On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 09:24 +0300, Lev Shamardin wrote:
Some later thoughts go below.
On 01/21/2010 01:50 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
1. The user should be instructed to start rescue mode with networking in
order to be able to retrieve the patch for mkinitrd.
The mkinitrd instructions
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:57 +0300, Lev Shamardin wrote:
On 01/21/2010 01:50 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
4. It is not necessary to change LABEL=... to /dev/md_d0... in
/etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf.
Have you tested this? I'm not quite sure, but it seems to me that this did not
work at
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0061 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0061.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
x86_64:
gzip-1.3.3-18.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
The Subject line says 5, but these are clearly CentOS-4 updates.
Apologies for the mix up here.
CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update
CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gzip Update
should have been:
CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gzip Update
CESA-2010:0061 Moderate
п'ятниця 22 січень 2010 02:01:12 Karanbir Singh ви написали:
On 01/21/2010 11:04 PM, Dennis J. wrote:
AFAIK Red Hat only supports KVM for the x86_64 architecture so if you
want to use it on i386 you have to build your own packages.
Has anyone tried building the kvm packages shipped by
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:39:31PM -0500, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Oh, one more thing.. is it only the guest VM taking cpu time when you
monitor with xm top?
Do you have the latest service packs installed in the guest?
Have you tried monitoring the performance from
On 01/21/2010 09:42 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
3) does anybody have the SRPM that was at Farkas's repo or know if it
went elsewhere? I assume the build issues have been solved there already.
i remove all of my rpm because in 5.4 everything is working and
supported by rh. which is much better
On 01/22/2010 01:01 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/21/2010 11:04 PM, Dennis J. wrote:
AFAIK Red Hat only supports KVM for the x86_64 architecture so if you want
to use it on i386 you have to build your own packages.
Has anyone tried building the kvm packages shipped by redhat on i386 ?
On 01/22/2010 12:40 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4042
This one I can fix :)
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK| http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
I want to create some rpms to install the open-vm-tools on my CentOS
5.4 servers. I have not been able to find any srpms that are of
recent vintage (The most recent I have found uses the version of
open-vm-tools released in Dec. 2008).
Before I spend a lot of time building a new srpm, I thought
On 01/22/2010 07:08 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
anyway who like to run the host on 32 bit
and why?
In my case it's on a small business server - kvm is meant to replace
VMWare with a better/Free option. That server is multi-purpose,
including running a proprietary database (app vendor
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:12 AM, David Knierim dknie...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to create some rpms to install the open-vm-tools on my CentOS
5.4 servers. I have not been able to find any srpms that are of
recent vintage (The most recent I have found uses the version of
open-vm-tools
Hello:
I am using kvm on a CentOS 5.4 server.
I am trying to install the TunkeyLinux Core appliance
found here: http://www.turnkeylinux.org/core
I downloaded the ISO file from the web site.
Then, I used this command to intall it:
virt-install -n tkl-core -r 512 --vcpus=1 --check-cpu
- Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com wrote:
Hello:
I am using kvm on a CentOS 5.4 server.
I am trying to install the TunkeyLinux Core appliance
found here: http://www.turnkeylinux.org/core
So this should be on a TurnkeyLinux list?
I tried turning on the debug option for
Hola, compañeros de centos :D
Tengo una duda, lo que pasa es que estoy autenticando a mis usuarios por
usuario de sistema en sus correo, pero su login es sin @domain.com se
loguean con el usuario, necesito que si lo hagan con el @domain.com por
ejemplo, alguien sabe como logro esto ?
Desde ya
@dominio.com.
Otra es que administres tus usuarios usando una DB.
Espero te sirva.
Saludos.
Walter.-
__ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de firmas de
virus 4797 (20100122) __
ESET Smart Security ha comprobado este mensaje.
http://www.eset.com
Greetings,
I know this mail is slightly OT. But my DNS server and and all other compute
nodes (currently around 80) run Centos.
Has anybody come across some package script which can be used to listen to
request from DynDNS.org clients which can be found commonly in the devices?
I have a
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Brian Mathis wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:38:12 -0500:
I don't think you'd want a compromised named to be able to make
changes to your authoritative DNS records, which is what could happen
if you have permissions set that way.
But why does named then report it right
Stephen Nelson-Smith schrieb:
Hello,
I am just starting work on a project that is going to require a recent
(ie version 4 or 5) rsyslog. The distro has 2.0. KB - I think you
have a 3.x kicking about, but it's not on cko - any idea how much work
it would be to adapt your spec to version 4
Hi folks,
after several updates and a reboot I get errors concerning gconfd
wanting to create a directory /usr/share/tomcat5/.gconfd which fails
and other errors - when I start Tomcat5.
Why is gconfd (suddenly) needed/activated if Tomcat5 is started? Can I
disable that - and how?
Dirk
Hello,
Does anyone have an idee how to add /sbin to the sudo $PATH environment?
Adding /sbin to .bashrc $PATH isn't really what I want...
