Hello,
RHEL 5.5 has been released, and it contains many Xen related fixes.
Here's the most important of the them.. fixing a dom0 caching bug which
could cause domU disk corruption when the domU disk was accessed from dom0
after the domU was shutdown. Most people noticed this bug when pygrub
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
Hello,
RHEL 5.5 has been released, and it contains many Xen related fixes.
Here's the most important of the them.. fixing a dom0 caching bug which
could cause domU disk corruption when the domU disk was accessed from dom0
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:43:38PM -0400, Grant McWilliams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Pasi KÀrkkÀinen [1]pa...@iki.fi
wrote:
Hello,
RHEL 5.5 has been released, and it contains many Xen related fixes.
Here's the most important of the them.. fixing a
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:28:56PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:43:38PM -0400, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Are these changes in the kernel or changes to the installed Xen? I'm
wondering if this effects anyone using Xen 3.4 or newer.
I think they're mixed.. you
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:19:34AM +1100, Norman Gaywood wrote:
This may be a dumb/FA question but how do you run Xen 3.4+ with the latest
Centos kernel?
And maybe another dumb question...
What's the difference between xen.org's 3.4.x series and Citrix
Xenserver 5.5?
--
rgds
Stephen
My 2 cents:
When Red Hat picks a release of kernel, xen, kvm, etc., they
tweak, change, and test it until its 'enterprise' ready. If
they say you can run a business class server with it, I
believe them. Based solely on how well centos works.
Even though RHEL 5.4 doesn't have the newest of
compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com writes:
When Red Hat picks a release of kernel, xen, kvm, etc., they
tweak, change, and test it until its 'enterprise' ready. If
they say you can run a business class server with it, I
believe them. Based solely on how well centos works.
Even though RHEL 5.4
Hola muy buenas, estoy intentando borrar un directorio de un ftp externo
que tenemos alojado en un hosting y todos los archivos hasta ahora me los
ha borrado bien hasta que me topado con el siguiente problema. Una carpeta
llamada ckfinder, quiero borrarla. Entonces lo que he hecho es montar el
r...@server1:/home/tecnico/Escritorio/comnet/ckfinder/userfiles# ls -lR
.:
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2010-03-31 10:16 images
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2010-03-31 10:16 _thumbs
es muy común con servidores de alojamiento que no manejan correctamente
los usuarios que poseen
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además se le pueden meter
plugins como por ejemplo para cambiar la contraseña via web. Pero oí
hablar muy bien
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además se le pueden meter
plugins como por ejemplo para cambiar la contraseña via web. Pero oí
hablar muy
Prueba con Zimbra.
El 31 de marzo de 2010 12:04, Leonel Nunez lis...@enelserver.com escribió:
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además
Zimbra y Horde
CARLOS BORTOLINI ACURUMO
Ingeniero en Informática
bortol...@gmail.com
Teléfono: +591 347 4546
Móvil: +591 766 69617
Skype: carlos.bortolini.acurumo
Msn: c_bortol...@hotmail.com
Santa Cruz - Bolivia
2010/3/31 Maykel Franco Hernández may...@maykel.es
Hola muy buenas otra vez,
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además se le pueden meter
plugins como por ejemplo para cambiar la contraseña via web. Pero oí
hablar muy
Estimados amigos,
Tengo instalado Qmail + Spamcontrol y necesito limitar la cantidad de envios de
correos por usuario, alguien sabe como hacerlo?
Muchas gracias
Jose Luis
_
Explore the
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 18:13 +0200, Maykel Franco Hernández wrote:
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además se le pueden meter
plugins como
RoundCube, ha mejorado bastante, han integrado LDAP, algo muy bueno para las
soluciones que se aplican actualmente. Lo que le falta mejorar es un poco el
tema de seguridad.
Y aunque tenga que admitirlo, HORDE es un webmail completo y configurable.
Sls
El 31 de marzo de 2010 15:46, Black Hand
El mié, 31-03-2010 a las 18:13 +0200, Maykel Franco Hernández escribió:
Hola muy buenas otra vez, quería comentarles que tengo instalado el
squirrelmail como webmail y demas y va como un tiro, me quedado asombrado
de la velocidad que tiene y de las opciones. Además se le pueden meter
plugins
Estimados amigos,
Quiero aprender todo sobre Centos 5.4. Para empezar nunca he usado Linux
pero creo que nunca es tarde para empezar espero me puedan ayudar a ubicar
un buen manual para empezar de cero
Muchas gracias
Elmer Rabanal Palacios
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
Hi guys,
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo user command
I tried su - command and su -l root command on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how should I do ?
sorry for the disturbance I'm new in RH Linux distro
--
Cordialement, /
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Georghy fu...@wanagain.net wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo user command
I tried su - command and su -l root command on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how should I do ?
sorry for
Kwan Lowe a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Georghy fu...@wanagain.net wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo user command
I tried su - command and su -l root command on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how
Simply plugging in my older Microsoft MultiMedia Keyboad 1.0A and some
crappy old mouse, both of which are wired with PS/2 connectors, resulted
in the problem going away. This kind of sucks because I like using my
keyboard and mouse and I dont intend to leave these old things connected
to my
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote:
dn't mean 512K RAM?)
Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only
address 64K.
:D
I remember some 6502-based systems that used bank switching to access
separate 32K windows... Used it
Tom H a écrit :
I'm searching for a way to have root privileges momentarily
like on ubuntu with the sudo user command
I tried su - command and su -l root command on my CentOS server but
it doesn't work
how should I do ?
sorry for the disturbance I'm new in RH
It seems that all the problem was caused by selinux.
I booted all the nodes with the kernel option selinux=0 and now I can
mount GFS partitions without problems.
Thanks,
Sandra
sandra-llistes wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a GFS expert either :-)
In fact, I erased all the configuration of the cluster
Hi,
I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web access
in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
protect that configuration, e. g. a more knowledgeable user might
circumvent this
On 03/30/2010 09:05 PM William Hooper wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:13 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Without the full yum output it is a bit hard to be sure (you might
want to paste the full output to pastebin.centos.org, but it looks
like:
--- Package gmime.i386 0:2.2.25-1.el5
On 03/30/2010 09:56 PM Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 03/31/2010 08:13 AM, ken wrote:
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: gmime = 2.2.10-5.el5.centos for package:
gmime-sharp
--- Package gmime.i386 0:2.2.25-1.el5 set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
From: Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net
I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web
access in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
protect that configuration, e. g. a more
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:21:32AM -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
I remember some 6502-based systems that used bank switching to access
separate 32K windows... Used it mainly for RAM disks.. Was pretty
impressive to see apps load within a second when 1 to 2 minutes was
the usual wait time.
The BBC
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 12:23 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently configuring Squid and Squidguard for filtering web access
in a public computer room. So far, everything works fine.
I know how to configure Firefox to use a proxy, but there's no way to
protect that
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 23:59 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
No, 512 Byte. Here's one similar :
http://www.computermuseum-mannheim.de/images/pic_g/siemens_8080_1g.jpg
The thing had to be programmed in Assembler using a hex keyboard.
My dad worked at a lab at Siemens and brought one of these
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:30 AM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Available Packages
gmime.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
epel
gmime-devel.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
epel
The newer version of gmime is coming from the epel repo, which doesn't
appear to package
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:58 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
2010/3/30 nate cen...@linuxpowered.net:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Hi all,
do you know if there is a way at boot time do disable specific LUN's on a
SCSI
bus of a particular controller?
What do you need to do this for?
How
JohnS ha scritto:
---
scsi_dev_flags SCSI black/white list.
scsi_dev_flags=vendor:model:flags
This option lets the user add entries to the SCSI black/white list for
a specific vendor and model of device.
Dug it up from my notes. This goes on the kernel boot line.
For what I understand it
cahit Eyigünlü wrote:
i have 2 servers in a datacenter and each of them has 2 virtual machines
one is linux the other is windows of wirtual machines.
when i want to transfer my ip addresses between theese servers , for ex:
let me say
main server 1' guest windows : A
main server 1' guest
I rebuilt my xen host with the 64-bit OS and am in the process of recreating
the guests, both 32 and 64 bit. I use a kickstart installation with
virt-install, and so far none of the installation attempts has completed.
Anaconda indicates installation should take about 2-3 minutes, but when
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:41 +0200, Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
JohnS ha scritto:
---
scsi_dev_flags SCSI black/white list.
scsi_dev_flags=vendor:model:flags
This option lets the user add entries to the SCSI black/white list for
a specific vendor and model of device.
Dug it up from my
I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want CUPS
to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page, I see BrowseAllow,
but the entries are not clear enough for me to understand what they mean.
(Yeah, I know the
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
I rebuilt my xen host with the 64-bit OS and am in the process of recreating
the guests, both 32 and 64 bit. I use a kickstart installation with
virt-install, and so far none of the installation attempts has completed.
Anaconda indicates
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want
CUPS to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page,
I see BrowseAllow, but the entries are not
clear enough for me to
JD wrote
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
I've got a server with multiple virtual interfaces. Now, I only want
CUPS to advertise on *one* - eth0, not eth0:1 or eth0:gad
Looking at the CUPS manual, and cuppsd.conf man page,
I see BrowseAllow, but the entries are not
clear enough
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Janez Kosmrlj postnali...@googlemail.com
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Janez Kosmrlj
postnali...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, i have some old IBM USB touchscreens, that insist on not working
correctly under CentOS. I
Hello list,
[rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 GA Announcement:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2010-March/msg00147.html
And:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.5/html/Release_Notes/
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
Hmmm, didn't see that one. Do you know if you can have more than
one IP - I mean, it should listen on loopback, also.
Yes, the CUPS Manual says: Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
listen on multiple addresses
JD
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello list,
[rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 GA Announcement:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2010-March/msg00147.html
Hmm, that should be:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
Please be patient :)
Is it ready yet?
*grins, ducks and runs*
(patient? me?)
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
Hmmm, didn't see that one. Do you know if you can have more than
one IP - I mean, it should listen on loopback, also.
