As this thread is alive again...
On 11/30/2009 11:35 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 30.11.09 22:49, schrieb R P Herrold:
I was considering 'axes' to refactor it along over the
weekend
Please do consider plain English too, while doing so, as I have no
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
Again, I would reiterate Ralph's request for you to use plain English[1]
when communitcating with this list, especially considering that it's a
documentation list.
Shall I use crayons as well, to make the pictures easier for
you? Words of not more than
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5a9045330d1c6d9d4e282cafa71c9bbf
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
974d27def9772e424700074459935c1f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0044 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0044.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
1221ab24081392b69bae28f6b4b533ad
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0042
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0042.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
75c3d86012ed835fdd8e6adf4a7b46d5
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0020
kernel security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0020.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-89.0.19.EL.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0029
krb5 security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0029.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-71.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0029
krb5 security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0029.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-71.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0029
krb5 security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0029.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.3.4-62.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0029
krb5 security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0029.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.3.4-62.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039
gcc security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/cpp-3.2.3-60.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039
gcc security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cpp-3.2.3-60.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039
gcc and gcc4 security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/cpp-3.4.6-11.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0039
gcc and gcc4 security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
entOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0040
php security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/php-4.3.2-54.ent.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0040
php security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.29.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0044
pidgin security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0044.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/finch-2.6.5-1.el4.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0044
pidgin security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0044.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/finch-2.6.5-1.el4.1.x86_64.rpm
Hola Listeros mi duda es la siguiente , estoy configurando Squid en mi
Centos y he tenido dudas con la configuración del Delay Pools, resulta que
yo tengo un enlace de
100 Mb/s (Nacional) y 4 Mb/s (Internacional) , entonces la duda que me
asalta es con cual de las dos velocidades debo trabajar
Saludos amigos, tengo una pequeña consulta a ver si me pueden ayudar.
Tengo un router 2wire que es el que maneja el dsl, es el que conecta
con el proveedor y tiene un rango de IP de 192.168.2.x
Tengo un Linksys WRT300N que se conecta al 2wire y distribuye el
interneta las maquinas con un rango de
Saludos.
Probablemente tu WRT300N esta haciendo NAT y esa es la raiz de los
problemas. Debes desactivar el NAT y configurar el enrutamiento en
ambos routers. Con ello te quitas el problema de estar colocando rutas
extras manualmente en los hosts.
La otra alternativa si no sabes mucho de
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Max Hetrick
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:39 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
The reason I really like BackupPC is the compression you can get. It
really
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:57 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
On 1/13/2010 9:08 AM, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
My google searches would have
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need faster performance, and simple
to configure, I wrote a blog on this a couple of months ago:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:08:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need faster performance, and simple
to configure, I wrote a blog on this a
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:17 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of S.Tindall
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:30 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
So just use the stock epel package and you don't need to modify apache.
From: hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
server as the followings :
#yum install -y gcc
First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34 ?
'yum install gcc' would install gcc 4.x
But in the middle of the installation ,
wouldn't
rpm -ivh --force gcc
help you? :)
--
Luís Trindade
- John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my
CentOS 5 server as the followings :
#yum install -y gcc
First, didn't you intend
On Thursday 14 January 2010, John Doe wrote:
From: hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
server as the followings : #yum install -y gcc
First, didn't you intend to install compat-gcc-34 ?
'yum install gcc' would install
From: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular
choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange...
amanda was created in 1991...
BackupPC in 2001.
That would explain it a bit...
Also if tapes are the
From: Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com
I thought of that but I don't want to mess up what I already have
working with manipulating files in /etc
But at least I can try it to see if this much works
It did mess up all my /etc work, and did not work anyway
I was talking about tmp...
Not sure
On 14/01/10 09:49, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Thursday 14 January 2010, John Doe wrote:
From: hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com
I tried to install GCC3.x , required to compile Asterisk , on my CentOS 5
server as the followings : #yum install -y gcc
First, didn't you intend to install
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:08:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Today I have five 500GB-disks raided on linux machine. Remove one for
parity
and I have 2TB of real space available. Doing a 0+1, ie 1TB, would indeed be
better as performance goes, but 1TB of space, well, it just isn't enough
unfortunately.
