I have a CentOS 6.5 server running as a host for about a dozen other VM's,
and all were running just fine. I had a mix of CentOS, Ubuntu, and FreeBSD
VM's running, no problem at all.
I then updated the Ubuntu VM's to the newer 14.x release, and that
installed a 3.13 linux kernel, and after
On 29/09/14 15:47, Anthony K wrote:
So, what's broken in 7 - or is it that it requires something different?
I've just finished installing a CentOS7 virtual machine and guess what -
as long as both ends are CentOS7, the tap interface is created as expected!
Looks like an incompatibility
On 29 Sep 2014 05:37, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote:
Looks like the bash exploit tune may still be playing
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/396256,further-flaws-render-shellshock-patch-ineffective.aspx
Well 7169 is already patched, 7186 isn't in the RH database so it would
On 29 Sep 2014 07:37, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 Sep 2014 05:37, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote:
Looks like the bash exploit tune may still be playing
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/396256,further-flaws-render-shellshock-patch-ineffective.aspx
On 9/28/2014 11:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7186
Looks like we may find one more bash patch at least yet then.
per https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1306.htm the fix for 7187
and 7186 is already included in the updated fix that was
On 09/29/2014 01:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/28/2014 11:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7186
Looks like we may find one more bash patch at least yet then.
per https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1306.htm the fix for 7187
and 7186 is
William Woods writes:
5.4 ? really???. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about.
Repeating it three times doesn't make an arrogant statement more true.
There are corporate environments that cannot upgrade for various reasons.
Also, the history and performance of e.g autofs on
On 29 Sep 2014 07:47, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 9/28/2014 11:39 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7186
Looks like we may find one more bash patch at least yet then.
per https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1306.htm the fix for
Hi,
Anybody has bash package to Redhat 4 ?
tks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 17:04 +1300, Cliff Pratt wrote:
sendmail is a link to exim on most exim systems (like mine, though mine is
Ubuntu).
cliffp@ubuntu:~$ which sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail
cliffp@ubuntu:~$ file `which sendmail`
/usr/sbin/sendmail: symbolic link to `exim4'
C 5.10 C 6.5
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:33:08AM -0200, Eduardo Augusto Pinto wrote:
Hi,
Anybody has bash package to Redhat 4 ?
I imagine Red Hat does as they are providing support for EL4 still if
you are willing to pay for it.
John
--
The Special
I am looking for opinions and personal experience on CentOS7 for both
grid and virtualized web environments.
I am currently on CentOS6.5 in a production environment.
I am about to add about 50 more servers to my grid and am trying to
identify the advantages and disadvantages of going to
*Personally*, I would say no. I would certainly be starting to use it in
the lab and non-critical roles, but I will be waiting until ~7.2 before
I consider using it in production.
This is mainly based on the sheer amount of change that happened in EL7.
It's going to take time for bugs to get
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Dan Hyatt dhy...@dsgmail.wustl.edu wrote:
I am looking for opinions and personal experience on CentOS7 for both grid
and virtualized web environments.
I am currently on CentOS6.5 in a production environment.
I am about to add about 50 more servers to my grid
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:41 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:33:08AM -0200, Eduardo Augusto Pinto wrote:
Hi,
Anybody has bash package to Redhat 4 ?
I imagine Red Hat does as they are providing support for EL4 still if
you are willing to pay for it.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Or the Oracle version that you can download should work too:
https://oss.oracle.com/el4/SRPMS-updates/bash-3.0-27.0.2.el4.src.rpm
or the equivalent binary rpm under
My current samba domain controller is running ClearOS. But I am
migrating to ARM servers (cubieboards) and using RedSleeve for now, and
Centos7arm when that gets rolling. The driver is power savings; my ROI
just on power is ~15months.
So I only run an NT style Domain Controller with XP
This
On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:00 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Or the Oracle version that you can download should work too:
https://oss.oracle.com/el4/SRPMS-updates/bash-3.0-27.0.2.el4.src.rpm
or the equivalent
On 09/29/2014 04:15 AM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
William Woods writes:
5.4 ? really???. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about.
Repeating it three times doesn't make an arrogant statement more true.
