On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Maulvi Bakar mau...@maulvi.net wrote:
Hi all
I guess, as per http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute - 3. Contribute to the
Wiki, I am being persistent.
Good :)
The proposal is mainly to address these 'frequently' asked questions. Other
proposed additions that
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Maulvi Bakar mau...@maulvi.net wrote:
Hi all
I guess, as per http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute - 3. Contribute to
the
Wiki, I am being persistent.
Good :)
The
Dear Russ.
Your wish is noted; I figure leaving markers is a ready test
if the author (or another with edits) was interested enough to
follow the page, and to read their email, and to address it
I see people following me all the time with wiki edits and
read the diffs. I note your
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of cameras a little further
away (more than 5 meters).
USB has a limit,
Hi,
Am 17.06.10 08:22, schrieb Jobst Schmalenbach:
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of cameras a
Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of cameras a little further
away (more
ken wrote:
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
the speed at 600MHz. This processor is capable of
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Raja Subramanian wrote:
You need a shared SAN back end to run traditional cluster file systems.
there are parallel storage file systems like Ibrix FusionFS that work
with an array of systems with direct attach storage. FusionFS is
commercial oh, its HP now, hmmm
Give GFS a chance, works very well for us and centos ships it
On 06/17/2010 10:19 AM, Raja Subramanian wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 16:22 +1000, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom iso that I can use to install machines.
I want to include my custom kickstart file on the distro and when its
put in get the system to build using it.
I have done some reading about this process, but i still havent been
able to get it working with out any
Hi,
A bit of history is in order here:
http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2010/06/17/why-is-there-a-perl-i386-in-my-x86_64-install
On 15/06/2010 21:10, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying to do an update to some servers... and they have both i386 and
x86_64 perl. The latter won't update,
hi Don,
On 15/06/2010 21:29, Don MacAskill wrote:
I'm happy to help in some way, too. We have barebones CentOS 5 images
we've been using in EC2 for a long time, and our process for initially
creating them is fairly well documented, so holler if I can help.
Thanks for your offer, I might just
From: Anthony Davis t...@specialistdevelopment.com
I am trying to create a custom iso that I can use to install
machines.
This used to work for me (I think):
mount CentOS-XXX.iso /mnt/cdrom -t iso9660 -o loop
cp -a /mnt/cdrom /tmp/cdrom
cp ks.cfg /tmp/cdrom/
vi
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:15 +0100, Anthony Davis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom iso that I can use to install machines.
I want to include my custom kickstart file on the distro and when its
put in get the system to build using it.
I have done some reading about this
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
A bit of history is in order here:
http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2010/06/17/why-is-there-a-perl-i386-in-my-x86_64-install
On 15/06/2010 21:10, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying to do an update to some servers... and they have both i386 and
x86_64 perl.
On 17/06/2010 13:36, Les Mikesell wrote:
In this particular instance, is removing perl.i386 the right thing to do?
Are
there any common situations where it would be used on an x86_64 system?
Removing perl.i386 is the way to go here. I don't personally know of any
situations where perl.i386
At Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:22:48 +1000 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want
Hi,
I would like to announce a set of DRBD kABI-tracking kernel module
packages for RHEL5, CentOS-5 and Scientific Linux 5 kernels. These
packages have been introduced into the ELRepo testing repository
(http://elrepo.org/).
You can find these packages at:
On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any
On 16/06/2010 21:11, Boris Epstein wrote:
Will surely check Glusterfs out. What's your thoughts on GPFS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPFS ?
I've used gpfs in the past, but it was a long time back. It works,
mostly just does what it needs to do and stays out of your way. When we
were using it,
On 16/06/2010 21:12, Todd Denniston wrote:
In short if you are considering DRBD as a backing device, definitely ask over
on their mailing list
and I suspect that mailing list population has a higher percentage of folks
who use cluster FSs.
DRBD is only worth looking at if you have something
On 17/06/2010 09:28, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
Give GFS a chance, works very well for us and centos ships it
yes, seconded. The gfs stack works really well too. I'm running 2
instances and have not really had any major 'issues'. Production grade
clvm's snapshot's would be a nice-to-have, but
Boris Epstein sent a missive on 2010-06-16:
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Thanks in
On 06/17/2010 04:16 AM Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
ken wrote:
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu stepping pegs
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:33:02 -0400
Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any
ken wrote:
On 06/17/2010 04:16 AM Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
ken wrote:
Hey, folks,
Sometimes my workstation bogs down... slows to a crawl. Using gkrellm,
it's obvious the CPU is the laggard. The top utility confirms: the load
average gets up over 4 at times. But this occurs when cpu
Hi All,
This is the settings of my NFS server (192.168.10.55)
/etc/exports:
/nfs/iso
192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0(rw,sync)http://192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0%28rw,sync%29
From the remote host, I mount it correctly. But when I write/create
files/directory inside the mounted nfs
Looks like you need to allow nfs through your firewall so that it can be
accessed
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device available from bmobile.
-Original Message-
From: James Corteciano ja...@linux-source.org
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:17:04
To: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
If it's giving him a file system error on the remote host it's NOT a
fw issue
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2010, at 12:22 PM, earlarami...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like you need to allow nfs through your firewall so that it
can be accessed
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
James Corteciano wrote:
Hi All,
This is the settings of my NFS server (192.168.10.55)
/etc/exports:
/nfs/iso 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0(rw,sync)
http://192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0%28rw,sync%29
From the remote host, I mount it correctly. But when I write/create
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Corteciano
ja...@linux-source.org wrote:
Hi All,
This is the settings of my NFS server (192.168.10.55)
/etc/exports:
/nfs/iso 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0(rw,sync)
From the remote host, I mount it correctly. But when I write/create
Hi Boris,
[r...@server]# ls -ld /nfs/iso
drwxrwx--- 2 root apache 4096 Jun 18 00:46 /nfs/iso
Regards,
James
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, James Corteciano
ja...@linux-source.org wrote:
Hi All,
This is the
On 6/17/2010 1:22 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Hi
I want to put up a few cameras connected to a CentOS box.
