[CentOS-virt] working config for xen which would transfer a serial interface

2010-08-05 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
Hello Can anyone share a known working config for xen which would transfer a serial interface ( add-on card preferably, mine uses e880-e887 : :03:05.0 / ec00-ec07 : :03:05.0 ) to a DomU ? I've been trying with the stock packages from Centos 5.5 ( fully updated) and also

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread Monica BM
A ver si lo puedo explicar bien. El gateway2 es el que une las 2 subredes, no tienes por que ponerle ese gateway a ningún equipo, ya que desde el gateway 1 y el gateway 3, puedes decir que toda la info que vaya para internet, pues que vaya para internet y toda las peticiones que vayan hacia

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread daniel
Monica muchas gracias ya resolví mi problema con la topologia que estaba manejando, bueno explico mi solución la red es esta (INTERNET)---(GATEWAY1)(192.168.X.X)---(GATEWAY2)--(172.26.X.X)--(GATEWAY3)--(INTERNET) Espero no se descomponga mi dibujo :P Bueno lo primero que hice gracias a la

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2010/8/5 daniel danielog2...@gmail.com En el gw1 con el comando route escribes: route add -net 172.26.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192..168.1.254 Donde la ip 192.168.1.254 es la ip del gw2 y 172.26.0.0 es la red con la que se va a conectar la mascara de la red que sera usada. Recuerda que

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread daniel
Recuerda que esta información de ruteo no queda estáticamente definida para el próximo arranque, sino que hay que editar /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX como dijimos antes. Y si el archivo no existe lo puedo crear? utilizo centos 5.5 ___

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread Héctor Suárez Planas
Saludos, hermanos. Recuerda que esta información de ruteo no queda estáticamente definida para el próximo arranque, sino que hay que editar /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX como dijimos antes. Y si el archivo no existe lo puedo crear? utilizo centos 5.5 Igual lo puedes poner en el

Re: [CentOS-es] unir dos subredes con salidas independientes a internet

2010-08-05 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2010/8/5 Héctor Suárez bolo...@medired.scu.sld.cu Saludos, hermanos. Recuerda que esta información de ruteo no queda estáticamente definida para el próximo arranque, sino que hay que editar /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX como dijimos antes. Y si el archivo no existe lo

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread Mathieu Baudier
I am trying to find something (php prefered) that I can stick onto a Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system by employees through a web-browser explorer like interface. AjaXplorer is a mature and pretty well supported web files explorer, with plugins for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread Frank Thommen
Mark wrote: I recently updated to OpenOffice 3.2 and I noticed that it, and the latest Evolution, seem to be incredibly slow for some operations. E.g., in OO, about half the time when I'm editing something, it takes anywhere from 10-30 seconds for OO to respond to a click on one of the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread James Pearson
Frank Thommen wrote: I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80 GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not restricted to OO, but the whole systems is slowed down.

[CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10 mirrors down, including Harvard and VCU. Anyone know what's going on? mark

Re: [CentOS] WAS/CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow//Now Where are the Kernels?

2010-08-05 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 19:07 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: On 04/08/10 10:08, JohnS wrote: UPDATE ! Replying to my self those you see missing are not on Red Hats Public Mirror Site so evidently those are not built to go in CentOs. I presume those come out in the fastrack

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10 mirrors down, including Harvard

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Karanbir Singh wrote: On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10 mirrors

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:07:33AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times out. Doesn't look to be a mirror.harvard.edu in DNS. From yum -d9 update: yum update runs instantly for me from NYC just now. Yum was working a half-hour

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Drew
And it's still going. What we have here is a massive problem with the mirrors. So, any *real* idea what's going on?        mark Other then http://mirror.harvard.edu/ everything referenced in your test is showing as up. -- Drew Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be

[CentOS] CentOS to RedHat and vice versa

2010-08-05 Thread Kwan Lowe
Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa? I was thinking of generating a list of all packages and then running RPM or yum with a 'replace' option. The reason for doing this: Years ago I was tasked with building a RHEL4

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread Frank Thommen
James Pearson wrote: Frank Thommen wrote: I'm experiencing similar problems on a DELL Optiplex 740 with the same CPU (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+ @ 2.60 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 80 GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 HD). But in my case the slowness is not restricted to OO, but the whole

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/05/2010 03:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: And it's still going. What we have here is a massive problem with the mirrors. I cant reproduce the issue, but from the looks of things, you seem to have a bad network locally to you. I'd doubt the whole internet had fallen apart at exactly the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to RedHat and vice versa

