Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request

2011-03-06 Thread gaohu
Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . Alan. Thanks Alan, Maybe we should give Ralph a while ... GaoHu ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request

2011-03-06 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 6 March 2011 07:59, gaohu tigerhei...@gmail.com wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . Alan. Thanks Alan, Maybe we should give Ralph a while ... GaoHu . . . or time to recover from yet another excellent beer festival! Alan.

[CentOS-docs] Homepage request

2011-03-06 Thread R P Herrold
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . well, not exactly .. the page and acl for GaoHu is now present http://wiki.centos.org/GaoHu and he should be able to edit it -- Russ herrold

Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request

2011-03-06 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 6 March 2011 17:35, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . well, not exactly .. the page and acl for GaoHu is now present http://wiki.centos.org/GaoHu

[CentOS-es] Problemas con Yum y python

2011-03-06 Thread Angel Manuel Delgado Echezarreta
Saludos listeros, tengo CentOS 5.5 instalado y no habia usado el yum para nada, ahora por asunto en dependencias decido instalarlo y me da error. [root@quad yum]# rpm -ivh yum-3.2.22-26.el5.centos.noarch.rpm warning: yum-3.2.22-26.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID

Re: [CentOS] Octet (was: IP6 Anyone?)

2011-03-06 Thread Bob Marcan
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 + Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember byte being a synonym for bit field and a byte could be any number of bits,

Re: [CentOS] Octet (was: IP6 Anyone?)

2011-03-06 Thread Always Learning
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 14:36 +0100, Bob Marcan wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 + Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote: PDP being a 'main franme'? Baby mainframe perhaps when compared to Honeywell's (later Bull's) Level 66? Level 66 had 36 bit words which could be used as 6

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-06 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR.  LPAR can be divided in units

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have hardware

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-06 Thread Mag Gam
We are a data shop. nfs v4 support native XFS support ext4 Hopefully by 6.4 they will have native brtfs :-) On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers

2011-03-06 Thread Chuck Munro
On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote: Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4 Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards. Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200? What

[CentOS] Problem burning dvd's

2011-03-06 Thread Jimmy Bradley
I have a question on burning dvd iso's, using k3b. I have a sony dvd rw, and I've burned cd's with now problem, including iso's. The problem I'm having is, when I burn a dvd iso, k3b says it's a success, but then when I re-insert the disk, the drive tries to read the disk, but the read/write

Re: [CentOS] Updating hardware clock from cron

2011-03-06 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, March 04, 2011 3:04 PM -0500 Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane todd.dennis...@navy.mil wrote: Not if you are running ntp and it was able to sync, because ntpd activates a mode in the kernel that sets the hwclock every 11 minutes when ntp declares it got synced.

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely resembles virtualization, from Xen to Solaris Zones to hardware partitioning on the M

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-06 Thread Peter A
On Sunday, March 06, 2011 05:28:13 pm John R Pierce wrote: On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely resembles virtualization,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers

2011-03-06 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Chuck Munro chu...@seafoam.net wrote: On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote: Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4 Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards. Are

Re: [CentOS] Gnu Screen - terminal issues

2011-03-06 Thread Sean Carolan
The remote host's $TERM variable is in fact xterm.  When I connect to the screen session the $TERM variable is 'screen'. Are you running screen locally or remotely? Remotely. My work machine is a laptop, which is not powered on all the time. Hence I use a remote box as a jumping-off point,

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-06 Thread Charles Polisher
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: A warning: round robin can be problematical. Amen. Consider what happens with round-robin DNS when one host stops working. Round-robin DNS will hand out the address of the failed host just as often as it did when it was all working. Some clients (applications) will

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers

2011-03-06 Thread Charles Polisher
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I like Adaptec for price/performance, and good Linux overall compatibility (including CentOS). Just don't order those fell off the truck Taiwan specials that are clearly Adaptec chipsets, but have actually had the numbers filed off. Adaptec is proud of their

Re: [CentOS] kernel NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out

2011-03-06 Thread Charles Polisher
Simon Matter wrote: Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short message in syslog saying: [localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out (or similar). By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64 bit and the kernel version was 2.6.18-164.

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-06 Thread Tim Dunphy
an interesting choice for low cost hardware load balancing appliances is coyote point http://www.coyotepoint.com/products/?gclid=CI6ri9jQu6cCFQbc4Aodmi1V4Q however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Polisher cpol...@surewest.net

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-06 Thread Lucian
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-06 Thread David Brian Chait
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software. It really depends on your needs, if you are building a production ops environment then the last thing that

[CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)

2011-03-06 Thread Roland RoLaNd
Hello, Today my server stopped responding. i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the following info shown on the screen: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] and alot of other information. ii've took a screen shot of the info shown , you can

Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)

2011-03-06 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 07.03.2011 08:31, schrieb Roland RoLaNd: Hello, Today my server stopped responding. i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the following info shown on the screen: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] and alot of other information.

Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)

2011-03-06 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200 Roland RoLaNd wrote: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. The first google result for the above string takes me here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3582 Which in turn contains a

Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)

2011-03-06 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 07.03.2011 08:46, schrieb Frank Cox: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200 Roland RoLaNd wrote: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. The first google result for the above string takes me here: