CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0715
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0715.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
236d22c871a93d27bef49f12e394cb2d
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0715
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0715.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e84c3e9c215431f4002d177a70e04b68
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0712
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0712.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
3bed17cb47beee0b411cb95cda8edbe3
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0712
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0712.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7e375cefe264020b716c39ed2d234ae2
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720
mikmod security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720
mikmod security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720
mikmod security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720
mikmod security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm
On 09/28/2010 06:14 PM, José Lara wrote:
Ernesto,
cuando le doy al link que dice como poner los repositorios de dag el
link esta roto, puedes mandarme las indicaciones por esta via?
ya está corregido el repo en el sitio, revisale de nuevo
saludos
epe
buenos dias listeros
Mi consulta es. Tengo mi firewall trabajando muy bien pero en mi LAN e puesto
otra red y la quiero alojar en la misma interface como VIRTUAL para no comprar
otra tarjeta.
eth0 -- 192.168.2.2/24--- al router
eth1 -- 192.168.210.1/24 --- LAN
eth1:0 -- 192.168.205.1/24 ---
2010/9/29 Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com:
buenos dias listeros
Mi consulta es. Tengo mi firewall trabajando muy bien pero en mi LAN e
puesto otra red y la quiero alojar en la misma interface como VIRTUAL para
no comprar otra tarjeta.
-snip-
intente ponerle asi
iptables -A
disculpen...
iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT
probe tu consejo ... ya no sale error pero tmabien el forwarder pero no hay
conexion
si no es mucha molestia ... como deberia estar las reglas para q haya conexion
de la lam a la red q va al router??
From:
2010/9/29 Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com:
disculpen...
iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT
probe tu consejo ... ya no sale error pero tmabien el forwarder pero no hay
conexion
si no es mucha molestia ... como deberia estar las reglas para q haya
conexion
Hola
Por más que intento cada vez que uso Centos tengo
que ajustar la resolución de mi monitor, se mantiene
siempre fija a 800x600.
Tengo una tarjeta Nvidia Gforce Serie 700, he actualizado
los drivers y nada de nada, no tengo ni la más mínima idea
de lo que esta pasando.
Me las he apañado
I can say
The qemu from rpmforge.net contains the --curses options but not the
one in the centos repo
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John Doe
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
On 29.9.2010 8.29, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Hello Jussi,
If searching on a local archive on your host consider grepmail.
Hei,
There should be a web interface - sorry for not saying this before. I am
looking for a web app where people can search the archive (which is in
mbox format), and
No i can start qemu but no network
I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it
My start line
qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Ross Walker wrote:
Which version of MSM?
Is the Framework service running?
I have it running on a headless server and run the GUI from a management
station and can log in without a problem.
I've worked out what the problem was - I didn't have shadow passwords
enabled ... once I'd
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote:
No i can start qemu but no network
I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it
My start line
qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no
I have something running along these lines, maybe it can help -
I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server
But verry slow
Xen are much faster
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope.
On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote:
markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with
gmane having the added benefit of providing a bi-directional mail2news
Hello all,
I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to
store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to
its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS
LostSon wrote:
Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy
Mark Van Bogart mark.vanbog...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson lost...@lostsonsvault.org wrote:
Hello
A few weeks ago I started
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that when
I put an .html file
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem
Sometimes simple problems have simple solutions!
For example:
# ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
-r--r--r-- 1 rootroot 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php
-rw-r--r--
hi Boris,
On 09/29/2010 02:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
I dont have any specific hints for you - but when you are done, a page
in the centos wiki would be nice to have, with challenges and options
you had to work through
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote:
# ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 599 Sep 29 15:49
Alexander Farber wrote:
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote:
# ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
-r--r--r-- 1 root
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 01:43:19 pm Timothy Murphy wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
When a server simply has to have minimal downtime, LVM is worth its LoC in
gold for this use.
What do you mean by no downtime?
What exactly do you do?
Is it documented anywhere?
Sorry for the delay; been
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello all,
I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to
store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to
its
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and
vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote:
# ls -al Alex.html index.php
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Jay Leafey wrote:
Fixing it is easy, just run restorecon:
restorecon -rv /var/www/html
Is there any received wisdom about when it is more appropriate to use
restorecon directly instead of the fixfiles wrapper? I tend to use
fixfiles, but I haven't really thought it
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the selinux
context information for the files - the error is usually to do with the
context of the files.
Hello and thanks for your reply. The SELinux stuff is new
At Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:13:14 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html
and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio
rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote:
 #
- Original Message -
| On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
| filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be
| used to
| store an extremely large number of files
: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/6cfa9567/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:48:48 +0200
From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
- Original Message -
| On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS
| filesystem as specified in the subject
I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled
RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned).
25 TB on a single volume, not distributed? Huh, let me know how long
that takes to check the first
Is there a document with instructions for this?
I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
Not to hijack a thread but on a similiar note. I have a Centos 4.x
server with a 500G sata drive working fine except for
Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
drives in a similiar way?
The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry
behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what
you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or bigger.
On 30/09/10 12:43 AM, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail
(relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine,
with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on).
[SNIP
Does anybody know what is
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled
RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned).
25 TB on a
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of
| some
| sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe
|
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
| However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of
| some
| sort.
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the
selinux context information for the files - the error is usually to
do with the context of the files.
Hello and
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
...
I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as
mine resides on a logical volume
Simon Billis wrote:
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
snip
You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the
command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is
useful
On 30/09/10 3:21 AM, Simon Billis wrote:
You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the
command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is
useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using
commands such as audit2why and
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not copy data around as it
sees fit. It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then
stripes this across all drives giving you a stripe-size'ed piece of chunk
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:13:52 pm Matt wrote:
Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
drives in a similiar way? If so what not too expensive 2 port
hardware raid controller do you reccommend and how do you do it?
3ware 9500S; can be had used and NOS (New Old
Thank you all for the valuable suggestions!
--Tim
- Jim Davis jda...@lbto.org wrote:
There's a review just now on Slashdot of a book that covers autoconf
and friends...
- Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com wrote:
My first recommendation is always Kernighan and Pike's ``Unix
Quoting Mário Barbosa mplbarb...@clix.pt:
LostSon wrote:
Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy
Mark Van Bogart mark.vanbog...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson lost...@lostsonsvault.org
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:23 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote:
I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server
But verry slow
Xen are much faster
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
Sent: Wednesday,
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not copy data around as it
sees fit. It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then
stripes this
Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two
drives in a similiar way?
The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry
behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what
you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or bigger.
on 9-28-2010 5:53 PM Timothy Murphy spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
I should have admitted that there is a Windows partition on the old disk.
It came with the machine, but I never use it.
However, I would like to save it if possible,
as there seem to be some operations on this
Would going from a single 500G sata to two 500G sata drives in
hardware raid 1 work? Just wandering if some space will be lost using
raid 1?
Again like I said: The same or bigger. Often HW raid controllers coerce the
size of a drive down a gig or so slightly different drives can all work
On 9/29/10 5:40 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope.
On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote:
markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with
gmane having the added benefit
59 matches
Mail list logo
