Phil Schaffner wrote:
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 05/26/2010 10:37 AM:
...
# kernel /vmlinuz ro root=LABEL=/ vnc vncconnect=192.168.15.2
ip=dhcp upgradeany lang=en_US keymap=us
method=http://192.168.15.40/mrepo/centos5-x86_64/disc1/ ksdevice=link
Will be glad to add your
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 05/27/2010 08:22 AM:
...
My example is adequate (and used) for remote upgrades (hence the
upgradeany from the kernel line) rather than fresh installs.
I don't doubt that it works, but still wonder if the root= is a NOP.
___
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:30 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Proposed new page for comment:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallFromGRUB
Phil
I suggest adding links to some supporting documentation. For example,
you could add a prerequisites section saying this technique or trick
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010-0410
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0410.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
acc3dbc8de0744fc10887b5b97994f89
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010-0410
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0410.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
d970499effd032897c90099750df1bac
On 05/27/2010 12:21 PM, Aleksei Miheev wrote:
Is it typo?
There can be no subnet with /32 bit mask, it's single host only.
Actually, it is possible:
ip addr add xxx.yyy.zzz.215/32 dev eth0
ip route add xxx.yyy.zzz.193 dev eth0
ip route add default via xxx.yyy.zzz.193
Of course you can do
2010/5/27 Veiko Kukk ve...@ekp.ee:
On 05/27/2010 12:21 PM, Aleksei Miheev wrote:
Is it typo?
There can be no subnet with /32 bit mask, it's single host only.
Actually, it is possible:
ip addr add xxx.yyy.zzz.215/32 dev eth0
ip route add xxx.yyy.zzz.193 dev eth0
ip route add default via
Has anyone had any success getting WinXP 32bit to use 4 CPU's under
Centos 5.5 KVM?
I have tried everything and the best I can get is 2 CPU's. I tried
everything listed here
http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/running-windows-smp-guests I am using
the VIRTIO drivers.
Is this known
Has anyone had any success getting WinXP 32bit to use 4 CPU's
under Centos 5.5 KVM?
I have tried everything and the best I can get is 2 CPU's. I
tried everything listed here
http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/running-windows-smp-guests
I am using
the VIRTIO drivers.
Is
I think he means cores. And XP will see and use 4 cores.
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Estimados:
Tengo un problema con iptables, les comento lo que deseo realizar, tengo un
firewall en iptables el cual ha estado funcionando perfectamente con la ip
asociada (200.10.10.1). ahora desean publicar un servidor web y un server de
correo el cual esta asociado a otra ip (200.10.10.2)la
Hola amigo solo para comentarles que mi problema ya quedo, lo que pasa
es que en esta version no venia ningun named.conf predefinido y lo saque
con la herramienta grafica system-config-bind, el cual como les comento
me creo un archivo nuevo named.conf virgen, al cual solo le agregue mis
zonas,
hola a todos
Estoy intentano intalar el pure ya lo intente por alcance libre y agregue un
repo pero aun asi no instala el pure tb probe por tar y no tengo respuesta
alguna alguien podria ayudarme por favorestoy intentanto hacer un ftp con
usuarios virtuales.
amigos necesito de su ayuda, tengo en mi equipo unas rutas que me sirven
para poder llegar a conectarme remotamente a una aplicacion web que esta
fuera de mi sede:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
101.11.5.14192.168.0.222 255.255.255.255 UGH 0
2010/5/27 Jose Bonilla jose.bonilla.ch...@gmail.com:
amigos necesito de su ayuda, tengo en mi equipo unas rutas que me sirven
para poder llegar a conectarme remotamente a una aplicacion web que esta
fuera de mi sede:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
2010/5/27 victor santana reparaciononl...@gmail.com:
Hola a t...@s, a ver si alguien puede darme alguna idea al respecto.
Resulta que mi servidor de correo con varios dominios, cada uno con su ip,
no deja entrar correos de hotmail, terra,yahoo, pero de gmail si deja.
Bien, ni siquiera sale en
Yo tengo 3 conexiones a internet balanceadas, te recomiendo mires:
http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html
Al final instalé esta utilidad que me resulta mucho más amigable de
configurar que iptables.
El 27 de mayo de 2010 00:13, Jaime Aguirre jaime.aguirr...@gmail.comescribió:
Estimados:
Tengo
Hi,
First, I would like to apologize for the out-of-topic post. I will keep
this as short as I possibly could.
Does anybody know Dr. Francis T. Seow, the former Solicitor-General from
the Republic of Singapore? I want to contact him but can't seem to find
his email address or telephone number
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:37 AM, James Corteciano
ja...@linux-source.org wrote:
Is it possible that the output after doing logrotate could be like the below
sample. All compressed logs will be keep until 6 months only. I know there
is man page / docs in internet but I can't get the exact
Dear Christopher,
I have sent countless emails to many governmental, non-governmental and
international organizations in the world with the subject Plea for
Medical Help/Assistance. But surprisingly I get very few replies. Maybe
the replies have been deleted or the emails I sent have been
Assistance Requested in Looking for Dr Francis T. Seow, Harvard Law
School Research Fellow
Maybe you should start by contacting Harvard? This is a list for
CentOS users, have you ever seen this fellow on here before? Maybe you
should search the archives first? I noticed you also posted this
Dear James,
I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
medical plea.
