CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0373
firefox security update for CentOS 4 1386 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0373.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
i386:
firefox-3.6.15-2.el4.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0374
thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 1386 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0374.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
i386:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-36.el4.centos.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0375
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 1386 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0375.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
i386:
seamonkey-1.0.9-68.el4_8.centos.i386.rpm
Hola colegas :
Que debo instalar en mi server para dar soporte zend framework a php ?
..o sea que pueda ser capaz de interpretar frameworksuso php
5.1.6 .no se si me supe explicar bien, pero espero que tengan mas o
menos idea de lo que necesito .gracias de
Hola
Instala el paquete php-pear y luego sigue los pasos de esta página
[1], en resumen:
- Instalar yum install php-pear
- Editar (si es necesario) la directiva include_path en /etc/php.ini
- Reiniciar httpd
- Agregar el Canal de Zend en Pear
- Y ya esta.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/zend/
Miguel me mataste el sueño, sufri tu problema como si me pasase a mi.
Ojala lo resuelvas y que todo te salga bien.
Ahora como hacer para que no pase esto... ademas de evitar
borrados indebidos?
Lo mejor que es? ( ya estoy previniendo para que no me pase nunca) guardar
una iso con la imagen de
hola:
tengo un dns (bind)en centos que quiero integrar con active directory alguien
puede darme una mano?
Atte Jose Manuel
GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
El día 15 de marzo de 2011 05:28, Santi Saez santis...@woop.es escribió:
Hola!
Quería presentar aquí también el proyecto PowerStack [1] en el que he
estado trabajando el los últimos meses como mejora para la distribución
CentOS.
La primera versión es un repositorio que contiene las últimas
Not that it matters, but the last time I checked, SL had not released
their 4.9 or 5.6 releases either.
On the other hand, unlike CentOS, Scientific Linux (SL) is backporting
5.6 security fixes. Indeed, all of the security issues CentOS 5.5 has
right now aren't in SL.
SL is a fine product
On 23/03/11 03:41, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
133 days delay, an all time record (not
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 06:45:46AM +, Ned Slider wrote:
I see time-lines clearly published in this FAQ on the CentOS website:
Trimmed for brevity.
This will normally be within 2 weeks of the Update Set release.
The above FAQ creates an expectation of 2 weeks being the norm.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Sam Trenholme
strenholme.use...@gmail.com wrote:
As an open-source developer, I understand the frustration of working
hard and having a lot of freeloaders not appreciating my work. I feel
people posting here talking about how unprofessional CentOS is acting
On 03/22/2011 08:37 AM, Sam Trenholme wrote:
Hello everyone:
* DNS does not have a refresh rate. In DNS, the person running the
domain determines what the refresh rate (it's called TTL in DNS) for
their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of once per hour and
my domains (maradns.org,
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD
Version is 8.3.10
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this
peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
the problem is, thats a RED HAT
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and
DRBD Version is 8.3.10
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
And then looking at the reason for the fails:
Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out:
--- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0 -0500
+++ work/RHEL-req 2011-03-23
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Sam Trenholme
strenholme.use...@gmail.com wrote:
As an open-source developer, I understand the frustration of working
hard and having a lot of freeloaders not appreciating my work. I feel
people
On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
And then looking at the reason for the fails:
Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out:
--- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
like RHEL.
So I thought instead of going with such a diff paradigm, that using
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is
2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
We're pretty much unable to help because yours is a RHEL6 system, we're
stuck at RHEL5.5 until our team gets RHEL6 ==
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji balajisun...@midascomm.com wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD
Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Node testing with
Simplex Setup
Server 1 :
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Ouch. Johnny, I'd really like to replicate this error, but I just
don't have the visibility into your build configurations. Saying it's
easy to do yourself doesn't work,
Hi! I would need an advice from those that use IB (as admins :) )
i have a choice between :
1. Mellanox InfiniHost® III Lx HCA card, single-port CX4, DDR, PCIe
x8, mem-free, tall bracket, RoHS R5
2. QLogic Single Port 20 Gb InfiniBand to x16 PCI Express Adapter
(Single Pack)
aside the price is
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji
balajisun...@midascomm.com wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is
2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2
Hi,
Am trying to build SMP kernel.
Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot up,
following errors were shown up(highlighted in bold red color):
My kernel config file has ACPI and PCI configs
sri wrote:
Hi,
Am trying to build SMP kernel.
Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot
up, following errors were shown up(highlighted in bold red color):
My kernel config file has ACPI and
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
133 days delay, an all time record (not
On Monday, March 21, 2011 07:53:04 pm Max Hetrick wrote:
If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
Duplicate Messages on Mozilla's add-on site.
As a pointer, the kmail I'm using, from within Kontact, also can do
de-duplication; click 'Folder' then 'Remove Duplicate
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
sri wrote:
Hi,
Am trying to build SMP kernel.
Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot
up,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the
SL notes on the srpms that don't build with the listed
dependencies as shipped - and they aren't being picky about
the library linkages matching the RH binaries like CentOS
is.
