[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 poppler Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
66ee1357503afe32ee034b91227b70a2 poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
7ab9a8bd9cfeef80a442752d82c47def poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
53db13b9adb9b228d624742055b24cf7 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
b4e1cbd5ba5e8f803b8658a26db16ad6 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
c78b951572d13fe19127ade4e919fe2c poppler-utils-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ec88eeda73820877e07c58c1196d633e poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 i386 poppler Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
72e449e8db5b17a87cdba060c072b823 poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
9481379357221f0c0daffc056b2667b8 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
60fd980c99575fa30f2921f260be9d52 poppler-utils-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
Source:
ec88eeda73820877e07c58c1196d633e poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 i386 ghostscript Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0646
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0646.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9c3052568673423d60d3a49eb020338d ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
2e0f8d86ddd2a6441d8c495cef043dff ghostscript-devel-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
d926844618e6cf2b8e41363a9418e124 ghostscript-gtk-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
Source:
eac3fccca99f7d85dcdf0e93485ac02b ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 x86_64 ghostscript Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0646
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0646.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a3dd062c82646f0ef41667217ac66eff ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
a8b1a8303491fccd895faa8306d04417 ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
db9438c5e8399ff49aaad1dea4fc3fef ghostscript-devel-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
6aeb7a8f016842da84459c41c58c0e09 ghostscript-devel-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
ed910235e318e3bbd8bf6b8a0e43ca11 ghostscript-gtk-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
eac3fccca99f7d85dcdf0e93485ac02b ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 postgresql84 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
cb420292f2b778da1364c78ef841cd50 postgresql84-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
6ca6477576ef31cfef057fdf66578063
postgresql84-contrib-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
a83e19d8ceb9194a3cd6b19650da540f postgresql84-devel-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
337ec8789e5ceb489a6111b79f7e02b6 postgresql84-devel-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
bceb0483814ba479bdcf7835e19a55f0 postgresql84-docs-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
10bab787adb50d584bf984b8e208a21e postgresql84-libs-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
b6660f6ff2d335b823231b48a412c5e9 postgresql84-libs-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
073f5c729371e814ade0555301459c7e postgresql84-plperl-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
8cb6717efaf80e2d6d8a8ba74a9420eb
postgresql84-plpython-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
833be65f8863296b6d999afc5202c843 postgresql84-pltcl-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
56bdbd05b1cf0d51ae246de005afb52d postgresql84-python-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
f8f559d9c307a4ec062ad165dd3c3a5d postgresql84-server-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
1e5880ff812ead589da088935d9815ff postgresql84-tcl-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
ef5846dcd85db7c9c2908f44f892cc60 postgresql84-test-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
df5e1625537b822c559107dfdde35d9e postgresql84-8.4.5-1.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0753 Important CentOS 5 i386 kdegraphics Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0753 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0753.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
1cf0c1d049128c5391141fbad6fe1bbb kdegraphics-3.5.4-17.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
2901187c433f3822ca8ec8bb45856ce6 kdegraphics-devel-3.5.4-17.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
Source:
dd74575aa79804f706aebf7aa02917de kdegraphics-3.5.4-17.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 mikmod Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0720 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
fb576dead59bd03479e4da16b10a4fe4 mikmod-3.1.6-39.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
4b0d57d3171dc45bf2ebf2a839ea800f mikmod-devel-3.1.6-39.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
Source:
f23d805af06e1c0ffeda5a894a82cb2f mikmod-3.1.6-39.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 i386 openais Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0708
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0708.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a627871ba4ec41f8c41cf870706c64ca openais-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.i386.rpm
56fe1ec7d352ff0beba6025540dc66ed openais-devel-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.i386.rpm
Source:
9872346d8bbadd9d7b346679e1c96e6b openais-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 x86_64 openais Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0708
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0708.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
2d2d94c9d29772dda82e85cc52eb3241 openais-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.x86_64.rpm
01c8f547a3e2264bbb928964d278ecb4 openais-devel-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.i386.rpm
4900e71641e63a8bd4ffc780978b557b openais-devel-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9872346d8bbadd9d7b346679e1c96e6b openais-0.80.6-16.el5_5.9.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 x86_64 tomcat5 Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0744
