[CentOS-docs] [Fwd: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3]

2010-08-12 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Thanks in advance, Timo - Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:46 +0200 From: Timo Schoeler

Re: [CentOS-docs] [Fwd: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3]

2010-08-12 Thread didi
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Here you go http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3 Cheers Didi -- Hoffmann Geerd-Dietger http://contact.ribalba.de

Re: [CentOS-docs] [Fwd: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3]

2010-08-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/12/2010 12:30 PM, didi wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Here you go http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3 why is it a HowTo ? Also, it needs to be marked as

Re: [CentOS-docs] [Fwd: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3]

2010-08-12 Thread Timo Schoeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus didi spake: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Here you go http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3 Cheers Didi Thx,

Re: [CentOS-docs] Can not to update a page ?

2010-08-12 Thread gaohu
Dear Ralph, Today I tried to translate some updated pages to chinese, but I just can work on zh pages. As zh and zh-tw pages come together, would mind to give me rights of edit zh-tw pages, just as Timothy mentioned in his letter befor: Yes, I've talked to Gaohu, and did agree that it would

Re: [CentOS-es] LiveCd Centos 4

2010-08-12 Thread Maria Elena Correa C
NENA   --- El mié, 8/11/10, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com escribió: De: Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] LiveCd Centos 4 A: centos-es@centos.org Fecha: miércoles, 11 de agosto de 2010, 10:28 pm On 08/11/2010 03:12 PM, Maria

Re: [CentOS-es] monitoreo de enlace

2010-08-12 Thread David Rosado T.
Te recomiendo mejor la herramienta jnettop, con esta inclusive puedes ver el trafico por puerto que se te esta generando dentro de tu red lan, es algo mas detallado a la hora del monitoreo que el resto de herramientas que te indican los compañeros, bueno, espero que no se ofendan, pero en si creo

[CentOS-es] LUN's o SAN

2010-08-12 Thread Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres
Buen día, tengo un servidor con buen espacio de almacenamiento, pero tengo una duda, puedo hacer que este servidor ofrezca LUN's para otros servidores o discos iSCSI para que otros servidores se beneficien del espacio??? basicamente me interesa poder ofrecerle mas espacio a un servidor con VMWare.

Re: [CentOS-es] LUN's o SAN

2010-08-12 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2010/8/12 Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres mauricio.rami...@axtop.com Buen día, tengo un servidor con buen espacio de almacenamiento, pero tengo una duda, puedo hacer que este servidor ofrezca LUN's para otros servidores o discos iSCSI para que otros servidores se beneficien del espacio???

Re: [CentOS-es] LUN's o SAN

2010-08-12 Thread Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres
Gracias Eduardo en este momento comienzo la investigación. On 12/08/10 18:11, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: 2010/8/12 Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres mauricio.rami...@axtop.com mailto:mauricio.rami...@axtop.com Buen día, tengo un servidor con buen espacio de almacenamiento, pero tengo

Re: [CentOS-es] LUN's o SAN

2010-08-12 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2010/8/12 Mauricio Cesar Ramirez Torres mauricio.rami...@axtop.com Gracias Eduardo en este momento comienzo la investigación. Esto puede servirte http://www.google.com.ar/search?q=Using+GNBD+with+Global+File+System On 12/08/10 18:11, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: 2010/8/12 Mauricio

[CentOS] system shutdown - turning off quotas takes a long time

2010-08-12 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
Hi, recently I had to instal a new raid storage system for our central fileserver. It is connected by iscsi (1Gbit) and the fielsystems mounted are 400GB and 1TB and ext3. curretly about 400 GB are used by 1.5 Mio files. I turned quota on and did a quota check. BUT on reboot the system

Re: [CentOS] system shutdown - turning off quotas takes a long time

2010-08-12 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/8/12 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de: Hi, recently I had to instal a new raid storage system for our central fileserver. It is connected by iscsi (1Gbit) and the fielsystems mounted are 400GB and 1TB and ext3. curretly about 400 GB are used by 1.5 Mio files.