There are corporate environments that cannot upgrade for
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
I read the thread before replying, and didn't see anyone mention that, if
one needs an open source stay-on-a-point-release setup, one should
investigate Scientific Linux, which does do this. Yes, you can stay on 5.4
and get
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
sendmail is a link to exim on most exim systems (like mine, though mine is
Ubuntu).
cliffp@ubuntu:~$ which sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail
cliffp@ubuntu:~$ file `which sendmail`
/usr/sbin/sendmail: symbolic link to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The basic question: Should I be holding off a little longer on going to
CentOS7 in production?
On the one hand, we're starting to roll it out... *only* on new servers,
and the servers we're rolling it out on are *only* fileservers -
Les Mikesell wrote:
Or the Oracle version that you can download should work too:
https://oss.oracle.com/el4/SRPMS-updates/bash-3.0-27.0.2.el4.src.rpm
or the equivalent binary rpm under
http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL4/latest/x86_64/
They now have a more recent version
Dan Hyatt wrote:
I am looking for opinions and personal experience on CentOS7 for both
grid and virtualized web environments.
I am currently on CentOS6.5 in a production environment.
I am about to add about 50 more servers to my grid and am trying to
identify the advantages and disadvantages
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Anthony K akcen...@anroet.com wrote:
Hi all.
I'm trying to bring an Amazon VM into the LAN by following this guide
[0]. However, it appears that OpenSSH on either RHEL7 or CentOS7 is broken
as it is not creating tap interface but tun interface. I've tried
On Mon, September 29, 2014 11:02 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
The basic question: Should I be holding off a little longer on going to
CentOS7 in production?
On the one hand, we're starting to roll it out... *only* on new servers,
and
On 09/25/2014 12:26 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
No packages for EL6 AFAIK,
Seamonkey is available in EPEL.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
understand your hotel analogue. In England many hotel guests use their
mobile
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough of
them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from an
internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may be a way to allow
Windows admins here (familiar with WSUS) to
On Mon, September 29, 2014 12:59 pm, Chris Beattie wrote:
Nothing in this message is intended to make or accept an offer or to form
a contract, except that an attachment that is an image of a contract
bearing the signature of an officer of our company may be or become a
contract. This
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Chris Beattie cbeat...@geninfo.com wrote:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough of
them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from an
internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It
Chris Beattie wrote:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough
of them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from
an internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may be a way to
allow Windows admins here
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Chris Beattie wrote:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are
enough of them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get
updates from an internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may be a
way to allow
Hey Chris,
If you are up for the challenge you can try a hybrid of squid + local repo.
Local repo is based upon the basic nature of rsync which copies everything.
You can write a script that will filter a list of urls of mirrors and
will prepare a fetch list of files which will be fetched only
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 10:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
sendmail is a link to exim on most exim systems (like mine, though mine
is
Ubuntu).
cliffp@ubuntu:~$ which sendmail
/usr/sbin/sendmail
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 10:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net
wrote:
snip
Thanks. I learned something new today.
Not exactly... Applications that pipe to the sendmail command line
program to send messages
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 12:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
If this inconvenience's an innocent web user, I have neither ability to
detect the inconvenience nor to determine the user's innocence. I
understand your
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Thanks. I learned something new today.
Not exactly... Applications that pipe to the sendmail command line
program to send messages go back to the dawn of email. MTAs that
replace the 'real' sendmail pretty much
On Mon, September 29, 2014 1:19 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Chris Beattie cbeat...@geninfo.com
wrote:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are
enough of them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get
updates from an internal
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:11 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Mon, September 29, 2014 12:59 pm, Chris Beattie wrote:
Nothing in this message is intended to make or accept an offer or to form
a contract, except that an attachment that is an image of a contract
bearing the signature of an
On Saturday 27 September 2014 00:20:17 Cliff Pratt wrote:
It may be that you have a bad bash RPM from somewhere. I believe
that the cpio command works directly on the package so you could
try with cpio on the command line to see if it will open the RPM.
I suspect that it won't be able to.
On Sep 29, 2014, at 14:44, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 10:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net
wrote:
snip
Thanks. I learned something new today.
Not exactly... Applications that pipe
2014-09-29 20:59 GMT+03:00 Chris Beattie cbeat...@geninfo.com:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough
of them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from
an internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:44 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 10:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net
wrote:
snip
Thanks. I learned something new today.
Not exactly...
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
The alternative is to be a willing victim.
