- Original Message -
Yum search shows a qspice.86_64 package available. I'm guessing it's
not the
version you're seeking, but have you gotten spice running?
www.spicespace.org seems to have a new version for download, but it
requires
compiling.
I've been eager to try spice since
heres the config for the guest
domain type='kvm' id='3'
namewww/name
uuidcf0351ad-2df9-1f83-d668-3901543109ef/uuid
memory1048576/memory
currentMemory1048576/currentMemory
vcpu1/vcpu
os
type arch='x86_64' machine='rhel5.4.0'hvm/type
boot dev='hd'/
/os
features
acpi/
The KVM update below (RHBA-2010-0479) is now available with yum update
-Original Message-
From: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-virt-
boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of David Martin
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 10:02 AM
To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:10 PM, chaim.rie...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I see if the guest is using br0 only eth0 is configured on the guest
Run `/usr/sbin/brctl show` to display what devices are attached to the
bridges on your physical virtual host.
If other hosts can reach your virtual guest,
Hola a t...@s, tengo que convertir 2 discos que están en array1 con mdadm en
discos simples, llevar un disco para el /, /boot y el otro disco solo /home.
No estoy seguro de como proceder sin perder datos y obviamente sin
reinstalar.
--
___
REPARACIONONLINE
GARANTIA PARA
LinkedIn
Elder Flores Salas pidió añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Angelo:
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
- Elder Flores Salas
Aceptar invitación de Elder Flores Salas
2010/7/13 laureano laureano.b...@gmail.com
Hola, estoy montando un servidor con centos 5.5.
como necesito publicar una web instale vsftp siguiendo esta guia[0]
corri el segundo script (vsftpd_virtual_config_withTLS.sh)
. cree el usuario prueba1 con el script ese y reinicie el servicio.
Amigo por favor valida que si le hallas asignado clave a tu usuario de
prueba
puede ser que no le hallas asignado password y por eso el filezilla no se
esta autenticando
Saludos...
El 13 de julio de 2010 21:39, laureano laureano.b...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola, estoy montando un
Me gustaria ser ingeniero de Redhat.. Que consejos le darian los que ya son
para uno que esta empezando recien a entrar en el tema de Redhat?? SOy de
Asuncion Paraguay..
_
Discover the
Que leas mucho y que estes siempre al tanto de las tecnologias
nuevas. Presta mucha atencion a la documentacion y busca en google como
hacer preguntas de forma correcta asi vas a tener la respuesta adecuada
a tu inquietud.
Saludos
PD: el examen no es tan complicado, son vuelteros
Hi,
Did you try to disable the mirror selection and specify one single repo?
-Jens
- Originalnachricht -
Von: Jatin Davey [jasho...@cisco.com]
Gesendet: 14.07.2010 11:03 ZE5B
An: centos@centos.org
Betreff: [CentOS] Running yum shows errors
Hi
I am getting the following errors
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael Klinosky
Sent: 14 July 2010 00:15
Just to let you know, I use the keyring to store passwords for a Subversion
repository. The first time, after logging in, I use Subversion I am asked for
the password to unlock the keyring. Then everything goes fine, i.e. I'm not
ask for the Subversion password.
Which version of Subversion
Just to let you know, I use the keyring to store passwords
for a Subversion repository. The first time, after logging
in, I use Subversion I am asked for the password to unlock
the keyring. Then everything goes fine, i.e. I'm not ask for
the Subversion password.
Which version of Subversion
Dear all,
unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
LUNs 2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs 2.2T and
goes back to normal performance when using a LUN 2T with normal,
2010/7/14 Jens Neu jens@biotronik.com:
Dear all,
unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
LUNs 2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs 2.2T and
goes back to normal
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
that matter)
Sorry, if I was not clear: I was just throwing ideas because I will
have soon to face a similar need.
I just wanted to explore if you could avoid using the gnome-keyring at all.
I was not pretending to give you a direct solution for your pb.