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0744.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
7a7ed5e8aae2f92cd1112622dca1e453 tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
58554e63da8f3d5f03ff7bfa4caaf0b8
tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
43263a5abf5093df5a36d6da75357851
tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
40b3e0569ba64c9fdd484853433762c3 tomcat5-jasper-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
a403cf57df0ef4d16e9b13795ccad28e
tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
20dcd690a47edb3283827e94b95aa0f9
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
4d9274a2027275b8d9f8f05a40b34fe3
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
1e9c64358e96b6ab9b5b2d9c95309edd
tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
1769f17ef586b6bbb77f9b30311771fb
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
2e57a5d407834a4c07a05a5858190e97
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
f5f28b44ccf2fc26ac217c0efa33c9b1
tomcat5-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b20b30e8b3a5fa613def4bf67a25f3b7 tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 i386 tomcat5 Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0744
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0744.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
785f021ca998cdf3d662d761e36e tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
d39fb05bb62eb66f58a8687f0dc1a3af
tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
1798b73687f309a693c2780b207d05b3
tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
7aac46a625a7eab22292159f124b7227 tomcat5-jasper-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
9e32df471531ce2016a8f8a95a113b4d
tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
461b88df9c6d56018c89fce8b0e6b044
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
b0272dd8a553409d9bad638b47de8d51
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
847b876c53813e03711216231938031c
tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
bd5126797680da1c96735172523891f9
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
1618f79fc2c95dec58a2005f32fd2af1
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
296dfa0ec614a144af8fee50c3c96eca tomcat5-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.i386.rpm
Source:
b20b30e8b3a5fa613def4bf67a25f3b7 tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.11.el5_5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 postgresql Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a2f087dd2963808a1b0001d6917ab5ee postgresql-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
412ae489675af469f079e34df10270c3 postgresql-contrib-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
02bc4a270543a089b45f8fbe5e607d36 postgresql-devel-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
f4e475082cce5ec1a39d4a062c1a7e59 postgresql-docs-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
2fc002db451811bf3fe44b9e5e22811a postgresql-libs-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
9c32ef7a6cae292141a6221b5accb2d0 postgresql-pl-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
4667909e671f3b4a7bd73aa8a247a72a postgresql-python-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
b8daa29c5082f871f8eeeb422ce6a631 postgresql-server-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
d4edf5e0e060de8651927f4cf46023ea postgresql-tcl-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
026aa585667d56422f5feab3cfea4523 postgresql-test-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
Source:
4a2a044075d02bcabcf8221189c3e48d postgresql-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 postgresql Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0742 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0742.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0e1254a1eade7a996020c491a9952d35 postgresql-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
b98d09b3352570c97471ad3cbc5f3644 postgresql-contrib-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
848a8db88a0d99f265796dfd97f6080b postgresql-devel-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
2c896cdd9703a590692833f119c12fae postgresql-devel-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
701935e781c34fb85c02f7e4359afd2a postgresql-docs-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
58ff60ee3cafcc94452c5ec2077073e9 postgresql-libs-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
937e99b9179c67ae898ddb884d03f0bf postgresql-libs-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
16e442754dfd2a993cc25c8907fe4349 postgresql-pl-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
4da4a7ed1586f30d5346dc68fd2840e4 postgresql-python-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
0df21282010775ed76e1c7aac8f25980 postgresql-server-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
ab12ba6fbe351a0abb47102607123bd2 postgresql-tcl-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
f97a5bd654e77623050a13fd1cc4a5c1 postgresql-test-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4a2a044075d02bcabcf8221189c3e48d postgresql-8.1.22-1.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0716 CentOS 5 i386 conga Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0716
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0716.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
093a78cb38f91231691bc8fdac6d8ed2 luci-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm
82f7cdf8a3782f771789bb6e58c4dedc ricci-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm
Source:
79632debd088ae52b4eeb6dbd209120c conga-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0716 CentOS 5 x86_64 conga Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0716
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0716.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
024f57483c6345cba1c26bcf5d4dfe4c luci-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.x86_64.rpm
f1d5bc44539c931a86e961be71c7c603 ricci-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
79632debd088ae52b4eeb6dbd209120c conga-0.12.2-12.el5.centos.4.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema resolución de DNS?
