Yves Bellefeuille wrote on 08/10/2011 09:30 PM:
Hi:
I've finished the changes about installing Skype on CentOS 6. Thanks.
(Except that I still think that this information should be moved in the
list of HowTos from section 17, Misc., to section 18, Non CentOS
Applications.)
Yves,
I think
Hi all
According to a report made in #centos, the procedure described at
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-sun-oracle-java-jdk-jre-7-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
works OK for jdk 1.7
It looks pretty similar to
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaRuntimeEnvironment
Buenos días.
He reutilizado un viejo servidor HP DL360 G3 para montar un servidor de backups
centralizado con CentOS6. La LAN está a 1Gb
He instalado el S.Op y como servidor FTP el ProFTPD. Ya he redireccionado los
scripts de backup de las copias seguridad de los otros servidores y funciona
Buenas Tardes Lista tengo una consulta .. yo ya tengo instalado el apache y el
tomcat respectivamente funcionando en los puerto 80 y 8081 pero quiero que
cuando ponga un sub-dominio valla directamente a la aplicación que esta en el
tomcat mostrando siempre el subdominio todo esto bajo CentOS
Hola
Has mirado que no tengas TransferRate en proftpd.conf? (Yo uso pureftpd,
así que no se, pero quizá poniendole algo si no lo tiene)
Supongo que has confirmado que no es una limitación del cliente o
incluso de la red (QoS).
Para hacer copias de otros servidores (si son Linux también), por
Hola,
pues con proftpd no me ha pasado nunca.
Y no puede ser que tengas algun firewall que limite el ancho de banda a modo
qos ?
No puedo decir mas.
Salutaciones :)
2011/8/11 José María Terry Jiménez j...@tssystems.net
Hola
Has mirado que no tengas TransferRate en proftpd.conf? (Yo uso
El día 11 de agosto de 2011 14:34, Alberto Rivera M.
rivera.albe...@gmail.com escribió:
El 09/08/11 00:26, Javier escribió:
Hola, quizas en un kernel mas nuevo, como los que vienen con Fedora, estan
los modulos para esa placa. Tambien podes probar actualizando con los que
estan en los repo de
Una distro que de seguro te funciona es PCLinuxOS, muy estable.
El 11 de agosto de 2011 22:49, Edg@r Rodolfo edgarr...@gmail.com escribió:
El día 11 de agosto de 2011 14:34, Alberto Rivera M.
rivera.albe...@gmail.com escribió:
El 09/08/11 00:26, Javier escribió:
Hola, quizas en un
On Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 18:59:14 Paul Heinlein wrote:
Oddly, when using sssd+ldap, getent without a specific key won't
return ldap account information, but with a key it will. That is,
getent passwd will return only accounts in the local /etc/passwd
database, but getent passwd bob will
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Michael Gliwinski wrote:
On Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 18:59:14 Paul Heinlein wrote:
Oddly, when using sssd+ldap, getent without a specific key won't
return ldap account information, but with a key it will. That is,
getent passwd will return only accounts in the local
dear All,
I'm trying to set Shadow options in Ldap with the help of phpLDAPadmin.
This is *what I know :
* */Shadowmax : /maximum nr of days a pw can be valid
* /ShadowLastchange : /contains the last change of the shadow file
* Shadowwarning : nr of days before expiration to warn user.
*What
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:36 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ffmpeg
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
*snip*
I use ffmpeg
Am Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb John Doe jd...@yahoo.com:
From: Digimer li...@alteeve.com
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009.html
It looks quite nice, although a tiny bit too big for me (no real need
the room for 4
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:02 +0200, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
dear All,
I'm trying to set Shadow options in Ldap with the help of
phpLDAPadmin.
This is what I know :
* Shadowmax : maximum nr of days a pw can be valid
* ShadowLastchange : contains the last change of the shadow file
*
Paul,
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
listadmin,
Can you PLEASE, PLEASE find *any* other blacklist than manitu? This
asshole's method was ok a dozen years ago; these days, with hosting sites
hosting tens or hundreds of thousands of
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
none of this nonsense is necessary.
