On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Timo Schoeler
timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi (Ralph),
I'd like to edit my personal page (would be nice to link images from
here to the interview); could you please grant me the appropriate
permissions?
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:19:34AM +1100, Norman Gaywood wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:28:56PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:43:38PM -0400, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Are these changes in the kernel or changes to the installed Xen? I'm
wondering if this
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:08:42AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:29:51PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:19:34AM +1100, Norman Gaywood wrote:
This may be a dumb/FA question but how do you run Xen 3.4+ with the latest
Centos kernel?
Hola amigo, yo te recomendaria que vayas a la pagina de centos.org, ahi en
los menus desplegables buscas information luego documentation y escoges
centos 5.x, ahi hay manuales, y son buenos por q son oficiales:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
solo q estan en english, pero no es muy dificil de
2010/4/1 Edgar Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com:
Hola amigo, yo te recomendaria que vayas a la pagina de centos.org, ahi en
los menus desplegables buscas information luego documentation y escoges
centos 5.x, ahi hay manuales, y son buenos por q son oficiales:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
solo q
Sendmail en los log esta arrojando
grew worklist for var spool mqueue
Alguna sugerencia ?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Gracias Eduardo estàn muy buenas las imagenes ya puedo hacer las portadas
para mis discos
Algo màs instale en una pequeña maquina con CentOS 5.2 en modo consola y
tengo pensado montar un server web con joomla 1.5.15 nada todavia estoy en
el proseso de configuracion pero ahi voy luchando a paso
Amigos necesito ayuda, agardeciendo de natemano su respuesta, ya que un user
esta q me dice q linux no pasa nada, nunca me habia apsado, trate de instalr
linux fedora, que es de la misma familia de centos, en una maquina q tiene
windows xp, pues lo normal es q grub arranq y nos muestre las
2010/4/1 jorgito jorg...@alimatic.cu:
a la hora de montar un dispositivo USB como una memoria me perdi si alguien
me
pudiera ayudar.
Por defecto debería montarse solo. Insertas el pen drive y debería
aparecer debajo de /media (el mío queda en /media/KINGSTON).
Si no es así, busca cuál es el
2010/4/1 Edgar Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com:
Amigos necesito ayuda, agardeciendo de natemano su respuesta, ya que un user
esta q me dice q linux no pasa nada, nunca me habia apsado, trate de instalr
linux fedora, que es de la misma familia de centos, en una maquina q tiene
windows xp, pues lo
Jatin Davey wrote:
http://centos.corenetworks.net/5.3/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
...
odd that its using /5.3/ in the path, it should be just /5/
try
yum clean
then try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
It's going to have an accident, pretty soon, pretty
soon.
Steve
aah!... does anybody smell a BOFH here ;)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/odds/bofh/
Regards,
Thanks John.
Actually had to use yum clean all and then used yum to install the
net-snmp package and it worked great.
Good to go with my testing.
Appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks
Jatin
On 4/1/2010 11:39 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Jatin Davey wrote:
http://www.rdpslides.com/webresources/FAQ00035.htm
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not have
centralized authentication or sudo or the same room password. I tried
doing this with expect and su - but the script fails or acts funny.
Please advise me or tell me where I need to look...
Thanks and regards,
Bazy
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
have you checked man newusers?
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
Yes, the CUPS Manual says:
Multiple Listen directives can be provided to
listen on multiple addresses
Well, did that... and no joy, from another box, I can still
telnet to the server on one of the virtual IPs, port 631.
I can't really play around
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
have you checked man newusers?
Regards,
Rajagopal
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Raja. My problem is connecting to those 200 servers and su-ing
in, they all have different root passwords.
If you have _that_ kind of infrastructure you are better off using a
Directory server too.
If you have
On 03/31/2010 09:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
...
Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to build up
the new rpms from the deltarpms compared to just downloading the new rpms
as full packages :)
I've noticed that too on my eee 901 with a slow flash disk.
yum remove
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I
Bazy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
raju.rajs...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not
have you checked man newusers?
Regards,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Unfortunately I have to add 2 users on 200 servers that do not have
centralized authentication or sudo or the same room password. I tried
doing this with expect and su - but the script fails or acts funny.
Please
dear all,
i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always turn to
webmin..
though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through cli instead of
relying on webmin as i said..
especially System and Server Status
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to send mail from CLI (bash, python) without any LOCAL
SMTP installed, using SMTP on another machine.
Care to give a glimpse of the code?
Thank you.
Personally, I'd use the default Centos install of sendmail because it's there,
it's easy, and it
I'm not surprised at the delay for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still
supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right
now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x
before spitting out another version.
On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On
Short of finding some remotely exploitable vulnerability, you'll have
to visit each server and login. Imagine if you *could* create IDs
without root authority? :D
Are the servers identically configured?
If you can login remotely as root you can automate some of them via
expect. What
Am 31.03.2010 18:47, schrieb MHR:
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I didn't see anything jump
Having list issues..sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
I guess that they are well informed, so this supports the idea that
Fedora 12 will be the basis for RHEL 6.
[1]
From: Roland RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com
i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always
turn to webmin..
though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through
cli instead of relying on webmin as i said..
Hey
As you all might know the new Newsletter is now online [1].
I just want to thank all the people that have helped and contributed
again. This is what makes the C in CentOS :)
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/Latest
--
Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger
http://contact.ribalba.de
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for
Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was too
conservative, given the somewhat
On Apr 1, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Bazy baz...@gmail.com wrote:
Short of finding some remotely exploitable vulnerability, you'll have
to visit each server and login. Imagine if you *could* create IDs
without root authority? :D
Are the servers identically configured?
