Saludos, por favor necesito me ayude a configurar mi red en una Laptop. El
modelo es una Emachine Acer E625. Les comento ingresando a windows detectecta a
los siguientes componentes:
Adaptador de Red 802.11g Broadcam
Atheros AR8132 PCI Fast Ethernet Controller (NDIS 6.20)
Al momento de ingresar
2011/2/20 Sean s...@orcon.net.nz
James B. Byrne wrote:
But, our future financial support
for CentOS is contingent upon dealing with an independent legal
entity that conforms with national and international tax laws and
corporate reporting requirements.
A new model (appropriate to
Eric Gerzon wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
# strace -p 2256
attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted
I am trying to trace an mdadm re-sync pid and I keep getting the above
error.
I believe the MD re-sync process is
That works for me. Thanks James!
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:34 AM, James Pearson
jame...@moving-picture.comwrote:
Eric Gerzon wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get some more information about the following issue:
# strace -p 2256
attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not
cornel panceac wrote:
in (my) ideal world. money are not necessary. you give me centos, i
give you electricity, or hardware, or an office, etc . since we still
live in money-lenders ruled world, is there a way to contribute
(money) to centos but not directly? like, instead giving money, pay
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:19:23PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
[root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
Starting sshd:WARNING: initlog is deprecated and
Hello Centos,
I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
[root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
Starting sshd:WARNING: initlog is deprecated and will be removed in a
future release
On 02/20/2011 03:22 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:19:23PM -0500, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I am getting an error that I am not familiar with when I restart ssh.
[root@virtcent01:~] #service sshd restart
Stopping sshd: [ OK ]
On 02/20/11 2:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Also the following will help determine if you have normal centos
packages or something else:
rpm -q initscripts openssh-server
The result should look this for CentOS-5:
initscripts-8.45.30-3.el5.centos
openssh-server-4.3p2-41.el5_5.1
I believe
Hey guys,
good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
[root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -qa | grep ssh
openssh-askpass-gnome-5.6p1-7.el5.em2
On 02/20/2011 04:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
[root@LCENT01:~] #rpm -qa | grep ssh
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 05:16:47PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If you take a look at man sshd, there may be a switch you can pass in to
No. This has nothing to do with sshd configuration.
As I previously said, the problem is purely 100% in the init script.
The generic script from OpenSSH
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
good call! yes this is a custom ssh. It's a version that has LPK
capabilities (LDAP public keys) included. It is the product of an rpm
built from a spec file and tarball that was patched with LPK.
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:09 -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
Are you talking about the SAQC? I run all CC transactions through one
CentOS VPS webserver (actually I have two servers that I periodically
wipe out and alternate between every year or two). So I don't have POS
terminals or any Windows
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:51 -0500, John Hinton wrote:
Very good information, Ed. And yes, you will almost certainly be
fighting with the compliance company, as I have not yet seen any who
recognized CentOS. RHEL, yes. CentOS however does not hold the same
'trusted standard' or clout as the
2011/2/18 Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net:
That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE
:)
Wow, I'm really impressed with the professionalism of that site :-P
Quotes from their FAQ:
Currently, our physical servers are ... ... with RAID 1 (mirroring)
10K SATA
Hello,
I have a problem configuring the timezone on a CentOS 5.5 server.
I would like the timezone to be Europe/Paris.
I have followed the steps described here:
http://www.wikihow.com/Change-the-Timezone-in-Linux
I think I have changed the appropriate configuration files ( /etc/localtime,
On 02/20/2011 07:41 PM, John Nash wrote:
Am I missing something important ?
Is your /usr a separate partition? If so try to copy
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Paris to /etc/localtime (instead of it being
a symbolic link). See if that works.
--
Jorge
___
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 00:41 +0100, John Nash wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem configuring the timezone on a CentOS 5.5 server.
I would like the timezone to be Europe/Paris.
I have followed the steps described here:
http://www.wikihow.com/Change-the-Timezone-in-Linux
I think I
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9 weeks after
RHEL6.
The FIRST build of a
Hallo Dag,
CentOS 4.0 was released 23 days after RHEL4.0
CentOS 5.0 was released 29 days after RHEL5.0
CentOS 6.0 is *not* released 103 days after RHEL6.0
en ?
This is not a problem for me. I am contented to wait - en jij?
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The FIRST build of a distribution (the .0 of 4.0 or 5.0) takes MUCH
longer than the subsequent rebuilds. This is because you have NOTHING
to start from except SRPMS.
Hoi Dag,
This was in a direct response to Johnny ;-) No worries, I put the context
back so it's clear *why* I replied this. It's not that I am impatient for
CentOS 6.0. In fact I switched to RHEL6.
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a
Dag Wieers wrote:
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers are bothering with 5.6,
if 6.0 very shortly.
--
Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers are bothering with 5.6,
if 6.0
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
I admire very much what you and the others have done to provide builds
and a very large repository for the benefit of millions - not only of
Centos users. The public spirited nature of your (plural, d.w.z. jullie)
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 02:04 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0.
As there is a direct security impact to users.
Could you explain that more fully, please?
I've actually been puzzled why the developers
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 18:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
I admire very much what you and the others have done to provide builds
and a very large repository for the benefit of millions - not only of
Centos users. The
On 02/20/2011 07:30 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/16/2011 04:31 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 15/02/11 17:25, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Let's see. 7 weeks after a RHEL release, we have:
For RHEL6, lets make that 14 weeks. And RHEL5.6 got released 9
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Ian Forde ianfo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:09 -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
Are you talking about the SAQC? I run all CC transactions through one
CentOS VPS webserver (actually I have two servers that I periodically
wipe out and alternate
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On the initial pass through builder for C4, maybe 30 packages needed to
be fixed because the links were bad.
On the initial pass through builder for c5, maybe 20 packages needed to
be fixed.
On the initial pass through
31 matches
Mail list logo
