Re: [CentOS-docs] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix
Am 20.07.2012 01:25, schrieb Edward Cavill:
Hi in the wiki, using 64 without the trailing M gives an error.
code
The dovecot configuration file is located at /etc/dovecot.conf. The
following lines should be added, edited or uncommented:
login_process_size = 64
[root@localhost etc]# /etc/init.d/dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean
config file with: doveconf -n dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=imaps is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=pop3s is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:86:
login_process_size has been replaced by service { vsz_limit }
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
service(pop3-login): vsz_limit is too low
/code
Adding the M after the login_process_size = resolves the issue, as can
be seen below
login_process_size = 64M
[root@localhost etc]# /etc/init.d/dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean
config file with: doveconf -n dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=imaps is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=pop3s is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:86:
login_process_size has been replaced by service { vsz_limit }
[ OK ]
Please could you update the wiki to show these changes.
the two occurrences are at
1) login_process_size = 64
2) the Dovecot package on x86_64 kernels requires the parameter
login_process_size = 64
[root@localhost etc]# uname -ams
Linux xx 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 6 19:48:22 GMT
2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks
Hi,
I'Ve added the changes - thanks for finding them.
cheers
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Access request to page TipsAndTricks/ApacheVhostDir
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:07 -0600, Ed Heron wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:40 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
The use of mv -v ...{,_} is too clever for this kind of educational
document, and should be changed to spell out the full mv command. I
get what you're doing there, but the purpose of the document is not to
teach clever uses of bash, it's to make it obvious to people that
you're renaming the file. It will trip up the flow of reading for all
but the most knowledgeable users, and users who don't understand it
will be totally lost.
I'm not trying to be clever, I just don't like to type it twice if I
can avoid it and the typing the higher the chance for a typo. I don't
have a problem having both forms. I'll add it and see what you think.
In most documents and scripts, I usually spell out the short form
options as well, such as using --verbose. Short forms save you
typing, but documentation should not trip people up if they don't know
what the option means.
Normally, I expect, if people don't understand a command, they will
refer to the man page for the command. However, to my constant
disappointment, I understand that many people aren't looking for long
term knowledge improvement, they are looking for a recipe to blindly
follow.
Also, I find the use of _ to be obtuse and highly error prone if one
were to actually run a server that way. It's far more obvious to use
disabled, which makes it very clear that those items are disabled.
It may work for you but only because that's a convention you came up
with so you're used to it, but we're not in dos 8.3 days with
filenames, so why not be more descriptive?
Having both forms should make it plain that people can use any
convention they wish. System administration is not a fixed target.
Like many things, there are many ways to accomplish the same result.
When approaching a system that someone else is administrating, we should
try to maintain the existing conventions instead of forcing our own
ideas onto a server for which we are not the primary responsible party.
In section 6.4, is there a reason not to make a vhosts.conf file
that contains the Include in the in the conf.d/ directory, instead
of appending to the httpd.conf, or do you run into ordering issues
there? I try to avoid changing the distro files if possible.
Sections 6 and 7 are optional. There are certainly arguments against
customization. In the past, upgrades might have replaced all files
including configuration files. In that case, creating a vhosts.conf
file in the conf.d directory to separate the directive would have been a
must. However, the Linux distributions I have used for the past decade
or so have avoided replacing existing configuration files, expecting
they might be customized.
That said, I like the suggestion. It would allow for the virtual host
files to be packaged into an RPM file that could be installed on
multiple web hosts.
❧ Brian Mathis
I made the changes I've described about a week ago. Brian, does that
satisfy your concerns? Does anybody else agree with Brian? Have the
changes I've made make it easier to read the document?
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Ralph
Am 20.07.2012 14:45, schrieb Edward Cavill: Hey Christoph, It was my pleasure, thank you for making it in the first place! Cheers, Eddie Thanks but this credit is more due to NedSlider, RalphAngenendt, AkemiYagi and AthmaneMadjoudj - I just did the last modification :) http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix?action=info If possible, could you please post future suggestions for corrections to the centos-docs mailing list? Just so feedback on/improvements for the wiki don't get lost in the inbox of one person :) http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs thanks again and cheers Christoph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Ralph - should be Re: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix
sorry for the topic on the previous post ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix
On 20/07/12 12:00, Christoph Galuschka wrote:
Am 20.07.2012 01:25, schrieb Edward Cavill:
Hi in the wiki, using 64 without the trailing M gives an error.
code
The dovecot configuration file is located at /etc/dovecot.conf. The
following lines should be added, edited or uncommented:
login_process_size = 64
[root@localhost etc]# /etc/init.d/dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean
config file with: doveconf -n dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=imaps is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=pop3s is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:86:
login_process_size has been replaced by service { vsz_limit }
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
service(pop3-login): vsz_limit is too low
/code
Adding the M after the login_process_size = resolves the issue, as can
be seen below
login_process_size = 64M
[root@localhost etc]# /etc/init.d/dovecot start
Starting Dovecot Imap: doveconf: Warning: NOTE: You can get a new clean
config file with: doveconf -n dovecot-new.conf
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=imaps is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:21:
protocols=pop3s is no longer necessary, remove it
doveconf: Warning: Obsolete setting in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:86:
login_process_size has been replaced by service { vsz_limit }
[ OK ]
Please could you update the wiki to show these changes.
the two occurrences are at
1) login_process_size = 64
2) the Dovecot package on x86_64 kernels requires the parameter
login_process_size = 64
[root@localhost etc]# uname -ams
Linux xx 2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 6 19:48:22 GMT
2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks
Hi,
I'Ve added the changes - thanks for finding them.
cheers
One issue I see here is that the original howto was written for CentOS-5
with dovecot 1.x.
The OP here is clearly using CentOS-6, which uses dovecot 2.x and no
surprises for guessing that there are a few incompatibilities between
the config files for dovecot 1 and 2.
Personally, I'd suggest forking the original article and maintaining
separate versions for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6, or have separate sections
within the article for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6 where they differ.
To the best of my knowledge this list never did agree a mechanism for
handling documentation differences between product versions. The danger
is that if we keep editing changes for CentOS-6 into docs for CentOS-5
we will end up with broken useless docs.
How do others feel this type of situation should best be handled?