2010-08-05 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/05/2010 03:24 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: I've seen posts that RHEL - CentOS is at least possible. That is, take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS repositories. I have not seen the reverse, however. you might want to speak with your Red Hat support / sales guys as well,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread James Pearson
Frank Thommen wrote: Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ? sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post: [r...@shelley ~]# lspci ... 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio (rev a2) [r...@shelley ~]# lsmod ... snd_hda_intel 639265

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to RedHat and vice versa

2010-08-05 Thread Tom Georgoulias
On 08/05/2010 10:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa? I've seen posts that RHEL - CentOS is at least possible. That is, take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
mark the FAQ suff is a good idea... in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or be pointed to them on signup. i wonder though, seriously, does the teach a man to fish principle really apply? ie LMGTFY type stuff or ??? or cluesticks? ;- as far as lazy, it is

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Niki Kovacs
m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit : Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting it all from our own repo, actually), and then the next one showed about 8-10 mirrors down, including Harvard and VCU. Anyone know

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Todd Denniston
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote, On 08/05/2010 12:40 AM: That's the thing, I don't think I can tolerate a slightly behind copy on the system. The transaction once done, must remain done. A situation where a node fails right after a transaction was done and output to user, then recovered to a slightly

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:07:33 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: On 08/05/2010 02:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Just went to update a couple systems this morning, and first one machine took nearly 15 min to find the mirrors (and it should be getting

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Steve Huff wrote: On Aug 5, 2010, at 10:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I do not believe it's a local yum issue. I tried to point firefox to http://mirror.harvard.edu, not exactly an obscure mirror, and it times out. As I work for an agency of the US gov't, and we have *fat* pipes, it's not

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:04 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote: You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with databases. If this is the case, then I suggest you take a few searches over to the drbd archives** and look for database issues, IIRC in some cases you are

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Todd Denniston
JohnS wrote, On 08/05/2010 11:24 AM: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:04 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote: You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with databases. If this is the case, then I suggest you take a few searches over to the drbd archives** and look for database

Re: [CentOS] mirrors down?

2010-08-05 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:13:50AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: yum update runs instantly for me from NYC just now. Yum was working a half-hour back from NY too. Same here, from both NYC (roadrunner), and work (Verizon commercial, LIC). -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to RedHat and vice versa

2010-08-05 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tom Georgoulias t...@mcclatchyinteractive.com wrote: On 08/05/2010 10:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: Has anyone ever tried to mass replace installed RedHat RPMS with their equivalent CentOS versions or vice versa? I've seen posts that RHEL -  CentOS is at least

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:49:36AM -0700, R-Elists wrote: mark the FAQ suff is a good idea... in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or be pointed to them on signup. I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have something like that, but it's

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson jame...@moving-picture.com wrote: Frank Thommen wrote: Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ? sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post: [r...@shelley ~]# lspci ... 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:49:36AM -0700, R-Elists wrote: mark the FAQ suff is a good idea... in fact, when people singup, they should have to agree to list rules or be pointed to them on signup. I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have something

Re: [CentOS] CentOS to RedHat and vice versa

2010-08-05 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 08/05/2010 03:24 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: I've seen posts that RHEL -  CentOS is at least possible. That is, take a RHEL system and get it to update via YUM and CentOS repositories.  I have not seen the reverse,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread James Pearson
Mark wrote: I'm not having sound problems 00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev a2) It might still be worth adding 'enable_msi=0' to the 'options snd-hda-intel' line in /etc/modprobe.conf to see if it makes any difference after a reboot ... James

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/4/2010 11:40 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: It is good for 2 things - you can snapshot for local 'back-in-time' copies without using extra space, and you can do incremental dump/restores from local to remote snapshots. That sounds good... and bad at the same time because I add yet

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread Frank Thommen
James Pearson wrote: Frank Thommen wrote: Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ? sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post: [r...@shelley ~]# lspci ... 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio (rev a2) [r...@shelley ~]# lsmod ...

