CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0459 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d57925d52e7175b822b02f0deb56ee21
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0459 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
ae41ba0696a6a9986bae400a2aabee4c
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0475 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0475.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
db4e52e8079ccb1a49f19cb40d8522b2
I just installed Centos 5.5 with the xen kernel on an older machine. It
has Xeon processors and a 700 Mhz processor speed, so I realize I must
use para-virtualized guests. Reading the Centos/RH Virtualization Guide
gives examples of the process of installing guest hosts, but it only
lists
Windows guests can use drivers to work directly with the virtual-hardware
devices that are presented to the guest. And since windows is acpi, etc.
aware, with the right settings it works almost as if its paravirtualized.
When installing, for me its easiest to d/l and store the .iso file for
If I were restricted to the older machine, I'd explore using VMWare.
The bare metal version should be comparable to XEN performance, but the
free version is restricted as far as the number (3?) of virtual machines
that can be run. It'll virtualize MS Windows guests on older hardware.
The
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:40 -0700, Drew wrote:
The free ESXi can virtualize more then three guests. The limitations
imposed on the free license revolve more around advanced capabilities
within the suite. Things like vMotion (automatic guest migration
between hosts), High Availability, etc are
I believe ESXi only works on 64bit machines with hardware VT.
Depends on the version.
ESXI 3.x will run on older 32bit only Intel Processors. I have it
running on an old IBM x445 w/ 8 pre-64bit Xeon processors.
ESXi 4.x does require 64bit processors. I can't speak to whether it
requires
Saludos, listeros, tengo un problema con un VNC-Server.
Nunca antes me habia pasado, no entiendo que esta ocurriendo ahora.
He instalado VNC en mi maquina de escritorio, donde uso CentOS 5.5 y
cuando accedo a mi sesion, por la red, me abren 4 ventanas de
terminales, y aunque las cierren se
On 06/15/2010 03:39 PM, O§many Oconnor wrote:
Hola amigos, como puedo lograr que mi servidor apache redireccione el
pedido del navegador de internet.
es decir si escribo una direccion IP en la barra de búsquedas del
navegador me envíe hacia otro sitio. Ej: 10.30.60.20 a
Buenas a t...@s.
Llevo muy poco tiempo subscrito a la lista, pero ya llevo utilizando CentOS
desde hace algunos años.
Mi uso es de servidores dedicados de internet.
En estos momentos estoy trasladando un servidor de un datacenter a otro, y
estoy configurando el
nuevo desde cero.
Me quedan
Ok colegas gracias .por la ayuda y la aclaracion... pondre
manos a la obra para arreglar tal error
El 15/06/2010 10:06, Jorge García escribió:
El 12 de junio de 2010 14:34, Antonio amgallard...@gmail.com
mailto:amgallard...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola Javier:
Si has
From: Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com
the PNP crew enhances their documentation with some working
examples, or I learn German
I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered perl
in the process)...
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:28:51AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered
perl in the process)...
Agreed, it's easy enough to write Nagios plugins. I've done that too.
Then PNP will automaticaly plot these values... but yes, if you
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 02:28:51AM -0700, John Doe wrote:
I was able to make some plugins without too much problems (even discovered
perl in the process)...
Agreed, it's easy enough to write Nagios plugins. I've done that too.
Then PNP will automaticaly plot these
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:01:26AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
If have firewalling to protect from security issues, why not just run an
older
version of cacti?
Sensible suggestion. One, it's not obvious where to find an older version.
Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led me
Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led me to be
underimpressed with the whole project.
That's odd because other than the usual php version issues I've always
considered cacti to be the easiest of the graphing tools to get working
- but I haven't tried the most recent versions.
There is always ZenOSS. I would definitely take a look at ZenOSS. Very
active, very powerful, nice interface, SMNP/SSH/WMI based monitoring,
etc.
jb
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
Sent: Wednesday, June
On 6/16/2010 10:30 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Two, hours of attempting to get cacti to work have led me to be
underimpressed with the whole project.
That's odd because other than the usual php version issues I've always
considered cacti to be the easiest of the graphing tools to get working
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
the speed at 600MHz. This processor is capable of 1.5GHz and when
On 6/16/2010 1:47 PM, ken wrote:
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
the speed at 600MHz. This
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Thanks in advance for any and all advice.
Boris.
Boris wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
We've been looking at glusterfs here. It's under active
On Tue, June 15, 2010 15:43, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 15.06.2010 20:55, schrieb James B. Byrne:
Are you tackling with that for over 1 year now?
Yes. Actually, I have been dealing with this on and off for several
years. I have never found an answer and other things come along
that require
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Boris Epstein wrote, On 06/16/2010 03:33 PM:
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Thanks in
Boris wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Boris wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
You haven't actually stated whether you want the backing devices distributed
Hello all,
I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
First off, the system is running a LAMP stack to serve a web
application. It will only be doing email to
Hello all,
I have been doing some searching for information about disabling
services within a CentOS 5.5 install. I have found a few different
opinions, and wanted to ask for some feedback.
No brainer.
First off, the system is running a LAMP stack to serve a web
application. It will only
Ski Dawg wrote:
From my research, the services that I am thinking of turning off are:
nfs (already off)
nfslock
portmap
rpccgssd
rpcidmapd
rpcsvcgssd
all safe to shut off if you're not serving NFS, NIS, etc.
apci
power management. I believe you need acpid for things like screen
On 06/16/2010 03:09 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
On 6/16/2010 1:47 PM, ken wrote:
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu
The following NSA document provides very good information on the secure
configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5/CentOS 5.x:
Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf
It goes through almost all the services
33 matches
Mail list logo
