Gracias Eduardo,
Voy a aportar el manual (tipo dummy) de como instalar Pykota (Software para
la contabilización de impresiones) en CentOS 5/ RHEL 5 que no es nada
trivial como si lo es en Debian/Ubuntu.
El autor de Pykota no coloca algunos tips en la documentación que al no
saberlos pasan la
Revisa el archivo /etc/resolv.conf.
Carlos R.
2011/8/30 Ariel Hernández ariel@gmail.com
Ok! ahora si :D gracias por su ayuda!!
2011/8/30 Jesus Rudas Simmonds jrud...@gmail.com
Revisa el firewall, debes tener abierto el puerdo del DNS
-Mensaje original-
De:
ola a todos, resulta que estoy intentando instalar asterisk en mi CentOs y
cuando quiero hacer:
*yum install bison bison-devel ncurses ncurses-devel zlib zlib-devel openssl
openssl-devel gnutls-devel gcc gcc-c++ make*
me aparece el siguiente error:
*Error: Package:
Si no recuerdo mal habia una maquina virtual con Asterisk preinstalado en CentOS
Saludos
miguel
--- El mié, 31/8/11, Ariel Hernández ariel@gmail.com escribió:
De: Ariel Hernández ariel@gmail.com
Asunto: [CentOS-es] Instalaciòn Asterisk
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Fecha: miércoles,
yum clean all
e intenta nuevamente.
Carlos R.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 10:34, Miguel Gonzalez
miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.esescribió:
Si no recuerdo mal habia una maquina virtual con Asterisk preinstalado en
CentOS
Saludos
miguel
--- El mié, 31/8/11, Ariel Hernández ariel@gmail.com
Me sigue dando el mismo problema carlos.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 13:05, carlos restrepo restrcar...@gmail.comescribió:
yum clean all
e intenta nuevamente.
Carlos R.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 10:34, Miguel Gonzalez
miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.esescribió:
Si no recuerdo mal habia una maquina
primero prueba si existe :
yum search (paquete )
El 31 de agosto de 2011 12:19, Ariel Hernández ariel@gmail.comescribió:
Me sigue dando el mismo problema carlos.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 13:05, carlos restrepo restrcar...@gmail.com
escribió:
yum clean all
e intenta nuevamente.
Los encontro todos, solo que cada paquete aparece con un nuemro al final del
nombre, ejemplo:
yum search bison, aparece como bison-devel.i686, debere instalar asi
entonces el paquete o no??, pero lo que encuentro extraño es que me tira
error con el paquete glibc.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 14:21,
[root@srvsquid ~]# yum search glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Exiting on user cancel
[root@ ~]#* yum search glibc*
===
Matched: glibc
se soluciono tu problema?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:29:01 -0500
From: ohmi...@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Instalaciòn Asterisk
[root@srvsquid ~]# yum search glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Exiting on
OK.! gracias, si recien se soluciono, no entiendo porque me marcaba error en
los paquetes, al final hice un yum install kernel-devel, y de ahi todos los
otros paquetes los instale correctamente. Muchas gracias por la ayuda de
todos.
El 31 de agosto de 2011 14:37, ces can arvega...@hotmail.com
aggh! me volvio el problema con el glibc, hago un yum clean all, luego un
yum install glibc, y me manda el siguiente error:
*Error: Package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.i686 (updates)
Requires: glibc = 2.12-1.7.el6_0.5
Installed: glibc-2.12-1.7.el6.i686
entonces dererias hacer antes un yum update;
fijate que no tengas otros repositorios a parte de los que tiene centos.
saludos
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:49:29 -0400
From: ariel@gmail.com
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Instalaciòn Asterisk
aggh! me volvio el
AHí está lo malo..
El 31/08/11 14:49, Ariel Hernández escribió:
[root@localhost src]# rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.12-1.7.el6.i686
glibc-2.12-1.7.el6_0.5.i686
ACÁ...debiera indicarte sólo uno.. dale un rpm -qa|sort y verifica que
no esten duplicados los programas.. en este caso, tienes instaladas 2
Are you a dog lover ? I like dogs too. They usually bark at strangers.