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix
Ned Slider wrote on 07/20/2012 03:12 PM: One issue I see here is that the original howto was written for CentOS-5 with dovecot 1.x. The OP here is clearly using CentOS-6, which uses dovecot 2.x and no surprises for guessing that there are a few incompatibilities between the config files for dovecot 1 and 2. Personally, I'd suggest forking the original article and maintaining separate versions for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6, or have separate sections within the article for CentOS-5 and CentOS-6 where they differ. To the best of my knowledge this list never did agree a mechanism for handling documentation differences between product versions. The danger is that if we keep editing changes for CentOS-6 into docs for CentOS-5 we will end up with broken useless docs. How do others feel this type of situation should best be handled? I'd say it should be decided on a case-by-case basis, but perhaps some general guidelines would be helpful. If differences can be easily handled by a note here and there then a separate page is probably not justified. If differences are substantial between major releases, then a fork of a new page for the later release may be the best approach. Phil ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1104 CentOS 6 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1104
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1104.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
47a9c162e677b05e00e6e41d4271cea162cd11dd717b906ea2a42a18b2f9d57c
kernel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
4d0b128aaefd1762e23dbebe3e99ae0bd389bb37269731eab94769da922a3f5b
kernel-debug-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
124260533275510231e994b0b27847010596b195c3841d3b378e36038a4b36c6
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
9f4873910f2402e25746a9b33f9c3450f71df191a1d5a6e125d30dc0cef60396
kernel-devel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
9716b8eaa2ecf907e2e359b8b254f28284d7149188db15eb84f8b689ecc52dd9
kernel-doc-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
e41313bd54004adc53b24ef5272365ddd07fdbed8d534f7f8b11cdaf7c9cd188
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
6c440009f5bc1979ec693d94cf0536f434be0f66db213f1325af7a2a835398f8
kernel-headers-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
6e77bede19b008c107ac7dfb7415c0d258f9e15b65ebf9092db22b7df60a4e78
perf-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
e13655b3960ca9f7373bb93feebdbdc7aba1ca3d93dbffe3b2a894fec54e927b
python-perf-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
cefcdd0d9b855d602d674f4e6d0dfd4824848b1a2af01c7fe12ff55ad8a069ae
kernel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
8d25e8a5414ad9c134675b7be0d0455251c47a5ce876a93433b9a17f4e80c1d9
kernel-debug-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
bcea8b165e4eb73b3a2a25895d38b04c03667beec532f1d50d2b47331c10e3c4
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
3c4834268d08f9dace2885eb18c0c0596cf3711ab4cf10ae88cc101131391f4c
kernel-devel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
e71e8ba81ad04182612f25dbd43cbedb14fe850fbfc4fdf3671bfdf45fe5445e
kernel-doc-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
c24bac2a85be3a8f0debcce1a942303cee5e017ec8850c955a2adeab5cdcdbeb
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
f82a34dc7865e3c32aa532c410f0bdcaa06421c696df2034675b3b276d42a082
kernel-headers-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
3cfc8bd6c6668e719266966dbec58d635abb2a64ecdd392f24b3dd6685c28ba8
perf-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
2460e7661deb3c0530f4aa65db4d3f0f471968e2e1062287598eef404d85b172
python-perf-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
85323f39e4b891c454abb9c2538f6d0dd99c764b4a89a9fdb142e471b555df32
kernel-2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Hola: Entiendo que esto es un RAID por software, si es por hardware, la controladora debería mostrarte un solo disco. Miguel De: Sergio Villalba svillal...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes 20 de julio de 2012 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Un saludo amigos, El día de ayer me paso algo similar realice un raid por hardware en un proliant ml 110 g7 sin embargo CentOS 5.8 reconoce dos discos Saludos, Fabricio Palacios V. Enviado desde mi iPhone 4 El 20/07/2012, a las 8:45, Miguel Gonzalez miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es escribió: Hola: Entiendo que esto es un RAID por software, si es por hardware, la controladora debería mostrarte un solo disco. Miguel De: Sergio Villalba svillal...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes 20 de julio de 2012 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Creo que esos equipos no tienen una controladora de raid propiamente dicho, sino que realizan raid por software. Si la controladora raid está integrada en la placa desde mi punto de vista no es recomendable usarla. Saludos 2012/7/20 SisNet sis...@sisnet.com.ec Un saludo amigos, El día de ayer me paso algo similar realice un raid por hardware en un proliant ml 110 g7 sin embargo CentOS 5.8 reconoce dos discos Saludos, Fabricio Palacios V. Enviado desde mi iPhone 4 El 20/07/2012, a las 8:45, Miguel Gonzalez miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es escribió: Hola: Entiendo que esto es un RAID por software, si es por hardware, la controladora debería mostrarte un solo disco. Miguel De: Sergio Villalba svillal...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes 20 de julio de 2012 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Ricardo ___ IT Architect website: http://www.pulsarinara.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Tu hiciste el RAID? Están en RAID0 y quieres hacer un RAID1? Cuando instalas centos la capacidad de los discos que vez es la misma que de los discos físicos? Y cuantos discos físicamente tienes? Si puedes instalar centos en un solo disco pero tendrás que deshacer el RAID y volver a crear un RAID0 pero ahora con un solo disco. Daniel Ortiz Gutierrez El 20/07/2012, a las 10:14, Ricardo Martinez harisel...@gmail.com escribió: Creo que esos equipos no tienen una controladora de raid propiamente dicho, sino que realizan raid por software. Si la controladora raid está integrada en la placa desde mi punto de vista no es recomendable usarla. Saludos 2012/7/20 SisNet sis...@sisnet.com.ec Un saludo amigos, El día de ayer me paso algo similar realice un raid por hardware en un proliant ml 110 g7 sin embargo CentOS 5.8 reconoce dos discos Saludos, Fabricio Palacios V. Enviado desde mi iPhone 4 El 20/07/2012, a las 8:45, Miguel Gonzalez miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es escribió: Hola: Entiendo que esto es un RAID por software, si es por hardware, la controladora debería mostrarte un solo disco. Miguel De: Sergio Villalba svillal...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes 20 de julio de 2012 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Ricardo ___ IT Architect website: http://www.pulsarinara.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] RV: CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i
Creo que no me explicado bien. Desde la controladora creo un RAID 1, acta aquí todo bien. Ahora cuando comienzo la instalación centos, en el paso de particionamiento no aparece el raid, sino los dos discos duros..esto no pinta nada bien, lo normal es que detecte un sólo volumen. Mi idea son varias: 1. Grabar los drivers en un usb y arrancar la instalación como linux dd y enchufarle los drivers. 2. Realizar la instalación en un sólo disco como me lo representa el sistema e instalar el rpm comentado anteriormente. 3. Meterle un misto al HP Alguna sugerencia... Gracias y un saludo. - Forwarded message - Para: centos-es@centos.org centos-es@centos.org Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Fecha: vie., jul. 20, 2012 17:21 Tu hiciste el RAID? Están en RAID0 y quieres hacer un RAID1? Cuando instalas centos la capacidad de los discos que vez es la misma que de los discos físicos? Y cuantos discos físicamente tienes? Si puedes instalar centos en un solo disco pero tendrás que deshacer el RAID y volver a crear un RAID0 pero ahora con un solo disco. Daniel Ortiz Gutierrez El 20/07/2012, a las 10:14, Ricardo Martinez harisel...@gmail.com escribió: Creo que esos equipos no tienen una controladora de raid propiamente dicho, sino que realizan raid por software. Si la controladora raid está integrada en la placa desde mi punto de vista no es recomendable usarla. Saludos 2012/7/20 SisNet sis...