is floated across it will still accept requests
on that then - in additional the the real node IP address.
Given that you are talking a public IP address however it depends on your
network
Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a
service with ONE public IP
address??
If I understand clustered services, you have only one
public IP address for the cluster, but that IP address needs
to be a virtual IP which can be point to one or more machines
on private IP adresses.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
From: a...@myphonebook.co.in a...@myphonebook.co.in
I want to set up a cluster that is used for web hosting (RHCS cluster).
Recently,
I experimented with a 2 node cluster and was able to run it successfully.
However,
I have started facing some issues with Apache, which I had configured as a
From: mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw
Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and
bash.
When I put on cron job I got error message:
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
It says you miss a closing back-quote...
JD
Yes that's why it depends on his ISP and network layout
Ideally he'd have his firewall allowing http in to his public IP (with
appropriate routing) and the floating IP actually be a private IP in the
internal address space that floats between two systems with private IPs in
the relevant
a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
public IP
address??
You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer instead. Myself
I have most experience with F5 gear
On 1/8/2010 10:09 AM, nate wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
meanwhile, ATT, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
CA that I worked for earlier this year, and here at the US NIH, we run
Linux.
Since this
From: Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com
Yah, RAID-5 is a bad idea anymore with the large drive sizes. RAID-6 or
RAID-10 is a far better choice.
I prefer RAID-10 because the rebuild time is based on the size of a
drive pair, not the entire array.
Anyone tested RAID 50 and/or 60
I was wondering this myself (we use F5) but if he doesn't have the budget
for a redundant pair of F5's )they are pricey...) then he may be trying to
get resilience this way
That said a single front end apache server with mod_proxy and load balanced
across N nodes (depending on front end
a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
public IP
address??
You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer instead. Myself
I have most experience with F5
John Doe wrote:
From: Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com
Yah, RAID-5 is a bad idea anymore with the large drive sizes. RAID-6 or
RAID-10 is a far better choice.
I prefer RAID-10 because the rebuild time is based on the size of a
drive pair, not the entire array.
Anyone tested RAID 50
Karanbir Singh wrote:
snip
Good question, they are after all ( the Sun 45xx's ) just
opteron box's with a mostly standard build. Finding a CentOS
compatible ( drivers pre-included, and not crap like cciss )
would not be too hard.
Who wants to offer up a machine to test on :)
--
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:06:10AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/8/2010 10:09 AM, nate wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
meanwhile, ATT, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
CA that I worked for
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote ..
a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
public IP
address??
You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
I use grub, but I wish I could go back to lilo - it was so much less
complicated and finicky.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods
On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
I think you are confusing it with something else. Somewhere I saw that
these list around $400k for 80TB - but
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Matty matt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com wrote:
On 1/7/2010 10:54 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org
On 01/07/2010 02:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
KB, thanks. When you say dont go over 1 TiB in storage per spindle
what are you referring
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from:
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo/
works just fine on
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Thanks. I'm guessing that I'll have to manually update lilo.conf after
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:29:06 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
Thanks for the Link Ray.
One thing I am confused is... failover manual means whenever there is a
link failure this will case the host to be rebooted?
Paras.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:45:14AM -0600, Paras pradhan
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
wrote:
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
Thanks. I'm guessing that I'll have to manually update lilo.conf
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Looks like the new kernel stanza gets added to lilo.conf
automatically, but the default needs to be changed manually.
That's ok, I randomly see that with grub, too.
grub is supposed to set the default kernel to the newly installed one
Hi
No if you have a dual hba then the host should in worst case scenario
become un-responsive for a second or two but then continue as nothing
had happen.
If it fails then it may be your multipath config but a lot of the time
it is sitting at your switch level or san.
Regards
Per
On Fri,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Looks like the new kernel stanza gets added to lilo.conf
automatically, but the default needs to be changed manually.
That's ok, I randomly see that with grub, too.
grub is supposed to set the default kernel to the newly installed
Thank you for the many helpful suggestions. I have to spend a bit
more time researching this evidently.
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software --
On 01/07/2010 02:14 PM Robert Heller wrote:
At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:37:46 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
products and would very much
I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
I determined that none of my backed up configuration files going
back to October will load either. This is
Quoting James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca:
I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
I determined that none of my backed up configuration files
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
:BRUTE_FORCE - [0:0]
. . .