Paul.
PLONK
see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_%28Usenet%29
best regards
---
Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hello R,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:46:53 -0700 R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 25/08/11 18:33:
Anyone have any idea how soon RHEL and CentOS will be releasing the patch
package?
Apparently Apache just released a patch:
https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
Source:
Am 31.08.2011 01:58, schrieb Always Learning:
I also notice our servers successfully contacting official time
references centres which are not those sites trying to connect to us. I
notice too the installed time software is listening on every available
IP. I can not identity any options in
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:43:46AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
That you for the useful enlightenment. I was unaware it was an OpenVZ. I
thought is was XEN on Ubuntu.
Next time, try posting more usefull information stating that you are indeed
running CentOS on a CentOS support mailing list and
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote:
On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
I got:
iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how
On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
Thats quite a good idea - and something that we explored at length when
looking for a replacement
thus Karanbir Singh spake:
On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
Thats quite a good idea - and something that we explored at length when
On one of my xen hosts a virtual machine does not start at boot. I can
see that xendomains gives an error:
service xendomains start
Starting auto Xen domains: fszeleNo handlers could be found for logger
xend
Error: Disk isn't accessible
No handlers could be found for logger xend
Error: Disk isn't
Am 31.08.2011 04:24, schrieb Always Learning:
On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
I got:
iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
lsmod | grep
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:13 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
ntpd shipping with CentOS 6 has an option -I iface; see man 8 ntpd.
Edit /etc/sysconfig/ntpd accordingly. ntpd shipping with CentOS 5 does
not have that and thus always binds to all available interfaces.
That explains why I can not
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:15:28 PM brian wrote:
...to your rule list will allow the specified net address(es) to contact
you on port 123. the above, of course, assumes your
input port is eth0 (change that, if different on your system), and that the
NTP server uses TCP protocol
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:24:41 PM Always Learning wrote:
On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
iptables -A -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
This is
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
While I use Kmail (which can
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:01 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:24:41 PM Always Learning wrote:
uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
This is not a CentOS-provided kernel; as has been said elsewhere
in the thread, this is likely an OpenVZ
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
snip
While I use Kmail (which can do very powerful filtering based on a number
snip
So how is kmail these days? I jumped ship to t-bird about '03 or '05, when
I got tired of kmail munging my mbox (I tend to have
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:25 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So how is kmail these days? I jumped ship to t-bird about '03 or '05, when
I got tired of kmail munging my mbox (I tend to have thousands of emails
stored there, before I get around to moving them to a dated folder...).
Why not store
On 08/31/2011 12:10 PM, Walter Haidinger wrote:
PS: To install iptables from source is pretty straightforward:
get the tarball from netfilter.org, unpack and run:
./configure --prefix=/opt/iptables make make install
And at that point you lose. All management capability or the
Hi,
On 08/31/2011 10:56 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Just released:
https://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
thanks. I guess we should wait on a fix from upstream, make sure its
tested etc. If there is interest in doing a local fix/build for c4/5/6
testing repo's, please submit a
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:25:06 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46:53 AM R - elists wrote:
snip
While I use Kmail (which can do very powerful filtering based on a number
snip
So how is kmail these days?
Kmail beats the Dickens out of
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:34:48 AM Always Learning wrote:
Why not store them in a correspondence database ?
Kmail is working towards full Akonadi integration, and the full 'semantic
desktop' paradigm is (or will be) available.
So it's already being done, to a degree, and in a very
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 09:18:26 AM Always Learning wrote:
A very helpful and knowledgeable poster, Walter Haidinger, in his email
dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:10:16 +0200 (12:10 BST), gave what appears to
be an ideal solution.
* get a more recent iptables from netfilter.org
It's
Perhaps the most important point here is that the script kiddies and/or
bots usually make sure the target string, 'login' in your example is *not*
contained within a single packet. You can verify this with wireshark. In
any case just be aware that your solution will likely not have the
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:54 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
It's less than ideal to install anything from source, as Karanbir
has so correctly pointed out downthread.
