On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote:
On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will..
| Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com
loverhearts.com is a single page that
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
| On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote:
| julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
|
| Responded off-list to
On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will..
| Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com
loverhearts.com is a single page that seems to do nothing. and there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote:
julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content
that is not suitable for minors.
It is possible subscribed under
- Original Message -
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
| On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote:
| julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
|
| Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content
| that is not suitable
On 8/26/2015 10:55 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
I told my wife (yes awkward) that I thought that the list would be removing
content of this type (images), since likely it is of little value to the list
for helping people. I was shocked (for many reasons) that it is not.
the spammer was NOT
On 08/26/2015 03:38 PM, Peter wrote:
On 08/27/2015 07:29 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Maybe I'll start blocking any server with an SPF record that includes
more than 5 IP addresses,
That's not a very good idea. major ESPs (eg: gmail.com) have way more
IPs listed than that.
Yeah, I thought
On Wed, August 26, 2015 4:23 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/26/2015 02:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 2:29 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote:
On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
On 08/26/15 14:29, Alice Wonder wrote:
If you look at the SPF record for loverhearts.com (where they are coming
from for me) there are a whole slew of servers permitted to send on
their behalf.
So I took all those IP addresses specified and added them to my
blacklist, it appears
On Wed, August 26, 2015 2:29 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote:
On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will..
| Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com
On 08/26/2015 02:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 2:29 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/26/2015 12:11 PM, g wrote:
On 08/26/15 13:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
something no one seems to have mentioned, so i will..
|
One more question.
I am using following grub.conf.
title Linux Init Break
kernel /vmlinuz root=/dev/sda6 init=/bin/sh
initrd /initrd.gz
Control comes to the shell command prompt. But the filesystem I am seeing
is not initrd filesystem.
Is it possible to access initrd file system ?
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/08/15 10:28, Gary Stainburn wrote:
This is pretty much a retorical question, although I would like to
know the extent of the problem and how quickly it's gonna be
sorted.
My problem has already been described in a previous post, i.e.
This is pretty much a retorical question, although I would like to know the
extent of the problem and how quickly it's gonna be sorted.
My problem has already been described in a previous post, i.e. clamd fails
after a reboot.
The cause apparently is that /run and therefore /var/run has at
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 8/25/2015 11:58 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Does Centos 7 use
/etc/sysconfig/network or is this replaced by some
systemctl set of commands.
I let Network Manager control the interfaces on my two or three C7 boxes. I
used nmtui to set the hostname, and MAC and IP addresses (the MAC
Hello Boris,
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 15:59 -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
We have a Centos 6 VM (64 bit) running on a VMware vSphere 5.5 server. It
was running just fine until one day I decided to reboot it and it just
would not boot up. Effectively, dracut failed to initialize the LVM, much
like
On Wed, August 26, 2015 1:12 am, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote:
julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content
that is not
On 08/26/2015 09:14 AM, Chris Beattie wrote:
On 8/25/2015 11:58 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Does Centos 7 use
/etc/sysconfig/network or is this replaced by some
systemctl set of commands.
I let Network Manager control the interfaces on my two or three C7 boxes. I
used nmtui to set the
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:53 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Thanks a lot! The most difficult part of this I noticed is to make sure
they responded with report of what discovered and which actions were
taken, and if this didn't happen to have the whole block of IPs registered
to them blocked off
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 00:44 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
This is a typical internal message:
REJECTED
Sender's IP: 14.215.136.13 = (no host name)
Sender's HELO : gmail.com = 173.194.116.118
Sender's port : 18168
Our server : abc.def.ghi
Date : Wednesday, 23:19:33, 26
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 17:22 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web
links. the first domain is registered to someone claiming to be in
Miami Florida, while the 2nd is registered to some organization in
Bangladesh. yeah, right.
On Wed, August 26, 2015 7:40 pm, zep wrote:
On 08/26/2015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me.
Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an
English company.
On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me.
Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an
English company.
its loverhearts.com, and they are also using heartslover.com for web
links. the first domain
On 8/26/2015 5:30 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Easier just to block Digital Ocean for port 25 - as I have previously
done for all port 80 traffic.
you realize Digital Ocean is a rather large virtual private server
provider?wikipedia says they host over 190,000 sites, and last year
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 17:37 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
you realize Digital Ocean is a rather large virtual private server
provider?wikipedia says they host over 190,000 sites, and last year
surpassed Rackspace to become the 4th largest hosting provider.
a blanket block of /16
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 19:54 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Happily unblocked their blocks of IP addresses (as they do not need
this sort of pressure to hear out about the trouble with their customer).
This message will inadvertedly serve as a test if what is said is done ;-)
I've blocked the
On 08/26/2015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like 'hearts' to me.
Have complained to lovehearts.com owner = Swizzels Matlow Ltd, an
English company.
its loverhearts.com, and they are also using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/08/15 20:11, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message - | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin
wrote: | On 25/08/15
On 08/27/2015 07:29 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
Maybe I'll start blocking any server with an SPF record that includes
more than 5 IP addresses,
That's not a very good idea. major ESPs (eg: gmail.com) have way more
IPs listed than that.
or servers where any host in the SPF record is in a DNS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/08/15 02:54, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, August 26, 2015 7:40 pm, zep wrote:
On 08/26/2015 08:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/26/2015 5:09 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Whoops. Lovehearts just arrived. They don't look like
'hearts' to
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 02:18 +, Chris Olson wrote:
We plan to use new digital voice recorders.
Is this difference in USB connectivity a concern for file transfer to
CentOS computers?
I have a digital voice recorder. I use it just like a USB memory stick -
although I haven't re-formatted
We plan to use new digital voice recorders. Products are available
from Olympus, Sony, and others. All of these digital voice recorders
offer file-based audio storage. We would like to take advantage of
this feature and move the files to our computers.
It is not clear whether there is a
On 8/26/2015 7:18 PM, Chris Olson wrote:
We plan to use new digital voice recorders. Products are available
from Olympus, Sony, and others. All of these digital voice recorders
offer file-based audio storage. We would like to take advantage of
this feature and move the files to our computers.
34 matches
Mail list logo