Subversion is already set up correctly to use the
Jens Neu writes:
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
that
On Tuesday 13 July 2010, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
GPU for working, not the CPU? [by default]
That is not possible (for reasonable values of possible...). No such operating
system exists today.
/Peter
Or this solution is
On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Jens Neu wrote:
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jozsi Avadkan jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
GPU for working, not the CPU? [by default]
Or this solution is still in the beginning part?
Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
Still in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
2010/7/14 William Warren
- Brian T. Brunner bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 7/14/10, William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
wrote:
ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
linux system.
- Brian T. Brunner bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical
Start with a 4 port PCI ethercard
http://www.cyberresearch.com/store/industrial-computers-rugged-pcs/industrial-computer-accessories-pc-peripherals/bus-adapters-expansion-chassis/bus-adapters-expansion-chassis-pci/PRO_3212_8873.2.htm
Expand a PCIex1 slot into several PCI slots, claiming 13 PCI
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
with the number of interrupts needed to *PROPERLY* service all of those
interfaces in
On 07/14/2010 08:17 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
with the number of interrupts needed
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Filed some bug reports, and it was evident from the response that very, very
few Linux users ever go 4 eth's on a system. Thus the lack of properly
debugged IPv6 support for that then. Fortunately I don't (yet) need IPv6.
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I had 'issues' with
bonding and VMs
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
playing with things; putting the playing with things functions into
virtual servers
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:32:12 -0500
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
Thanks
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
playing with
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
X3450
Shutdown the machine pull the power cord (s) completly. Let it sit a
while plug her back up and they should show now.
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support
On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
Thanks
See http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PHP_5.1_To_5.2
--
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
playing
On 07/14/2010 07:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
Thanks
See http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PHP_5.1_To_5.2
Sorry, i thought about CentOS 5,
for CentOS 4 try Utter Ramblings repo, it will
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Kwan Lowe kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
Thanks for your info,
but it's for CentOS 5, i need please for CentOS 4.
Thanks
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:00:25 +0100
From: athma...@gmail.com
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on CentOS 4
On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6
On 07/14/2010 10:30 AM, JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I
On Wed, July 14, 2010 12:47, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:32:12 -0500
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server,
On Wed, July 14, 2010 12:55, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
Xen
and have the full
On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:03, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a
On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:07, Victor Padro wrote:
I own a Xeon X3430 X3440 and both have vmx extensions so the X3450,
please recheck your BIOS config.
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=42929
The Intel page certainly says the X3450 has vt-x and vt-d.
This system is a Dell Poweredge R310,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:06 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:07, Victor Padro wrote:
I own a Xeon X3430 X3440 and both have vmx extensions so the X3450,
please recheck your BIOS config.
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=42929
The Intel page certainly
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:09, Brian Mathis wrote:
Are you checking the stats from inside the dom0 or a domU? What's the
output of 'uname -a'?
In dom0; I haven't gone ahead creating domUs yet, until I'm sure I've got
the dom0 right.
[local...@prcapp00 ~]$ uname -a
Linux
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I found one BIOS entry, Virtualization technology; it was initially
disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that it
was still enabled later (I reported enabling it in my original message).
I'll
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:12 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:09, Brian Mathis wrote:
Are you checking the stats from inside the dom0 or a domU? What's the
output of 'uname -a'?
In dom0; I haven't gone ahead creating domUs yet, until I'm sure I've got
That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be fully powered off
for the entry to be effectively changed - some BIOSes evidently are flakey
about it.
+1
Totally agree, forgot that...
--
Linux User #452368
http://twitter.com/vpadro
Everything that irritates us about others can
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:20:10PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
they're not explicit as I stated but perhaps it just states as VT-D or
something that you may overlooked it.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) is virtualization
for devices. With this it's possible for a guest OS to
Am 14.07.2010 20:12, schrieb Torintino T:
Thanks for your info,
but it's for CentOS 5, i need please for CentOS 4.