Sometimes it is necessary; but it is never ideal, for the reasons KB
stated
The service provider has suggested it needs the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:46 PM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list
would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list
reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists.
the CentOS
On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
login.php
contact.php
forgotten_password.php
your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind script ('bot')
running on distributed previously hacked hosts, and probing
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:07 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
login.php
contact.php
forgotten_password.php
your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind script ('bot')
Christopher,
It's not an email program but I think it has the best
filtering capabilities of all - the brain.
umm, yeah, exactly, i want to use my brain to program certain peoples posts
from never reaching my eyeballs
arent they called threaded email readers?
i really didnt find much
John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/31/11 7:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
In the current 4,000 to 6,000 daily hits, the lunatic uses
login.php
contact.php
forgotten_password.php
your 'lunatic' aka 'hacker' is undoubtably a blind script ('bot')
running on distributed previously
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 08/30/2011 11:33 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
Someday, perhaps we'll end up back on an authenticated version of NNTP,
with support for bbcode, images, and the front end reader of your choice...
Thats quite a good idea
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban, with
three lines from one of our config files:
failregex = HOST -.*GET .*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config/c
onfig\.inc|main)\.php.*.*404.*
On 8/31/2011 11:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban, with
three lines from one of our config files:
failregex = HOST -.*GET .*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config/c
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
(http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from the epel
repository. There is a bit of a learning curve to get it running, but
it protects against a ton of hacking
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Maybe not, for a small website. However, let me re-suggest fail2ban,
with
three lines from one of our config files:
failregex = HOST -.*GET
.*(php|pma|PMA|p/m/a|db|sql|admin).*/(config/c
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:15 AM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
sometimes people on the list just get beligerant, drunk, and/or stupid and
need to be filtered.
But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
a conversation you should have a certain responsibility
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dennis,
Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
honestly was unware of the fact that dom0 is just like another VM ...
Anyway I had
On 08/31/11 8:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Looking at your example seems to suggest Fail2Ban is an 'after the
event' response. I would like to implement 'before the event' filtering
which prevents, even on the first detected hacking attempt, anything
reaching HTTPD.
so you want another piece
But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
a conversation you should have a certain responsibility to
follow it to the bitter end. Filters mostly don't understand
that (but gmail will push a reply to your own message into
the 'important' view).
i hear ya
On 8/31/2011 11:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
(http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from the epel
repository. There is a bit of a learning curve to get it
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:41 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/31/11 8:22 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Looking at your example seems to suggest Fail2Ban is an 'after the
event' response. I would like to implement 'before the event' filtering
which prevents, even on the first detected hacking
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:51 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/31/2011 11:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:29 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I assume this is an Apache server. Have you looked at mod_security
(http://www.modsecurity.org/)? It is available from the epel
On 08/31/11 9:00 AM, Always Learning wrote:
No I do not want another piece of software to parse the http protocol
and analyze the traffic.
IT Tables, in which I have great confidence and trust, can do it.
iptables will filter on packet headers and such at layer 3, it can't and
won't analyze
I'm running the command yum -y update from a script called from the the post
section of my kickstart config file, and I get the following error:
Installing : kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686
185/378
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
After the
UPDATE:
I started with kernel 2.6.35.4 #2 and lsmod | grep ipt = ipt_LOG 5419 2.
My service provider produced a replacement kernel 2.6.24-28-xen #1.
Now lsmod | grep ipt reveals ..
ipt_LOG 8192 2
iptable_filter 4608 1
ip_tables 24232 1
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:48 AM, R - elists list...@abbacomm.net wrote:
But filters tend to be stupid as well. And once you are involved in
a conversation you should have a certain responsibility to
follow it to the bitter end. Filters mostly don't understand
that (but gmail will push a
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 09:11 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
iptables will filter on packet headers and such at layer 3, it can't
and won't analyze the content of packets, regardless of your emotional
attachments.
I believe IP Tables '-m string' will. If you think the custodians and
maintainers
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:15:20 AM Always Learning wrote:
Dangerous to ignore any background noise - far better to
firmly shut the door and fill-in all known holes.
The unknown holes are the ones that will get you.
