Hi Phil,
Thank you for your reply.It's not a good news.
If i install my CentOS5.3(2.6.18-128.el5) in a new PC,
and plug an other wireless card(mini-pci card with Atheros AR9223 chiset )
into the mother board.
Could i get a proper driver and make it work?
Now i have done something for that.I
Cordial saludo.
José, esta maquina la tienes expuesta a internet?. si tu respuesta es
afirmativa estaría casi seguro que tienes un rootkits en ella.
Carlos Restrepo M.
Administrador de Sistemas
Profesional Linux LPI 101 - 102.
El 10 de junio de 2011 20:58, Juan Pablo Botero
http://elartemuebles.com.ar/index080a.html
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hello,
does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package
for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included
but the apr-util-mysql is included...
Thank you
Alex
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:09:54AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package
for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included
but the apr-util-mysql is included...
Disclaimer: you might want to wait for
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:09:54AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hello,
does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package
for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included
but the apr-util-mysql is included...
Sorry, just realised I was getting my
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Alexander Farber wrote:
does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package
for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included
but the apr-util-mysql is included...
I seem to have one built on a CentOS 5 platform, although I do
not
On 06/11/2011 10:42 PM st...@echo.id.au wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Jason wrote:
Hi All,
My Logwatch was very long today with 404 requests to the Apache
server. I dont understand what the person was trying to do by what
they were attempting to access. Can anyone explain
So my guess is they're fuzzing/scanning for potential weaknesses in
jQuery...
For those managing web sites it would be good to acquire such scripts
and run them in pre-production as system tests. So where do we get
scripts such as the one run against Jason's site?
I don't know if this is
On 06/12/2011 10:21 AM Barry Brimer wrote:
So my guess is they're fuzzing/scanning for potential weaknesses in
jQuery...
For those managing web sites it would be good to acquire such scripts
and run them in pre-production as system tests. So where do we get
scripts such as the one run
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
That's interesting and useful in its way. But I'd prefer to use the
same scripts used by the actual crackers/bots. Not only would I be able
to test my sites with them, but I'd be able to recognize the
probes/attacks when they
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com
(mailto:geb...@mousecar.com) wrote:
That's interesting and useful in its way. But I'd prefer to use the
same scripts used by the actual crackers/bots. Not only would I be able
to test my sites with them, but I'd be able to
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com
(mailto:geb...@mousecar.com) wrote:
That's interesting and useful in its way. But I'd prefer to use the
same scripts used by the actual crackers/bots. Not only would I be able
to test my sites with them, but I'd be able to
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Jason slackmoehrle.li...@gmail.com wrote:
When you see attempts to fetch things that are not installed on your
system it is usually someone up to no good.
Well, I was creating ReWrite rules and directing to 301 when something came
in that was not on my system,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Mike Williams wrote:
Do you edit rewrite rules for every access that would
otherwise be a 404 and change it to a 301? If so, what do
you redirect them to, and why? Sounds like a lot of work.
This was covered by me in a blog post some time ago, as to my
approach:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I am stuck taking this stupid online training course from work. It just
sits there doing nothing with firefox, so I pulled up konqueror, and tell
it to lie and say it's IE. That works... until it gets to the content,
which some HR moron
Russ,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Mike Williams wrote:
Do you edit rewrite rules for every access that would
otherwise be a 404 and change it to a 301? If so, what do
you redirect them to, and why? Sounds like a lot of work.
This was covered by me in a blog post some time ago, as to my
17 matches
Mail list logo