Ok, changes made! If you could move it that would be great.
Cheers,
Alex
On 18 Apr 2011, at 21:46, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 14.04.11 16:13, schrieb Alex Goffe:
Any further thoughts, If not can the FOG page now be created so I (or
someone) can move the info?
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b05b16f3996e844e5b06fe1d2cf7629a
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0caebe2fef578220c38fa4815baa4ab8
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0471
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0471.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2882a8e5b0aed38aceea08ffd7a35cef
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0471
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0471.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
99da79cd96ecbed895ac47be441d4153
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
8b51ea11a8f17a45a35e565818a99f76
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
6ee7aa6adb0e776a0cee538deebfcb85
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
083987e51c47be6f06c0f45f00592b14
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0474 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0474.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
3adc6c00d576cff96d021d5e366b9b03
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9c055c5e578703d613e13019d34c8f75
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0472 Important
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0472.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
8741490a97cac04107dacfb5018dc35c
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0473 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0473.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
4e7b7da9b3d3b299abed3ef21b5b6d58
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0473 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0473.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
76ec6c019465d76308d83a865fae25fd
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0471 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0471.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2f0e14e77730c6766bd96fa8bb918aa2
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0471 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0471.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
f3396eb86c69d19f049d2b18b52e8623
Hola,
Puedes hacer una copia de un particion o de un disco entero. Clonezilla hace
una foto del origen y plancha esa foto en destino. Asi que si se pierde la
info del destino, el destino queda con el mismo formato de sist de ficheros
que origen y en un principio si recuperas un disco entero no has
Hola a todos.
Mi consulta es la siguiente.
Que software puedo emplear para incluir o aprovechar el espacio de cada
disco que tengo en cada nodo ? Por que es espacio que no se usa y de esa
forma de doy mas capacidad a cada usuario.
Desde ya muchas gracias.
Saludos - Luciano.
--
He estado montando una red Wi-fi, con varios access Point pero estos tiene
limitada la cantidad de user en su interior a 32, las preguntas son:
1. Como crear la red wifi autenticando los user contra freeradius.
2. se puede crear una base de datos de donde radius busque a los usuarios,
con sus
En general que mismo estas haciendo, das servicio de internet por medio de
equipos inalámbricos como un ISP??
- que tipo de equipos estás usando, les controlas los Anchos de Banda con
algún soft o tienes algún equipo para este trabajo?
- que tipo de equipos usas para la difución, etc,etc, etc.
-
En general que mismo estas haciendo, das servicio de internet por medio de
equipos inalámbricos como un ISP??
El objetivo es conectar los user a la red intranet, y de ahí darles permisos
a la intranet o internet
- que tipo de equipos estás usando, les controlas los Anchos de Banda con
algún
mmm, ok, loque puedes hacer es implementar todo lo que me estas diciendo con
un solo equipo, este es el Router Mikrotik RB450 o 750 ya que este equipo te
permite implementar Firewall, control de acceso por medio de hotspot y
controlarles el tiempo de acceso, asignarles claves y de paso con Radius,
y dejamos a linux por el suelo?
me interesa lo mismo pero todo con linux
o mejor compremos todos fierros y resuelto?!
Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
Unidad de Infraestructura
Dirección de Tecnología y Comunicaciones
MINISTERIO DEL AMBIENTE
email: xtir...@ambiente.gob.ec
Telefax: (593 2)
un solo equipo, este es el Router Mikrotik RB450 o 750 ya que este equipo
Hermano eso es muy duroi para mi, donde vivo no puedo comprarlo, desearia
implementarlo con Access Point, que esta en cascada y se conectan aun
Switcher y de ahi a server linux con radius
Dime como hacer pues no
ES LO QUE DIGO NADA DE EQUIPOS, solo Linux
delaosa
y dejamos a linux por el suelo?
me interesa lo mismo pero todo con linux
o mejor compremos todos fierros y resuelto?!
Xavier Mauricio Tirado L.
Unidad de Infraestructura
Dirección de Tecnología y Comunicaciones
MINISTERIO
si se puede tambien con linux, si deseas para todo eso, mira los Manuales de
Alcance Libre, e aqui el link:
http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/manuales-indice
Aqui tienes todo para implementar, tambien en Ecualug:
http://ecualug.org/2002/12/11/comos
La idea no era dejar a Linux
La idea no era dejar a Linux por los suelos, porque el Mikrotik está
basado en Linux mismo, solo traté de darte luz.