As it is now, the 2TB
I installed checkinstall 1.6.2 on CentOS 5.4 VM (VMWare Server on
WinXP). After getting the dependencies installed it compiled with no
errors. But when I run it in its own source directory, I keep getting an
error that I can't track down. The message is:
install: cannot change ownership of
- Original Message
From: Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 10:44:59 AM
Subject: [CentOS] Problem with checkinstall
I installed checkinstall 1.6.2 on CentOS 5.4 VM (VMWare Server on
WinXP). After getting
Sorin Srbu wrote:
I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you
never
know...
There's a big write performance hit from raid5 (software or not). It
may not be enough to be a showstopper but I wouldn't recommend it. Can
you reconfigure to a 0+1 or some other type
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Franz
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1 TB
RAID
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:14 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
If you have any opportunity to change things, I'd get some larger drives
and
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Have you paid attention to this? How big is the difference nowadays?
Or I wonder if it was just on some specific product..
Depends on the product, my blog mentions a new product that draws
less power on 10GbaseT vs fiber.
As for latency I'm sure it's a bit more, but for
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
10GBase-T:
- latency 2.6 us
- power per port: 4-6W/port
With the right gear this is much lower, only 1 switch on the market
that is this good though the one mentioned in my blog, I'm sure
others will follow at some point with the same or similar chipset,
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Franz
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:55 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
I haven't got a budget really. Today I asked for a new group-printer today
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Benjamin Franz
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
Brian Mathis wrote:
To put it into perspective, ask the manager how much it would cost the
business if this data was unrecoverable? After that, if they still
don't want to spend a few hundred $$s on the insurance, get it in
writing that your manager understands the risk and print it out and
Fernando Gleiser wrote:
- Original Message
From: Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 10:44:59 AM
Subject: [CentOS] Problem with checkinstall
I installed checkinstall 1.6.2 on CentOS 5.4 VM (VMWare Server on
On 1/14/2010 9:08 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Go to the vendor's web site, enter their serial numbers and get an RMA for a
free replacement. Every vendor has had bad batches.
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
Unfortunately, the only way commodity priced things get
On 1/14/2010 9:23 AM, Max Hetrick wrote:
That's what led me to BackupPC in the first place. We used to use
rsnapshot here, and there were quite a few customized hacked together
things that we thought were running nightly, and they really weren't.
So, when I started investigating, I realized
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
joined the lawsuit at the time(and got booted by the judge because
I was in another state), had probably an 80% failure rate on those
disks. I got a
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
joined the lawsuit at the time(and got booted by the judge because
I was in another state), had probably an 80% failure rate on those
disks. I
Les Mikesell wrote:
Backuppc will at least send you an email when the backups have failed
for 3 days in a row.
Yeah, I have this configured. Although, to be honest since I've set it
up, I've not had any failures yet, so I'll have to wait until I do, ha.
Max
On 1/14/2010 10:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
joined the lawsuit at the time(and got booted by the judge because
I was in another state), had probably an 80%
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:52:01AM -0800, nate wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
10GBase-T:
- latency 2.6 us
- power per port: 4-6W/port
With the right gear this is much lower, only 1 switch on the market
that is this good though the one mentioned in my blog, I'm sure
others will
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:49:07AM -0800, nate wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Have you paid attention to this? How big is the difference nowadays?
Or I wonder if it was just on some specific product..
Depends on the product, my blog mentions a new product that draws
less power on
On 1/14/2010 10:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
snip
OT but reminded me of that..
Seagate Barracudas - mid-nineties, and again three-four years ago.
Hi,
Thanks for you input. 802.3ad seems better but I am not in a position
to terminate both links in the same switch or same stack.
Some switches support LACP across several devices - for example the
cisco 3750 with extended image can glue several switches together to
one virtual switch and
Right in the middle of doing something important on my Ubuntu box, the
web quit working. However, I could get to sites in my /etc/hosts file.
Sure enough, all three of my ISPs nameservers were down.
I'm not a DNS guy, but on my CentOS boxes I always installed a caching
DNS out of the box since
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 1/14/2010 10:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On 1/14/2010 10:04 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though.
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
snip
OT but reminded me of that..
Seagate Barracudas -
Hi all;
I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4
I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the wireless
key. Anyone know how to get NetworkManager to save the keys?
I've tried going to the 'edit connections' and adding the key there as well
with no luck.
Thanks in advance
On Thursday 14 January 2010, nate wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
10GBase-T:
- latency 2.6 us
- power per port: 4-6W/port
With the right gear this is much lower, only 1 switch on the market
that is this good though the one mentioned in my blog, I'm sure
others will follow at some
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 10:07 -0700, Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi all;
I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4
I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the
wireless
key. Anyone know how to get NetworkManager to save the keys?