Properly handling emails means, to me, not being too reliant on others
whose faults and omissions could
Hi Mark,
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
literally hundreds of thousands of domains. The email gets funneled for
all, I assume, except those paying for co-location, through their
heavy-duty mailhost. manitu sees spam coming from that mailhost, and
blocks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2011 05:51 PM, Harold Pritchett wrote:
On 8/10/2011 5:40 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
SELinux? I'm out of ideas apart from that.
Simon
audit2allow /var/log/audit/audit.log shows no errors have been
logged.
I suppose I can try
Hi Mark,
Why not run your own mail server ? I use Exim (a Sendmail replacement)
Because I'm not going to pay for colocation, or whatever. This is my
personal domain, etc, and I'm paying about $6US for it a month. I'm not
running a business, and so don't want to pay $$$ to Verizon for a
Always Learning wrote:
Hi Mark,
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
literally hundreds of thousands of domains. The email gets funneled for
all, I assume, except those paying for co-location, through their
heavy-duty mailhost. manitu sees spam coming from that
we block with manitu = nixspam as our primary RBL (followed by Spamhaus).
Results are excellent. Their blocking is very reasonable. It's also
possible to ask for inclusion in the whitelist. Obviously your great ISP
Roadrunner isn't interested in inclusion or is sending out so many spam
that
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 05:11:12 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on
CentOS 6.
I installed faad2-libs. It *still* will not install, telling me the same:
Error: Package: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.el5.x86_64
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:09 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The real problem is manitou.net, and their algorythm. 15 years ago, it
might have been reasonable to track mailhosts, and block all mail coming
from that host. For the last 10 years, at least, it's *wrong*. Even the
best of 'Net
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 06:52 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
Why not run your own mail server ? I use Exim (a Sendmail replacement)
on several servers. I refuse incoming mails where the sender's HELO /
EHLO does not match the sender's IP host name,
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
we block with manitu = nixspam as our primary RBL (followed by Spamhaus).
Results are excellent. Their blocking is very reasonable. It's also
possible to ask for inclusion in the whitelist. Obviously your great ISP
Roadrunner isn't interested in inclusion or is sending out
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Obviously I don't know your computer situation. It seems your present
'service' is not always reliable, so is there anything we can do to help
you devise an alternative plan ?
No, you still don't understand.
How much sympathy do you expect for
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:52:47AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem.
If you don't
like their browser interface, use pop/imap and authenticated smtp.
Did gmail ever fix their feature that
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
1. I'm not going to join this list, or any other, from multiple email
accounts
So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
No. Not ever. I have no intention of using a service that will have
On 8/11/2011 9:58 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:52:47AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem.
If you don't
like their browser interface, use pop/imap and authenticated smtp.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 8/11/2011 8:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
1. I'm not going to join this list, or any other, from multiple email
accounts
So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
No. Not
On 8/11/2011 10:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So move them to gmail. Price is right. End of problem. If you don't
No. Not ever. I have no intention of using a service that will have
*years*, at least, of backups of all my mail, including stuff that was
hypothetically d/l and *deleted*.
Hi,
I try to set up
- A centos 6 firewall
- With proxy-arp (I know: arp is not supported in ipv6)
with ipv6.
Arp does not exist for ipv6. So I have added:
sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.default.proxy_ndp=1
To use the neighbor proxy facility.
How to activate ipv6 forwarding? As
I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
dependencies in either epel or rpmforge (lame, xvid, faac etc...). There
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Brandon Ooi brand...@gmail.com wrote:
I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
xfs is available in the stock distro
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:17:50 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/11/2011 06:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
What do I need to enable XFS support in CentOS 6? is there a
CentOS
Plus kernel yet that enables this ?
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
Best regards,
Brandon Ooi wrote:
I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
compiling it from git. It's relatively easy and you can find most of the
snip
Not to be insulting, but I *wish* folks would
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
none of this nonsense is necessary.
Properly handling emails means, to me, not being too reliant
Craig White wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
Waste of time and resources. Learn how to properly handle email and
none of this nonsense is necessary.