No me refiero a eso es que aqui donde vivo comprar algo se hace dificil
así que no lo puedo hacer, tratare de bajar todo y te digo, Un saludo
Delaosa
--
Este mensaje le ha
hijole, ahi se es complicado, con todo, revisa la lista de manuales, ahi
está todo para lo que quieres implementar.
El 29 de abril de 2011 18:09, t...@giron.sld.cu escribió:
La idea no era dejar a Linux por los suelos, porque el Mikrotik está
basado en Linux mismo, solo traté de darte
hello centos network
ads on the list centos-annonces Thursday
the mirrors are still not updated
even the main deposit
No it has never been so long
someone has an explanation can be
thanks
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x092164A7
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of fakessh
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:17 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] the mirrors are still not updated
hello centos network
ads on the list centos-annonces Thursday
the
I use the following to prevent hanging at startup with LDAP.
nss_initgroups_ignoreusers root,ldap,bacula,named
timelimit 30
bind_timelimit 30
bind_policy soft
This is because some daemons start prior to the start of OpenLDAP
service.
Obviously adding haldaemon, dbus, radvd,
Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same
way ethernet devices can?
The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple public IP.
1 Physical NIC
- br0 (accepts incoming traffic for x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.5)
Then 3 different virtual interfaces are connected to this bridge
Hello,
I ask here if CentOS has a xml oval repository. This is the reason of my
question:
Actually I have an automatic system to check CVE vulnerabilities report
against RedHat OVAL resources, for example:
https://www.redhat.com/security/data/oval/com.redhat.rhsa-2011.xml for
2011 CVEs and
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same
way ethernet devices can?
Yes, I think you can even define whole ranges of addresses.
The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on
eth0? This cannot work.
Well, I have a physical connected to the ISP modem/router
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on
Lucian wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:51:50 +0800
Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote:
Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly
you are trying to achieve?
Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also
Benjamin Hackl wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:51:13 +0200:
Just assign IP1 to eth0, IP2 to eth0:1, IP3 to eth0:2 and so on.
and if you really need a bridge you attach those to the bridge: br0,
br0:1, br0:2 etc. eth0 ist the *physical* interface for the bridge.
Kai
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 1:59 PM
On 4/27/2011 12:43 PM, Todd Cary
wrote:
On 4/26/2011 9:25 AM, Todd
On 4/29/2011 7:10 AM, Richard Mollel wrote:
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Setting up a GUI remote access
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 1:59 PM
On 4/27/2011 12:43 PM, Todd
On 4/29/2011 9:10 AM, Richard Mollel wrote:
I just tried FreeNX on server (centos), and NX Client from Nomachine. Setup
was not bad, though too many sources of info. Settled on centos wiki doc to
get me going.
You shouldn't have to do anything but:
yum install freenx
and then get the
On 4/29/2011 9:41 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
I have FreeNX on my server now and NX Client from Nomachine on my
XP desktop. However my ssh is configured for PW access; not Key
access. My ssh clients work - that is I have access to the
server. However I cannot gain access via the Nomachine client.
On 4/29/2011 8:21 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing
because you don't have the right key?
When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it
states
Note: If you have disallowed ssh password authentication (which
is
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 04/29/2011 04:53 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
Hello,
I ask here if CentOS has a xml oval repository. This is the reason of my
question:
Actually I have an automatic system to check CVE vulnerabilities report
against RedHat OVAL resources, for example:
The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually
legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6.
I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what
is minimally necessary go from RHel6 to another distribution. I
suppose we could
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Todd Cary t...@aristesoftware.com wrote:
On 4/29/2011 8:21 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing
because you don't have the right key?
When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it
call redhat legal and/or please take this up with your own paul legal
counsel
this is not the place
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually
legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6.
I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what
is minimally necessary go from RHel6
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually
legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6.
I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just
On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given
the above paragraph.
Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type.
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:
On 04/29/11 10:26 AM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given
the above paragraph.
I've always been annoyed that file isn't /etc/release like many other
unix systems. or at least symlinked as such.
Le 2011-04-27 13:44, Ryan Wagoner a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Guy Boisvert
boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
Hi!
I have upgraded my servers yesterday to CentOS 5.6 via yum update.
Everything went smoothly except that i have client workstations not part of
the domain
On 4/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Which of the RPM files in RH6 have proprietary software in them?
Those cannot be re-distributed as is? I figure there must be
something, because I installed the test version of SL6 back in January
and it locked up in disk recognition, whereas RH6 did
On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given
the above paragraph.
Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type.
I could easily be confused as it has been so long now...
