On 26/11/14 23:25, centos-docs.neophyte_...@ordinaryamerican.net wrote:
Thank you.
Good bye.
We made a decision to require people to contribute content using
FirstnameLastname and asked people to be truthful about it since we take
content on wiki.centos.org very seriously, and thought that
On 27/11/14 13:57, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose a small change to
http://centos.org/download/mirrors/
Currently the mirror list is generated using Javascript but there is neither
non-Javascript version of the list nor fallback a message for users without
Javascript.
Hi,
Am 01.12.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Alan Bartlett:
Karol -- If you have created a wiki account with an embedded space
between forename and surname please delete it and create a new
account, as Jerry has mentioned, above.
Okay, I've messed that up. Is there a way for me (button/link) to
On 11/27/2014 08:01 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose to add a Contact us link to centos.org web site. The
page footer currently looks like this:
© 2014 The CentOS Project | _Legal_
Unfortunately, even the Legal link does not contain any useful address. It
took me
On 4 December 2014 at 12:00, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 01.12.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Alan Bartlett:
Karol -- If you have created a wiki account with an embedded space
between forename and surname please delete it and create a new
account, as Jerry has mentioned, above.
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1958
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1958.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1957
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1957.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1956 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1956.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am pleased to announce general availability of the rolling builds
for CentOS Linux. Todays release includes CentOS Linux 7 iso based
install media and the generic cloud images.
CentOS Linux rolling builds are point in time snapshot media rebuild
On 12/02/2014 07:36 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Hughes
On 12/01/2014 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
[81575480] panic+0xc4/0x1e1
[81054836] find_new_reaper+0x176/0x180
[81055345] forget_original_parent+0x45/0x2c0
[81107214] ?
Thanks all for the advice.
It seems there is an issue with Dracut booting from these hosts when LVM is
used.
dracut: Scanning devices sda2 for LVM logical volumes VolGroup/lv_swap
VolGroup/lv_root
dracut: inactive '/dev/VolGroup/lv_swap' [1.94 GiB] inherit
dracut: inactive
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Are you seeing other AVCs?
On 12/03/2014 05:36 AM, John Beranek wrote:
Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that
would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux
enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were
Hi,
I'm currently installing CentOS 5.11 i386 on an old PC.
Is the ELRepo third-party repository still active and maintained?
Cheers,
Niki Kovacs
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail
On 04/12/14 13:10, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently installing CentOS 5.11 i386 on an old PC.
Is the ELRepo third-party repository still active and maintained?
Cheers,
Niki Kovacs
Sure is. Although you would probably be better off asking on the elrepo
mailing list rather than the
On 03/12/14 17:10, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
I have just installed CentOS 7 onto two servers and applied all the
current patches. There are currently two kernels installed:
# rpm -q kernel
kernel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64
However, if I reboot the servers
Le 04/12/2014 14:24, Ned Slider a écrit :
Sure is. Although you would probably be better off asking on the elrepo
mailing list rather than the CentOS list.
Anything you are particularly interest in?
Not really, but I've been a CentOS user for a few years. Then migrated
to Slackware, but it
Thanks for all the responses. A little more digging revealed:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
md1 is made up of two 2T disks on which /home resides.
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it
we have Centos 5.X on DELL servers. Recently we upgrade to BACKEXEC later
version of software and /var/log/messages have following messages:
Dec 3 18:19:04 ORA1 modprobe: WARNING: Unmatched bracket in ÷ 0E[rŠ£½Øô/N
Dec 3 19:14:45 ORA1 modprobe: WARNING: Unmatched bracket in
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
web sites.
I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card)
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil
-Original Message-
From: Jason Ricles
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
sites with New DoDCAC
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
DADMS is a
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 18:20 -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cal Webster
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 17:35
To: CentOS List
Subject: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:22 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
DADEMS recently?
DoD does use RHEL for the critical infrastructure hosts and in our case
for training simulators. The issue here was with a separate non-DoD
asset used to
I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6
virtual guest:
time-Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c03e syscall=2
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698
pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Cal Webster wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote:
On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote:
Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in
CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems as well.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
Gotcha, I also
-Original Message-
From: Jason Ricles
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
But
When the installer complains that it has detected unsupported hardware,
is there any way to tell just what it didn't like? Following the URL in
the message just ends up at the RHEL Hardware Certification page, which
isn't much help. The installer seemed quite willing to continue with
the
Do you mean as in terms of updates? I forget some of the STIGs and
don't deal with that part of our projects.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Ricles
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
Gotcha, I also work with
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems as well.
That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be
used. He would
We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have
something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel
might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed to
install ok (we would also update the kernel in the install process, so that
Am 04.12.2014 um 18:29 schrieb James B. Byrne:
I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6
virtual guest:
time-Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c03e syscall=2
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6
On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote:
Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting
needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . .
Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the
following?
grep avc
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jeremy Hoel wrote:
We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have
something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel
might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything
-Original Message-
From: Cal Webster
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 13:31
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things.
Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems
This question may not belong in the Centos.org list, but I do want to
compile against this distro. Please advise.
The question:
Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro.
I have software development background (but too long ago to be
specifically useful;
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:16:28 -0700
Stan Cruise wrote:
Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro.
I think you need to ask a more specific question, but this is an overview of
the process to give you a place to start with further reading. Google is your
friend
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Stan Cruise stancru...@me.com wrote:
This question may not belong in the Centos.org list, but I do want to
compile against this distro. Please advise.
The question:
Can I be pointed at methods to learn to compile source against a distro. I
have software
On 12/04/2014 05:45 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
md0 is made up of two 250G disks on which the OS and a very large /var
partions resides for a number of virtual machines.
...
Challenge is that disk 0 of md0 is the problem and it has a 524M /boot
partition outside of the raid partition.
Assuming
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Dumb question: *how* were you installing? Did you have a kickstart of your
very own? If so... could it have wanted eth0, and the installer called it
em1?
In my case there was no kickstart -- just a plain install from the ISO image,
and
43 matches
Mail list logo