@sisnet.com.ec Un saludo amigos, El día de ayer me paso algo similar realice un raid por hardware en un proliant ml 110 g7 sin embargo CentOS 5.8 reconoce dos discos Saludos, Fabricio Palacios V. Enviado desde mi iPhone 4 El 20/07/2012, a las 8:45, Miguel Gonzalez miguel_3_gonza...@yahoo.es escribió: Hola: Entiendo que esto es un RAID por software, si es por hardware, la controladora debería mostrarte un solo disco. Miguel De: Sergio Villalba svillal...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes 20 de julio de 2012 15:23 Asunto: [CentOS-es] CentOS 6 + HP proliant DL120G7 no detecta Raid 1 HP B110i Hola a tod@s, estoy intentando instalar la distribución CentOS 6 en un HP proliant DL120G7 con Raid 1 pero no detecta la controladora HP B110i. Buscando en la Web de HP encontrado el software kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=usprodTypeId=15351prodSeriesId=5075942swItem=MTX-03ac247e6fb74f3f88590932d1prodNameId=5075943swEnvOID=4103swLang=8taskId=135mode=3 Mi pregunta es, podría instalar el sistema CentOS 6 en un solo disco en el proceso de instalación (aparence 2 dos discos - no RAID), una vez instalado el sistema operativo mínimo, instalar el driver del controlador kmod-hpahcisr-1.2.6-7.el6.x86_64.rpm?? detectaría el RAID posteriormente? Es posible instalar el RPM en el proceso de instalación de la CentOS 6?? Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Ricardo ___ IT Architect website: http://www.pulsarinara.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Hello CentOS Guys :-) Oracle has created a new Website to capture CentOS Users :o http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ -- Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Chris xchris...@googlemail.com wrote: Oracle has created a new Website to capture CentOS Users :o http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ http://news.techworld.com/operating-systems/106971/novell-looks-to-lure-red-hat-users/ --- Novell has launched a migration service in an attempt ook aim at rival and Linux market leader Red Hat with a migration service designed to help move Linux users onto Novell's SuSE enterprise servers. The SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) Subscription with Expanded Support program is a three-year contract that covers support for Red Hat or CentOS, a Red Hat clone, during the first two years of the deal. During that time, Novell will provide Red Hat and CentOS server users with binaries released by Red Hat for its platform and technical support. The subscriptions, which include two years of transition support and three years SLES support, are similar to the three-year priority contracts Novell offers on its own servers. So, busines as usual... move along... nothing to see here... FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 6.2 x86_64 + PHP 5.3.3 + Zend Guard Loader v3.3 == Segfault
Hello everyone, I've got issues getting Zend Guard Loader v3.3 running. Tried several installations, doesn't work for any. Once I install Zend Guard Loader my PHP CLI binary starts to segfault *at exit*. Same is true for apache processes with mod_php enabled: Works until you SIGHUP your apache processes. Doing that your webserver quits with a segfault. Can anyone reproduce that issue? Does anyone know a way to work around it? Thank you very much! Regards, Andreas -- SNIP -- $ php -v PHP 5.3.3 (cli) (built: Jul 3 2012 16:53:21) Copyright (c) 1997-2010 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies with Zend Guard Loader v3.3, Copyright (c) 1998-2010, by Zend Technologies Segmentation fault $ php -m [PHP Modules] bcmath bz2 calendar Core ctype curl date dom ereg exif fileinfo filter ftp gd gettext gmp hash iconv json libxml mbstring mysql mysqli openssl pcntl pcre PDO pdo_mysql pdo_sqlite Phar readline Reflection session shmop SimpleXML sockets SPL sqlite3 standard tokenizer wddx xml xmlreader xmlwriter xsl Zend Guard Loader zip zlib [Zend Modules] Zend Guard Loader Segmentation fault -- SNIP -- -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
I just went to install kmod-nvidia on a 64-bit CentOS 6.2 system... and enabling elrepo, yum can't find it. There's a page for it, but that was last updated last year, and there are also references to packages for older Nvidia cards, but not the current. What do I not know? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Am 20.07.2012 16:44, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: I just went to install kmod-nvidia on a 64-bit CentOS 6.2 system... and enabling elrepo, yum can't find it. There's a page for it, but that was last updated last year, and there are also references to packages for older Nvidia cards, but not the current. What do I not know? You seem to have missed the fact that Nvidia sucks :) At least on our elrepo mirror site there are recent kmod-nvidia packages. The Package kmod-nvidia-295.59-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm is just a few days old. Maybe your yum configuration went bad? Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Andreas Rogge wrote: Am 20.07.2012 16:44, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: I just went to install kmod-nvidia on a 64-bit CentOS 6.2 system... and enabling elrepo, yum can't find it. There's a page for it, but that was last updated last year, and there are also references to packages for older Nvidia cards, but not the current. What do I not know? You seem to have missed the fact that Nvidia sucks :) I have no control over Nvidia. It's a very popular maker of cards. Oh, and the AMD/ATI is even more of a pain to get and install drivers At least on our elrepo mirror site there are recent kmod-nvidia packages. The Package kmod-nvidia-295.59-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm is just a few days old. Maybe your yum configuration went bad? Dunno why it would. [elrepo] name=ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6 baseurl=http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://elrepo.org/mirrors-elrepo.el6 And the same for testing, kernel, and extras. Did they change the repository names? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Chris wrote: Hello CentOS Guys :-) Oracle has created a new Website to capture CentOS Users :o http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ Yup. No, don't switch from CentOS to RHEL, switch to *us*, and pay even more for very, very, very lousy support.* And I *love* the chart... never mind that RH changed the build structure to give Oracle pain, and it hurt us, Never mind that the difference between Oracle and CentOS, once that was fixed, dropped like a rock, due to our team (that is, Johnny, and Karanbir, and all the rest), to where it's even No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of mark * Long rant of personally-experienced month of Sun/Oracle support available upon request. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On 20 July 2012 15:19, Chris xchris...@googlemail.com wrote: http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ I found the update delay graph laughable. They're comparing themselves to a bunch of volunteers and then say we beat people work for free and for the love of it Right... IMHO, I'd rather go for RHEL if I'm paying. (Unfortunately I don't make that decision, customers do, disclaimer, $dayjob has OEL customers too). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Andreas Rogge wrote: Am 20.07.2012 16:44, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: I just went to install kmod-nvidia on a 64-bit CentOS 6.2 system... and enabling elrepo, yum can't find it. There's a page for it, but that was last updated last year, and there are also references to packages for older Nvidia cards, but not the current. snip At least on our elrepo mirror site there are recent kmod-nvidia packages. The Package kmod-nvidia-295.59-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm is just a few days old. Maybe your yum configuration went bad? Ok, build the driver using the proprietary package, and he's back up. Well, *after* I ran nvidia-xconfig, since there was no xorg.conf, and nothing in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, which created /etc/X11/xorg.conf. Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of Once again, the problem seems to be hatred of Ellison more than anything else. Red Hat and CentOS based on it are #1, it´s only natural that smaller players want a piece of the pie. This is different from Novell trying to lure RHEL users exactly how? http://news.techworld.com/operating-systems/106971/novell-looks-to-lure-red-hat-users/ What Oracle is saying is if you want free, you can use ours instead of CentOS and get a more recent kernel centos 6.3 -2.6.32-279.1.1.el6 uek http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/i386/kernel-uek-2.6.32-300.29.2.el6uek.i686.rpm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Linux#RHEL_compatibility --- Oracle distributes Oracle Linux with two kernels: Red Hat Compatible Kernel - identical to the kernel shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel - based on a later Linux 2.6-series kernel, with Oracle's own enhancements for OLTP, InfiniBand, and SSD disk access, NUMA-optimizations, Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS), async I/O, OCFS2, and networking.[8][9] --- https://oss.oracle.com/ol6/docs/RELEASE-NOTES-UEK2-en.html --- New Btrfs features/functionality An updated version of btrfsfsck, a tool to check and repair a Btrfs file system, is now included in the btrfs-progs package. This new btrfsck now supports a --repair option that allows fixing errors in the extent allocation tree and block group accounting. btrfsck also provides the option --init-csum-tree which replaces the check-sum root with an empty one. This will clear out the CRCs but allows the file-system to be mounted with the mount option nodatasum. Automatic defragmentation: Brtfs now provides an online defragmentation facility that reorganizes data into contiguous chunks wherever possible to create larger sections of available disk space and improve read and write performance. (snip) Xen domU improvements Several bug fixes and improvements have been incorporated to make the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel scale and cooperate better as a guest (domU) in Oracle VM and Xen. Xen block backend from Linux 3.3 kernel. This provides the fully featured Xen blkback along with extra features, such as passing through a flush (a lighter version of barrier), discard (also known as TRIM or SCSI UNMAP) and various bug-fixes and enhancments. Xen PCI backend from Linux 3.3 kernel, this includes the option to specify how the PCI structure shows up in the PV guest - either as in host or virtualized; Fixes to make it work with SR-IOV VF cards; and numerous mutex fixes. Memory self-ballooning - allows the guest to automatically balloon depending on the workload. Transcendent memory support for HVM and PV guests Tracing API support for Xen MMU operations. Syncing the wall-clock time from the initial domain Numerous code cleanups and bug fixes (e.g. in the following areas: memory balloning, blkfront, P2M, E820, IRQ, MMU, Gntalloc driver) Other improvements dm-nfs: device-mapper target that allows you to treat an NFS file as a block device. It provides loopback-style emulation of a block device using a regular file as backing storage. The backing file resides on a remote system and is accessed via the NFS protocol. Driver Updates The Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel supports a vast range of hardware and devices. In close cooperation with hardware and storage vendors, several device drivers have been updated by Oracle. The list below only indicates the updated drivers that deviate from the versions included in mainline Linux 3.0.16. Storage drivers Broadcom bnx2i 2.7.0.3 Broadcom bnx2fc 1.0.4 Brocade bfa 3.0.2.2 Emulex be2iscsi 4.1.239.0 Emulex lpfc 8.3.5.58.2p LSI mpt2sas 12.100.00.00 LSI megaraid_sas 5.40-rc1 QLogic qla2xxx 8.03.07.12.39.0-k QLogic qla4xxx 5.02.00.00.06.02-uek2 Network drivers Broadcom bnx2 2.1.11 Broadcom bnx2x 1.70.00-0 Broadcom cnic 2.5.7 Brocade bna 3.0.2.2 Cisco enic 2.1.1.24 Emulex be2net 4.1.297o Intel e1000e 1.4.4-k Intel ixgbevf 2.1.0-k Intel igbvf 2.0.0-k Intel ixgbe 3.4.8-k Mellanox mlx4_en 1.5.4.2 QLogic netxen_nic 4.0.77 QLogic qlcnic 5.0.25.1 --- Sounds like value-added to me, for those that need that functionality. For those that do not, CentOS is just fine. The OP got the negative reactions he came seeking, I bet... So can we please move along?. This bickering and gnashing of teeth does nobody any good. FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of Once again, the problem seems to be hatred of Ellison more than anything else. Have you seen any of my other posts, where I describe Sun/Oracle's utterly abysmal and unacceptable support? Perhaps you might, and then you might understand why I, personally, dislike Oracle. They've also always been the high-priced spread. I've never been involved with the contracts, so I simply don't know: perhaps someone here can tell us the difference between the costs of the 3? 4? SLA contracts from RH and Oracle? I'll wager Oracle's is comparable or higher. Red Hat and CentOS based on it are #1, it´s only natural that smaller players want a piece of the pie. In the US: at least five years ago, SuSE was the bigger share in Europe. This is different from Novell trying to lure RHEL users exactly how? http://news.techworld.com/operating-systems/106971/novell-looks-to-lure-red-hat-users/ RH, not free distros. snip Just one last question: if you think this highly of OUL, why are you here? Why haven't you gone to their lists? mark not imputing someone being a marketing troll ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On 07/20/2012 10:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? mark Here's what the same operation looks like on my box: [jleafey@megamind ~]$ sudo yum list \*nvidia\* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit, : security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com * elrepo: elrepo.org * epel: mirror.steadfast.net * extras: mirror.raystedman.net * nux-libreoffice.org-rpms: mirror.li.nux.ro * rpmforge: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * updates: mirror.raystedman.net 1314 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Installed Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64295.59-1.el6.elrepo@elrepo nvidia-x11-drv.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo@elrepo Available Packages kmod-nvidia-173xx.x86_64 173.14.31-1.el6.elrepo elrepo kmod-nvidia-96xx.x86_64 96.43.20-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-173xx.x86_64 173.14.31-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-173xx-32bit.x86_64 173.14.31-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-32bit.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepoelrepo nvidia-x11-drv-96xx.x86_6496.43.20-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-96xx-32bit.x86_64 96.43.20-1.el6.elrepo elrepo [jleafey@megamind ~]$ Just a thought, have you tried flushing yum's metadata? I have run across a couple of instances where yum seems to get a bit... retentive and won't retrieve new metadata for one or more repositories. I usually run yum clean metadata or yum clean all, then re-try the operation. Unless it is something *I* have boogered badly it usually works. Of course, YMMV! -- Jay Leafey - jay.lea...@mindless.com Memphis, TN ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Friday, July 20, 2012 10:19:05 AM Chris wrote: Hello CentOS Guys :-) Oracle has created a new Website to capture CentOS Users :o http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ They also mention Scientific Linux in their 'QA.' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Jay Leafey wrote: On 07/20/2012 10:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list ^ \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? snip Just a thought, have you tried flushing yum's metadata? I have run across a couple of instances where yum seems to get a bit... retentive and won't retrieve new metadata for one or more repositories. I usually run yum clean metadata or yum clean all, then re-try the operation. Unless it is something *I* have boogered badly it usually works. See emphasized line, above, from previous email. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Just one last question: if you think this highly of OUL, why are you here? Why haven't you gone to their lists? I have two AMD Opteron servers, a self-built one with Asus mobo, and a Sun w1100z (ages old, single core Opteron). I plan to run Oracle's on the latter, while keeping CentOS on the Asus one. Came here asking about OpenJDK 7 support in CentOS 6.3, as I plan to run a Java based app server on it. Since I haven't installed Oracle's yet on the Sun box, no need still to ask any questions (I don't even know if there are mailing lists for Oracle's or web based forums). I want to run both, and don't see the point of having any grudges against any particular distro. But hey, that's me. FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEEA-2012:1101 CentOS 6 tzdata Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEEA-2012:1101 CentOS 5 tzdata Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2012:1102 Moderate CentOS 5 pidgin Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2012:1102 Moderate CentOS 6 pidgin Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CEBA-2012:1104 CentOS 6 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:58:36 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:1101 CentOS 6 tzdata Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120719155836.ga15...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:1101