Thanks
IUS Community provides 5.2.13 for CentOS 4.
http://wiki.iuscommunity.org/Doc/ClientUsageGuide#Common_Examples_for_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_4
Alexander
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I found one BIOS entry, Virtualization technology; it was initially
disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that
it
was still enabled later (I
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:20:10PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
they're not explicit as I stated but perhaps it just states as VT-D or
something that you may overlooked it.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O)
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Keith Keller
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 10:41 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] free
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
The man page does
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be
fully powered off for the entry to be effectively changed -
some BIOSes evidently are flakey about it.
Now *there's* something I wouldn't have thought of trying on my own.
Okay, I can
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
The flags from /proc/cpuinfo after this reboot where I checked the
virtualization setting in the bios are:
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic mtrr cmov pat clflush acpi mmx
fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida pni est ssse3
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:57, R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be
fully powered off for the entry to be effectively changed -
some BIOSes evidently are flakey about it.
Now *there's* something I wouldn't
On Wed, July 14, 2010 15:08, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
The flags from /proc/cpuinfo after this reboot where I checked the
virtualization setting in the bios are:
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic mtrr cmov pat clflush acpi
mmx
fxsr sse
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
continues to issue them while it remains in support,
particularly for the PowerEdge series
This is a brand-new R310, received from Dell and installed this week.
Which doesn't mean it's for sure at the latest BIOS level of course.
* chuckle *
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I found one BIOS entry, Virtualization technology; it was initially
disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that
it
was still enabled later (I
On 07/14/2010 12:49 PM, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
That can be the case if your kernel is
Flaherty, Patrick wrote, On 07/14/2010 03:49 PM:
I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
(Roughly) The test was:
* Turn swap off
On 07/13/2010 05:51 PM, William Warren wrote:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
Most of the limits on the number of any device come from the major/minor
numbers on
On 07/14/2010 01:34 PM, Todd Denniston wrote:
Did your test program actually USE the 100 megs of ram?
Because of lazy allocation or optimistic memory allocation*** as done by
the kernel,
over-commit is the term you were looking for.
the memory
is not actually consumed until used. When I
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:17 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
* chuckle *
The other thing might be to use that device you hold beside
the ear and the mouth, and let the magic voices ask you for
your chassis' Service tag or Express Service Code -- the
voices know all sorts of information about
On 07/13/2010 05:19 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these
systems, that they don't support NFSv3?
It's a combination of some very old (RH2.1) systems and a rigid
for 5.3.2 follow the instruction on
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
I did a fair amount of research before I decided to go
with something providing a more recent version of PHP
and a lot of people are raving about this one.
Jobst
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:46PM +0300,
I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an
Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to
my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't
working) - any suggestions?
[r...@marktop mark]# lspci | grep Ether
00:12.0 Ethernet
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 07/13/2010 05:19 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these
systems, that they don't support NFSv3?
[r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0 essid hrfamnet-101
[r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0 enc XX [not really...]
[r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:hrfamnet-101
Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Tx-Power=0 dBm
RTS thr:off
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an
Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to
my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't
working) - any suggestions?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you looked at these CentOS wiki articles?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/WpaSupplicant
That would have been
I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
What advices
I can get from you list?
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
Hi All,
I have a post on the forums about this. I'm hoping maybe you guys can help me
track down what I'm doing wrong.
I am trying to get nscd to cache my LDAP user data. You know, for when the LDAP
server goes down. The problem I am having is not related to the bind_policy
soft issue that
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:52 AM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
What advices I can get from you list?
Nothing. All RH certificate holders are sworn to secrecy about the
content but not the format.
When I did it, there were three parts. MC,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mark mhullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you looked at these CentOS wiki articles?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 21:05 -0600, Brian Marshall wrote:
So, when LDAP is down I can clearly see that nscd is caching passwd
but not shadow.
---
if getent shadow as root returns a shadow file with passwords, then
the PAM unix module can do authentication without using libpam-ldap
So that may
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:52 AM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
What advices I can get from you list?
Nothing. All RH certificate holders are sworn
82 matches
Mail list logo