On 05/27/2010 06:24 PM, James Bensley wrote:
Assistance Requested in Looking for Dr Francis T. Seow, Harvard Law
School Research Fellow
Maybe you should start by contacting Harvard? This is a
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) writes:
Dear James,
I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
medical plea.
You also sent to openbsd-misc and who knows where, so by definition, you
are a spammer. Go away.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) writes:
Dear James,
I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
medical plea.
You also sent to openbsd-misc and who knows where, so by definition, you
On 27 May 2010 11:35, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
space.time.unive...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear James,
I apologize but I am really not spamming. I am really sending a genuine
medical plea.
But this isn't a genuine medical forum, someone has lied to you, the
same goes for all the other lists
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:42:48PM +0400, Sevana Oy wrote:
Overview
unsubscribed
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B
pgphaa8x1iReB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:49:30PM +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
Hi,
First, I would like to apologize for the out-of-topic post. I will keep
this as short as I possibly could.
unsubscribed
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
Ryan and Paul...
Thank you for your suggestions and help I was able to track it down to
three separate things: an improper ACL, nscd, and iptables. Everything is
working fine now. Again, thanks for your insight!
--
Andy Akins
Director of Development
NICUSA, Tennessee A Partnership with
I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
core,
however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
Is the OS only using a single core?
jerry
--
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 17
model : 3
model name
On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
[...]
The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by
the *practical* observation that I have had existing systems broken by
SELinux multiple times on the mere handful of
JohnS wrote:
For others that are saying it want update the boot config then you may
have something wrong somewhere because it should plain out update it.
We know that it should update the boot config. And under most
circumstances, it does. The problem is that under some conditions,
while
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
core,
however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
Is the OS only using a single core?
Check the BIOS, I have seen HP desktops that have option in BIOS to turn
How many processors are shown in your process monitor/activity monitor?
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ - There are only 10 kinds of people in
the world, those who understand trinary, those who don't understand
trinary and those who don't understand trinary.
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are
On 5/27/2010 9:25 AM, James Bensley wrote:
How many processors are shown in your process monitor/activity monitor?
In order to view the number of cpu's in top, press the '1' key. You will
then see cpu0, cpu1, cpu2, etc. if there is more than 1 core detected.
Ryan Manikowski
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 05:55 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
[...]
The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by
the *practical* observation that I have had existing systems
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
// core,
// however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
//
// Is the OS only using a single core?
/
Check the BIOS, I have seen HP desktops that have option
Thanks for all suggestions ~ ^-^
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
sync wrote:
Thanks for all suggestions ~ ^-^
So, don't leave us hanging by suspenders, tell us what you've decided on!
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Looked in the BIOS and there was no setting.
Top is only showing 1 CPU.
What kernel are you running? 'uname -a' output?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
lists-centos wrote:
Original Message
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:38:34 AM -0400
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo
shows Dual
Jerry Geis wrote:
lists-centos wrote:
Original Message
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:38:34 AM -0400
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com
On 05/27/2010 03:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo
On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows Dual
core,
however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
Is the OS only using a single core?
jerry
What's the status of ACPI?
Is it enabled in the bios? Is the acpi
From: Ned Slider
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:16
Subject: Re: [CentOS] question on CPU
On 05/27/2010 01:47 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have centos 5.4 on an HP laptop, as below the /proc/cpuinfo shows
Dual core, however, there is only 1 processor listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
Is the OS
Hi Alexander,
thanks for replying, here's my current multipath.conf:
defaults {
user_friendly_names yes
}
blacklist {
devnode ^(ram|raw|loop|fd|md|dm-|sr|scd|st)[0-9]*
devnode ^(hd|xvd|vd)[a-z]*
wwid *
}
blacklist_exceptions {
wwid
Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in module:
type/attribute zos_remote_t
libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed
semodule: Failed!
Any ideas as to what's going on, or why?
mark
On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever
touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on
non-production machines.
...
Now back to fixing the SELinux configuration on a machine I had to put
in 'permissive' mode
On 27.5.2010 18.49, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Duplicate declaration in module:
type/attribute zos_remote_t
Have you seen this (though it is a couple of years old):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467026
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki *
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration in
module:
type/attribute zos_remote_t
libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed
Hello,
since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
mails in a conversation (like in a typical CentOS mailing list
thread).
Did anyone
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote:
Hello,
since I upgraded from CentOS x86_64 5.4 to 5.5, I noticed that Firefox
has become significantly slower on GMail (or Google Apps Mail).
The page becomes slow to scroll as soon as there are more than a few
mails
On 05/27/2010 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever
touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on
non-production machines.
...
Now back to fixing the
I am now running stock centos 5.5 x86_64.
jerry
Sorry
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:08:30 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If so, you may
have been affected by this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
There is a workaround which solved the problem for me.
Thanks for the hint!
I
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:16:45 -0500
From: Andy Akins a...@egovtn.org
Subject: [CentOS] Having trouble with LDAP Authentication...