If the
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
It takes hours to analyze all the packages in a build ... I do not have
hours to spend on doing it for SL ... but here is another error that I
found in the SL tree when figuring out build issues in the CentOS 5.6 tree:
Which is why opening the process
Hi! I would need an advice from those that use IB (as admins :) ) i have a
choice between :
1. Mellanox InfiniHost(r) III Lx HCA card, single-port CX4, DDR, PCIe x8,
mem-free, tall bracket, RoHS R5
2. QLogic Single Port 20 Gb InfiniBand to x16 PCI Express Adapter (Single Pack)
aside the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
'doing' rather than
talking in the cloister
as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder. so i believe the real question is: how can we
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. Building it
yourself, without that access to your unique build environment or a
way to gracefully replicate it, represents dozens or hundreds of
man-hours for each
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:19:49 AM + Miguel Medalha
miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
The D-Links are NOT suitable for professional use. I used one of their
models and it hanged on me multiple times. Because it is powered by the
keyboard/mouse/video connectors, the only way to recover
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, cornel panceac wrote:
2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
'doing' rather than
talking in the cloister
as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder.
At Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:34:10 +0530 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hi,
Am trying to build SMP kernel.
You do know that the *stock* CentOS 5.x kernels (2.6.18-...) are already
built as SMP kernels? That is, under RHEL 5/CentOS 5 you don't even get
uniprocessor kernels,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. Building it
yourself, without that access to your unique build environment or a
way to gracefully
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
thanks very much for any help
luigi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
admin lewis wrote:
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
Have you configured any raid disk controllers in the bios first?
This is a very common question - servers with RAID
on 18:40 Wed 23 Mar, admin lewis (adminle...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
thanks very much for any help
1: Comfirm your boot menu settings
2:
Le 23/03/2011 18:40, admin lewis a écrit :
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
thanks very much for any help
luigi
What have you as Raid Controller ? H200, H700,
On 03/23/11 10:40 AM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
does that system have some form of PERC raid controller? you need to go
into the PERC Bios
On 3/23/2011 10:40 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
Sometimes looking at the list and the posts, I feel like I am
watching a group of nuns, talking (speculating) about the life
issues of Las Vegas showgirls
The showgirls are picky about who they let under the covers. So I
suppose we have to wait for
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is just hard for an outsider to reconcile the statements about the
build process not needing any changes or more resources with the lack of
a target time. Or that binary compatibility is the critical thing with
the distribution becoming
2011/3/23 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 03/23/11 10:40 AM, admin lewis wrote:
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
does that system have some form of PERC raid
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
Yes, but using the machine principal you're able to request any number of
service principals that are SERVICENAME/machinename. For this to work in a
virtual hosting environment, you need multiple machine names (since we're
talking about making a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:19:49 AM + Miguel Medalha
miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
The D-Links are NOT suitable for professional use. I used one of their
models and it hanged on me multiple times. Because it is
Ok, I won't argue with that; a it fails in this scenario overrides
a it works for me. I will add though, that were it got into the state
described above was where I was able to recover it by using the reset
button. You might want to try that next time instead of the cable
disconnect
Hi.
I'm new to configuring Clustering .
The CentOS 5.5 guest machines will be running on ESXi 4.1 . I'm configuring the
clustering using Conga . I see that there is support for using ESX to do the
fencing. The problem I have is that the guest machines are not allowed to have
access the
On 03/23/2011 11:19 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I’m new to configuring Clustering .
The CentOS 5.5 guest machines will be running on ESXi 4.1 . I’m
configuring the clustering using “Conga” . I see that there is support
for using ESX to do the fencing. The problem I have is that the guest
Thanks to the help of folks on this forum, I now have my Centos 4
box up and working, however I do have a question on how the
repair actually worked.
After starting the Linux Repair, the process found my installed
Linux. Some of you will remember that I had accidentally erased
the /boot and
Use fence_manual ... but it is not supported officially by TUV in
production environments ...
Do not use that...
How does that actually fence the offending node when it needs to?
The concept of fencing is for the preservation of data integrity, circumventing
it with a manual fence is useful
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Todd Cary t...@aristesoftware.com wrote:
Thanks to the help of folks on this forum, I now have my Centos 4 box up and
working, however I do have a question on how the repair actually worked.
After starting the Linux Repair, the process found my installed Linux.
Am 23.03.2011 19:33, schrieb admin lewis:
Thanks very much to all, now I have understood..
anyway it's a perc s300.. I see I can make a virtual disk read-only...
very interesting.. well .. to have a /boot partition read-only is a
non-sense...
thanks to all again... someone has told google is
* As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been
mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security
updates are being backported to SL 5.5. Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but
security patches look current)
And we try very hard not to release things until they
Sam Trenholme wrote:
* As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been
mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security
updates are being backported to SL 5.5. Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but
security patches look current)
And we try very hard not to
I plan to make my current Centos 4 HD a slave and install Centos
5.5 on a new HD (master). Then comes the challenge of of moving
all of my /home/user data to the new master. I have some
preliminary questions:
Is this a good strategy for installing Centos 5.5: keep the
Centos 4 on a slave
60 matches
Mail list logo