I've tried going to the 'edit connections'
On Thursday 14 January 2010 10:28, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 10:07 -0700, Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi all;
I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4
I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the
wireless key. Anyone know how to get NetworkManager to save the
On 1/14/2010 11:10 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 14.1.2010 17:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
Backuppc will at least send you an email when the backups have failed
for 3 days in a row.
I probably should mention the one scenario it doesn't handle very well,
though. If you have very large files that have
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
subsets first since they will be
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there any way to auth with keys
or
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there any
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load average
is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of 15-20 instead of
the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat, vmstat, top, ps. But
I don't get significant hint.
On 1/14/2010 12:27 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
If you are running as root, rsync
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:12 PM, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote:
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load
average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of 15-20
instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on such an
Put them here:
http://rpms.linuxpowered.net/hpn-ssh/
All the usual disclaimers apply, I have these running on a few
dozen systems at different data centers running file transfers
24/7 for the past year now that I think about it.
Nate,
That's great! I am not convinced yet that an rsync daemon
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
For the sake of being ready Saturday, what is the most secure (not using
ssh) to
authenticate in a script with an rsync daemon? Looks like it only does the
user:pass
pairs (not really good for script) or host based wrapper style security?
If the IPs are static then
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load
average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of 15-20
instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat, vmstat, top, ps.
But I don't get significant
On 01/12/2010 10:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
On the other hand, here, we have around 30 HP servers.
Some DL360/380/180 G5/G6 with CentOS 4/5 and,
in 2 years, only 3 drives failed... That's it; no other problems...
Drives is hardly the issue - most of them are going to be seagate anyway.
My main
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:07:43PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/12/2010 10:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
On the other hand, here, we have around 30 HP servers.
Some DL360/380/180 G5/G6 with CentOS 4/5 and,
in 2 years, only 3 drives failed... That's it; no other problems...
Drives is
On 01/12/2010 03:51 PM, nate wrote:
I've used HP/cciss on a couple hundred systems over the past 7 years,
can only recall 2 issues, both around a drive failing the controller
didn't force the drive off line, and there was no way to force it
off line using the command line tool, so had to go on
Karanbir Singh wrote:
My main issue with that kit is that the linux drivers are very basic,
lack most management capabilities and fail often with obscure issues.
And, as Peter pointed out already, they are not really exposing a proper
scsi interface, but modeled around a really old ata
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:14:52PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/12/2010 03:51 PM, nate wrote:
I've used HP/cciss on a couple hundred systems over the past 7 years,
can only recall 2 issues, both around a drive failing the controller
didn't force the drive off line, and there was no
On 1/14/2010 1:12 PM, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote:
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load
average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of
15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat,
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load
average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of
15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat, vmstat, top,
ps. But I don't get significant
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote:
Are you by any chance now running a CPU throttling program and weren't
before?
ACPI is not enabled. Other than that I couldn't tell. Sorry if it sounds noob.
What can I check to be sure nothing is throttling the CPU?
Check if
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:47 -0500, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote:
We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load
average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of
15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to.
I searched a lot for information on
On 01/14/2010 05:42 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
On Thursday 14 January 2010 10:28, Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 10:07 -0700, Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi all;
I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4
I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the
wireless key. Anyone know
- Original Message
From: fortin.pie...@bell.ca fortin.pie...@bell.ca
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 5:47:43 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] High load since passing from rhas3 to centos4.8
The purpose of the server is to run NMS Telephony cards. The only support is
On Thursday 14 January 2010 12:52:15 Michael A. Peters wrote:
This is the second time in the last 6 months that all three of my ISP's
nameservers have gone down,
You can also use Google's free Caching Nameservers (a recent offering) with
some easy-to-remember ip's;
8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On Thursday 14 January 2010 12:52:15 Michael A. Peters wrote:
This is the second time in the last 6 months that all three of my ISP's
nameservers have gone down,
You can also use Google's free Caching Nameservers (a recent offering) with
some easy-to-remember ip's;
I concur that I would not use them on anything important.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Noob Centos Admin
centos.ad...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
- A: one is with 80 GB SSD (and 12 GB memory)
http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_ssd.xml
- B: the other with 750 GB SATA2 (and 8 GB memory).
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Brian Mathis
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
[...]
So you need to be able to walk the fine line
between these two.
I'm
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:48 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
Unfortunately, the only way commodity priced things get large scale
real-world
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of nate
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:00 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even
joined the lawsuit at
93 matches
Mail list logo