Gracias Eduardo Para comenzar, he ejecutado wget con -4 y funcionó de forma instantánea. Cuando lo ejecuto sin la opción -4, veo a través de iptraf muchas solicitudes UDP al DNS que tengo configurado hasta que finalmente resuelve y descarga. En cambio si lo ejecuto con -4 envía solo una solicitud UDP de DNS. Sin embargo veo que todo el servidor tiene problemas. Tengo instalado wordpress y es imposible actualizarlo a través del mismo ya que da error por timeout. He deshabilitado IPV6 según: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5 sin embargo, no puedo bajr plugins de forma automática a través de wordpress. Supongo que me contestarás que ello es problema de WP. Sin embargo lo tengo instalado en otros servidores centos, pero versión 4 y funciona correctamente. Me estoy olvidando de configurar algo? Sólo por hacer una prueba, puede decirme si puedes resolver DNS rápidamente al baja este archivo con wget?: wget http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/jw-player-plugin-for-wordpress.1.2.4.zip Gracias El 09/10/2010 04:46 p.m., Eduardo Grosclaude escribió: entar con esos parámetros. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema resolución de DNS?
Ya verificaste en el /etc/resolv.conf que tengas ahi la ip de tu dns, deberas de tener al menos 3 nameservers, y has probado con dig y nslookup tu dns y resolucion inversa, tambien checa si tu dns esta en chroot Saludos Enviado desde mi Nokia E71 3G de Telcel -- mens. original -- Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Problema resolución de DNS? De: Normando Hall nh...@unixlan.com.ar Fecha: 11/10/2010 02:46 Gracias Eduardo Para comenzar, he ejecutado wget con -4 y funcionó de forma instantánea. Cuando lo ejecuto sin la opción -4, veo a través de iptraf muchas solicitudes UDP al DNS que tengo configurado hasta que finalmente resuelve y descarga. En cambio si lo ejecuto con -4 envía solo una solicitud UDP de DNS. Sin embargo veo que todo el servidor tiene problemas. Tengo instalado wordpress y es imposible actualizarlo a través del mismo ya que da error por timeout. He deshabilitado IPV6 según: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5 sin embargo, no puedo bajr plugins de forma automática a través de wordpress. Supongo que me contestarás que ello es problema de WP. Sin embargo lo tengo instalado en otros servidores centos, pero versión 4 y funciona correctamente. Me estoy olvidando de configurar algo? Sólo por hacer una prueba, puede decirme si puedes resolver DNS rápidamente al baja este archivo con wget?: wget http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/jw-player-plugin-for-wordpress.1.2.4.zip Gracias El 09/10/2010 04:46 p.m., Eduardo Grosclaude escribió: entar con esos parámetros. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] installing 32 bit vlc on Centos 5.5??
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:58:51PM -0700, Dave Stevens wrote: Quoting Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com: Is movieplayer mplayer? I don't think so I think it's Totem Totem often seems to have problems, even in more up to date distributions such as Fedora and Ubuntu. If that's the case, it's worth trying mplayer. By the way, priorities are explained on the CentOS wiki at http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities if you're not familiar with using them. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Willow: Xander, wanna stay and help me? Xander: Are you kidding? Willow: Yes, it was a joke I made up. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum update error
For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386 - 1. I don't really see how the man pages can cause conflicts; 2. More importantly, how should I deal with this? [I've updated everything else with yum --exclude=perl* update.] -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Timothy Murphy spake: For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386 - 1. I don't really see how the man pages can cause conflicts; 2. More importantly, how should I deal with this? [I've updated everything else with yum --exclude=perl* update.] Ran into this, too, recently. I don't know whether it's the 'recommended' way, but removing perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386 (on a 64bit machine), which was possible without removing anything else, and then updating (which included the installion of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 fixed it for me. HTH, Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFMsvEDfg746kcGBOwRAugdAJdyBoSwrHhfdq9wGOcT4I4+MwdAAKCkj4qa gcaDmDsde71I8W0JC/2oaQ== =Uo2F -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] security updates
I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Ritika Garg spake: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? YMMD. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMswD6fg746kcGBOwRAtvVAJ9HWjA7ZOMw2TdtFECGbNFGA2L4FQCffE4q vDimM5oXWRFSF/gQPwbGZQw= =smyX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? ___ What is your IP? :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
Am 11.10.10 14:30, schrieb sync: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? Okay, I'll bite. From time to time there are bugs found in the software which CentOS ships. These bugs can lead your code to crash, your machine to be denied of service as the process which has the bug takes up all system ressources or even can lead to others being able to run code on your system (which some bugs being able to do so as root). Security updates fix those flaws in the Software which CentOS ships, so you are advised to install those. Regards, Ralph ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
