CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0591
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0591.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0587 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Il 05/03/2013 21:24, jbo...@meridianenv.com ha scritto:
Greetings -
Ok, I made a mistake that I need to fix. Fortunately it is not a
destructive mistake, but I need some advice on how to correct the problem.
CentOS 6.3 host system named Earth
I was creating some new logical volumes within
On 1.3.2013 16.40, Van wrote:
01.03.2013, 15:22, Van va...@yandex.ru:
26.02.2013, 20:01, Veli-Pekka Kestilä cen...@vpk.nu:
Greetings,
I have problem using Dom0 as NFS(v4)-server and DomU as client. When
ever the client actually tries to copy data to nfs-server the virtual
network (bridge)
Hmmm... this sounds like common issues that crop up when you are having
DNS resolution issues. Are the name servers for your network on the other
end of the ADSL connection? If so, you might be able to resolve some of
the issues by editing the hosts file to make sure the local systems are
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 10:28 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:40AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf Of Fred Smith
Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or at least I
don't see it anywhere.
Anybody know otherwise?
Hello,
is there maybe a clever way of finding all possible words
from a given set of letters by means of PostgreSQL
(i.e. inside the database vs. scanning all database
rows by a PHP script, which would take too long) -
if the dictionary is kept in a simple table like:
create table good_words (
I apologize - sent to a wrong mailing list!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
The ADSL is connected toa switch and from that switch all the other
clients and the server itself. All clients, LPD hosts and servers use
IPs, I think no name resolution must be present for it to work.
Yesterday I switched servers to a backup CentOS 5 install that works
excelent with or without
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Chris Weisiger cweisi...@bellsouth.netwrote:
I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software
raid system about a month ago.
I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of
1.5TB.
Currently I configured the
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:15:46 +0100:
Has anyone seen such a hardware failure where the link goes up but no
packets go over the wire? It seems a bit unlikely that this hardware
failure (and nothing else) should happen on a reboot after an upgrade.
It was indeed a weird
On 04/03/13 04:35, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:26AM +0800, Earl Ramirez wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 21:49 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64?
It dies almost immediately, complaining for lack of ld-lsb.so.3.
Perusing user
Hi all,
A recent update to CentOS 5.9 has broken my cluster's ability to fence
nodes. I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards. The
current configuration in cluster.conf for the fencing devices is:
fencedevice agent=fence_drac5 cmd_prompt=admin1-gt;
ipaddr=192.168.251.11
Hello,
I managed to make ipsec-tools work on CentOS 6.x
here is how I did it:
http://unix.wikinet.org/wiki/Configure_IPSec_on_CentOS_6.x_using_Kame_implementation#Modify_network_scripts
thanks
Rick
On 3/5/13 12:01 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 03/04/2013 07:45 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives.
--
Juan Pablo De Mola Rodríguez
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Juan De Mola wrote:
How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives.
A number of questions: first, does it have a hardware RAID controller? If
so, has it been configured via firmware to present drives to the o/s?
mark
___
CentOS
On 03/05/2013 08:13 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
I managed to make ipsec-tools work on CentOS 6.x
here is how I did it:
Yes, you got a tunnel working between two systems both running
ipsec-tools on Linux. Try to link with anything else. The
configuration that you present will not work with
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Juan De Mola wrote:
How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives.
A number of questions: first, does it have a hardware RAID controller? If
so, has it been configured via firmware to present drives to the o/s?
Oh, yes - bad form to follow myself up, but
Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as
Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least
the one that is connected.
2013/3/5 m.r...@5-cent.us:
Juan De Mola wrote:
How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives.
A number of questions:
On 3/5/2013 8:58 AM, Juan De Mola wrote:
Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as
Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least
the one that is connected.
that sounds like fake raid, not real HW raid like a smartarray p400
--
john r pierce
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Juan De Mola juan.dem...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as
Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least
the one that is connected.
If the RAID controller has a raid1 array set up then
Fake (software) or real (hardware) it only allow install in AHCI mode,
for the records. It is now running the OS. Install complete. Thanks.
2013/3/5 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com:
On 3/5/2013 8:58 AM, Juan De Mola wrote:
Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.comwrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:15:46 +0100:
Has anyone seen such a hardware failure where the link goes up but no
packets go over the wire? It seems a bit unlikely that this hardware
failure (and nothing
SilverTip257 wrote on Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:28:29 -0500:
But it would have been helpful if you had shared more information (think
NIC model, NIC chipset, kernel module in use for that chipset).
Why? It's quite clear that this is a hardware failure. I tested a live CD
and PXE booting on it with
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/oracle-rushes-emergency-java-update-patch-mcrat-vulnerabilities-030413
mark
___
CentOS
On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/oracle-rushes-emergency-java-update-patch-mcrat-vulnerabilities-030413
As soon as redhat
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
On 03/05/2013 12:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day
vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :)
When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or
very close to that date).
Thanks for posting a projected date. I promise not to rant if you miss it...
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
trying to figure out if it *only* affects Oracle's java,
or openjdk also.
OpenJDK IS Oracle´s java, sans the browser plug-in which was never
open sourced by Sun, and which is provided by Icedtea-web.
Oracle has made OpenJDK 7 the
On 03/05/2013 08:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :)
When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or
very close to that date).
Thanks for posting a projected
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'd found that in googling, but it only mentioned Oracle.
Because the new pastime of the mainstream IT press (specially IDG;
ZDNet which includes many Microsoft employees that write slamming
Java) is slamming Oracle, not educating about
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 03/05/2013 08:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :)
When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or
very close to that date).
Thanks for
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'd found that in googling, but it only mentioned Oracle.