Properly handling emails means, to me, not
Sorry, mouse ran away there with the last post with no comments.
Craig White wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
snip
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
literally
On 08/11/2011 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
snip
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
literally hundreds of thousands
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:25:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Now, so far, motion, and ffmpeg, are not available for 6.
rpmfusion/updates/free/testing has faad2. I don't see ffmpeg, much less
motion. So I'm stuck trying to work from an 5 repository for ffmpeg.
There are basic dependency
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/11/2011 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
snip
You don't seem to understand the issue. My hosting provider has
literally
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:25:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Now, so far, motion, and ffmpeg, are not available for 6.
rpmfusion/updates/free/testing has faad2. I don't see ffmpeg, much less
motion. So I'm stuck trying to work from an 5 repository for ffmpeg.
There are
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 13:56 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
If an RBL has designated a particular SMTP server or range of SMTP servers
as a source for spam then the solution lies with those that own the SMTP
servers to satisfy the RBL and get the blocks removed.
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 01:05:46 PM Brandon Ooi wrote:
I work with ffmpeg a lot. I recommend that you don't try to build the rpms
which are constantly out of date. ffmpeg is a moving target so I recommend
compiling it from git.
This breaks, with regularity, ZoneMinder for one. I
On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
ah. i needed to install xfsprogs and xfsdump to get mkfs.xfs.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
On 08/11/2011 11:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
In fact, that is one of the single most effective mechanisms used to
combat spam, in my experience and will cut down the amount accepted at
the gateway(s) by up to 95%.
I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 13:56 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Craig White wrote:
And that's *EXACTLY* what I'm saying is the wrong thing to do. Dunno
where you live, but go ahead, for whoever provides 'Net access to your
home: call them up, or email them, and tell them to
On Aug 11, 2011, at 10:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, mouse ran away there with the last post with no comments.
Craig White wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:51 AM, mark wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:36 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
snip
You don't seem to
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:12:03 -0400:
I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but my point is still
that 90% of everybody blocked has no clue whatever about what to do about
it, and esp. the people with infected systems. A standard channel *to* an
ISP for this
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:46:22 -0400:
I'm sorry, nobody seems to get what I've been saying: I haven't been on
roadrunner for two years. I'm sending this email via bluehost, my current
hosting provider.
Ok, so you use Bluehost and one of their mailservers got on the list
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and XFS
On 08/11/11 10:23 AM, Morten Stevens wrote:
xfs is available in the stock distro
Only for the x86_64 kernel.
ah. i needed to install xfsprogs
On 8/11/2011 1:16 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Let me know when they get back to you. I'll look for your email sometime
around the time when you move and change providers.
You can not change the world on your own, even a little bit, without
some help. Help from mass 'Internet connections' ISP
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/11/2011 11:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
In fact, that is one of the single most effective mechanisms used to
combat spam, in my experience and will cut down the amount accepted at
the gateway(s) by up to 95%.
I'm not sure who you're answering or
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:12:03 -0400:
I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but my point is
still that 90% of everybody blocked has no clue whatever about what
to do about it, and esp. the people with infected systems. A standard
channel
On 08/11/2011 03:38 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Digimerli...@alteeve.com
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06a/15351-15351-4237916-4237918-4237917-4248009.html
It looks quite nice, although a tiny bit too big for me (no real need the
room for 4 HDs + 1 HD or DVD).
Saw that one guy
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:46:22 -0400:
I'm sorry, nobody seems to get what I've been saying: I haven't been on
roadrunner for two years. I'm sending this email via bluehost, my
current
hosting provider.
Ok, so you use Bluehost and one of their
On 8/11/2011 1:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Be pragmatic. Accept partial defeat. Get an alternative email
arrangement and you may become more happier.
NO. I WILL *NOT* allow the goddamned spammers to block me from the 'Net,
and I'm *not* willing to have them cost me my email, and go to
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:53:02PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Is it really the first time that you hear about the concept of RBLs? They
have been around for years and have proven to be one of the most effective
ways to combat spam, still.