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Message-ID: c821a86d.754b%a...@egovtn.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I?ve google and
What's the status of ACPI?
Is it enabled in the bios? Is the acpi service installed and running?
I see nothing in the bios for ACPI which is odd.
in /proc/acpi/processor there is a CPU0 and CPU1
the info file shows process id: 0 and 1 in each file.
So it looks like its there but
I am looking for a recommendation for a vinyl sign letter cutter that is
supporrted under Linux, specifically Centos. My knowledge of these
machines is nil, but a bit of googling makes it appear that at least
some of them can be made to work using Inkscape.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
Postfix 2.3.3 that comes with RH/CentOS is very old, there are lots of
new features in newer versions that appear to be very useful (revised
queue manager with better scheduler as far back as v2.5, etc.).
Latest stable version is 2.7. I was looking for RPM packages and I've
found this site:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Baudier
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:33 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox slower on GMail since update to
CentOS 5.5
I had somewhat similar
Running postfix 2.7.0 on about 7 machines with CentOS 5.5 from source
works just fine. Extremely happy with it serving up all sorts of
mail. Running it with dovecot 1.2.11 and having a blast.
--Rohan
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
Postfix 2.3.3
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
so, you may
have been affected by this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
There is a workaround which
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see:
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote:
Les wrote:
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
so, you may have been affected by this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4335
There is a workaround
On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les wrote:
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
I had somewhat similar problems. This is a shot in the dark, but do
you happen to have a Nvidia controller in your system? If
so, you may have been affected by this bug:
nvidia is not fond of the Linux world (compared to ATI).
A more realistic way to say that is that linux is
intentionally incompatible with a lot of other software.
AIUI, nvidia gives (to the linux world) less information about how to
exploit nvidia capabilities than does ATI, and that
On 5/27/2010 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les wrote:
On 5/27/2010 1:00 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
snip
Thanks for the hint!
I tried the workaround but unfortunately I still have the problem...
I cured my nvidia driver problems (which re-arose every kernel update
or re-compile) by
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
own drivers for Linux.
Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
impossible to use such
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ah, no, it's not. Brian had it right: nvidia does keep a lot
proprietary, and does *not* pay a lot of attention to writing their
own drivers for Linux.
Exactly - and it is linux that intentionally makes it difficult to
impossible to use such
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
difficult to impossible? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
the other unices. It's not M$, and
On 5/27/2010 2:06 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
difficult to impossible? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
the other unices. It's not M$, and it's not Apple... so is being neither
making it hard?
For one thing, the
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 14:08, Steve Snyder swsny...@snydernet.net wrote:
In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The
Samba
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Updating a system from CentOS 5.4
On 5/27/2010 2:47 PM, MHR wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/27/2010 1:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, I don't understand what you wrote. How does Linux make it
difficult to impossible? It's an o/s, with POSIX calls, just like all
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 04:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM,
On 05/27/2010 04:09 PM, Vnpenguin wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 14:08, Steve Snyderswsny...@snydernet.net wrote:
In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from
using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages,
mostly because the newer version was
I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
disallow relaying.
I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
Based on this:
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
I added|:
FEATURE(relay_hosts_only)
to my sendmail.mc file and
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
disallow relaying.
I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
Based on this:
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
I added|:
On 5/27/2010 4:16 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
I think my sendmail is not correctly set. It says the default is to
disallow relaying.
I am running centos 4.8 and I think sendmail is relaying for anything.
Based on this:
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk-89f.html#RELAYING
I added|:
I
was planning to evaluate devical, but have not tried it yet:
href=http://www.davical.org/; target=_blank
http://www.davical.org/
I would welcome comments from anyone with
experience with devical.
DAViCal is excellent. Perhaps more at home on a Debian based disty, but can be
CentOS 4.8
Hi All:
We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
problem that I am having now is that the failed drive had ceased
responding to SCSI commands and we have since rebooted the system
which
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
CentOS 4.8
Hi All:
We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
problem that I am having now is that the failed drive
From: Brian Mathis Sent: May 27, 2010 15:27
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank
h...@forsoft.com wrote:
I know that I can just reboot the system and kudzu will add the tape
drive back in during the boot process however I was wondering if it
would be possible to manually
On 5/27/2010 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
CentOS 4.8
Hi All:
We recently had a Sony SDX-500V tape drive fail on one of our servers
running CentOS 4.8. I have now replaced it with a spare SDX-500C. The
problem that I am having now is that the failed drive had ceased
responding to SCSI
From Ryan Manikowski Sent: May 27, 2010 18:42
When you say the 'system' no longer recognizes the tape drive, are you
sure the SCSI controller even detects the tape drive during boot? From
what I've seen, tape drives use the generic tape driver and get mapped
to /dev/stX.
I know that it
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jens Neu wrote:
Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers
(IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN
via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We
want them to use multipathing from the
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I
was planning to evaluate devical, but have not tried it yet:
href=http://www.davical.org/; target=_blank
http://www.davical.org/
I would welcome comments from anyone with
experience with devical.
DAViCal is
88 matches
Mail list logo