Because the new pastime of the mainstream IT press (specially IDG;
ZDNet which includes many Microsoft employees that write slamming
Java) is slamming
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What do you mean M$ employees?
http://zdnet.sumben.com/?/meet-the-team/us/jason.perlow/
Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet ...
... Jason is currently a Technology Solution Professional with
Microsoft Corp.
I've never worked
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$, have stayed away
from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java, which failed in
everything it was sold on the basis of being able to solve in the
mid-nineties
Errr, beg
On 3/5/2013 12:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$
you work for ZDNet or another 'mainstream IT press' outfit?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$, have stayed
away
from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java, which failed in
everything it was sold on the basis of being able to solve in the
Am 05.03.2013 um 18:51 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
I see there's a release today
The question is rather: are there days without new emergency patches for Java?
And at what point does an emergency become a permanent condition….
___
CentOS mailing list
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 05.03.2013 um 18:51 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
I see there's a release today
The question is rather: are there days without new emergency patches for
Java? And at what point does an emergency become a permanent condition….
Oh, come on. The last one was all of, um,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
The question is rather: are there days without new emergency patches for
Java?
Yeah, right, like there are no 0day patches periodically for a
multitude of software, including Apache, PHP, and the like. And what
are
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and
break easily?
Tell you what - install OpenGrok
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick
it, it is moving soon) and index/browse/search a
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and
break easily?
Tell you what - install OpenGrok
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick
it, it is moving soon)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and
break easily?
Tell you what - install OpenGrok
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick
it, it is moving soon) and index/browse/search
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:23:25PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Yeah, right, like there are no 0day patches periodically for a
multitude of software, including Apache, PHP, and the like. And what
are Microsoft´s Patch Tuesday Windows updates for, after all?.
Please.
Java is doing
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Please.
Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records
of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's.
It's just one rolling security vector. It's apparently maintained
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Please.
Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records
of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's.
It's just one rolling security vector. It's
On 3/5/2013 1:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity ...
sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely
sandboxable environment.
I wonder... is Java really getting worse, or is it that the hackers are
getting more
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Please.
Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records
of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's.
It's just one rolling security vector. It's apparently maintained by
people that
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:10:02PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely
sandboxable environment.
I was just discussing this very issue with someone the other day. That
was such a huge marketing factor in the beginning. And we
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and
free as in beer but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with
an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj instead and
made everybody hate
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and
free as in beer but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with
an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj instead and
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely
sandboxable environment.
I was just discussing this very issue with someone the other day. That
was such a huge marketing factor in the beginning.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:21 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and
free as in beer but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with
an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj instead and
made
On 3/5/2013 2:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Free as in what the FSF names code encumbered with restrictions that
prevent combining it with any other components.
specifically, the Sun Java license restricted redistribution of the
runtime, and it wasn't opensource at all. further, it had
I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards.
Without your cluster config, we can only guess. Fencing w/ two nodes
requires specific startup config for this scenario. Given that, I presume you
can find your issue, or post your conf.
jlc
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Free as in what the FSF names code encumbered with restrictions that
prevent combining it with any other components.
specifically, the Sun Java license restricted redistribution of the
runtime, and it wasn't opensource
Thanks for the response. I just discovered the problem about 30' ago.
post_join_delay was set to the default of 3, meaning that it was only
waiting 3 seconds for the node to join before fencing it. Silly. After
changing that to 300 seconds, it worked fine.
The config was this way with 5.8 and
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've never worked for M$, have stayed away
from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java
It´s amazing the Java haters are not content with hating it in
silence, they must spread their dislike and insisit that everyone else
should hate
On 03/04/2013 10:53 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software raid
system about a month ago.
I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of
1.5TB.
Currently I configured the complete individual drivers as
Turns out I spoke too soon.
Increasing the post_join_delay did at least allow me to restart the
cman+clvmd+gfs2+rgmanager services on each node, but if I reboot a node, it
will not rejoin the cluster.
If I start with both machines up, and cman stopped, I can start cman on
one, then then the
On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
The question is why are you using raid at all?
indeed. the primary justification for the R in RAID, Redundant, is
high availability. having the OS on a non-raid volume completely
violates this.RAID is most definitely NOT a substitute for
I essentially configured the software raid to create a home server and not have
to worry about individual drives. I've built a collection of several several
gigs of music and pictures. Enough to look into a raid system. Plus it is alot
cheaper than a hardware raid setup.
Plus I want to do
On 3/5/2013 5:18 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
I essentially configured the software raid to create a home server and not
have to worry about individual drives. I've built a collection of several
several gigs of music and pictures. Enough to look into a raid system. Plus
it is alot cheaper than
Turns out I spoke too soon.
Slow down cowboy, man fenced:)
See clean_start for example. There are more than one param needed
for a two node cluster.
https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FAQ/Fencing#fence_stuck
https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FAQ/Fencing#fence_startup
Much
Im not so much concerned about the os not being on a raid system. I am really
concerned about my data, music, pictures,docs, etc.
I run a minimum os centos 5.9 install anyway so it would take long to reload
the os if i had to.
-Original Message-
From: John R Pierce
Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45
Im in the process of configuring my data to be backed up to external devices.
-Original Message-
From: John R Pierce
Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions
On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
The
Brilliant. Many thanks. I love great documentation: once the guns are
out, someone *must* win
Adam Wead
Systems and Digital Collections Librarian
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum
216.515.1960 (t)
215.515.1964 (f)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:44 PM,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 04/03/13 04:35, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:26AM +0800, Earl Ramirez wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 21:49 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64?
It dies almost
71 matches
Mail list logo
