On 8 April 2010 18:40, Michael Convey smcon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is user MichaelConvey. I would like to add a section under
TipsAndTricks/Filesystem Tips called Configuring Automount in Gnome for USB
Drives. The content will include something like the following:
1) yum install
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I have just finished my Spanish translation of the last
Newsletter. As I have no edit rights to the proper zone,
Where would that be - in your opinion?
Ralph
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Michael Convey smcon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is user MichaelConvey. I would like to add a section under
TipsAndTricks/Filesystem Tips called Configuring Automount in Gnome for USB
Drives.
You can have http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/GnomeAutomount
Hey Eduardo
On 03/04/2010 01:40, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Hello, I have just finished my Spanish translation of the last
Newsletter. As I have no edit rights to the proper zone, I have
written it into my own personal page
http://wiki.centos.org/EduardoGrosclaude. Please some elder member of
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume we should be keeping the
Hola,
Por curiosidad ¿cual es el motivo de elegir pureftp en lugar de
vsftpd? El segundo está en el repositorio oficial de CentOS.
http://vsftpd.beasts.org/
--
Oscar Osta Pueyo
oostap.lis...@gmail.com
_kiakli_
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Estimados amigos,
Tengo instalatado un servidor de correo con CentOS 4.8 + Qmail + Spamcontrol +
Simscan + SpamAssassin + ClamAV.
Mi intencion es limitar la cantidad de recipientes (rcpt to) por envio por
parte de mis usuarios (A traves de Thunderbird, Outlook, etc).
Es posible esto?
Estuve
Hola listeros.
De antemano les agradezco mucho por tomarse la molestia de leer el correo,
así no puedan ayudarme.
El día de hoy me comunico con ustedes por que tengo un proyecto que tengo
que hacer y quisiera que ustedes me dieran las orientaciones iniciales.
Tengo un servidor centos que
Samuel :
Si, claro ke es posible, podrias montar el hd del server 2 al server 1 y
ke este haga todo el proceso. Si estan en red lo puedes hacer mediante samba
o mediante ssh con sftp sin problemas.
A) Si usas samba entonces yo lo haria asi en /etc/fstab :
mount -t cifs -o
El 08/04/10 16:20, xOChilpili escribió:
Samuel :
Si, claro ke es posible, podrias montar el hd del server 2 al
server 1 y ke este haga todo el proceso. Si estan en red lo puedes
hacer mediante samba o mediante ssh con sftp sin problemas.
A) Si usas samba entonces yo lo haria asi en
Eyy!!!.. muchisimas gracias por la info!!!...
falto poner algo que aclara una de tus propuestas... y es que el server 1
(ldap) estará montado en una maquina virtual, por eso no tiene espacio en el
disco duro, y por eso es necesario llevarlo todo por red a otro equipo.
Una duda que se me genera
Hola a t...@s,
compre el ordenador y tiene la placa la controladora raid intel matrix
storage manager ich10R, que por lo visto no hay drivers para centoso
¿estoy equivocado?
--
___
REPARACIONONLINE
GARANTIA PARA SU PC
Hey
As some of you might know the new Newsletter [1] has a section
Desktop-Shots. Now I need YOU to send me your desktops so I can put them
online.
Please obfuscate personal details.
Looking forward to seeing your funky workplaces.
Cheers Didi
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1002
--
I have configured my vsftpd instances to use virtual users and map them
to a system user. So all uploads should be written with owner and group
of this system user (let's call it ftpsystemuser).
But in the the last weeks/months it appears that uploads are written
twice, on instance as it
Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
It really
is as simple as I wrote out earlier, multiple servers ssh a background job
at
nearly the same time consisting of an rsync command. The destination host
for
this target gets overwhelmed with more than one at a time...
This isn't a
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
answers you want. This is unfriendly, please stop this! And spare lame
excuses.
Did you
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill,
but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque,
or Condor (there are quite a few other schedulers out there). If
JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 07:33 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Are you looking for a real job scheduler? If so, it might be overkill,
but you might want to look into software like Sun Grid Engine, Torque,
or Condor (there are quite a few other schedulers out
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 07:34 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
A very long time ago I did some generic job queueing stuff by hooking scripts
into the unix lpr print spooler which had the advantage that they could be
submitted from windows boxes through samba by going through the motions of
Kai,
Am 08.04.10 12:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
answers you want. This is unfriendly,
where to fidn the rpm package
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
epel repo afaik
On 04/08/2010 04:42 PM, mattias wrote:
where to fidn the rpm package
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
This isn't a complete answer, but a possible approach: I'd use a named pipe
on the destination host. Here's a little experiment to demonstrate.
[u...@dhost temp]$ mkfifo pipe
[u...@dhost temp]$ while true ; do ` pipe` ; done
Now, in another xterm:
[u...@dhost temp]$ echo date pipe
[u...@dhost
Hi,
I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
dhcpd.conf.
Here's a few stanzas of my dhcpd.conf :
host babasse{
Hi Les,
White space could be a tab. '[[:space:]]CP_' should work, but why not use sed
and be done with it.
ah, worked!. I was thinking way to much into this. I thought that I had to
ignore what I didn't want, but in thie case what I dont want does not have a
space so it would not show up
Niki Kovacs wrote:
How comes these machines never appear in dhcpd.leases ? Do the
respective leases only find their way into /var/log/messages ?
