CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1016
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1016.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hi All:
Thanks for all the responses and suggestions. I have been doing some
more research and I believe that it may be possible to go 64-bit. I
am going to leave this for now and have another look at it in the
morning when I am, hopefully, awake before I make the final decision.
Good night.
On 6/19/2012 2:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But now I'm seeing the same from Azerbaijan, and France, and elsewhere.
Two questions: first, are other folks seeing this? and second, I can't
imagine malware this stupid, to keep hitting the same sites over and over
when it's not found, rather
Just fyi, since yesterday evening RHEL 6.3 is available on rhn, but I
see no announcement yet.
[root@rhel6-test ~]# uname -a
Linux rhel6-test 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 13 18:24:36 EDT
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@rhel6-test ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise
On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
I'm running Centos 5.7 32 bit with Firefox 10.0.5 ESR
Not sure if this has been mentioned on the list yet, but the
latest version of Adobe flash-plugin 11.2.202 has a bug
which causes it to hang and not play SWF files.
I've been pulling my hair out
On 2012-06-20 02:11, Diego Sanchez wrote:
find /whe/re -mtime +2 -exec echo {} \;
If you get Argument list too long error, you can use
find . -name * -print | xargs rm
Be very careful using that line!
If you have files or directories with whitespace or other special items
in the name it
Am 20.06.2012 12:07, schrieb Ned Slider:
On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
I finally found the answer here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1080414
I have downgraded the flash-plugin now to version 10.3.183
from rpmforge repo. It works fine now :)
I've also added
On 20/06/12 11:39, Rainer Traut wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 12:07, schrieb Ned Slider:
On 19/06/12 23:59, Keith Roberts wrote:
I've also added exclude=flash-plugin to the end
of /etc/yum.conf file, to make sure this does not get
upgraded again.
That's a bad idea. Unpatched critical
On Jun 20, 2012, at 2:18 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
Thanks for all the responses and suggestions. I have been doing some
more research and I believe that it may be possible to go 64-bit. I
am going to leave this for now and have another look at it in the
morning when I am,
Everyone,
Most of the time I am over my head in trying to troubleshoot problems.
However, after reading manuals, man pages, and getting advice from this
list I have been able to work my way through difficulties, and at the
end, I usually have a better understanding of what 'is going on'. I can
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The failure is characterized by dropping its
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The failure is characterized by dropping its
On 6/20/2012 10:27 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The
Greg,
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one. The
symptoms are the same
John Hinton wrote:
On 6/20/2012 10:27 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
snip
If you are having to fully 'cold boot' the system
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one. The
symptoms are the same with the second card.
snip
Several questions: do you
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The failure is characterized by dropping its
Greg,
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are the same with the second card.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are the same with the second card.
snip
Ah,
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are the same with
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 6/20/2012 11:13 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and quiet,
so you can actually see what's happening. Sounds to me as though it's
trying
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
Some additional information that may be useful. The TrendNet card is
the second TrendNet card I have used. The first card had the same
symptoms, and I deduced the card was bad, and purchased another one.
The symptoms are the same with
On 6/20/2012 11:13 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
snip
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
The
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Ned Slider wrote:
*snip*
That's a bad idea. Unpatched critical vulnerabilities in Flash (along
with Java) is one of the most likely routes of infection of your machine
and not updating it is asking for trouble.
In general yes, but afaik flash player 10.3 is still
On 6/20/2012 9:34 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works well for 6 to 12 hours and then fails.
Try moving the network card to a new
On 6/20/2012 12:31 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
Is there not a free alternative to Adobe's flash plugin
please?
I haven't tried them myself, but I think both Gnash and Lightspark aim
to be open source replacements for Adobe Flash. I think one of them
even works well enough to play YouTube
Arun Khan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and
quiet,
snip
edit the kernel line in grub, and add rdshell at the
On Jun 18, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Woodchuck wrote:
[snipped swap/pagefile list of statements]
Thanks to the list for any answers!
Nothing in your list was phrased as a question. What are you trying to
determine? If the list of statements was accurate?
Nate
On 6/20/2012 11:09 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
That's interesting. Here are the log entries for the previous card as
well as the eth4 that is currently installed.
# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8168 (r8169)
SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, DRIVERS==?*,
ATTR{address}==00:e0:b3:10:f6:81, ATTR{type}==1,
On 06/20/12 8:44 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev ff)
pure unmitigated junk.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Chris Beattie cbeat...@geninfo.com wrote:
On 6/20/2012 9:34 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I have been chasing a problem with a pci-e TrendNet(TEG-ECTX) gigabit
card. After adding the card to a machine with a new Centos 6.2 install
and naming it 'eth4' it works
On 06/20/12 11:17 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
Or it could mean that the PCI-e slots are not providing enough power
for this card, or the slots are specialized to run only certain types of
cards. What motherboard does the OP have?
more likely, it means once again Fry's is selling junk that
On 06/20/12 11:17 AM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
Or it could mean that the PCI-e slots are not providing enough power
for this card, or the slots are specialized to run only certain types of
cards. What motherboard does the OP have?
more likely, it means once again Fry's is selling junk that
Kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5
I recently experienced an odd problem with a host at our warm-site
location. The facility we use suffered an hvac failure during
elevated ambient temperatures (30C+) on Monday past and the equipment
room reportedly cooked for some hours. It was sufficient that our
James B. Byrne wrote:
Kernel 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5
I recently experienced an odd problem with a host at our warm-site
location. The facility we use suffered an hvac failure during
elevated ambient temperatures (30C+) on Monday past and the equipment
room reportedly cooked for some hours. It
On 06/20/12 12:21 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I am being persuaded that you are right. I'll have to look at the
mother board to answer Dale's question; the machine and the nic card
came from Fry's. I have had pretty good luck with Fry's in the past,
but this has turned out to be a real pain.
John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/20/12 12:21 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I am being persuaded that you are right. I'll have to look at the
mother board to answer Dale's question; the machine and the nic card
came from Fry's. I have had pretty good luck with Fry's in the past,
but this has turned
Greetings all, newbie to CentOS here. Also newbie to 64 bit installs.
Package Manager problem:
I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants a
way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something after the
post install upgrade.
1st Question:
Is there
On 20/06/12 17:31, Keith Roberts wrote:
Does anybody have the latest flash plugin 11.2. working on
Centos 5.7 32 bit please?
I have the latest 32-bit flash-plugin from the Adobe repo installed and
running on 64-bit 5.8 (latest) with 32-bit Firefox from the distro (I
run 32-bit FF and
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Arun Khan wrote:
Reboot the system with disk1 removed, the kernel boots, the 'md'
driver tries to bind sda. At this point the systems seems to hang
for a few seconds and then 'dracut' reports that it cannot find
/dev/md_dop1 (the
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Ned Slider wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bug in Latest Adobe Flash Plugin
On 20/06/12 17:31, Keith Roberts wrote:
Does anybody have the latest flash plugin 11.2. working on
Centos 5.7 32 bit please?
I have
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants a
way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something after the
post install upgrade.
1st Question:
Is there anything that can be done about this? Or is
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 17:08:11 Nate Duehr did opine:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants
a way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something
after the post install upgrade.
1st
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
I'm getting close to that in N. Central WV, phone and internet are on the
local cable, getting about 385k/sec dl speeds on average. But I have kept
my own email corpus here since 1998, over 7Gb of it now, and old, probably
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:
I think google/gmail gives you 10 gigs for free these days. Or at the
cost of ignoring the ads on the right side if you use the web
interface, but you can use imap if you want. Before they offered imap
I used to use fetchmail to pull to my
I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
single link.
http:// 2927755261/
I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
not going to it without proper measures.
it takes you to a record search site.
When I look up this number block
On 6/20/2012 11:21 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
single link.
http:// 2927755261/
I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
not going to it without proper measures.
it takes you to a record
On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote:
I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but
a single link.
http:// 2927755261/
2927755261 in hexadecimal is AE81FFFD. If you change this to AE.81.FF.FD
and convert it back to decimal, you get
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:21:41PM -0400, Bob Hoffman wrote:
I got a spam today (from a yahoo server, surprise!) with nothing but a
single link.
http:// 2927755261/
I separated the http so it would not be a link in your email... suggest
not going to it without proper measures.
it
On 06/21/2012 04:11 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Arun Khanknu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
For one thing, edit grub.conf and get *rid* of that idiot rhgb and quiet,
so you can actually see what's
52 matches
Mail list logo