--On Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:53:52 AM -0400 Scott Robbins
scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:21:58PM +0200, Mattias Geniar wrote:
I've tracked this down to the following known bug in Redhat, but
it dates back to early 2010.
Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe this is not the
correct group to ask. Just saying. ;)
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Paul Johnson
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:17 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
On top of that, it just seems logical granted the RHEL binary compatibility
thing. It's used by many apps to detect the distro you're using, so...
2011/4/29 John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com
On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
I've always been
John Hinton wrote:
On 4/29/2011 1:46 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 04/29/2011 01:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
I've always been surprised that CentOS ships /etc/redhat-release given
the above paragraph.
Probably a programmatic requirement, if I was the betting type.
I could easily be confused as it
On 4/29/2011 10:57 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing
because you don't have the right key?
When I read the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX), it states
Note: If you have disallowed ssh password authentication (which is
On 4/29/2011 2:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Am I required to remember everything I did from that long back? LOL
There might be some stuff in the archives though... back in the early
ver. 3 days.
Actually, it annoys me - it *should* be LSB release, not redhat, I always
thought.
Well, if
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe
this is not the
correct group to ask. Just saying. ;)
Actually, telling us just how hard and complex and detail-burdened it
would be to kick off BlueSox, a homolog to CentOS rebuilding of
RedHat, might
On 4/29/2011 2:16 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
3: Being so careful with the fine details that businesses world-wide
trust your statement It's Done.
Part of the must-be-perfect requirement for release seems to be
imposed by the package name/version compatibility with upstream.
There's no way
[This reply isn't directed at John; his message just makes a good place to
reply]
On Friday, April 29, 2011 02:50:27 PM John Hinton wrote:
Am I required to remember everything I did from that long back? LOL
There might be some stuff in the archives though... back in the early
ver. 3
On 04/29/2011 12:26 PM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/29/2011 11:17 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually
legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6.
I am not
On 4/29/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Only problem is... networking still isn't working although brctl show
on the host shows that a vnet0 had been created and attached to the
bridge. Any pointers would be appreciated!
Just to close off on this issue for the benefit of
That good faith effort is required for all packages (GPL or not).
And yes, it is legally necessary make that good faith effort not to
infringe upon someone else's trademarks.
This is specifically called out here:
http://www.redhat.com/about/companyprofile/trademark/
I've just read that
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote
So .2 works as main IP and .3 does not?
Is your ISP doing any MAC address filtering? You may need to use a
routed bridge then..
It turns out that I was barking up the wrong tree and chasing red herrings.
The virtualized guest definition was off by
On Friday, April 29, 2011 03:49:47 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take
all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them
on a disk, and you can label the disk Centos 6, and you are
completely within the guidelines.
On 04/29/2011 02:49 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
That good faith effort is required for all packages (GPL or not).
And yes, it is legally necessary make that good faith effort not to
infringe upon someone else's trademarks.
This is specifically called out here:
Some interesting developments coming:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/96/html/6.1_Release_Notes/index.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4/29/2011 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But, legally, yes, someone COULD distribute some of the RH files.
I thought these days you couldn't get the binaries in the first place
without also getting a support contract where the terms you agree to say
you can only install on the licensed
On 04/29/2011 03:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/29/2011 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But, legally, yes, someone COULD distribute some of the RH files.
I thought these days you couldn't get the binaries in the first place
without also getting a support contract where the terms you agree
Hi all
I just update the package above. on 0.12 my qemu window opened on my X
server as a window.
Now it starting in a VNC session.
How do I get it back to opening in a window on the X screen as the default?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
Greetings,
Just followw Akemi. :)
Regarw,
Rajagopal
On 4/30/11, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/29/2011 10:57 AM, Todd Cary wrote:
First, why would you disable key authentication? Or is it just failing
because you don't have the right key?
When I read the wiki
Plz rfr to othr lis
t
On 4/30/11, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
Hi all
I just update the package above. on 0.12 my qemu window opened on my X
server as a window.
Now it starting in a VNC session.
How do I get it back to opening in a window on the X screen as the default?
I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on
logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups
and again their own logical volumes. I want to access the domU logical
volumes and tried this:
[root@kr ~]# fdisk -l /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02
Disk
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on
logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups
and again their own logical volumes. I want to access the domU logical
volumes
On 04/29/11 3:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on
logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups
and again their own logical volumes. I want to
...
ugh, and double ugh. this violates the KISS 'keep it
I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine
that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and
don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that
would install httpd without including it?
--
Les Mikesell
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine
that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and
don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that
would install httpd without including it?
81 matches
Mail list logo