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Hi. I am trying to find something (php prefered) that I can stick onto a Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system by employees through a web-browser explorer like interface. I know I can do this through WinSCP

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread Frank Thommen
Mark wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, James Pearson jame...@moving-picture.com wrote: Frank Thommen wrote: Can you post the output of lspci and lsmod ? sorry, forgot to copy-paste these in my original post: [r...@shelley ~]# lspci ... 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:49:07AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: have to type something halfway intelligent to join the list, but really don't seem to have actually read the FAQ. No one reads FAQs. They're a relic of the old guard (what, read the FAQ and monitor a newsgroup for a week before

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow

2010-08-05 Thread James Pearson
Frank Thommen wrote: The problem was reported for 00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio (rev a2) it seems you're lucky having the MCP61 ;-) The MCP61 still uses the snd_hda_intel driver, and the upstream ALSA 'fix' is to blacklist all NVidia chipsets wrt

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread Mathieu Baudier
AjaXplorer is a mature and pretty well supported web files explorer, with plugins for various authentications and backends: http://www.ajaxplorer.info/ with some instructions for CentOS here: http://www.argeo.org/mediawiki/index.php/AjaXplorer#How_To_Install_on_RHEL.2FCentOS_5 Note

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
disagree, we read them all the time. if we didnt, then we would be wasting time money purchasing very hi tech and then wasting time and money not being able to use it or spinning wheels looking for docs etc. i think the problem is more that rules are not enforced in many lists... or nobody

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 8/5/10, Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil wrote: You speak of transactions in a way that makes me think you are dealing with databases. That's part of the application suite. Although we do suggest to clients to have different servers for each particular use, some of them

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: I am trying to find something (php prefered) that I can stick onto a Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system by employees through a web-browser explorer like interface. I know I can do this

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
R-Elists wrote: disagree, we read them all the time. Come on, did he need satirepost/satire? #insert old_guard.h mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 8/6/10, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: But even if you have live replicated data you might want historical snapshots and/or backup copies to protect against software/operator failure modes that might lose all of the replicated copies at once. That we already do, daily backups of

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 10:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I co-moderate an ancient beginners' list on yahoo--we have something like that, but it's almost useless. They say they read it, they even have to type something halfway intelligent to join the list, but really don't seem to have actually read

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
the point is enforcement somehow... why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ??? 12 bucks a year? or more ? donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated and to come back, they donate again - rh But what's the point? When you give away

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
R-Elists wrote: the point is enforcement somehow... why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ??? 12 bucks a year? or more ? donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated and to come back, they donate again The simple answer is moderation.

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
huh? it was sincere we are on your side bunky... :-) insert foot in backside;-) lighten up homes - rh Come on, did he need satirepost/satire? #insert old_guard.h mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: snip The simple answer is moderation. If, say, 3, or 5 regular posters complain about someone, they get a canned warning message; the luser does it a second time, they get dropped from the list. They rejoin, and do it again, they get dropped and banned for at least six

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write for yourself, the same does not apply to shell commands

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
R-Elists wrote: Come on, did he need satirepost/satire? #insert old_guard.h huh? it was sincere we are on your side bunky... :-) insert foot in backside;-) lighten up homes Hey, I worked long and hard to become a curmudgeon, and that was with a stirling example to follow

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
well taken i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of their lists... revenue will do centos project/people good. then moderate - rh The simple answer is moderation. If, say, 3, or 5 regular posters complain about someone, they get a canned warning

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 12:12 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: What you want is difficult to accomplish even in a local file system. I think it would be unreasonably expensive (both in speed and cost) to put your entire data store on something that provides both replication and transactional guarantees.

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 12:31 PM, R-Elists wrote: well taken i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of their lists... What's a support list and how does it relate to CentOS where every request for change is countered with our policy is to be bug-for-bug compatible with

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:31 -0700, R-Elists wrote: well taken i think centos should make manatory donation for support list or a few of their lists... Ahh ok so you want mind paying a fee to join my list and everybody elses? You had hell got to be crazy. Is not Open Source to be free?

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write for yourself, the

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for a canned routine to do something

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Warren Young
On 8/5/2010 11:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: When someone says, I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need $TOOL to do such and such, a good answer is usually forthcoming. When someone says, Tell me how to script this $PROJECT, the commmunity usually points the OP off to Google/Manual.

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:02:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Mike, you seem to be misunderstanding - the lusers, like Hadi (sp?), are asking us to do their work for them, not help them to learn what they need to do it themselves. It goes beyond that. The issue that

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
When someone says, I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need $TOOL to do such and such, a good answer is usually forthcoming. When someone says, Tell me how to script this $PROJECT, the commmunity usually points the OP off to Google/Manual. The difference is (as before

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 1:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I don't think it is the nature of the requests that are different (although coders perhaps have to know more to even ask a reasonable question), just the responses. Coders seem much more likely to try to make their work available to others that

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would only be one or two messages on this thread instead of the current mess. +1 -- Benjamin Franz

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 12:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/4/2010 8:08 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: I am trying to find something (php prefered) that I can stick onto a Centos apache server that would allow me to browse a selected file system by employees through a web-browser