-A BRUTE_FORCE -p tcp -m tcp -m state -m recent --set -i eth0
--dport 22 --state NEW
-A BRUTE_FORCE -m comment -j RETURN --comment Return to calling chain
COMMIT
Check out this TUTORIAL
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
so on.
Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
Well that is really what the OP asked for NOT. There have been good
answers so
On 01/08/2010 08:28 AM James Rankin wrote:
Hello,
After a yum update last night, I had a CenOS 5.4 i386 system pull in the
following selinux updates:
Jan 07 21:39:14 Updated: selinux-policy-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch
Jan 07 21:39:31 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch
On Fri, January 8, 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
I ran lsmod and I do not find that ipt_recent is
On 1/8/10 11:06 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
so on.
Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
Well that is really what the OP asked
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:28 AM, James Rankin rankin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, this error message means little to mean... in the course of
troubleshooting, I tried this:
# setenforce Permissive
# /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch
And it worked! The logwatch email sends without error. If I turn
Check out this TUTORIAL
http://www.zoominternet.net/~lazydog/iptables-
tutorial.html#RECENTMATCH
I do not seem to be making myself clear. I do not need a tutorial
on how to use the recent module of iptables. The recent module
itself seems not to be available on this particular host anymore.
On 1/8/2010 3:06 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
so on.
Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
Well that is really what the OP asked
By setting selinux to permissive, you've, in effect, turned it off.
SElinux will still provide messages about infractions, but won't prevent
things from running... i.e., it is no longer guarding your system.
hth,
ken
Thanks for the reply; the fact that the error only occurs when Enforcing is
That's interesting... Have you tried increasing the loglevel? It's a
kernel option, unfortunately, and enabled with an audit=xx on the grub
boot. It might give you more than you're seeing in the audit log. You
may also want to try a relabel and manually check the context of all
associated
I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the disk images are from a
previous PIII system), and things are 'interesting' WRT how the Lava
Computer mfg Inc
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:54 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the disk images are from a
previous PIII system), and things
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
I think you are confusing it with something else. Somewhere I saw that
these list around
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:54 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and
RHEL 5.
uname -ra
Linux ethies 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686
i686 i386
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:36 -0800, nate wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
I think you are confusing it with
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:55 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and
RHEL 5.
uname -ra
Linux ethies
JohnS wrote:
Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
yes per second. Also what type of sparse file I/O you get . I
JohnS wrote:
Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
yes per second. Also what type of sparse file I/O you get . I see
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:23 -0800, nate wrote:
JohnS wrote:
Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
yes per
JohnS wrote:
Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
(~500MB/s)
Thats with BiDirectional, both links at 4 GB/s. Were looking for
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:43 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
JohnS wrote:
Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
yes
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:08 -0800, nate wrote:
JohnS wrote:
Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
(~500MB/s)
G Bits per
After upgrading to centos 5.4 I am getting a selinux violation, yet
nothing is logged to /var/log/audit/audit.log. Other violations do get
logged.
The violation occurs when running the following command on the mail
server:
aspen /usr/bin/Mail centos@centos.org
Subject: test
hi
Cc:
aspen
I got the same thing, which I think if from the selinux updates last
night. My machine was on 5.4 since 5.4 was released. I will let you know
if/when I figure out the solution.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-January/088465.html
___
Here is the fix. Just found this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
and also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
For anyone else finding this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
and also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:34 -0700, Nataraj wrote:
After upgrading to centos 5.4 I am getting a selinux violation, yet
nothing is logged to /var/log/audit/audit.log. Other violations do get
logged.
The violation occurs when running the following command on the mail
server:
aspen
JohnS wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:08 -0800, nate wrote:
JohnS wrote:
Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
(~500MB/s)
G
Your ROI of 5 minutes doesn't make any sense to me.
Ok, Job submission and completion is what I am getting at.
ROI generally refers to the time an expense takes to pay off.Like,
if buying $X worth of capital equipment will generate savings or
additional income of $x over Y
Only tangentially on topic, at best...
Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a single
html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
turn the entire book into a single PDF?
I can't think of a way to do that, all I can come up with would result
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