On 11/10/10 11:30 PM, sync wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? *Sigh* If you don't update it then it won't remain so. It's like buying a brand new deadlock for the door to your house and then leaving the door wide open when you go out. Chances are that sooner or later your stuff will get stolen and the place will get trashed. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:30:04 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? If you apply ALL of the security updates as they become available. ALL O/Ss have security updates from time-to-time (what do you think those MS-Windows 'Service Packs' are?). In the case of CentOS (and Linux in general), the security updates are generally released *before* some cracker writes an exploit, where as with MS-Windows the updates show up like 6 months *after* some cracker has trashed a zillion PCs and recuited them into an army of zombies and incorporated them into a botnet. The reason for the more timely updates with Linux is that it is open source, and with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow (I am not totally sure if this is a quote from Eric Raymond or Linus Torvalds). There are *lots and lots* of people looking over the code looking for mistakes (bugs). There are *always* bugs in any non-trivial piece of software -- no non-trivial piece of software is perfectly bug free. Us programmers *try* to write the best code we can, but sometimes stuff slips through the cracks... The operating system itself (the kernel) is a very complex piece of code. Plus there are all of the additional bits and pieces that people use for everyday tasks, many of these pieces of software are fairly complex all on their own. Also, since Linux is not a monolithic blob (like MS-Windows), much of the everyday software is maintained by a whole batch of different people and each piece of software has a different schedule of update releases, so there are updates (security and otherwise) released at different times. Red Hat / the CentOS team release these updates as soon as they become available (and have been quality tested, etc.). MIME-Version: 1.0 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update error
From: Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net For some reason all the perl man pages cause yum errors like - Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.i386 - 1. I don't really see how the man pages can cause conflicts; 2. More importantly, how should I deal with this? Simply because both packages contain several identical (as in filepath) files... You try to install two versions of the perl package at the same time. You have an old i386 version and try to install a newer x86_64. I think I would remove the old i386 version and install the newer x86_64. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
From: Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote: I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a need to have a security update? What is your IP? :-D Keep this information secret, but I think his IP is 127.0.0.1 ... And there's no firewall!!! ;P JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
On 10/11/2010 07:10 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: [snip] - install 'mock' (IMPORTANT: install the one from CentOS, exclude the one from EPEL in your repo file) Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. Thanks, Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Because the one in CentOS will, out of the box, pull out and properly configure the CentOS buildsys package, which itself is a meta-package whose dependencies are the minimal set required to create a chroot build environment: http://dev.centos.org/centos/buildsys/5/ My understanding (to be confirmed/infirmed by CentOS developers) is that this is the tool actually used to build CentOS. Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. Yes, that's what I thought first as well, but the one from CentOS worked, while the one from EPEL did not (for the purpose of building CentOS RPMS = I don't say that EPEL's mock is broken). I tried to tweak it a bit, but in the end all that you need is a cleanly prepared chroot and the CentOS mock is good enough for that. (there is probably a way to get the EPEL one to work as well.) Hence the need to exclude the mock from EPEL in the repo file, otherwise it updates the one from CentOS. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. ehh?? mock-1.1.5-1orc.src.rpm from upstream Raw Hide The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not know the particulars of why the other party recommmended using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ... -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 10/10/2010 05:56 PM: ... http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls seems just a touch on the hysterical side. i don't disagree that installing packages from the source rpm is probably a questionable idea. but that doesn't justify simply not explaining how to do it easily. I think you missed the main point of that page. It is about (not) installing from source tarballs, although using packages from a reliable repo if available is good advice anyway. Perhaps that page would benefit from a link to http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM That is only one hop away via the RPMs link that is on the SourceInstalls page. Any comments on the latter page are welcome, but probably best done on the centos-docs list. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 68, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 poppler Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 i386 popplerUpdate
(Karanbir Singh)
3. CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 i386 ghostscript Update (Karanbir Singh)
4. CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 x86_64 ghostscript Update (Karanbir Singh)
5. CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 postgresql84 Update
(Karanbir Singh)
6. CESA-2010:0742 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 postgresql84 Update
(Karanbir Singh)
7. CESA-2010:0753 Important CentOS 5 i386kdegraphics Update
(Karanbir Singh)
8. CESA-2010:0753 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kdegraphics Update
(Karanbir Singh)
9. CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 mikmodUpdate
(Karanbir Singh)
10. CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 mikmod Update
(Karanbir Singh)
11. CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 i386 openais Update (Karanbir Singh)
12. CEBA-2010:0708 CentOS 5 x86_64 openais Update (Karanbir Singh)
13. CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 x86_64 tomcat5 Update (Karanbir Singh)
14. CEBA-2010:0744 CentOS 5 i386 tomcat5 Update (Karanbir Singh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:51:57 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
poppler Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20101010225157.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
66ee1357503afe32ee034b91227b70a2 poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
7ab9a8bd9cfeef80a442752d82c47def poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
53db13b9adb9b228d624742055b24cf7 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
b4e1cbd5ba5e8f803b8658a26db16ad6 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
c78b951572d13fe19127ade4e919fe2c poppler-utils-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ec88eeda73820877e07c58c1196d633e poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:51:57 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0749 Important CentOS 5 i386
poppler Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20101010225157.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0749 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0749.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
72e449e8db5b17a87cdba060c072b823 poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
9481379357221f0c0daffc056b2667b8 poppler-devel-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
60fd980c99575fa30f2921f260be9d52 poppler-utils-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.i386.rpm
Source:
ec88eeda73820877e07c58c1196d633e poppler-0.5.4-4.4.el5_5.14.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:55:17 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5 i386 ghostscript
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20101010225517.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0646
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0646.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9c3052568673423d60d3a49eb020338d ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
2e0f8d86ddd2a6441d8c495cef043dff ghostscript-devel-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
d926844618e6cf2b8e41363a9418e124 ghostscript-gtk-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.i386.rpm
Source:
eac3fccca99f7d85dcdf0e93485ac02b ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12.el5_5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:55:17 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0646 CentOS 5
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
On Sunday, October 10, 2010 05:56:47 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote: frankly, the wiki page on downloading from source: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/SourceInstalls seems just a touch on the hysterical side. For certain uses and certain software stacks from source is the only sane way. For other stacks and uses the opposite is true. Plone from the Plone.org UnifiedInstaller is one stack where you simply want to stay with a from-source managed-by-zc.buildout setup, not from RPM's. It is one of the very few cases where this is so. In that case you have to balance support from the OS versus support from the Plone upstream; in the case of Plone upstream is preferred. YMMV. i don't disagree that installing packages from the source rpm is probably a questionable idea. but that doesn't justify simply not explaining how to do it easily. The referenced wiki page has nothing to do with rebuilding a source RPM, but has to do with the 'traditional' ./configuremake sudo make install mantra that is a support nightmare. Properly controlling from source-rpm builds is a sane activity, as long as you take the responsibility for the package, set the EVR for the RPM properly, etc. Good info on how to do this is in the Fedora developer docs. EPEL contains all the rpm developer tools you need, so enable EPEL, load rpmdevtools, and have fun. Support is in your own hands, of course. When there are specific options I need (like building a package with a non-default set of compile-time arguments or modules) I'll do this myself, and keep all the changes in my own setup with EVR the CentOS package EVR (twiddling epoch, though really really ugly, is quite effective to make you package always win the comparison). But I packaged PostgreSQL for five years, and am not a novice. I'm not as in practice as I once was, but I do try to keep up with most of the current ways of doing things. And I always try to start with the CentOS base package where possible. my plan is to install yum-utils to get yumdownloader, add the repo file suggested above, then have students: $ yumdownloader --source package so they can examine the source of some packages. is the approach i'm suggesting reasonable? thanks. Very reasonable for a learning tool, which is what your question was really asking. Not as reasonable for a production server. Do use the Fedora/EPEL rpmdevtools, though. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: Would you mind giving a hint why one should not use mock from EPEL? Afaict the mock version in the CentOS repo is 0.6.13 which was released years ago and the one in EPEL is 1.0.7 which is current. ehh?? mock-1.1.5-1orc.src.rpm from upstream Raw Hide I'm aware of the 1.1 branch but the mock website says that 1.1 is for F-13+. Doesn't that excludes CentOS? The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not know the particulars of why the other party recommmended using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ... Sorry but I don't get it. Are you saying that mock from EPEL or the Rawhide one you mentioned work equally fine on CentOS (5.5) and all cover the buildsys requirement that Mathieu mentioned? Regards, Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Went with OpenDNS for now
