Re: [CentOS-docs] Install On Partitionable RAID1

2010-01-21 Thread Lorenzo Quatrini
Phil Schaffner ha scritto: 2. The command to create /etc/mdadm.conf will result in an extra line spares=1 while the array is still syncing. Adding | head -1 to the command to create it fixes the problem. May I suggest to add | grep -v spares or | grep ARRAY instead? If the command is

Re: [CentOS-docs] problem disconnected: No supported authentication methods available

2010-01-21 Thread Ralph Angenendt
2010/1/13 prof.tariq prof.ta...@hotmail.com: Hi there, I encountered that message when try to login to ssh via putty, this happened after implement what have been said in this article http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute?action=showredirect=HowToContribute except the DSA PRIVATE KEY step and

Re: [CentOS-docs] TipsAndTricks/ApacheVhostDir re-org

2010-01-21 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Ed Heron e...@heron-ent.com wrote:  Hopefully, this will make the document easier to read for those that don't have any interest in the optional alternatives or reading it entirely. Too me it looks more clearly arranged this way.  It occurs to me that I could

Re: [CentOS-docs] Install On Partitionable RAID1

2010-01-21 Thread Phil Schaffner
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote on 01/21/2010 06:26 AM: Phil Schaffner ha scritto: 2. The command to create /etc/mdadm.conf will result in an extra line spares=1 while the array is still syncing. Adding | head -1 to the command to create it fixes the problem. May I suggest to add | grep -v

Re: [CentOS-docs] TipsAndTricks/ApacheVhostDir re-org

2010-01-21 Thread Ed Heron
From: Ralph Angenendt, Thursday, January 21, 2010 5:56 AM On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Ed Heron e...@heron-ent.com wrote: Hopefully, this will make the document easier to read for those that don't have any interest in the optional alternatives or reading it entirely. Too me it looks

Re: [CentOS-docs] Install On Partitionable RAID1

2010-01-21 Thread Lev Shamardin
Some later thoughts go below. On 01/21/2010 01:50 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote: 1. The user should be instructed to start rescue mode with networking in order to be able to retrieve the patch for mkinitrd. The mkinitrd instructions should be moved to the beginning of the guide. Networking

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:18:06PM -0500, Ryan Pugatch wrote: Hello all, I have a PowerEdge 2950 that I am using to host Windows XP VM's under CentOS. I am experiencing poor performance in the Xen VM's. Any time I try to do something, the CPU usage (as reported by the Windows task

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Ryan Pugatch wrote: So I take it you're not using PV-on-HVM drivers in Windows.. ie. windows is using the emulated NIC and IDE disk? That will be slow. You need to use PV drivers. See GPLPV drivers: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv/ http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads/

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Ryan Pugatch
compdoc wrote: If you have only one network card in the server, you should add more. 32 computers (vms) sharing one card is only one bottleneck your system has. Another would be using a file to run the vm from, rather than a block device. Is it possible to migrate from a block device to

[CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Bill McGonigle
Hi, all, I'm attempting to run a Windows 2003 (32-bit) VM under CentOS 5.4, generally following: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM I've seen nice performance benefits with the VirtIO driver under Fedora, so I'd like to get that running with CentOS as well. I have the September drivers

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Andri Möll
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:31 -0500, Ryan Pugatch wrote: compdoc wrote: If you have only one network card in the server, you should add more. 32 computers (vms) sharing one card is only one bottleneck your system has. Another would be using a file to run the vm from, rather than a

Re: [CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Bill McGonigle wrote: Hi, all, I'm attempting to run a Windows 2003 (32-bit) VM under CentOS 5.4, generally following: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM ARGHH ... forget that page as it was written during the first kvm tests and ïsn't current anymore see

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Ryan Pugatch wrote: Eric Searcy wrote: The install worked beautifully except that my VM now has an ip assigned of 192.168.122.186 which I'm guessing is in relation to virbr0 which is 192.168.122.1 on the host (and subsequently has no internet

Re: [CentOS-virt] Windows Xen VM's have high guest CPU usage and poor performance

2010-01-21 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: Oh, one more thing.. is it only the guest VM taking cpu time when you monitor with xm top? Do you have the latest service packs installed in the guest? Have you tried monitoring the performance from inside the guest, to figure out what takes cpu time there?

