Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to Edit Wiki

2011-05-19 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Am 19.05.11 00:02, schrieb Mike Karasoff: I would like to contribute to the Wiki. A few things right off – I’d like to add to the “Yum and RPM Tricks” section and would also like to add information and tips on setting up CentOS machines for FPGA (Quartus/ISE/Modelsim) development. I've

Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to Edit Wiki

2011-05-19 Thread Mike Karasoff
Thanks Ralph. When I log into the Wiki and go to http://wiki.centos.org/MikeKarasoff/?action=edit I get: You are not allowed to edit this page. Am I doing something wrong here? My login name is Michael Karasoff. Mike -Original Message- From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org

Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to Edit Wiki

2011-05-19 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mike Karasoff mkaras...@rgb.com wrote: Thanks Ralph. When I log into the Wiki and go to http://wiki.centos.org/MikeKarasoff/?action=edit I get: You are not allowed to edit this page.  Am I doing something wrong here?  My login name is Michael Karasoff.

Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to Edit Wiki

2011-05-19 Thread Mike Karasoff
Oh. My wiki name is Michael Karasoff, MikeKarasoff would be a completely different user. How do I fix this? Should I create a new account? Thanks. -Original Message- From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi Sent: Thursday,

[CentOS-es] (sin asunto)

2011-05-19 Thread Freddy Zavaleta
http://esquelinfo.com.ar/Iindex.html ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] Sobre Zimbra

2011-05-19 Thread César CRUZ ARRUNATEGUI
Zimbra es una suite, viene con varios programitas que integrados forman un buen servidor de correos. hay una opcion de instalacion denominada multiservidor y que segun tengo entendido solo se puede hacer con la version de pago (zimbra server). Todo depende de la cantidad de usuarios que usaran

Re: [CentOS-es] Sobre Zimbra

2011-05-19 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
El 19/05/11 10:34, César CRUZ ARRUNATEGUI escribió: Zimbra es una suite, viene con varios programitas que integrados forman un buen servidor de correos. hay una opcion de instalacion denominada multiservidor y que segun tengo entendido solo se puede hacer con la version de pago (zimbra

Re: [CentOS-es] Sobre Zimbra

2011-05-19 Thread César CRUZ ARRUNATEGUI
Prueba con el DELL y usa la version 5.26 que es para 32 bits, la version 7 ya es para equipos a 64bits. si este equipo lo soporta a buena hora. César D. Cruz Arrunátegui - Mensaje original - De: Yoinier Hernandez Nieves ynie...@lt.datazucar.cu Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviados:

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

2011-05-19 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote: My question to everyone are these: -Does KVM have a concept of virtual switches and and are they tied to physical NICs? ESXi allows me to create a vSwitch that isn't tied to a physical NIC so I can create a DMZ that exists solely

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

2011-05-19 Thread Michael Simpson
On 19 May 2011 05:39, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote: No and I don't think it's the hypervisor's job to do that. Even in ESXi I don't think it's the hypervisor itself that does that. You could try however to mess with Openvswitch if you insist on such features, at least until someone decides

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

2011-05-19 Thread Lars Hecking
KVM is meant to be much closer to bare metal performance but doesn't have (at the moment) the all inclusive, easily managed from one console, turnkey solution to massive virtual installs at the datacentre level. If you need to be able to remotely provision VMs and move them whilst live from

[CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

2011-05-19 Thread Matt Keating
Hi guys, Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. Everything is up-to-date and yet I'm running into major problems. How do I make sense of these kernel errors? Any help will be greatly appreciated, as I'm now had to roll back to an old copy

Re: [CentOS] KVM vs ESXi

2011-05-19 Thread Alain Péan
Le 19/05/2011 13:27, Lars Hecking a écrit : KVM is meant to be much closer to bare metal performance but doesn't have (at the moment) the all inclusive, easily managed from one console, turnkey solution to massive virtual installs at the datacentre level. If you need to be able to remotely

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-19 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that Whitebox had a list of issues of its own, no timely updates,

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-19 Thread B.J. McClure
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:54 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

2011-05-19 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: Hi guys, Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. ... While serving httpd pages: ... May 19 12:19:19 ip-10-234-90-180 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.16-xenU #1) ... not

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

2011-05-19 Thread Matt Keating
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: Hi guys, Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? I cant get it stable on as a LAMP platform. ... While serving httpd pages: ... May 19

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.6 kernel errors

2011-05-19 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:46:10PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Matt Keating wrote: Hi guys, Is anyone else having kernel issues with CentOS 5.6? I cant get it stable on as a

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-19 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:54 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: It will be released when it is released, if you don't like it then leave. Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread carlopmart
only FYI: http://osnews.com/story/24760/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] OT: Video Surveillance SW on CentOS

2011-05-19 Thread Lanny Marcus
Hi Again: (b) Motion http://www.lavrsen.dk/foswiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome We use this at work. It comes std. with the last few fedoras, so it should be coming in CentOS soon. I forgot to mention that motion is available in the RPMForge repository. yum install motion That's as easy as it

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee -- Russ herrold Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now come

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: herrold earlier: and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now come out today; the release called 6.0 was a teaser and a beta of the

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread m . roth
Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2011, carlopmart wrote: Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_6_1_Released and look at all the anaconda related, and other fixes, that should have been in a dot zero release ... gee Which means, that RHEL6.0 should have just now

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Markus Falb
On 19.5.2011 15:56, R P Herrold wrote: There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, festooned wth arrows in him) Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R P Herrold
(possible duplicate -- the first post had some mal-formed headers that the MailMan should have rejected) On Thu, 19 May 2011, Markus Falb wrote: Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid 'dot.zero' products then no bugs would be discovered and no 'dot.one' product would be released. You basically

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/19/2011 9:40 AM, Markus Falb wrote: There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, festooned wth arrows in him) Oh Lord! If everyone would avoid

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-19 Thread R - elists
Dag wrote: Before I leave this list let me take you back about 7 years to the Whitebox mailinglist. You may not remember that Whitebox had a list of issues of its own, no timely updates, no community effort, lack of good communication. It was mostly a one-man-effort. bummer to see you

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R - elists
no, the saying is... if it aint broken, dont fix it ! especially on weekends, monday, or friday ;- that is why everyone should have a small or large lab for testing and rollout... - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and how much we

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R - elists
Les wrote: Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and how much we gained from that process).

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:59:45 AM Les Mikesell wrote: Everyone expected [dot-zero bugfest] from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just how

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/19/2011 9:40 AM, Markus Falb wrote: There is an old piece of wisdom in IT to avoid the public 'dot zero' products so that some-one else gets to be the advance guard scout (you know, the one who staggers back to base camp, festooned wth arrows in him) Oh Lord! If

[CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: started holding my breath when RHEL 6 Beta was released, and my face is not blue any more but totally black :-) Yowzer -- Zombies!!! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/19/2011 10:15 AM, R - elists wrote: Les wrote: Everyone expected this from Red Hat before the 'EL' versions when publishing a free CD of community work was the way QA was done. (And if you've forgotten, go dig through some changelogs of that era to see just how bad things were and

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 75, Issue 8

2011-05-19 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

2011-05-19 Thread m . roth
R P Herrold wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: started holding my breath when RHEL 6 Beta was released, and my face is not blue any more but totally black :-) Yowzer -- Zombies!!! The CDC can help with that