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1101.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
376b8d0e06bfaa5f4829153607f04aa73f02adf6a3b6950867a4de47a96ad5da
tzdata-2012c-3.el6.noarch.rpm
639a764782e14254a78feff334e91ee03c45b917aeb5bc98782042d401b57c6b
tzdata-java-2012c-3.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
376b8d0e06bfaa5f4829153607f04aa73f02adf6a3b6950867a4de47a96ad5da
tzdata-2012c-3.el6.noarch.rpm
639a764782e14254a78feff334e91ee03c45b917aeb5bc98782042d401b57c6b
tzdata-java-2012c-3.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
23ecac28cdef679d17a20c4c6e31797032fdeecc7e212f6814592bc938618cee
tzdata-2012c-3.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:04:23 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:1101 CentOS 5 tzdata Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120719160423.ga16...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:1101
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1101.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
3180cf771478ef5dfdd152d70192d7cd6e46e4318a68577ebcf853f86b00d47c
tzdata-2012c-3.el5.i386.rpm
0282ecdc33b6be353fc859b0b5e9db560d66faa777ba983e547eccaf478c78f8
tzdata-java-2012c-3.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
5f7e34b3595b2844f7be787aa6493a08196ef0f10932fb89dc78931137bf54a0
tzdata-2012c-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
04393b92f35c30e6fd8bc51956b3710543617ebe184621d0e52d1e8d187b12a1
tzdata-java-2012c-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e33474a66129c84c550ef86bc379c23675bceba6dc3cc4a4f0db41c8e69c87ee
tzdata-2012c-3.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:46:55 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1102 Moderate CentOS 5 pidgin
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120719164655.ga18...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1102 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1102.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8908908678462c28bc03c3915620946db378b4a1f3fe93a21c52e442cae90c69
finch-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
c6587668fe8ea1222184d2ca9d8ad4214150a2700297efe5657630f97b4f8184
finch-devel-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
f475dc5dd1fad54bf7b0bd4a5c44099ab813ea20b198ecdda7a4c657e2d26d58
libpurple-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
ec8715feb4a1ae7db0cf3117caa0f6b35e13cef91c30e597170517939e52e108
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
d12e73335aa5c14bc0e1faf27511fb9b4c22a41f024180db8880800941e74ddd
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
c27bb1f6da30f4fe09a9f71c1cb72799a7e2f350d1e684d7dbbb1de0f974d1c3
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
77b67caa2d887bf7240006928ae0e02e6d656a6233ceca778d2aca7a8cdb44c0
pidgin-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
78626e2510297051788d1dd3813181351cf9a8d554bff703a6210b69feef9135
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
2dacc069567913571d78e30faa3c23612d647486d75c9203fc0e88c4ab016ea9
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
x86_64:
8908908678462c28bc03c3915620946db378b4a1f3fe93a21c52e442cae90c69
finch-2.6.6-11.el5.4.i386.rpm
9c9624d412fe0b2ebfd528409f7861a909cb1330316b798171448edd0de3a8e5
finch-2.6.6-11.el5.4.x86_64.rpm
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On 7/20/2012 11:15 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: On 20 July 2012 15:19, Chris xchris...@googlemail.com wrote: http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ I found the update delay graph laughable. They're comparing themselves to a bunch of volunteers and then say we beat people work for free and for the love of it Right... IMHO, I'd rather go for RHEL if I'm paying. (Unfortunately I don't make that decision, customers do, disclaimer, $dayjob has OEL customers too). Yes, pick the one bad time for CentOS and release 6 and show that in a graph. I find it interesting the CentOS is showing as faster than Oracle now. Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? If you want something laughable. Anyway, Oracle came with some old distro or book I picked up. It was free with some strings as I remember, but that is likely a decade ago now. Still, shouldn't Oracle linux include Oracle? The word Oracle being synonymous with one thing. I might have to do an install if it did and if it was free for any use. ;) -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Just one last question: if you think this highly of OUL, why are you here? Why haven't you gone to their lists? snip I want to run both, and don't see the point of having any grudges against any particular distro. But hey, that's me. Oh, as I read this, I was thinking, and realized I *do* have something against OUL specifically: of commercial providers of Linux, Novell's SuSE is their own distro. RHEL is their own distro. Oracle takes RHEL and customizes it, rather than building it from the F/OSS components, the way SuSE and RH do, and sells it as their distro. *That's* what frosts me. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? No, as IBM doesn´t make DB2 GPL either. It´s the big bucks from the fortune 500 proprietary products which pays -in part- for all the FOSS goodness like OpenJDK, Netbeans, Virtualbox, Glassfish, MySQL, Btrfs, InnoDB, BerkeleyDB... If you mean, ´free as in free beer ... I guess it´s a matter of keeping things simple... as they try to mirror the RHEL package set... Plus, I wouldn´t pay for Oracle DB, with all the free options (including MySQL community edition) available on repos... Just my $0.02... FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? No, as IBM doesn´t make DB2 GPL either. It´s the big bucks from the fortune 500 proprietary products which pays -in part- for all the FOSS goodness like OpenJDK, Netbeans, Virtualbox, Glassfish, MySQL, Btrfs, InnoDB, BerkeleyDB... snip Um, there *is* a free version of Oracle. There are coded-in limits to size - I know, because in '09, I was fighting to install and configure spacewalk (*bleah!*), which *required* Oracle at the time, and the free version of Oracle would only allow a max mem of 1G, and just to make spacewalk work, I had to up the default to something like 997M. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? No, as IBM doesn´t make DB2 GPL either. It´s the big bucks from the fortune 500 proprietary products which pays -in part- for all the FOSS goodness like OpenJDK, Netbeans, Virtualbox, Glassfish, MySQL, Btrfs, InnoDB, BerkeleyDB... Why don't they just continue to do something more useful like continue the support for OpenSolaris! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ken godee k...@perfect-image.com wrote: Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: Meanwhile, if this is linux.oracle.com, shouldn't Oracle database be included in the 'free version'? No, as IBM doesn´t make DB2 GPL either. It´s the big bucks from the fortune 500 proprietary products which pays -in part- for all the FOSS goodness like OpenJDK, Netbeans, Virtualbox, Glassfish, MySQL, Btrfs, InnoDB, BerkeleyDB... Why don't they just continue to do something more useful like continue the support for OpenSolaris! Aren't the SRPMs available for OEL? How about an Indestructible CentOS sub-distro? ❧ Brian Mathis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of Once again, the problem seems to be hatred of Ellison more than anything else. some people object to Ellison and I would suspect that many more just don't trust Oracle as a corporation but there are some businesses that rely upon Oracle too. I would suspect that few will actually switch from CentOS to OUL just because of their offer but it is just a re-spin of the RHEL, like CentOS and Scientific Linux so it's relatively easy to switch back and forth anyway. Oracle really doesn't care whether users install their OUL... they want to sell SLA's which they sell cheaper than Red Hat which has caused a rather sucky side effect which makes it more difficult to produce customized kernels which would never have happened had Oracle not chosen to ride the coattails of Red Hat and undercut the pricing (just another reason that some dislike Oracle). Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Craig White wrote: On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: No, you should pay us, says Larry, I need to keep my yacht and fighter jet taken care of Once again, the problem seems to be hatred of Ellison more than anything else. some people object to Ellison and I would suspect that many more just don't trust Oracle as a corporation but there are some businesses that rely upon Oracle too. I would suspect that few will actually switch from CentOS to OUL just because of their offer but it is just a re-spin of the RHEL, like CentOS and Scientific Linux so it's relatively easy to switch back and forth anyway. Oracle really doesn't care whether users install their OUL... they want to sell SLA's which they sell cheaper than Red Hat which has caused a rather sucky side effect which makes it more difficult to produce customized kernels which would never have happened had Oracle not chosen to ride the coattails of Red Hat and undercut the pricing (just another reason that some dislike Oracle). Don't worry, just as soon as Oracle drives RH under, or buys them, they'll crank up the prices to higher than RH now - I mean, Oracle's a *lot* bigger than RH, and can afford the loss leader for a while. mark and the quality of their service will drop, if that's possible ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote: Oracle really doesn't care whether users install their OUL... they want to sell SLA's which they sell cheaper than Red Hat which has caused a rather sucky side effect which makes it more difficult to produce customized kernels which would never have happened had Oracle not chosen to ride the coattails of Red Hat and undercut the pricing (just another reason that some dislike Oracle). Yes, but the real sucky thing here was when Red Hat cut off the community that contributed the fixes to their buggy initial versions from getting free binaries of the results that became RHEL. If Oracle - or anyone else - can steal their support customers by providing free access to usable binaries, well, they brought it on themselves. And they still could rectify that mistake if they wanted... -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On 20/07/12 16:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Jay Leafey wrote: On 07/20/2012 10:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list ^ \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? snip Just a thought, have you tried flushing yum's metadata? I have run across a couple of instances where yum seems to get a bit... retentive and won't retrieve new metadata for one or more repositories. I usually run yum clean metadata or yum clean all, then re-try the operation. Unless it is something *I* have boogered badly it usually works. See emphasized line, above, from previous email. mark Please post the output from: cat /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo and yum list \*kmod-nvidia\* thanks. PS - This query would really be better placed on the elrepo users mailing lists rather than the general CentOS mailing lists. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:30:49PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: If you mean, ´free as in free beer ... I guess it´s a matter of keeping things simple... as they try to mirror the RHEL package set... You misspelled, once again, leech. It's a simple word, you should really use it more often considering how applicable it is in this thread. Plus, I wouldn´t pay for Oracle DB, with all the free options (including MySQL community edition) available on repos... So for all your ramblings of commercialism these past few posts you would rather use something free instead of paying? Really? John -- Sued for what? I can see it now: If you win, you get a hug from Stallman. If you lose you get 2 hugs. -- geekoid (135745) dadinportland@@@yahoo...com, Slashdot, in reference to claims that Emacs violated the GPL. pgpdvCohRQwFk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: Aren't the SRPMs available for OEL? How about an Indestructible CentOS sub-distro? Yeah can we please just forget this and avoid all the litigation? John -- Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed. -- Herman Melville (1819-1891), novelist and poet pgpcZjnGeMta7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Ned Slider wrote: On 20/07/12 16:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Jay Leafey wrote: On 07/20/2012 10:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list ^ \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? snip Just a thought, have you tried flushing yum's metadata? I have run across a couple of instances where yum seems to get a bit... retentive and won't retrieve new metadata for one or more repositories. I usually run yum clean metadata or yum clean all, then re-try the operation. Unless it is something *I* have boogered badly it usually works. See emphasized line, above, from previous email. Please post the output from: cat /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo and yum list \*kmod-nvidia\* thanks. Y'know, I appreciate any and all help, but I'm beginning to feel those trying to help haven't actually *read* my previous posts. Jay suggested I do a yum clean all, when I already said I'd done that; Ned's asking for what the repo looks like, when I posted the top bit and said the rest of the entries were the same Repeating my original post: ### Name: ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository for el6 ### URL: http://elrepo.org/ [elrepo] name=ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6 baseurl=http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://elrepo.org/mirrors-elrepo.el6 enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org protect=0 includepkgs=kmod-nvidia and the entries for elrepo-testing, elrepo-kernel, and elrepo-extras are the same. PS - This query would really be better placed on the elrepo users mailing lists rather than the general CentOS mailing lists. But the real question not about elrepo, which clearly *has* kmod-nvidia, but why yum can't find the repo, and that is on target for this list. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Ned Slider wrote: On 20/07/12 16:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Jay Leafey wrote: On 07/20/2012 10:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Now that he's up, which was my highest priority, I'm back to looking around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list ^ \*nvidia\*, and see * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com so this was what the mirrorlist came up with. That there's something screwy there. So I just pointed my browser there, and found elrepo there under distributions/elrepo. Anyone got any ideas why it finds that it's there, but yum doesn't see the actual repo (and yes, the kmod-nvidia packages are there)? snip Just a thought, have you tried flushing yum's metadata? I have run across a couple of instances where yum seems to get a bit... retentive and won't retrieve new metadata for one or more repositories. I usually run yum clean metadata or yum clean all, then re-try the operation. Unless it is something *I* have boogered badly it usually works. See emphasized line, above, from previous email. Please post the output from: cat /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo and yum list \*kmod-nvidia\* thanks. Y'know, I appreciate any and all help, but I'm beginning to feel those trying to help haven't actually *read* my previous posts. Jay suggested I do a yum clean all, when I already said I'd done that; Ned's asking for what the repo looks like, when I posted the top bit and said the rest of the entries were the same Repeating my original post: ### Name: ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository for el6 ### URL: http://elrepo.org/ [elrepo] name=ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6 baseurl=http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://elrepo.org/mirrors-elrepo.el6 enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org protect=0 includepkgs=kmod-nvidia and the entries for elrepo-testing, elrepo-kernel, and elrepo-extras are the same. PS - This query would really be better placed on the elrepo users mailing lists rather than the general CentOS mailing lists. But the real question not about elrepo, which clearly *has* kmod-nvidia, but why yum can't find the repo, and that is on target for this list. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On 20/07/12 20:34, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Please post the output from: cat /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo and yum list \*kmod-nvidia\* thanks. Y'know, I appreciate any and all help, but I'm beginning to feel those trying to help haven't actually *read* my previous posts. Jay suggested I do a yum clean all, when I already said I'd done that; Ned's asking for what the repo looks like, when I posted the top bit and said the rest of the entries were the same Your attitude doesn't make it easy for folks to help you. So far you haven't actually provided any information that might be useful in determining the issue. Repeating my original post: ### Name: ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository for el6 ### URL: http://elrepo.org/ [elrepo] name=ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6 baseurl=http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://elrepo.org/mirrors-elrepo.el6 enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org protect=0 includepkgs=kmod-nvidia and here we see you have made modifications to the config file. I know, because I wrote the config file. and the entries for elrepo-testing, elrepo-kernel, and elrepo-extras are the same. and perhaps it would have been better to simply provide what was asked for rather than making yet more assumptions. PS - This query would really be better placed on the elrepo users mailing lists rather than the general CentOS mailing lists. But the real question not about elrepo, which clearly *has* kmod-nvidia, but why yum can't find the repo, and that is on target for this list. The real question is why the elrepo repository is not working as intended for you. TBH I'm past caring as I have better things to do than have you waste my time when I try to help. Please don't bother subscribing to elrepo mailing lists. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:48:43PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list FWIW, that probably didn't do what you thought. On my machine I have EPEL configured, but disabled. $ pwd /var/cache/yum/x86_64/6 $ yum --enablerepo=epel list /dev/null $ du -hs * 8.0Kbase 20M epel 8.0Kextras 21M local-base 56K local-extras 5.6Mlocal-updates 0 timedhosts.txt 8.0Kupdates We can see the cache has been populated. $ yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Cleaning repos: local-base local-extras local-updates Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors $ du -hs * 8.0Kbase 20M epel 8.0Kextras 8.0Klocal-base 8.0Klocal-extras 8.0Klocal-updates 8.0Kupdates Wait, the epel directory still has data! $ yum --enablerepo=epel clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Determining fastest mirrors Cleaning repos: epel local-base local-extras local-updates Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors $ du -hs * 8.0Kbase 8.0Kepel 8.0Kextras 8.0Klocal-base 8.0Klocal-extras 8.0Klocal-updates 8.0Kupdates That's better. So you might need to do yum --enablerepo=elrepo clean all to flush your cache. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On 20/07/12 21:09, Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:48:43PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list FWIW, that probably didn't do what you thought. On my machine I have EPEL configured, but disabled. *Exactly* Which is *exactly* the reason I asked to see the .repo file and got a bunch of attitude in return :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:48:43PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: around. I did a yum clean all, then yum --enablerepo=elrepo list FWIW, that probably didn't do what you thought. On my machine I have EPEL configured, but disabled. Yeah. As you saw, I only want to enable it for kmod-nvidia, since I don't want to get anything else from there, resulting in conflicts with the usual repos. snip So you might need to do yum --enablerepo=elrepo clean all to flush your cache. Ok. Just did that, and see Cleaning repos: adobe-linux-i386 base cr dcb-CentOS-base dcb-CentOS-updates : dcb-rome elrepo epel extras rpmfusion-free-updates : rpmfusion-free-updates-testing rpmfusion-nonfree-updates : rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing updates Then I do yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\* ... * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com ... elrepo | 1.9 kB 00:00 elrepo/primary_db| 420 kB 00:00 ... And all I get is: Available Packages nvidia-x11-drv.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo So I'm still where I was: I cannot figure out why I see nvidia-x11-drv, and not the kmod itself. Oh, well, I was just showing my manager the problem, and his reaction is to ask whether it's worth wading through filelists.xml; he prefers I just d/l the package(s) to our local repo, which is what I guess I'll have to do, then write an automated script to rsync it every so often, maybe a cron job Thanks anyway. mark mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:29:53PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Cleaning repos: adobe-linux-i386 base cr dcb-CentOS-base dcb-CentOS-updates : dcb-rome elrepo epel extras rpmfusion-free-updates : rpmfusion-free-updates-testing rpmfusion-nonfree-updates : rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing updates Blimey, you have lots of repos enabled. Try --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=elrepo so that you only have the one repo enabled when running the list command. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:33 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:30:49PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: If you mean, ´free as in free beer ... I guess it´s a matter of keeping things simple... as they try to mirror the RHEL package set... You misspelled, once again, leech. It's a simple word, you should really use it more often considering how applicable it is in this thread. nit picking someone whose first language isn't English? Better to build a barrier to communication than to actual discuss the actual issues I guess. Plus, I wouldn´t pay for Oracle DB, with all the free options (including MySQL community edition) available on repos... So for all your ramblings of commercialism these past few posts you would rather use something free instead of paying? Really? From my experience with Fernando on Fedora-List... I am quite sure that he prefers to use free software and while I don't share any enthusiasm for Oracle, everyone is free to choose what they install on their boxes and I sense that what you really want to do here is ridicule. Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:29:53PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Cleaning repos: adobe-linux-i386 base cr dcb-CentOS-base dcb-CentOS-updates : dcb-rome elrepo epel extras rpmfusion-free-updates : rpmfusion-free-updates-testing rpmfusion-nonfree-updates : rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing updates Blimey, you have lots of repos enabled. We need some for packages not in the regular repos. Torque, for example, I think, isn't in the base (that's a packages for clustered computing). Try --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=elrepo so that you only have the one repo enabled when running the list command. No joy. Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * elrepo: mirror.symnds.com Installed Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64 290.10-1.el6.elrepo @elrepo nvidia-x11-drv.x86_64 290.10-1.el6.elrepo @elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-32bit.x86_64 290.10-1.el6.elrepo @elrepo Available Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo And I know from going to the elrepo master site that the 295's are there. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