Re: [CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 01/21/2010 04:08 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: The standard kvm from 5.4 and not the*old* one from extras Hrm, this is probably where I'm going wrong. I have kvm -36 from -extras (which bails if you specify a virtio type device). I'm not seeing kvm in the repos for 5.4 or updates/5.4 on

Re: [CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Dennis J.
On 01/21/2010 10:59 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: On 01/21/2010 04:08 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: The standard kvm from 5.4 and not the*old* one from extras Hrm, this is probably where I'm going wrong. I have kvm -36 from -extras (which bails if you specify a virtio type device). I'm not seeing

Re: [CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Bill McGonigle
On 01/21/2010 07:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: Has anyone tried building the kvm packages shipped by redhat on i386 ? apart from the spec file, are there any other changes required ? I'm working on this right now but running into missing packages as seen here:

Re: [CentOS-virt] VirtIO with CentOS 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com wrote: On 01/21/2010 07:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: Has anyone tried building the kvm packages shipped by redhat on i386 ? apart from the spec file, are there any other changes required ? I'm working on this right now but

[CentOS-es] como conectar dos servidores en modo de fallo

2010-01-21 Thread Alejandro Marin Maturano
Hola comunidad les platico mi situación tengo un servidor Ldap, en el cual se autentican mis usuarios, pero me solicitan hacer otro idéntico y que este conectado (sincronizado) con el primero para que en caso de que falle el primero el segundo entre automáticamente, la pregunta es: ¿Hay algun

Re: [CentOS] perl updates always break perl programs, how to fix?

2010-01-21 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2010, 21:46 +0100 schrieb James Chase: I realize this is my fault because once upon a time I installed a package using CPAN and probably other admins on the system have as well but now whenever I update perl I have to jump through hoops to get perl applications to work

[CentOS] cryptoloop

2010-01-21 Thread Morten Sundstrøm
Hi. Have a problem that i need som help with: 1. Have multipple raids working in a encrypted filesystem in CentOS 5.4 (i386): script file, crypt.sh modprobe cryptoloop losetup -e aes /dev/loop0 /dev/md0 (inserting password here) then run mount -t ext3 /dev/loop0 /mnt/raid5 Have been using this

Re: [CentOS] cryptoloop

2010-01-21 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:41:37AM +0100, Morten Sundstrøm wrote: Hi. Have a problem that i need som help with: 1. Have multipple raids working in a encrypted filesystem in CentOS 5.4 (i386): script file, crypt.sh modprobe cryptoloop cryptoloop is depracated, and should not be used.

Re: [CentOS] mysql Workbench

2010-01-21 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote: Slightly OT, I wanted to enable blackhole engine in the mysql server so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website

Re: [CentOS] cryptoloop

2010-01-21 Thread Morten Sundstrøm
I know about that. Is that the reason it wont work in ubuntu? If I switch to a new encryption i must copy all the data to a new raid wich is not possible at the moment. I need to get this mounted. /MS - Original Message - Fra: Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi Til: CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] Xorg without xorg.conf (a bit OT)

2010-01-21 Thread Ron Blizzard
I like to try out other distributions of Linux. Today I took a look at Mint Linux 8 and Fedora 12. I installed and updated each on a small partition -- actual physical install, not virtual machines. Both worked great at 1280x1024 (their defaults) but neither would let me use 1024x768 resolution.

Re: [CentOS] Xorg without xorg.conf (a bit OT)

2010-01-21 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 21 January 2010 09:37:11 Ron Blizzard wrote: And I'm curious as to how Xorg determines its monitor resolution choices when there is no xorg.conf file. X server queries the monitor for supported resolutions by reading the EDID data, and uses the best setting available as the

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:31:33 +0100: No. I usually see some change in the permissions (/var/named/chroot/var/named/ loses group write and named logs some complaints but still works) when updating named. And sure enought that happened with latest bind update today again.