I'd like sudoers to be able to run:
$ sudo chkconfig
And not:
$ sudo /sbin/chkconfig
Thanks
Sam
___
CentOS
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:54:37AM +0100, Samuel Contesse wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have an idee how to add /sbin to the sudo $PATH environment?
Adding /sbin to .bashrc $PATH isn't really what I want...
I'd like sudoers to be able to run:
$ sudo chkconfig
And not:
$ sudo
The ipv6 line was strange but I read a while back, some tech note
about ensuring that is your last line in hosts.
Perhaps IPv6 is enabled. I had a few instances where I turned it off during
install, but found it enabled at runtime. I had assumed I was being careless
during install... but
*You may have a firewall, try check iptable using iptable -L cmd, if you see
rolls try stop **iptable **service just for checking and test ssh*.
--
Best Wishes,
Waleed Harbi
Dream | Do | Be
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Geoff Galitz ge...@galitz.org wrote:
The
Thanks for the quick answer.
sudo -i simulate the initial shell, actually this is not what I'm
looking for.
On Debian systems, this is the default behaviour.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R. Dennison
Sent:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
for instead of an ftp server.
Anyone know of something/project that exists already?
You can have a look at
Samuel Contesse wrote:
Adding /sbin to .bashrc $PATH isn't really what I want...
I'd like sudoers to be able to run:
$ sudo chkconfig
And not:
$ sudo /sbin/chkconfig
Put a symlink to chkconfig in /usr/local/bin ?
--
Benjamin Franz
___
Some form of a webDAV, possibly 'skinned', comes to mind, as
shared rights and ACL are well defined and readily supported;
Clients in every Linux, OS/X or Windows release in active
support [also on my iTouch and related portible devices], so
far as I know; server side is trivial; uses the
Hi
ls postfi same as sendmail / exim ?
any mail program better to configure/manage
Thank you so much
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi Adrian,
I'm using zimbra open source, zimbra mta base on postfix.
Zimbra: easy, user friendly, available on open source of course.
--Original Message--
From: adrian kok
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] mail program
It's right, adding path into .bash_profil is so easy...
--Original Message--
From: Gaël Honorez
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Add /sbin to sudo PATH
Sent: Jan 22, 2010 8:44 PM
Except adding /sbin to the PATH
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Samuel Contesse wrote:
Thanks for the quick answer.
sudo -i simulate the initial shell, actually this is not what I'm
looking for.
On Debian systems, this is the default behaviour.
Sudo is meant to follow the user's PATH unless it has been
HI,
Postfix easy and power full
sendmail simple
exim useful and powe full
But for me postfix is the best solution and zimbra a good solution if you don't
spent time to create your own groupware mail solution's
Fabien FAYE
RHCE
www.generationip.com
Free network tools HOWTO for centos and
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:25 PM, fabien faye fab...@faye.eu wrote:
HI,
Postfix easy and power full
sendmail simple
exim useful and powe full
But for me postfix is the best solution and zimbra a good solution if you
don't spent time to create your own groupware mail solution's
Zarafa is a
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, adrian kok adriankok2...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
Hi
ls postfi same as sendmail / exim ?
any mail program better to configure/manage
Thank you so much
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:25 PM, fabien faye fab...@faye.eu wrote:
HI,
Postfix easy and power full
sendmail simple
exim useful and powe full
But for me postfix is the best solution and zimbra a good solution if you
don't spent time to create your own groupware mail solution's
Fabien
On 1/22/2010 6:31 AM, Lars Schelde wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
for instead of an ftp server.
Anyone know of something/project
QmailRocks, powerful but hadn't develop anymore
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Kaplan, Andrew H. ahkap...@partners.orgwrote:
Hi there --
I need to upgrade one of our systems from its current distribution, Fedora
Core 7, to the most recent
version distribution, release 5.4, of the CentOS operating system. Can I do
an in-place upgrade
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I need to provide a means for our people to stop using the mail server
as a file server, a web site with a friendly interface has been asked
for instead of an ftp server.
Dumb question: samba?
mark
Hi all:
i installed php, apache, mysql on my CentOS.
then i installed wordpress on localhost.
when i upgraded a plugin, wordpress asked me to enter hostname,
username and password.
what's them? i tried mysql username and password, they didn't work.
anyone can help me? thanks so much.
--
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Some form of a webDAV, possibly 'skinned', comes to mind, as
shared rights and ACL are well defined and readily supported;
Clients in every Linux, OS/X or Windows release in active
support [also on my iTouch and related portible devices], so
far as I know; server
-- Forwarded message --
From: centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:00 AM
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
:
:
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update
On 1/22/2010 9:25 AM, fabien faye wrote:
HI,
Postfix easy and power full
sendmail simple
exim useful and powe full
But for me postfix is the best solution and zimbra a good solution if you
don't spent time to create your own groupware mail solution's
That's the first time I've ever heard
On 01/22/2010 05:14 PM, MHR wrote:
1. CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gzip Update (Karanbir Singh)
3. Re: CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update
(Karanbir Singh)
According to
Hi, I am using Centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen.