I'd expect because the addresses are hard coded, there is no
reason to keep track of them. the leases file from what I understand
is used to
From: Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net
I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
dhcpd.conf.
How comes these machines
Hey guys,
messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
#!/bin/bash
mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
exec 42 /var/spool/my_fifo
while true
do
while read -t 5 data 42
do
echo data is ($data)
done
echo read again
done
What happens to
I ran into this issue on a busy vtund server, it would eventually
deadlock networking
After some detective work it appears to be as a result of this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541224
The bug report has a patch, I applied it to the kernel source and
rebuilt a new kernel RPM
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This isn't a complete answer, but a possible approach: I'd use a named pipe
on the destination host. Here's a little experiment to demonstrate.
[u...@dhost temp]$ mkfifo pipe
[u...@dhost temp]$ while true ; do ` pipe` ; done
Now, in another xterm:
[u...@dhost
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:57 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Hey guys,
messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
#!/bin/bash
mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
exec 42 /var/spool/my_fifo
while true
do
while read -t 5 data 42
do
echo data
I have used lokkit to setup iptables ( I have a big script that does
this) basically just ports I want with --port=https:tcp etc...
I wish to allow igmp and add igmp to the lokkit command line?
How do I do that?
I can add this to /etc/sysconfig/iptables:
iptables -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i
On 04/08/2010 10:57 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Hey guys,
messing around with a snippet from a mailing list post,
#!/bin/bash
mkfifo -m 666 /var/spool/my_fifo
exec 42 /var/spool/my_fifo
while true
do
while read -t 5 data42
do
echo data is ($data)
Works fine for me. Define short while (to a geologist, that could be a
few millenia). What is the exit code when your script does terminate?
Lol, yeah that was a little weak on my part...
It ran for about a minute.
I am not sure what caused the non 0 exit, I made a new condition based
on a
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:02 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith step...@atalanta-systems.com
I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
get could not open session if I try
Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly on
Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server will be
a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My plan is to
have this server in a 2003 Server's network receiving a DHCP address
OK, I just found this
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=13144
Which says that you cannot use unlimited for nofile
It says to do this
*softnofile 63536
*hardnofile 63536
or more realistically to do this :
*
On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
on Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server
will be a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My
plan is to have this server in a 2003
Sorry for the frequent updates - but I also found this :
http://gnufreakz.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/increase-ulimit-in-centos/
which talks about setting
“fs.file-max = 65536″
in sysctl.conf
Does it have to be set in both sysctl.conf and the /etc/security/limits.conf?
If so, why?
thanks,
On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
on Windows Server 2003. For simplicity's sake, the only non-2003 server
will be a CentOS 5.4 server running only vsftpd, httpd, and mysqld. My
plan is to have this server in a
On 4/8/2010 9:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a DHCP server on my local network. I've noticed something
that puzzles me. Leases are written to /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, but
only - so it seems to me - if the address is not fixed in any way in
dhcpd.conf.
Here's a few stanzas of
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press kit
so you may want to consider to elaborate on that a
Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by 2003 would be?
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On 4/8/2010 1:57 PM, David Lemcoe wrote:
Hello all. I'm in the process of making a small server farm based mostly
on
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press kit
so you may want to consider to elaborate on that a
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:26:54 -0400 m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Me, I like the idea although I doubt it's really necessary.
Actually, it's probably a good idea. That way, the next time someone
using CentOS at work has to deal with the press - and there are folks
who do - they can
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:26 +0200:
Since the source is no way to go
Try harder. I'm sure you'll get a response sooner or later. You could also
bug it at both the CentOS and RHEL bugzilla. You will need to give clear
reproduction instructions.
Kai
--
Get your web at
On 4/8/10 1:26 PM, David Lemcoe fo...@lemcoe.com wrote:
Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
Anyone have an idea what the limitations put forth by 2003 would be?
First, please stop top posting. This list has rules about that
Second, can you ping _from the managed switch handling
On 4/8/2010 3:26 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:43:33 +0100 Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
Now comes my question, what do people think should belong in
such a kit. Do you think this is needed?
Most peope are probably not even familiar with the concept of a press kit
so you
On 08/04/2010 21:40, Les Mikesell wrote:
But how can you describe it without mentioning the Large North American
Linux vendor that mostly makes it what it is?
That is a problem I often encounter. For the Newsletter I asked someone
working for the vendor if it would be Ok [1]. Nothing official
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
riba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Looking at the Fedora ML there is some commotion about a Press Kit [1]
they are constructing. I am thinking about doing something like this
for CentOS. Now comes my question, what do people think should belong
Please verify the network cable from centos or switch port(broken or vlan).
João Rodrigues
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Gary Greene ggre...@minervanetworks.comwrote:
On 4/8/10 1:26 PM, David Lemcoe fo...@lemcoe.com wrote:
Checked the firewall, and set the static IP.
Anyone have an
On 08/04/2010 22:54, Brian Mathis wrote:
The correct people to ask (or at least research) are the Press. It's
not a matter of what the CentOS project wants, it's a matter of what
the Press would want, and then it's up to the CentOS project to
answer/provide the content they feel represents
52 matches
Mail list logo