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote: A few weeks ago I asked about firewalls and family filters. Lanny Marcus, I believe, suggested OpenDNS. Just wanted to thank him (and everyone here) for their suggestions. snip Ron: My pleasure. Usually, I am the one receiving help from the list. Glad you found OpenDNS useful. Lanny I've already set it up at my brother's house, it has to be the easiest family filtering solution for multiple computers. The only downside is this allows me to put off learning anything about Linux servers... again. Ron: Again, you are welcome. One morning last week, we had no DNS. I told my wife, that's virtually impossible with OpenDNS. Called Tech Support of our ISP and they told me their international connectivity was down. For us, the nearest OpenDNS service is in Miami and that's where the underwater cable to the USA ends. The next morning, no DNS. For some reason, after 20 1/2 months, the DNS/DNS Caching in our IPCop box died. :-) I suggest everyone consider using OpenDNS, in their homes and offices. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] recommended way to install source rpms?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Patrick Lists wrote: On 10/11/2010 05:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote: The mock inplementaion is a moving target --- I do not know the particulars of why the other party recommmended using THE ONE CENTOS BUILT ON for CentOS, but ... Sorry but I don't get it. Are you saying that mock from EPEL or the Rawhide one you mentioned work equally fine on CentOS (5.5) and all cover the buildsys requirement that Mathieu mentioned? not at all -- I am saying that mock is a moving target as to bugs, features, and approach if you move beyond the one we ship in (as I recall) 'extras' In such cases the proper support venue regarding mock use is elsewhere, as we at centos are focused on supporting what we ship, rather than trying to know an answer for all bugs in all variations of all software everywhere -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Automated Reply from Dieter Thiel cent os-annou...@centos.org=
Abwesenheitsnotiz: Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin ab dem 22.10. wieder im Büro erreichbar. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Ostermann, Email osterm...@dimast.de. Vielen Dank! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
I have two CentOS servers running SSH on two different non-standard ports. So far as I can tell, they have identical /etc/ssh/sshd_config files with the exception of the different port (both are 22xx). However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause? Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth ports but I'm not the one making the decision! Thanks! -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
On 10/11/2010 04:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause? You're probably not running a full port scan with nmap. One of the systems is using a port that nmap includes in its quick scan set, and the other does not. Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? You can't. If that port is open, a full nmap scan will reveal it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
However, when running nmap on them, one betrays the port that SSH is running on, and the other does not. What does betray mean? I have shut down iptables on both machines and the behaviour remains this way. What could be the cause? Public facing machines w/ iptables off? Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? So if you want it hidden, you want it not to accept connections from other machines? #iptables -L See what's allowed, then if you're not iptable savvy, install/run system-config-security. Then do not permit connections to that port, unless you provide more info, like do you Have internal trusted interfaces etc, you will be locked out. I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth ports but I'm not the one making the decision! Probably good thing you haven't exposed a possibly bad config. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )
On a semi-related subtopic, Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful? I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. -- Drew Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood. --Marie Curie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth ports but I'm not the one making the decision! One method to obscure the presence of the ssh daemon would be to use port knocking: http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html Honestly (and this is mere opinion), the other person (who wants to hide ssh-the owner) is being paranoid. Use strong passwords, run ssh on an alternate port, don't expose unneeded services to the outside world, and install something like fail2ban to block ssh attackers. If they need higher security then set up openvpn. -- Ryan Manikowski r...@devision.us | 716.771.2282 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote: On a semi-related subtopic, Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful? I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. You want to VNC or SSH into a remote workstation that happens to be asleep. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )
I understand what it is and how it works but the why has eluded me. You need to do maintenance on hardware and you don't want it running wasting power or it happen to be off such as the case with many client boxes? You need to start a node and you don't want it running wasting power while you don't need it? You need to do * and you don't want it running wasting power while you don't need it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice
Hi, all : I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail noticerecently. That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then how to send an E-mail to notice him? By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently . Could someone give me some suggestions ? Thanks in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Scanner missing again