If you can login remotely as
They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
get into contract liability if they did).
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
RHEL5 will go out of
If you have your own account on each of the boxes the ssh key method is
the best.
1) Create ssh keys for YOUR unprivileged user account.
2) Add YOUR account to /etc/sudoers by adding: userALL=NOPASSWD:
/bin/su -
Then from there you can use clusterssh to connect to all the boxes
On 4/1/2010 10:14 AM, R-Elists wrote:
They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
get into contract liability if they did).
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb
On 4/1/2010 9:11 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was too
conservative, given the somewhat outdated software. I told him not to
mind, since Debian is bleeding edge compared to my OS of choice.
Maybe your friend needs another distro, of course everyone knows
it's
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
How many people got trampled in the rush?
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
on 4-1-2010 6:42 AM Benjamin Franz spake the following:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years,
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May
31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
Since the world will end in 2012, your version 5 installs
will be just fine!!!
LOL
Scott,
hehehe, do you mean
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing between releases, skipping a version
On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing
Hi,
As the number of hosts increases, it's getting harder to keep track of what
packages have been installed on each host using yum or rpm.
So I am wondering if there's an existing application that helps you keep track
of what packages installed on each host. Thanks.
Hi,
From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP changes from
central LDAP server to a secondary LDAP server.
So in other words, you can have your second LDAP server pull the db
based on either;
type=refreshOnly
which mean the pull interval will happen when ever you specify or;
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
How many people got trampled in the rush?
You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Yungwei Chen yung...@resolvity.com wrote:
Hi,
As the number of hosts increases, it's getting harder to keep track of what
packages have been installed on each host using yum or rpm.
So I am wondering if there's an existing application that helps you keep
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Manikowski r...@devision.us wrote:
If you have your own account on each of the boxes the ssh key method is
the best.
1) Create ssh keys for YOUR unprivileged user account.
2) Add YOUR account to /etc/sudoers by adding: user ALL=NOPASSWD:
/bin/su -
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:36 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP changes from
central LDAP server to a secondary LDAP server.
So in other words, you can have your second LDAP server pull the db
based on either;
At Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:29:26 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of
On 4/1/2010 8:06 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
dear all,
i can't count the times that webmin came to my rescue.
whenever i face a dead end in doing something through CLI i always turn to
webmin..
though at the moment i wanna learn how to do things through cli instead of
relying on webmin as i
Thanks Craig,
Do you have multiple secondary LDAPs using slurpd?
Its is pushing or pulling?
I may just use that.
- Brian
On Apr 1, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:36 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From what I gather, OpenLDAP on Centos 5.x pulls LDAP
On 4/1/2010 1:35 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing
slurpd is a push technology and yes, I have multiple 'slaves' on slurpd.
Craig
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:50 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Craig,
Do you have multiple secondary LDAPs using slurpd?
Its is pushing or pulling?
I may just use that.
- Brian
On Apr 1, 2010, at
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:44 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and nobody including
me likes to take *everything* down at once though we did have
such an outage a few weeks ago
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
CentOSPlus has the firewire drivers...
I asked about this a little while back, and I'm pretty sure the
firewire drivers are ok in the non-plus CentOS.
Or did I get that one wrong?
mhr
Hi Craig,
Will the below config allow me to push using slurp... to the d that is;
primary ldap slapd.conf;
replica uri=ldap://ldap.dns.name:389
binddn=cn=replicauser,dc=domain,dc=name bindmethod=simple
credentials=passofreplicauser
secondarie{s} ldap slapd.conf;
updatedn
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 17:25 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Will the below config allow me to push using slurp... to the d that is;
primary ldap slapd.conf;
replica uri=ldap://ldap.dns.name:389
binddn=cn=replicauser,dc=domain,dc=name bindmethod=simple
MHR wrote:
but I just don't like to do it. 30 systems? Yoik!
Out of ~300 ..
As for moving from 4 to 5, that's not a trivial thing at all - and
it's not an upgrade per se unless you have LOTS of faith in the
process. I always reinstall across releases, and that's a royal pain
(though
Hi
I wanted to download and install the net-snmp package. Usually on my
other CentOS boxes i use the following command to do it:
yum install net-snmp
I was able to successfully install net-snmp on 4 of my CentOS boxes but
not on one of them. It reports me the following error message:
These are my contents of the CentOS-Base.repo file:
[r...@localhost yum.repos.d]# vi CentOS-Base.repo
#released updates
[updates]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=updates
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jatin Davey jasho...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi
I wanted to download and install the net-snmp package. Usually on my
other CentOS boxes i use the following command to do it:
yum install net-snmp
I was able to successfully install net-snmp on 4 of my CentOS boxes
Hi Kwan
I executed the following on the host that was having problem:
[r...@localhost yum.repos.d]# wget http://www.google.com
--22:14:25-- http://www.google.com/
Resolving www.google.com... 74.125.19.105, 74.125.19.99, 74.125.19.106, ...
Connecting to www.google.com|74.125.19.105|:80...
Ok, i figured out the issue , Did some google on it and found this
useful link on usage of proxy.
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-set-proxy-environment-variable/
Thanks Kwan , Thanks kwan for questioning me on the proxy usage.
Thanks
Jatin
On 4/2/2010 10:51 AM, Jatin Davey wrote:
Hi
2010/4/2 Jatin Davey jasho...@cisco.com
Ok, i figured out the issue , Did some google on it and found this
useful link on usage of proxy.
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-unix-set-proxy-environment-variable/
or even better:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/yum/sn-yum-proxy-server.html
67 matches
Mail list logo
