G'day
Wiki username: SteveBarnes
As per the guidelines on:
http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5
I'd like to tidy up this page a bit:
http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/AutomatedTests
I used it as the basis for developing my test scripts; the
Saludos, hermanos.
un solo equipo, este es el Router Mikrotik RB450 o 750 ya que este
equipo
Jejejejejeje. Buen intento, pero como dice el hermano, donde vivimos no
tenemos acceso a esos toys, así que todo lo tenemos que hacer a mano. :)
Aunque también soy partidario de hacer al AP uno
I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages.
These currently contain PHP 5.1.6.
My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of
WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers
have announced that from WP 3.2 they will only support PHP
2011/4/30 Dave Cross dav...@gmail.com:
I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages.
These currently contain PHP 5.1.6.
My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of
WordPress. I currently had WP 3.1.2 installed, but the WP developers
have announced
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 04/29/11 3:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on
logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups
and again their own logical volumes. I
I would try to first yum erase php, and then install the php53 version.
- Jussi
On 30.4.2011 9.29, Dave Cross wrote:
I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages.
These currently contain PHP 5.1.6.
My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of
I am sure this is really simple.
I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
disks can boot.
Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the
physical disks is sda??
The
2011/4/30 Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi:
I am sure this is really simple.
I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
disks can boot.
Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But
Peter Peltonen wrote on 04/30/2011 03:51 AM:
... I just clicked my way through the CentOS installation like I
usually do, and that meant using LVM. And I don't think you are even
given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
If you want to use the default setup but
Paul Johnson wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:23 -0500:
After that, what am I legally required to do?
This is not the place to ask.
I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take
all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them
on a disk, and you can
Peter Peltonen wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:51:08 +0300:
And I don't think you are even
given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
Of course, you can ;-)
If you have only a few of these I'd rsync them over to dom0 lv's and
change domU fstabs and xen config
On 30.4.2011 12.34, Eero Volotinen wrote:
take look at serial number using smartctl
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/using-smartctl-to-get-smart-status-information-on-your-hard-drives/1389
Thanks, I did. I am sure they will help me when it is time to actually
replace the drive.
-
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:54:01 +0800:
if they are accessible via the Internet, then it means it wasn't
necessary to add any IP to a bridge.
FYI: the IP addresses of host and guest don't have to be in the same
subnet, e.g. your host may have a private, non-routable IP
On 4/30/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This list once was a valuable peer-to-peer support list but has been
turning into a meta-centos/rhel discussion list lately. There was already
a lot of off-topic linux-only stuff on it in the past that didn't
qualify for centosy things, but that at
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html
While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages,
Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information
The title gives a bit of info if that helps ;-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Les Mikesell wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:33:21 -0500:
But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing
the
artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
Are we? I don't see this
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
BTW, can guests be installed on raw (unformatted or formatted)
partitions (not images)? Can virt-install do that? I tried it and had no
luck.
- Jussi
You can install them to logical volumes...
On 28.4.2011 21.29, Jim Wildman wrote:
Season
On 30/04/11 17:57, Markus Falb wrote:
CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html
While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages,
Bugzilla #606272 looks
On 4/30/11 1:09 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing
the
artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
Are we? I don't see this and I don't
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 21:56, NOYK service.acco...@insightbb.com wrote:
Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe this is not the
correct group to ask. Just saying. ;)
It seems to me that is exactly why he was asking. The OP doesn't
really want to create Paul Linux, he wants
On 04/30/2011 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I am sure this is really simple.
I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
disks can boot.
Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
it's hard
to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos
Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about
how to
On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to
centos other than it's differences
25 matches
Mail list logo