Re: [CentOS] system shutdown - turning off quotas takes a long time

2010-08-12 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
Am 12.08.10 09:06, schrieb Eero Volotinen: 2010/8/12 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de: Hi, recently I had to instal a new raid storage system for our central fileserver. It is connected by iscsi (1Gbit) and the fielsystems mounted are 400GB and 1TB and ext3.

Re: [CentOS] DHCP problem with virtual interfaces

2010-08-12 Thread Simone Caldana
Il giorno 11/ago/2010, alle ore 20.31, Simone Caldana ha scritto: I am collecting port 67 traffic on the dhcp server since this afternoon. I hope to be able to find out more. further testing revealed that dhclient really asks for the wrong ip (but always sends the client-identifier), and

[CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
Hi, ext3 is very reliable, i never had such issues (fsck after a power failure, yes... but no data loss). so i whould say its a hardware issue. Greetings On 08/12/2010 10:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/8/12 Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off

Re: [CentOS] ATI mobility Radeon HD 5470

2010-08-12 Thread John Doe
From: sync jian...@gmail.com I try to use that version but it does not work ... Fatal : Module fglrx not found .. Did you check if the module is present somewhere? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread John Doe
From: Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That thing happened for years and it was fine

[CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it for the time. How can the clock drift by a day and a half? [r...@devserver21 ~]# date Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010 [r...@devserver21 ~]# rdate -s 192.168.1.67 [r...@devserver21 ~]# date Thu Aug 12 07:02:39 EDT 2010

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Simon Billis
Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12: We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it for the time. How can the clock drift by a day and a half? [r...@devserver21 ~]# date Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010 [r...@devserver21 ~]# rdate -s 192.168.1.67

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12: We have a

[CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Brown
Hi I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to create the archive as the i dont know what the contents of 'some data' might be so i

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Simon Billis
Hi, Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12: We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it for the time. How can the clock drift by a day and a half? [r...@devserver21 ~]# date Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010 [r...@devserver21 ~]# rdate -s

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Simon Billis
Hi, Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12: We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it for the time. How can the clock drift by a day and a half? /SNIP It is unlikely that the machine in question drifted forward in time if ntpd was running.

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:14 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd Hi, Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Tom Brown wrote: Hi I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to create the archive as the i dont know what the contents of 'some

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off

[CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Daniel Bruno
Hello, Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? Thanks, -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Jerry Franz
On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: Hello, Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards. They work fine. -- Benjamin Franz ___

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
We have several Quads in use, Myricom Intel. Bot work well, the Myricoms are cheaper. On 08/12/2010 02:56 PM, Daniel Bruno wrote: Hello, Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? Thanks, ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Jerry Franz
On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat path_to_file'. Just be sure to quote the redirection so it happens on the remote side. At a

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Todd Denniston
Jason Pyeron wrote, On 08/12/2010 08:01 AM: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd Jason Pyeron

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote: On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: Hello, Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x? I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards. They work fine.

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:55:29 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:11:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Jerry Franz
On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote: On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:05:25 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Michel van Deventer
On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote: On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote: Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Alexander Dalloz
As matter of interest, do these cards offer lower throughput than 4x single 1GB cards? Depends mostly on if you are using PCI/PCI-X vs PCI-express. At high bit rates you can saturate the old PCI bus. A single gigabit port can pretty much saturate a 32-bit PCI bus at 33MHz. PCI-express can

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Todd Denniston
Robert Heller wrote, On 08/12/2010 09:18 AM: At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:05:25 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you want to collect it to a remote file, you

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Stephen Harris
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:18:31AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: program | bzip2 | ssh -q remote-host 'bunzip2 | remote-program' If you're gonna put a compression tool in the pipeline then I recommend you ensure ssh's own on-the-wire compression is turned off 'cos otherwise you're potentially

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Todd Denniston Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:07 Jason Pyeron wrote, On 08/12/2010 08:01 AM: -Original Message- From: Simon Billis Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36 Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12: We have a local time

