On 1 December 2014 at 21:46, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote:
On 1 December 2014 at 20:26, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
Am 11.10.2014 um 00:04 schrieb Karol Babioch:
I hereby would like to ask for write
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1918
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1918.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1911 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1911.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1912 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1912.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1917
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1917.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Hi all,
Following instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/Xen4 to setup Xen on
CentOS 6.4. Unfortunately after installing Xen and modifying the boot line
there is a kernel panic during the boot process causing the host to enter a
reboot loop. Console log attached.
[81575480]
On 12/01/2014 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
Hi all,
Following instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/Xen4 to setup Xen on
CentOS 6.4. Unfortunately after installing Xen and modifying the boot line
there is a kernel panic during the boot process causing the host to enter a
reboot
Hola Jorge:
Muchas Graciassi Era eso.
ahora voy a probar utilizando el archivo access.
Saludos.
Cornelio Royer Climent
(507) 3991471
(507) 66741218
www.planillapanama.com
www.winsof.com
Se feliz con lo que tienes, mientras persigues lo que deseas
-Original Message-
From:
Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par de
lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un numero.
El problema comenzo hace un par de dias. El sistema es CentOS 7.
Alguien tiene al menos una solucion provisional que no incluya comentar las
Te animas a poner el error? asi lo podemos mirar?
El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 13:17, William Alexander Brito Vinas
wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió:
Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par
de lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un
Disculpas...este es el error:
Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 646) line 1.
Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 1139) line 1.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jorge Sanchezmailto:jsanchezsilv...@gmail.com
Parece que es solamente un warning, y es un bug reciente.
https://www.marshut.net/ksxqnr/argument-perl-version-isn-t-numeric.html
http://askubuntu.com/questions/554537/argument-perl-version-isnt-numeric-in-numeric-ge-at-eval-534-line-1
En esos post, recomiendan simplemente ignorarlo hasta un
Saludos cordiales estimados Especialistas,
Mi consulta está dirigida para todos los profesionales que vienen
trabajando desde hace rato con el CENTOS como servidor y tienen mucha
experiencia.
Después de un poco tiempo de pruebas y todo lo demás hemos vendido la idea
a la compañía a
CentOS es confiable, por eso es que se usa como servidor, y el soporte
es de muchos años.
Con soporte me refiero a las actualizaciones y los parches. Ya que
nunca administrate, mi recomendacion personal es que uses CentOS 7,
por un cambio que se dio hace poco, usar el 6, estarias aprendiendo
Por que usar una version de 32 bits? si tu procesador soporta 64bits o no
soporta.
la recomendacion en tu caso es usar 64bits
Y las recomendaciones estan demas por que estas escribiendo a una lista de
centos.
El 1 de diciembre de 2014, 17:50, Jorge Sanchez jsanchezsilv...@gmail.com
escribió:
Hola lista
Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la puedo apagar
es un ambiente productivo. Existe alguna forma que hacer esto, la VM esta
montada en un centos 6 y la maquina virtual también es centros
Esperó que me puedan apoyar
Saludos.
saludos, ando en busca de un buen manual para instalar bind-chroot en
centos 7, hace algún tiempo no obtengo actualizaciones del manual de
Joel Barrios que andaba por esta lista y me era muy útil para este tipo
de configuraciones, alguna sugerencia.
gracias
--
Convocatorias abiertas:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/01/2014 04:30 PM, jorge saul sanchez molina wrote:
Hola lista
Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la puedo
apagar es un ambiente productivo. Existe alguna forma que hacer
esto, la VM esta montada en un centos 6 y
Esta en formato qcow2
El dic 1, 2014 6:51 PM, Ernesto Pérez Estévez ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec
escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/01/2014 04:30 PM, jorge saul sanchez molina wrote:
Hola lista
Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la
On 25/11/2014, isdtor isd...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently started upgrading users' workstations to CentOS6. Now
we've come across an interesting issue:
~user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata is filling up with tons of files.
Once there are around 69270 of them, no more are being created, and
the
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
I just assembled a new machine.
Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3
Processor: AMD FX8350
Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB
Video: BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
I
I believe I have found the problem. CentOS version in use here is 6.4,
and it seems 6.6 has the updated packages.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561904
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1499.html
I have no access to BZ#902448,
This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml.
On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux
2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled
Thanks
Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a
newer version released that will fix it.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel J Walsh
Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58
To: CentOS
I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to
downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the
problem goes away.
On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
Thanks
Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a
newer version
I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
I was able to post to gmane.test, and could read these posts.
So I assume there is no problem
Our firm is constrained by the requirements of an upstream VAN to use a
software package called SNetTerm; an MS-Windows based enhanced SSH
communications program. SNetTerm is from a corporation called InterSoft
International, Inc. This firm's web site was last accessible in June 2014 and
is now
We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64
How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be
sufficient
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel J Walsh
Sent: 01 December 2014
On 12/01/2014 10:39 AM, Gary Smithson wrote:
We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64
How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64
be sufficient
Ok might not be related. One other suggestion would be to clear the
database out. And see if there
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Arun Gupta arun.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you know the timelines by which it will be included in CentOS 7.0 ?
Any place where a binary build can be downloaded ?
Two ideas:
1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a technology preview for CentOS 6.6, or so
this article
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Two ideas:
1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a technology preview for CentOS 6.6, or so
this article claims
http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml
2. Since Oracle Linux is
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I also changed the boot level to 5.
Do you mean the runlevel?
On 01/12/14 18:36, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I also changed the boot level to
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 +
Ned Slider wrote:
So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds
like a hardware issue to me.
I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would reboot about every
third time you started it up, otherwise it would hang.
Didn't
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 +
Ned Slider wrote:
So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds
like a hardware issue to me.
I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would
Dave Johansen wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086971
I have been able to reproduce the above issue on my home network and at
work, but RedHat is claiming it is not a bug, so can some people on this
list give it a try and see if they can reproduce it?
If you connect with
Hey,
We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
side, Red Hat BZ#771868.
I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS
On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote:
Hey,
We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
side, Red Hat BZ#771868.
I have not been able to
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
To be honest, this was a test post,
to see if I could post directly to
On 01/12/14 20:48, Ned Slider wrote:
On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote:
Hey,
We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice
code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write
side, Red Hat
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I found that I can indeed post to the centos newsgroup.
But for some reason I cannot post directly
to the corresponding Fedora newsgroup,
gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general,
though I can send email to the corresponding mailing list,
us...@lists.fedoraproject.org .
On Monday 01 December 2014 16:00:44 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years,
but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups
I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear.
To be honest, this was a
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site,
where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away.
That’s
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to
On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs
familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for
the
On 12/01/14 05:30, Ashish Yadav wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
I just assembled a new machine.
Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3
Processor: AMD FX8350
Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB
Video:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs
familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for
the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out
On 12/02/2014 10:35 AM, Warren Young wrote:
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar
with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box
before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site,
where they just
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
On 12/02/2014 10:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
It is generally unsafe to run a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/14 08:29, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues
warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported.
Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can
be
On 02/12/14 02:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that
it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please
confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ?
Thank you
The heartbleed and
52 matches
Mail list logo