You are also setting yourself up for a denial-of-service vector.
On 08/31/11 9:32 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Wrong. Some can be determined by machine searching for 'known' invalid
URL strings which are not remotely similar to valid web page names.
there's an infinite number of invalid strings, and only a finite number
of valid ones.
anyways, your webserver
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:17 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
anyways, your webserver already filters these out, its not going to
respond to an invalid URL with anything other than '404'. thats its
job.
The 'error' is trapped; a PHP routine examines the URL for known (in a
list) hacker strings;
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:17 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Wrong. Some can be determined by machine searching for 'known' invalid
URL strings which are not remotely similar to valid web page names.
there's an infinite number of invalid strings, and only a finite number
of
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:01 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On today's Internet you are simply not going to catch 100% of the
attacks, full stop.
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
Paul.
On 08/31/11 10:33 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
an attempted access of a non-vunerability won't be any more effective
the millionth time its run than the first time. its the
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:38 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/31/11 10:33 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
an attempted access of a non-vunerability won't be any more
On Tue, August 30, 2011 18:57, psprojectplann...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29/08/2011 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote:
I am experimenting with KVM and I wish to create a
virtual machine image in a logical volume. I can
create the new lv without problem but when I go to
format its file system then I
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
Getting the last 10% will cost you 90% of your time.
___
CentOS
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most of them.
Getting the last 10% will cost you 90% of your
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell!
These appear especially when I click on things on the KDE
menus. On my
On 31/08/11 17:12, Alfred von Campe wrote:
I'm running the command yum -y update from a script called from the the
post section of my kickstart config file, and I get the following error:
Installing : kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686
185/378
grubby fatal error:
On 08/31/2011 05:38 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dennis,
Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
honestly was unware of the fact that
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears
to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS response is always:No such name. Do tell!
These appear
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to 100% of the attacks, I
aim to reduce the penetrability of most
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and settings-system.desktop.
The DNS
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
other than that, is there a good reason why a mailserver would not be
configured
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example:
settings-personal.desktop and
On 08/31/2011 01:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
other than that, is there a
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
other than that, is there a good reason why a mailserver would not be
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply,
but
other than that, is there a good reason why a
Spam filter that'll authorize the sending before receiving? Just a thought
to stop the hundreds of emails...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email,
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply,
but
other
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in
its spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in
its spamming
On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:27:00PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Anyway, the SMTP server should send the delivery failure to the envelope
address, which may be different to both the From and Reply-To addresses.
That would be lovely. Unfortunately, a high percentage
On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
with full headers, and I see the *only* reference to my
http://www.openspf.org/Introduction - SPF FTW
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:27:00PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Anyway, the SMTP server should send the delivery failure to the
envelope
On 08/31/2011 01:48 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
with full
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in
eastern Europe, has harvested
On 08/31/2011 01:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Stephen Harris wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some
On 8/31/2011 4:50 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:48 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/31/2011 4:37 PM, Josh Miller wrote:
On 08/31/2011 01:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
problem I have with that is that a few of
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 22:08 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 01:33:31 PM Always Learning wrote:
Rather than being a willing or passive victim to
On Aug 31, 2011, at 14:58, Ned Slider wrote:
Yes, it's a known issue:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2011-January/msg6.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625216
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657257
Thanks, the workarounds described in the
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:16 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern
Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its
spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but
other than that,
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:33 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
You're saying it uses the envelope, not if exists Reply-To, else From? The
problem I have with that is that a few of them have returned the email,
with full headers, and I see the *only* reference to my email address is
in the
Folks
The system involved is a 32-bit system, installed via the net about a
week ago. The command
yum update
encountered the following diagonstic
Error: Package: yaf-1.3.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge)
Requires: libfixbuf-0.9.0.so.8()(64bit)
Removing:
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 13:50 -0700, Josh Miller wrote:
That is not true as the remote server will present the envelope header
to your mail server upon connection.
Surely the FROM is ?
Paul
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:19:05 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
Michael D. Berger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:02:09 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Michael D. Berger wrote:
On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be
frequent nonsensical
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