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Tom Brown
Why not just do `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=somethin eg find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out You don't need tar for anything. alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate streams in sequence that generate 5 or

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:55:29 am Fajar Priyanto wrote: Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That thing happened for

[CentOS] preupgrade

2010-08-12 Thread Charles Campbell
Hello! Just thought I'd present this problem for comment/help/hints: * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13 * I have a 64-bit system with Vista as a host o/s, running VMWare, and FC11 as a client o/s * cloned my FC11 as a backup * ran preupgrade, got expected problem with 200MB /boot, but

Re: [CentOS] preupgrade

2010-08-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/12/2010 03:22 PM, Charles Campbell wrote: * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13 you have the wrong list. try the Fedora lists! - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?

2010-08-12 Thread Joe Pruett
 as i'm reviewing the courseware for the rhel (centos) course i'm teaching next week, i'm going to ask the occasional question, possibly technical, possibly more policy.  first one involves the choice for virtualization.  the course has a short section involving virt using xen but everything

Re: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?

2010-08-12 Thread Patrick Lists
On 08/12/2010 05:37 PM, Joe Pruett wrote: [snip] the one thing that hasn't been addressed yet by kvm scripts is that a shutdown/reboot of the host won't do a save/restore of the guests like xen can do. for that reason i still use xen for production systems and only use kvm for testing random

[CentOS] CentOS 4 Kernel Update

2010-08-12 Thread Ramon Nieto
When this kernel update be released for CentOS 4? http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0606.html Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] preupgrade

2010-08-12 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] preupgrade On 08/12/2010 03:22 PM, Charles Campbell wrote: * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13 you have the wrong list. try the

Re: [CentOS] problems with yum_priorities on CentOS5/RHEL5

2010-08-12 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Nick wrote: To: centos@centos.org From: Nick oinksoc...@letterboxes.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] problems with yum_priorities on CentOS5/RHEL5 On 10/08/10 17:52, Keith Roberts wrote: 1. yum check-updates and yum update do *not* warn you of an impending unresolved

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 Kernel Update

2010-08-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/12/2010 05:01 PM, Ramon Nieto wrote: When this kernel update be released for CentOS 4? http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0606.html I'm working on trying to get it out asap. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] Is oprofile still working?

2010-08-12 Thread Hywel Richards
Hi all, Is anyone using oprofile? I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if it is opreport, or just me. In case it is something just plain daft I am doing, here is how it goes: opcontrol --reset opcontrol --setup --no-vmlinux opcontrol --start ... now I run my

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue? On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite

Re: [CentOS] ATI mobility Radeon HD 5470

2010-08-12 Thread Przemysław Pawełczyk
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:28:56 -0700 (PDT) John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: sync jian...@gmail.com I try to use that version but it does not work ... Fatal : Module fglrx not found .. Did you check if the module is present somewhere? Hi, I installed ATI in Debian dozens of times.

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/12/2010 8:46 AM, Tom Brown wrote: Why not just do `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=somethin eg find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out You don't need tar for anything. alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread Drew
Sorry to hijack this thread, but it could be relevant. As matter of interest, do these cards offer lower throughput than 4x single 1GB cards? If you should use them in a PCI slot yes, not if you use them in a PCI-X or PCI-e slot (although you could saturate a PCI-e x1 with 4 gbit ports I

Re: [CentOS] Ethernet Quad

2010-08-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/12/10 10:35 AM, Drew wrote: Not with the Intel Pro 1000's. The PCIe versions require a x4 slot in the dual or quad configuration. Can't speak to the PCI-X version as I don't have any in my inventory. yeah, a single PCI-E 'lane' (eg, x1) is only about twice as fast as a PCI 32 bit

Re: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?