I've installed a Centos 5.4 (64 bit too) DomU (paravirtualized),
process was apparently with no problems, but DomU refuses to start,
this the error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Dumb question: samba?
I should have stated for customers/vendors as well, across
the wire:)
The webdav approach sounds good, but building doesn't fit the time frame.
I'll look at the other reco's.
Thanks guys,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am using Centos 5.4 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen.
I've installed a Centos 5.4 (64 bit too) DomU (paravirtualized),
process was apparently with no problems, but DomU refuses to start,
this the error:
Samuel Contesse wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have an idee how to add /sbin to the sudo $PATH environment?
Adding /sbin to .bashrc $PATH isn't really what I want...
I'd like sudoers to be able to run:
$ sudo chkconfig
And not:
$ sudo /sbin/chkconfig
Thanks
Sam
I use an alias to handle that. I
Here's an odd one: I installed apcupsd, and it works with most of our
UPSs. I'd swear it worked on this one. Then I replaced the Gin-u-wine APC
batteries, which were dead, with new ones, non-APC. They're just dumb
batteries, no chips or whatever on them.
If I hook it up using a serial cable, I
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Dumb question: samba?
I should have stated for customers/vendors as well, across
the wire:)
The webdav approach sounds good, but building doesn't fit the time frame.
I'll look at the other reco's.
Take a look at knowledgetree - similar to alfresco.
Hi all!
I was scanning my servers with nmap, ( i have installed ssh), and the result
gave me this:
22/tcp open ssh
sshv1: Server Supports SSHv1
ssh-keyhost: 1024 ea:7e:77:b7:a1:78:18:70:6c:46:ee:a0:dd:08:0e:74 (RSA1)
1024
ba:d0:8a:44:16:fc:7c:7a:38:24:2e:72:06:fe:99:56 (DSA)
1024
Hi all!
I was scanning my servers with nmap, ( i have installed ssh), and the
result gave me this:
22/tcp open ssh
sshv1: Server Supports SSHv1
Yes. Turn off sshv1 in the configuration file.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:06 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Dumb question: samba?
I should have stated for customers/vendors as well, across
the wire:)
The webdav approach sounds good, but building doesn't fit the time frame.
I'll look at the other reco's.
webdav is far
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:06 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Dumb question: samba?
I should have stated for customers/vendors as well, across
the wire:)
The webdav approach sounds good, but building doesn't fit the time
On 1/22/2010 1:29 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Craig Whitecraigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 18:06 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Dumb question: samba?
I should have stated for customers/vendors as well, across
the wire:)
The webdav approach sounds
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's an odd one: I installed apcupsd, and it works with most of our
UPSs. I'd swear it worked on this one. Then I replaced the Gin-u-wine APC
batteries, which were dead, with new ones, non-APC. They're just dumb
batteries, no chips or whatever on them.
If I hook it
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's an odd one: I installed apcupsd, and it works with most of our
UPSs. I'd swear it worked on this one. Then I replaced the Gin-u-wine
APC batteries, which were dead, with new ones, non-APC. They're just dumb
batteries, no chips or whatever on them.
If I hook it
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote:
Hoping MyDomain.com will lower the TTL from 3600 to 300 for a few
days, so I can do the testing/migration I need to do a lot faster.
Even if your DNS provider lowers your TTL to 300 it doesn't mean other
peoples
On 01/22/2010 06:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi all!
I was scanning my servers with nmap, ( i have installed ssh), and the
result gave me this:
22/tcp open ssh
sshv1: Server Supports SSHv1
Yes. Turn off sshv1 in the configuration file.
mark
I am trying to run my old CentOS4.8 (32-bit) system as a guest system
under CentOS5.4xen (64-bit). I followed the instructions in Appendix A
of the xen user manual (/usr/share/doc/xen-3.0.3/pdf/user.pdf) and
created a 'disk image' (actually a 10gig LVM logical volume:
sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/22/2010 05:14 PM, MHR wrote:
1. CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gzip Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2010:0061 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gzip Update (Karanbir Singh)
3. Re:
hi all,
this is my first hit on the mailing list. hope i m posting in the right
place.
well, i have a dell vostro 1510 laptop with broadcom wifi adapter. n it
doesnt work! :(
i installed the wifi drivers with ndiswrapper.
iwconfig shows the following.
[r...@laptop ~]# iwconfig
lono
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 12:50 +0530, Arvind P R wrote:
[r...@laptop ~]# cat /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
Failed to read or parse configuration '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf'.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Arvind P R iin...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
this is my first hit on the mailing list. hope i m posting in the right
place.
well, i have a dell vostro 1510 laptop with broadcom wifi adapter. n it
doesnt work! :(
i installed the wifi drivers with ndiswrapper.
66 matches
Mail list logo