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100: I wonder now if the owner of that directory should actually be named? Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write permission there, but the rpm

[CentOS] Recent openvz kernels unstable?

2010-01-21 Thread Chris
Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels, we have mysterious machine lock ups. Sometime there will be an oops message, other times there will be none. The oops messages aren't the same

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100: I wonder now if the owner of that directory should actually be named? Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Mathis
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100: I wonder now if the owner of that directory should actually be named? Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in use it's

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
Brian Mathis wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100: I wonder now if the owner of that directory should actually be named? Hm, after looking on other machines that have named

Re: [CentOS] update of openssh-server i386 4.3p2-36.el5, dependencies

2010-01-21 Thread Anthony Kamau
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:39 +0100, Christopher Thorjussen wrote: Just checking 'yum update ecryptfs-utils' gives me alone 54 packages to install: Transaction Summary = Install 54 Package(s) Update 5 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total

[CentOS] [PKI concepts] Why Jboss need (signed cert and) root-cert in PEM format?

2010-01-21 Thread Sven Aluoor
Hi folks [ Please add me CC. Thanks ] We have here a Jboss app and web server. We signed the SSL-certificate that end-user don't have ugly error messages. I don't understand why we need to import the Root-Cert in PEM format? $ keytool -import -trustcacerts -file rootcert.pem -keystore

[CentOS] PAM and GNOME keyring

2010-01-21 Thread Giulio Troccoli
Hi everybody, I have a CentOS 5.4 server I need to se-up as Subversion server. On the server GNOME keyring has been installed and the integration with Subversion works fine: I'm asked for the keyring password the first time and that's it. I am now trying to set it up so that after login the

Re: [CentOS] update of openssh-server i386 4.3p2-36.el5, dependencies

2010-01-21 Thread John Doe
From: Anthony Kamau akcen...@anroet.com Just checking 'yum update ecryptfs-utils' gives me alone 54 packages to install: Transaction Summary = Install 54 Package(s) Update 5 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 25 M Is this ok [y/N]: n

[CentOS] perl-Mail-Box dependencies

2010-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
Does anyone know why the CentOS 5 package perl-Mail-Box from both rpmforge and epel is dependent on spamassassin? Looking at the source from cpan, it appears to be an option rather than a dependency (and is even commented out of the option list in the makefile). -- Bowie

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Brian Mathis wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:38:12 -0500: I don't think you'd want a compromised named to be able to make changes to your authoritative DNS records, which is what could happen if you have permissions set that way. But why does named then report it right after the update? Jan 21

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Bowie Bailey wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:34:02 -0500: # ll /var/named/chroot/var/ total 24 drwxr-x--- 4 root named 4096 Aug 25 2004 named drwxrwx--- 3 root named 4096 Mar 13 2003 run that has no group write permission here. drwxrwx--- 2 named named

[CentOS] [PKI concepts] Why Jboss need (signed cert and) root-cert in PEM format?

2010-01-21 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Sven Aluoor wrote: Hi folks [ Please add me CC. Thanks ] so .. a 'not subscribed' driveby -- also looks to be a cross-post We have here a Jboss app and web server. We signed the SSL-certificate on a product we do not build that end-user don't have ugly error

Re: [CentOS] Recent openvz kernels unstable?

2010-01-21 Thread Chris
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:09:59AM -0500, Chris wrote: Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels, we have mysterious machine lock ups. Sometime there will be an oops message, other

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread lhecking
It seems to be working, but I get this complaint (I see it as a complaint) each time named gets restarted - until I give it write permission for that directory. This is RedHat's policy for bind. The working directory does not need to be writable, and RH's bind maintainer Adam Tkac has

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 7

2010-01-21 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] perl-Mail-Box dependencies

2010-01-21 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 21.01.2010, 17:25 +0100 schrieb Bowie Bailey: Does anyone know why the CentOS 5 package perl-Mail-Box from both rpmforge and epel is dependent on spamassassin? Looking at the source from cpan, it appears to be an option rather than a dependency (and is even commented out of