Yes, the CUPS Manual says: Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
listen on multiple addresses
Well, did that... and no joy,
On 03/31/2010 08:18 AM William Hooper wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:30 AM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Available Packages
gmime.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
epel
gmime-devel.i386 2.2.25-1.el5
epel
The newer version of gmime is coming from
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
Please be patient :)
Is it ready yet?
*grins, ducks and runs*
(patient? me?)
Stay up to date on progress here:
Any one aware of some type of looping macro for rpmbuild instead of
creating an outside script to loop on something like rpmbuild -b[STAGE].
Or anything like a Debugger Stepthrough
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:09 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
# rpm -qi gmime gmime-sharp|grep URL
URL : http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/
URL : http://spruce.sourceforge.net/gmime/
The URL file generally just describes where the original source comes
from, not what
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
Please be patient :)
Is it ready yet?
*grins, ducks and runs*
(patient? me?)
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I didn't see anything jump out at me on the Red Hat site, so -
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
Timo
-BEGIN PGP
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
I didn't think they had, hence no CentOS6.
I have actually just been
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Stuffins
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Release 6?
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope.
On 3/31/2010 12:48 PM, Paul Stuffins wrote:
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
I didn't think they had,
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
At Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:22:05 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
*I* gave up on Fedora Core after FC2: I installed it on a dual Pentium
Pro 200 box
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
_
I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very well (definite
Paul Stuffins a écrit :
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Here's some fresh info:
http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3873916/Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-55-Released-RHEL-6-Coming-Soon.htm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:43:38PM -0400, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
_
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very well (definite
On 3/31/2010 1:58 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
I use F12 on my
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and
On 3/31/2010 2:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers
A lot of the work after Fedora 6 seemed to revolve around making
single-user desktop type access more convenient at the expense of more
general purpose server concepts - and making it boot quickly which isn't
a big priority on boxes that run all the time. And some things even
when not
Bob McConnell wrote:
Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only
address 64K.
indeed.There were exceptions, but yes, this involved 'additional
hardware assistance' in the form of bank switching, or bank mapping.
Altos Computers and others made Z80
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I vaguely recollect that RH mentioned pushing out the (total)
Hi,
I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is
not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a
kernel update so I used virt-manager to reboot. But it won't book. It
shows as not running and when I try to run it I get a dialog box with
this:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
We use F12 headless, so I can't comment on desktop issues, but I
really like the deltarpm stuff. It really cuts down on bandwidth
requirements on a frequently updated distro like Fedora.
Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:18:40PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote:
Hi,
I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is
not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a
kernel update so I used virt-manager to reboot. But it won't book. It
shows as
Spiro Harvey wrote:
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I vaguely recollect that RH
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:14 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's about time someone did that. I completely gave up on Fedora
after version 6 and unsubscribed from the mail list because they were
only interested in changing things and adding features, not making
anything work. Has it become
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the latest version that
will run on it. And
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than
a year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse
is that it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Milos Blazevic milos.blaze...@sbb.rs wrote:
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for
On 3/31/2010 4:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, can
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
When something works right there's not much need to change it. I still
have an RH 7.3 box running that's had a couple of 4-year uptime spans
I hope there's very little internet exposure on that box; even ssh has had
remote
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
setting up Fedora as servers at work.
Well, I love to make people laugh so I'll chime in here.
I do use Fedora for some hosting, and
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
setting up Fedora as servers at work.
I can't imagine such a practice. I use at home only on my desktop for the
bleeding
edge
I run Fedora on servers at home without any issues.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 31/03/10 17:11, Ned Slider wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:24:20PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
And yes, CentOS team does know about this, and is working on CentOS 5.5.
Stay up to date on progress here:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:
If the accident accidentally involves a circular saw, a YouTube link
would be really cool! :-)
You know you use Reddit too much when you look for an upvote button.
;)
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos
Hey
Could everyone please proofread and add last changes to the Newsletter[1].
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
--
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
http://contact.ribalba.de
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 3/31/2010 10:30 PM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
Hey
Could everyone please proofread and add last changes to the Newsletter[1].
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
Went to [1] - got this:
* Newsletter
* 1002
You are not allowed to view this page.
Link
On 01/04/2010 03:41, David Goldsmith wrote:
Went to [1] - got this:
* Newsletter
* 1002
You are not allowed to view this page.
Link to prior post works - http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1001
Yes, I am sorry. This is just for the editors I sent it to the wrong
list. That
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:04:10PM +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
Thank you.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=send+email+via+python
;-)
Ray
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
One approach
step 1: make sure packages 'expect' and 'telnet' are installed
step 2: read: man
Hi
I am new to CentOS and been into Linux for about 3 months now. I first
started off with fedora and also trying my hands on CentOS now.
Basically i used yum to download softwares on the fedora box. I mainly
require the snmp agent for my linux boxes so as to test my network
management
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
Thank you.
But of course, just cause the smtp server you are pointed at initially
is local, interpret that as 127.0.0.1. So point to
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 12:04 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
I use this:
http://www.cleancode.org/projects/email
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
97 matches
Mail list logo
