On 19/01/14 05:41, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/17/2014 03:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Anyway, if you want a wide-open Linux, Les, you know where to get it.
Sigh..., It's complicated. I want stability and reliable
On 01/19/2014 07:33 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 19/01/14 05:41, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/17/2014 03:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Anyway, if you want a wide-open Linux, Les, you know where to get it.
Sigh..., It's
Here is my take (just a CentOS user).
The communication from Red Hat/CentOS during this change has been somewhat
poor. By reading various blog posts, etc.. A lot of people are confused
about what this change actually means. When people read things like CentOS
will allow Red Hat to innovate and
On 1/19/2014 5:25 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
.(wonder if there are any CEntOS certification exams?.
No, since Redhat does not recommend CentOS for production
environments only
RHEL. More is mention in the FAQ:
I am having an issue where eth1 is throwing some messages and stops
responding. Restarting networking doesn't work and also just bringing down
eth1 with 'ifdown' doesn't fix it. I have never seen anything like these
messages:
eth1: no IPv6 routers present
r8169 :03:00.0: eth1:
So I have this centos 5.10 box which authenticates network users
against ldap(authorizing)+kerberos(authentication). And I now would
like to have sudo be able to allow admins (netgroup chinbeards) to
sudo about. I am not using sssd though (yet).
Here is the output of me trying sudo (debug on):
Hi
I updapted the ssl certificate on the 15th of Jan using the providers update
facility.
Then I downloaded the new certificate, installed it and restarted httpd.
Then I checked with the providers ssl installation diagnostic tool whether
everything is fine - and it is, all reported good.
Then
Thanks for the reply.
I put all the different certs into different subdirectories, so I know it's
that one, e.g.:
/apachepath/conf.d/cert1
/apachepath/conf.d/cert2
/apachepath/conf.d/cert3
It, too, complains about the /apachepath/conf.d/cert3/domain.crt file, which
comes from the
Hi,
I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it does
not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error
stating- Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB.
Could not initiate memory hot plug.
I understand from few
On 1/19/2014 10:17 PM, Hersh Parikh wrote:
I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it
does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error
stating- Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB.
Could not initiate
On 01/20/2014 09:17 AM, Hersh Parikh wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine.
However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It
keeps throwing error stating- Requested memory size is greater than
allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hersh Parikh said the following on 20/01/2014 07:17:
I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it
does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing
error stating- Requested memory size is greater
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Gary Greene
Sent: den 18 januari 2014 00:59
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] mail tools preferences?
That said, I've had more issues with Evolution with it trashing the
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have this centos 5.10 box which authenticates network users
against ldap(authorizing)+kerberos(authentication). And I now would
like to have sudo be able to allow admins (netgroup chinbeards) to
sudo about. I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