[CentOS] netgear wg111v2

2010-01-21 Thread Davy Leon
Hi folks I have a Centos 5.3 Box and need to know how to configure a Netgear wg111v2 USB WLAN adapter. I already have an wireless LAN build with an AP and a windows XP PC with another Netgear wg111v2 USB adaptor running on it.. Thanks David___

Re: [CentOS] netgear wg111v2

2010-01-21 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Davy Leon d...@scu.escambray.com.cu wrote: Hi folks I have a Centos 5.3 Box and need to know how to configure a Netgear wg111v2 USB WLAN adapter. I already have an wireless LAN build with an AP and a windows XP PC with another Netgear wg111v2 USB adaptor

Re: [CentOS] Bind data directory borked on update from 5.3 to 5.4

2010-01-21 Thread Kai Schaetzl
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:48:10 +: This is RedHat's policy for bind. The working directory does not need to be writable, and RH's bind maintainer Adam Tkac has explained this on numerous occasions. Thanks for the hint. I cannot see that he explained

[CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to 5 seconds to finally login. My tcpdump -vv weren't producing much output (not good) and my pings to and from that host were normal and almost identical to other hosts on my subnet that had no ssh login delay

Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread nate
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to 5 seconds to finally login. This is frequently a DNS issue, is forward+reverse DNS functional? You can also run SSH in debugging mode on the server, and increase verbosity on the client.

Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread aurfalien
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular server were taking up to 5 seconds to finally login. This is frequently a DNS issue, is forward+reverse DNS functional? DNS was normal, forward reverse lookups exist and match that host. I'll turn on ssh debug

[CentOS] I have a question.

2010-01-21 Thread Samet ÖZGÜR
Hello I have a question, How can I change logos and favicon.ico in Data.fs file for Conga (Luci) Can anybody help me? Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message From: aurfal...@gmail.com aurfal...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 20:07:27 Subject: Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a

Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread aurfalien
- Original Message From: aurfal...@gmail.com aurfal...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 20:07:27 Subject: Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed that my ssh logins to a particular

[CentOS] /proc/mounts always shows nobarrier option for xfs, even when mounted with barrier

2010-01-21 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is always set to nobarrier Here's an example: [r...@host ~]# mount -o nobarrier

Re: [CentOS] /proc/mounts always shows nobarrier option for xfs, even when mounted with barrier

2010-01-21 Thread Ross Walker
On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Tom Georgoulias t...@mcclatchyinteractive.com wrote: Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier mount option as displayed in /proc/mounts is

Re: [CentOS] /proc/mounts always shows nobarrier option for xfs, even when mounted with barrier

2010-01-21 Thread Tom Georgoulias
On 01/21/2010 04:13 PM, Ross Walker wrote: On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Tom Georgouliast...@mcclatchyinteractive.com wrote: Ran into a confusing situation today. When I mount an xfs filesystem on a server running centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5, the barrier/nobarrier

Re: [CentOS] Recent openvz kernels unstable?

2010-01-21 Thread Ugo Bellavance
On 2010-01-21 11:35, Chris wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:09:59AM -0500, Chris wrote: Has anyone else running heavily loaded openvz boxes noticed strange behavior with the latest kernels? Ever since updating to the latest *.164* kernels, we have mysterious machine lock ups. Sometime

[CentOS] Corporate drop box for files

2010-01-21 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked for instead of an ftp server. Anyone know of something/project that exists already? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS

[CentOS] Corporate drop box for files

2010-01-21 Thread R P Herrold
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked for instead of an ftp server. Anyone know of something/project that exists already? Some form of a

Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins

2010-01-21 Thread Amos Shapira
2010/1/22 aurfal...@gmail.com: The DNS server also behaved regarding name/ip addy lookups. This server is a Zimbra mail server which during install, checks for proper DNS configs.  I usually check proper functioning DNS by hand anyways. The ipv6 line was strange but I read a while back,

[CentOS] mysql update

2010-01-21 Thread madunix
I have the following update procedure that update mySQL DB over the internet between source Linux Centos (local machine on my net behind a DMZ with real IP A.B.C.D) and target Linux fedora (web server www.myweb.com) every day on a specific time 18:00 through a crontab on my source linux server