It's more a question of why you run the service at all. If blocking
people from reaching it doesn't bother you, why not just shut it down?
Blocking people ? Data Centre
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Don O'Hara don.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
I second and third that recommendation. A great exercise is to use
that book as a foundation, and to realize that the “what to do” has not
changed
that much, but the “how to do it” changes hourly.
Sigh... I'm rarely
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:03 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Thanks. I learned something new today.
Not exactly... Applications that pipe to the sendmail command line
program to send messages go back to the dawn
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:44 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 10:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net
wrote:
snip
Thanks. I learned something new today.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
If you really want to appreciate the concepts, you should find a unix
manual from the days before X was included. Back then there were 5
sections where 1 covered the command line programs, 2 covered system
calls, 3
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 14:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
You said you were blocking IPs.
Yes my systems block IPs on the basis:-
Emails
--
Block if IP allocated to a data centre or to a commercial email sending
organisation.
Web
---
Hacking attempts - individual IP if a 'home-type'
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 15:27 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*Make* the time. It'll save your bacon.
I will look for the book. An egg and crispy bacon sandwich would be
nice.
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 15:27 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*Make* the time. It'll save your bacon.
I will look for the book. An egg and crispy bacon sandwich would be
nice.
Yup - British bacon may well be better than American (even when you can
get American bacon
On 30/09/2014 3:59 am, Chris Beattie wrote:
I have a mix of CentOS 5, 6, and now 7 servers at work. There are enough of
them now that it is starting to make sense for them to get updates from an
internal source.
I've seen RHN Satellite in years past. It looks like it may be a way to
I found some help at:
http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_6p=sambaf=4
If anyone knows of something more, I am interested.
On 09/29/2014 11:01 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My current samba domain controller is running ClearOS. But I am
migrating to ARM servers (cubieboards) and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is the app at http://possereg.teachingopensource.org still being used?
If so, can we migrate that to the main TOS server?
If not, I'd like to take it down as part of a server migration we're
doing for theopensourceway.org host.
Thanks - Karsten
-
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it via SpaceWalk for all the same reasons.
How big is EPEL? And when you mirror with SpaceWalk does it preserve
old version so you'd have the possibility to downgrade after a
Anyone know of a 2.5 to 3.5 converter so I can put a 2.5 SSD drive
in a Supermicro 3.5 SATA hot swap bay? The one I purchased does not
seem to work.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, September 29, 2014 4:26 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it via SpaceWalk for all the same
reasons.
How big is EPEL? And when you mirror with SpaceWalk does it preserve
old
On 30/09/2014 7:26 am, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it via SpaceWalk for all the same reasons.
How big is EPEL?
My current EPEL mirror is 115GB. I mirror that from a local
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Mon, September 29, 2014 4:26 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it via SpaceWalk for all the same
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817994169
watch the video there
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 30/09/14 08:29, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Mon, September 29, 2014 4:26 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it
On 9/29/2014 3:11 PM, Matt wrote:
Anyone know of a 2.5 to 3.5 converter so I can put a 2.5 SSD drive
in a Supermicro 3.5 SATA hot swap bay? The one I purchased does not
seem to work.
its tricky to do this with a hotswap bay, because the 2.5 drive's
connectors are the same distance from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, my mail client expanded 'tos' to centos@ instead the intended
recipient t...@teachingopensource.org. Never mind. :)
On 09/29/2014 02:01 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
Is the app at http://possereg.teachingopensource.org still being
used?
If so,
chris,
On 09/28/2014 05:53 PM, g wrote:
On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX.
See the example here:
http://www.gofree.com/Tutorials/VLCVideoWebcam.php
Chris,
thank you for reply.
i will check site and reply back with results.
thanks
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:08:18PM -0500, g wrote:
chris,
On 09/28/2014 05:53 PM, g wrote:
On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX.
See the example here:
http://www.gofree.com/Tutorials/VLCVideoWebcam.php
Chris,
thank you for
On 9/29/2014 7:08 PM, g wrote:
i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead
to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's,
but none for centos.
so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try compile
source. not looking forward to
Fred, John,
On 09/29/2014 09:30 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:08:18PM -0500, g wrote:
so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try
compile source. not looking forward to such right now.
Oh no vlc definitely can be had in a Centos/RHEL binary, did you
68 matches
Mail list logo