2010-08-12 Thread Joe Pruett
Fedora 13 does save the guest on shutdown so I would expect this will be supported in RHEL6/CentOS 6 too. But when do you actually power down a RHEL/CentOS server? And if you did, wouldn't you have migrated the guests to another box already? mainly it is an issue for a quick reboot of the

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:49 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Why not just do `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=somethin eg find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out You don't need tar for anything. alas

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Jesus Hinojosa
Rsync works fine for this, keeping group and user Regards 2010/8/12, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com: At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:49 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Why not just do `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=somethin

[CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
I was fooled by a hard link trying to clean up disk space. How can I undelete many files? (time is of the essence as I cannot unmount the partition) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason

Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Don Krause
Google is you friend.. http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html Good luck! -- Don Krause Head Systems Geek, Waver of Deceased Chickens. Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc. P.O. Box 608 Loma Linda, California 92354

Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Jason Pyeron Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:22 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete I was fooled by a hard link trying to clean up disk space. How can I undelete many files? (time is of the essence as I I guess I can release

Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Don Krause wrote: http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html That's an excellent little program. It can take some mucking about to find the invocation that will save a particular file or set of files, but it often can get the job done. It's

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: [r...@devserver21 ~]# cat /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$ restrict default nomodify notrap noquery restrict 127.0.0.1 server 192.168.1.67 server 192.168.1.66 server 192.168.1.65 Some HOWTOs tell you that more time servers is better, on a

Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Whit Blauvelt Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:31 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Warren Young Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 3:43 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: Okay, I only have one timeserver, I meant that your on-site time server should be relying on only one other outside time server, one stratum up. but the ntp clients cowardly refuse to use less than 3. Only one server on a given LAN should be

[CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Yamins
Hi: I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on. Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive Before running fdisk, I can mount the volume find: $ mount /dev/sdo1 /home ... and the volume is mounted fine. And, $ e2fsck -f /dev/sdo1 /dev/sdo1:

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote: Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and fussy server. All the others should just call ntpdate or msntp every hour or so as a cron job to keep their own

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 08/12/10 2:56 PM, Dan Yamins wrote: Hi: I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on. Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive Before running fdisk, I can mount the volume find: $ mount /dev/sdo1 /home ... and the volume is mounted

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread David Véjar
cuak David Véjar Soporte y Redes Ferretería Santiago Soluciones de Abastecimiento Lira 919 Santiago, Chile Fono: (56 2) 731 3824 www.ferreteriasantiago.cl -Mensaje original- De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de John R Pierce

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Yamins
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 08/12/10 2:56 PM, Dan Yamins wrote: Hi: I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on. Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive Before running fdisk, I can

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Yamins
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:25 PM, David Véjar dve...@ferreteriasantiago.clwrote: cuak ? -Mensaje original- De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de John R Pierce Enviado el: jueves, 12 de agosto de 2010 18:22 Para: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2010 4:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote: Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and fussy server. All the others should just call ntpdate or msntp

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Yamins
instead, you should have used parted(8) or similar to expand the partition, then used resize2fs(8) to expand the file system on this partition to its new size. So I'm trying parted on a new, clean volume created from the snapshot, attached to /dev/sdm As I explained before, I can't do $

Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
On Thursday 12 August 2010 17:56, Dan Yamins wrote: I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on. I suggest you try Parted Magic: http://partedmagic.com/ It doesn't do anything you can't do from the command line, but it's much easier to use. -- Yves Bellefeuille

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Warren Young Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron

Re: [CentOS] Problem resizing partition of nfs volume

2010-08-12 Thread Dan Yamins
I was just shown the solution to my problem, using the sfdisk program instead of the fdisk or parted programs.Apparently parted could not work because the drive is not really SCSI, and the fdisk program is to incorrect and was overwriting a portion of the disk. however, sfdisk turns out to

Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd

2010-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Warren Young wrote: The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If it is a problem for your application, you need a different design. It's a bad idea in the general case. If you have scheduled

Re: [CentOS] tar - ssh - standard out

2010-08-12 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 08/12/2010 06:46 AM, Tom Brown wrote: alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate streams in sequence that generate 5 or 6 log files but i dont know in advance the names of these logs. If the thing is generating log files, then it's not using standard out. Perhaps you