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Benjamin Franz wrote: On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would only be one or two messages on this thread instead of the current mess. +1 The first

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 1:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: Hadi had been asked, repeatedly, to at least make a minimal effort on his own; to date there has been *no* evidence of that happening. So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this thread of

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/5/2010 1:17 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: snip The world is full of what seems an entire generation of people that possess an air of entitlement from those around them and expect people to instantly drop what they are doing and do their jobs / school

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 1:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Benjamin Franz wrote: On 08/05/2010 11:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: No, the part I don't understand is why you can't ignore any request where you are unwilling or unable to help. If everyone did, there would only be one or two messages on this

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:20:38AM -0700, R-Elists wrote: the point is enforcement somehow... Enforcement = suppression and suppression - consequences not elimination of the issue. why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ??? 12 bucks a year? or more ? Not

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 1:13 PM, Warren Young wrote: When someone says, I'm writing a shell script, and hereabouts I need $TOOL to do such and such, a good answer is usually forthcoming. When someone says, Tell me how to script this $PROJECT, the commmunity usually points the OP off to Google/Manual.

Re: [CentOS] Manually mounting partitions in linux rescue mode

2010-08-05 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:07:58 am Edward Diener wrote: I boot from the installation DVD, with an already existing CentOS 5.5 system on my hard disks. I have separate boot, root, and home partitions. I have moved the boot partition and now I need to re-initialize grub from rescue mode.

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread John R. Dennison
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:40:10PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this thread of non-answers: the one about installing a redhat version that didn't support USB on a USB disk? There seems to be a disconnect here, and

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread R-Elists
no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody. right? eh? ;-) open source doesnt mean free tech support to triple portion idiot morons on an email list present company excluded, of course ;-) - rh Ahh ok so you want mind paying a fee to join my list and

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 8/6/10, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: If you are going to do that, why not also rely on the database engine's replication which is aware of the transactions? Databases rely on filesystem write ordering and fsync() actually working - things that aren't always reliable locally,

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: So where would he have found an answer to the question that sparked this thread of non-answers: the one about installing a redhat version that didn't support USB on a USB disk? There seems to be a disconnect here, and for the life of me I

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote: no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody. Ok elaborate for me some more on this so I can get a complete idea in English. Do you mean would not in place of would? Do you mean to say it could be straight up

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/5/2010 12:25 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote: The part I have trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread m . roth
JohnS wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote: no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody. snip Do you mean to say it could be straight up shit? That it? I only Speak English and Gullah and there is no such word as doody. Maybe a do'de' No,

Re: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?

2010-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/5/2010 3:52 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: The DB will offer a more optimized alternative. A VM image won't. I'm not quite sure what's the connection here. The database runs within the VM and is stored in the virtual disk. I'm not using VM to substitute for a database replication but to

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:11:51PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: JohnS wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:14 -0700, R-Elists wrote: no, i probably would join your list because it might be straight up doody. snip Do you mean to say it could be straight up shit? That it? I only Speak

Re: [CentOS] Dogs, trolls, and neighborly free/open source

2010-08-05 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, August 05, 2010 05:26:12 pm Scott Robbins wrote: Often used, by children in insults such as doodie-head. Perhaps the phrase 'doodie thread' should be coined. Don't feed the trolls if you don't want a doodie thread. Dun G. Hill, author, in 'I feel a draught'

[CentOS] OT: Programming Need

2010-08-05 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Hey guys, Where is a good place people here have used with luck to find devs interested in work? I have a simple need involving an Axis M1031-W Camera I need an interface programmed for... Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] OT: Programming Need

2010-08-05 Thread Bill Campbell
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Hey guys, Where is a good place people here have used with luck to find devs interested in work? The Seattle Unix Group has a moderated mailing list for members interested in jobs, contract work, etc. Send a message to the list at

Re: [CentOS] Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD and dual monitors

2010-08-05 Thread Tsuyoshi Nagata
Hi,Kevin (2010/08/04 23:44), CS_DBA wrote: Anyone know if the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD will support dual monitors with CentOS ? Not supported GMA4500MHD(G45) with CentOS. This hardware is equipped with notebook and blue-ray home pc. CentOS/Upstream hardware supports until G40

Re: [CentOS] access to file system through web browser

2010-08-05 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Hi Using apache (either webdav or index) destroys the file permissions, on top of that I have to add the user that runs apache (nobody) to the group permissions having access to the file system. Most of my file systems do not have global access, only owner/group ... especially when it comes to