I'll love to see how they handle IPv6 once machines
How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(Current as: 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64)
With the patch applied, and a .local kernel built, I get 30% higher
throughput with vmxnet3 in my IP routing node, than when using e1000
Hi,
Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(Current as: 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64)
Maybe it could go into the plus kernel, but I'm quite sure it will not be
put into the standard kernel.
Did you check if it is in
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Matti Aarnio matti.aar...@methics.fi wrote:
Hi,
Could CentOS kernel keepers apply following patch on current kernel?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95785/
(snip)
Could this be applied on stock CentOS kernel so that I could return on
un-customized
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:07:49 -0400:
No. I've been blocked for a period ranging from hours to several days, and
kept getting myself unbanned, a number of times in the last couple of
years.
I see. So you got what you paid for.
Kai
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:03:45 -0400:
I'm sorry if I've confused you.
*You* confused things. You mixed ISPs and hosting. You can't. You were
talking largely about ISPs and how their customers get blocked from
sending mail directly and how they don't have a clue. I was
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, ken wrote:
How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
[Caveat: this is sort of from memory; I don't have a luks-encrypted
device handy for testing...]
First, add a second key (password):
cryptsetup luksAddKey /dev/XXX
Then delete the original key
cryptsetup
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:17:02 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
The issue is a bug in vmxnet3 driver, which is not able to disable
LRO mode when the kernel is telling the driver to do so.
The patch for it applies on 2.6.32 kernels as well as 2.6.38/39 where
it got applied to baseline.
What is with
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
*snip*
Many/most ISP's provide an upstream SMTP relay as part of
the service. If they do, configure it as your smart_host
and it will fix the problem. If they don't, find some
other relay service.
Is this any good?
On 8/11/2011 4:56 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
*snip*
Many/most ISP's provide an upstream SMTP relay as part of
the service. If they do, configure it as your smart_host
and it will fix the problem. If they don't, find some
other relay service.
Is this
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Morten Stevens
mstev...@imt-systems.com wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:17:02 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
The issue is a bug in vmxnet3 driver, which is not able to disable
LRO mode when the kernel is telling the driver to do so.
The patch for it applies on
--On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:52:21 PM -0400 Harold Pritchett
har...@uga.edu wrote:
[harold@newmick ~]$ sieveshell localhost
connecting to localhost
unable to connect to server at /usr/bin/sieveshell line 170.
Try specifying both --user and --authname as appropriate. sieveshell
can be
I notice that the smartd service is not running by default on a new
installation. But palimpsest seems to get updated statistics every so often as
when I check the statistics on a drive it says last updated some number of
minutes ago.
So if smartd isn't running, where does palimpsest get its
At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:57:59 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I notice that the smartd service is not running by default on a new
installation. But palimpsest seems to get updated statistics every so often as
when I check the statistics on a drive it says last updated some
Hi swapping out bash for tsch doen't work unfortunately. The window that gets
created when you do this only stays open for a split second. You are right, bash
is on the Centos server, it is just that the many custom environment variables
at my workplace only work in a tsch shell. Anyone know a
Ngày 04:16 12/08/2011, ken viết:
How do you change the LUKS filesystem password?
Please take a look at our wiki
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EncryptedFilesystem
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:42:46 -0400
Robert Heller wrote:
Almost all modern disk are S.M.A.R.T capable. What this means is that
various information about the disk, mostly relating to its health can be
monitored. This includes things like sector errors. If smartd is
running root will get
As smartd isn't running in the default Centos configuration, where does
palimpsest get its information? Is it a self-contained program that doesn't
require smartd or is something else happening behind the scenes?
I think you misunderstood the first reply: smartd, as in the init script is a
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 04:05:47 +
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I think you misunderstood the first reply: smartd, as in the init script is a
means to alert root of pending issues, _it_ doesn't present the data, _that_
init script simply checks it and reports it. You don't need it running to
make
Which still doesn't answer my question. Perhaps I'm wording it poorly -- I'll
try again:
Perhaps palimpsest runs smartctl and queries the device itself? Perhaps it
borrowed
code from the project and runs the query itself? I don't have any servers with
GUI's,
couldn't tell you...
81 matches
Mail list logo