Craig White wrote: On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:33 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:30:49PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: If you mean, ´free as in free beer ... I guess it´s a matter of keeping things simple... as they try to mirror the RHEL package set... You misspelled, once again, leech. It's a simple word, you should really use it more often considering how applicable it is in this thread. nit picking someone whose first language isn't English? Better to build a barrier to communication than to actual discuss the actual issues I guess. snip I think John was saying that Oracle isn't trying to mirror the RHEL package set, but leech off the RHEL package set. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:44:07PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Available Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo And I know from going to the elrepo master site that the 295's are there. Yes, and it showed up in your list... Or am I missing something? -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:37:34PM -0700, Craig White wrote: nit picking someone whose first language isn't English? Better to build a barrier to communication than to actual discuss the actual issues I guess. Oh please. His mastery of the language is better than many native speakers. From my experience with Fernando on Fedora-List... I am quite sure that he prefers to use free software and while I don't share any enthusiasm for Oracle, everyone is free to choose what they install on their boxes and I sense that what you really want to do here is ridicule. If I wanted to ridicule I would; this, sir, was far from it. I'm just pointing out facts from this and previous threads. John -- Michelle Backman - For those that think that Sarah Palin is too intellectual. -- Bill Maher pgpLdpBHVzF5m.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:45:40PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I think John was saying that Oracle isn't trying to mirror the RHEL package set, but leech off the RHEL package set. Just to clarify so there are no mistaken impressions. Oracle are, in the form of Larry Ellison, a bunch of leeches that are profiting off the blood and sweat of others. They are doing everything they can to, quite literally, steal the customer base of Redhat. And while some among us may think this is fine, just a form of capitalism, it isn't: the company they are trying to steal customers from is THE SAME COMPANY THEY ARE GETTING THE SOURCES FROM FOR THEIR OWN DISTRIBUTION. Sorry to shout, but it seems that a few of you want to brush this under the rug. If you want to spin it as just business as usual you are free to do so; but you're deluding yourself and basically full of it. And please stop referencing Novell, SuSE or anyone else. This isn't about them. This is solely about what a reprehensible company Ellison put together and their shady and downright shitty business practices. John -- Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor. -- Truman Capote (1924-1984), American writer, Portraits and Observations, The Essays of Truman Capote, Self Portrait (1972) pgpJI4itI40jF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:44:07PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Available Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo And I know from going to the elrepo master site that the 295's are there. Yes, and it showed up in your list... Or am I missing something? Think so. That was from my machine, where it's installed months ago. On the user's machine, all that shows, regardless of whether I disable all other repos and enable only elrepo, or if I use all and enable elrepo, all I see under available packages is nvidia-x11-drv. Sorry if I pasted in stuff to confuse. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
On Friday, July 20, 2012 05:30:14 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 04:44:07PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Available Packages kmod-nvidia.x86_64 295.59-1.el6.elrepo Yes, and it showed up in your list... Or am I missing something? Think so. That was from my machine, where it's installed months ago. On the user's machine, all that shows, regardless of whether I disable all other repos and enable only elrepo, or if I use all and enable elrepo, all I see under available packages is nvidia-x11-drv. Sorry if I pasted in stuff to confuse. Whoa, Mark. Man, you must be tired. The fact that your machine with the 290 driver only sees the kmod-nvidia for 295 and does not see nvidia-x11-drv is a big clue. You might want to double check the includepkgs= line on the machine you originally posted about (not this latest machine), and make sure that it isn't: includepkgs=nvidia-x11-drv I can duplicate this behavior very easily, and can duplicate the reverse behavior as well, by manipulating the includepkgs= line. Here's an example run, from a RHEL 6.3 machine (same would apply to CentOS, just with a few differences in the yum output dealing with the RHN repos): First, I edit the elrepo.repo file: [root@www ~]# vi /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo [root@www ~]# grep includepkgs /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo includepkgs=kmod-nvidia [root@www ~]# Ok, only kmod-nvidia. [root@www ~]# yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\* Loaded plugins: product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, subscription-manager Updating certificate-based repositories. Unable to read consumer identity elrepo | 1.9 kB 00:00 Available Packages kmod-nvidia.i686 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo [root@www ~]# Which is exactly what I told it to do with the includepkgs directive, and duplicates what you posted above (re-read your post carefully to see that I'm not spinning you a line, here). Point of fact is that you can't just install the kmod without the X11 driver, as we'll see in a few command sequences below [root@www ~]# vi /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo [root@www ~]# grep includepkgs /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo #includepkgs=kmod-nvidia [root@www ~]# Commented it out to double check. [root@www ~]# yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\* Loaded plugins: product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, subscription-manager Updating certificate-based repositories. Unable to read consumer identity elrepo | 1.9 kB 00:00 Available Packages kmod-nvidia.i686 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo kmod-nvidia-173xx.i686 173.14.31-1.el6.elrepo elrepo kmod-nvidia-96xx.i68696.43.20-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv.i686 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-173xx.i686173.14.31-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv-96xx.i686 96.43.20-1.el6.elrepo elrepo [root@www ~]# They're all there. [root@www ~]# vi /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo [root@www ~]# grep includepkgs /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo includepkgs=nvidia-x11-drv [root@www ~]# Now just nvidia-x11-drv. [root@www ~]# yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\* Loaded plugins: product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, subscription-manager Updating certificate-based repositories. Unable to read consumer identity elrepo | 1.9 kB 00:00 Available Packages nvidia-x11-drv.i686 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo [root@www ~]# Which duplicates your original result that does not show the kmod. [root@www ~]# vi /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo [root@www ~]# grep includepkgs /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo includepkgs=nvidia-x11-drv kmod-nvidia [root@www ~]# Ok, now this is what you really want. [root@www ~]# yum --enablerepo=elrepo list \*nvidia\* Loaded plugins: product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, subscription-manager Updating certificate-based repositories. Unable to read consumer identity elrepo | 1.9 kB 00:00 Available Packages kmod-nvidia.i686295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo nvidia-x11-drv.i686 295.59-1.el6.elrepo elrepo [root@www ~]# Ok, so can I install just the kmod and nothing else? Let's see. [root@www ~]# vi /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo [root@www ~]# grep includepkgs /etc/yum.repos.d/elrepo.repo includepkgs=kmod-nvidia [root@www ~]# yum --enablerepo=elrepo install kmod-nvidia Loaded plugins: product-id, refresh-packagekit, rhnplugin, subscription-manager Updating