A while back I posted about my new HP J3600 scan/fax/copy/print-er and how it was visible to the root but not me as an ordinary user. I had no trouble configuring it as a printer, but the scanner was invisible to xsane until I added my user id to the lp group. Now it's gone again, except that it is visible as a usb device to me as a normal user, but xsane can't seem to find it any more. Since this was working on the 2.6.18-194.11.4 kernel, I rebooted that one, but it exhibited the same behavior, so I wrote off the new (...17.1) kernel as innocent. However, I am getting an error during startup on hpssd - it complains about python-dbus being missing. I can't find that either, but there _is_ a dbus-python 0.70 installed and it wants a version 0.80, so I hauled down 0.83, built it and installed it and that didn't seem to help. I will try that when I have a few minutes to take the system down again, but in the mean time, can anyone hazard a guess at what's wrong? $ lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 002 Device 006: ID 03f0:3112 Hewlett-Packard Bus 002 Device 004: ID 22b8:2ac2 Motorola PCS Bus 002 Device 001: ID : Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04f9:0033 Brother Industries, Ltd Bus 002 Device 003: ID 03f0:0205 Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c It's Bus 2, Dev 6. There is nothing in any of the /var/log/* files to indicate any kind of problem for yesterday, when the problem appeared, other than my fumbled three attempts to input the password for 'sudo xsane'. What's interesting is this: $ sane-find-scanner # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer. # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter. found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [HP], product=0x3112 [Officejet J3600 series]) at libusb:002:005 found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett-Packard], product=0x0205 [HP ScanJet 3300C]) at libusb:002:004 # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported by # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage. # Not checking for parallel port scanners. # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports # can't be detected by this program. # You may want to run this program as root to find all devices. Once you # found the scanner devices, be sure to adjust access permissions as # necessary. So, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but xsane does not??? (For the record, on the 11.4 kernel, sane-find-scanner could _not_ find the scanner, but that was before I installed the newer dbus-python.) This was working perfectly a few days ago. I'm not sure where else to look TIA, Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice
I have a thought of writing the script to implement the LDAP mail noticerecently. That's to say , after creating the new account and his passwd , then how to send an E-mail to notice him? By the way , I used the LDAP tool called 389 LDAP or openldap recently . Could someone give me some suggestions ? What precisely are you looking to do? Are you trying to write a script to create a user and email them? If so, I've definitely done that. I put together a bunch of tools a while back if you are looking for some building blocks (including a send mail to user sub and a lot of retrieve/set LDAP attributes). A lot of this was put together from other stuff I found on the web in my years of LDAP administration. Disclaimer: I'm a self taught perl guy, so I don't know all of the tricks, etc http://xrayspx.com/part-3-subroutines If you give me a better idea of exactly what you are looking for I'm sure I could whip something up. Cheers, Sean ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] One server not showing SSH port, the other is.
2010/10/12 Ryan Manikowski jee...@gmail.com: On 10/11/2010 7:44 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Specifically, how can I hide the port that SSH is running on? I'm sorry that I cannot provide the IP addresses, the owner of the servers doesn't want that! I also know how silly it is to do stealth ports but I'm not the one making the decision! One method to obscure the presence of the ssh daemon would be to use port knocking: http://dotancohen.com/howto/portknocking.html Honestly (and this is mere opinion), the other person (who wants to hide ssh-the owner) is being paranoid. Use strong passwords, run ssh on an alternate port, don't expose unneeded services to the outside world, and install something like fail2ban to block ssh attackers. Just disable password authentication on ssh and use only keyfiles .. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice
On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote: What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the new account and his password and then can email them . By the way , My Mail server is not the Linux Server(CentOS) , it is the Windows 2003 Server . So how can I do that ? hire a windows scripting programmer who's familiar with whatever email server you're running, and whatever LDAP service you're using. you're way WAY off topic for this list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LDAP Mail Notice
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.comwrote: On 10/11/10 10:34 PM, sync wrote: What you said is right . I'm trying to write a script to create the new account and his password and then can email them . By the way , My Mail server is not the Linux Server(CentOS) , it is the Windows 2003 Server . So how can I do that ? hire a windows scripting programmer who's familiar with whatever email server you're running, and whatever LDAP service you're using. you're way WAY off topic for this list. Maybe what i said is not clear, because my English is too pool . Please forgive me if my expression is not precise. The following is my environment : Workspace Environment : CentOS 5.5 64bits , Using Openldap Server or 389 LDAP Server Mail Server : Windows Mail Server I am looking for the method that after I create the new account on the Openldap Server , then use the script to auto send an E-mail to him . Of course, these actions may used into one script . For example : If I create the new account called Tim on LDAP Server , and his password is 123456 , and his mail address is t...@test.com Then will send an E-mail to him to notice his information , like his name and his passowrd. So Would someone can give some suggestions ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