I currently have a box with one camera and that works (USB),
I can take a pic (the script does that) and see that on a webpage.
However, I want to have a couple of cameras a little
Try turning off root_squash in your /etc/exports file...
Default NFS server behavior is to prevent root on client machines from
having privileged access to exported files. Servers do this by mapping the
root user to some unprivileged user (usually the user nobody) on the
server side. This is known
James Corteciano wrote:
Hi Boris,
[r...@server]# ls -ld /nfs/iso
drwxrwx--- 2 root apache 4096 Jun 18 00:46 /nfs/iso
as I said, root squash in action.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Robert Heller wrote:
It would be simplier to just get a network camera, such as the ones made
by axis.com.
Isn't Axis rather expensive?
I've found the Linksys WVC54GCA WiFi camera has worked pretty well for me,
at least after I updated the firmware.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/
Axis also has lower end cameras that don't cost a whole lot. Price
depends on what options/capabilities one is looking for in a camera.
--
Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.)
M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204
NASA Langley Research Center
Hi klanix,
Thanks for your help, will try it out.
Kind Regards
Tony
On 17 Jun 2010, at 11:53, kalinix wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:15 +0100, Anthony Davis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom iso that I can use to install machines.
I want to include my custom kickstart file
When I do the following: yum install perl-XML-Parser
I get all these errors.
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirror.sanctuaryhost.com
* base: centos.cs.wisc.edu
* extras: mirror.trouble-free.net
* updates: mirrors.serveraxis.net
I edited /etc/yum.repos.d/*
and set enabled=0 on everything except base and updates.
This fixed the issue.
This was stock centos 5.5 x86_64.
I have added no other repos.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 6/17/2010 1:28 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
When I do the following: yum install perl-XML-Parser
I get all these errors.
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirror.sanctuaryhost.com
* base: centos.cs.wisc.edu
* extras:
--- On Thu, 6/17/10, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com
Subject: [CentOS] yum install perl-XML-Parser
To: CentOS ML centos@centos.org
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 11:28 AM
When I do the following:
yum install perl-XML-Parser
I get
On 14/06/10 18:58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The standalone gspca code is old and deprecated. It's now maintained
as part of the Video4Linux v4l-dvb tree here:
http://linuxtv.org/
snip
The main v4l-dvb tree is here - just grab the latest tarball and build
it. Here if you don't see it:
ken wrote, On 06/17/2010 10:46 AM:
The problem really is as I first stated. And the solution-- good
settings for /etc/sysconfig/cpuspeed-- is really what is needed (at
least as far as can be discerned at this time).
looking in /etc/sysconfig/cpuspeed around MAX_SPEED= they suggest looking
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:07:57PM +0100, Simon Billis wrote:
Take a look at ganglia - http://ganglia.sourceforge.net/
This may do what you need.
It's what I've ended up going with. (Munin also looked promising - if I
could get the syntax right to modify its CPU test for individual cores,
On 17/06/2010 23:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
- best complied from source, there are big dependency problems with the
available rpms
I find that very hard to believe - to the extent that I don't believe
you at all. Or did you mean to say that its not easy to locate a well
done rpm set for
On 17/06/2010 20:49, Mark Pryor wrote:
there are 2 solutions here. Try the plugin problem fix first.
http://just-another.net/2008/11/22/centos-5-upgrade-and-yum/
Dude, that is just random url spamming in irrelevant situations. Whats
on that webpage has nothing to do with Jerry's problem. Jerry
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:20:03PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
- best complied from source, there are big dependency problems with the
available rpms
Very few packages are ever best compiled from source on an
enterprise distro.
What, specifically, is wrong with the
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 at 6:51pm, John R. Dennison wrote
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:20:03PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
- best complied from source, there are big dependency problems with the
available rpms
Very few packages are ever best compiled from source on an
enterprise
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:37:11AM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 17/06/2010 23:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
- best complied from source, there are big dependency problems with the
available rpms
I find that very hard to believe - to the extent that I don't believe
you at all. Or did you
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:51:52PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Very few packages are ever best compiled from source on an
enterprise distro.
What, specifically, is wrong with the 3.0.7 in EPEL?
Um, that yum install ganglia produces a long list of package conflicts on
a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
That being said, it's trivial to recompile the F13 RPM for 3.1.2 for
centos-5.
And that would be the proper route to go instead of building
from native source :)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:21:00PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Um, that yum install ganglia produces a long list of package conflicts on
a current CentOS system? Or that only 3.1.7 has a fully working multicpu
module, plus a number of significant bug fixes?
I just tried a ganglia
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:09:11PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
I should care what you believe? Stay ignorant, if you like. If not, take a
CentOS system, add the EPEL repository for ganglia, try yum install
ganglia, and prepare to see all sorts of package conflicts. Plus it's not
the current
Mark, John, and Miguel,
Thank you for the information. I will take all of this into
consideration with the rest of my research. I do appreciate your
feedback and help.
--
Doug
Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org)
Never trust a computer
www.cisecurity.org/tools2/linux/CIS_RHEL5_Benchmark_v1.1.pdf
contains very good paper how to harden centos/rhel installation.
--
Eero,
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
58 matches
Mail list logo
