El 25 de agosto de 2015, 13:28, José Roberto Alas jrobertoa...@gmail.com
escribió:
El 24 de agosto de 2015, 9:48 a. m., Luis Alberto Roman Aguirre
luisroma...@hotmail.com escribió:
Buenas estimados listeros:
Actualmente vengo trabajando con la versión del CentOS 6.4 y me
decidí a
Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
the DNS needs of the AD.
thanks.
Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as
my AD will not have a GUI; nor should I be doing this on the AD
On 08/26/2015 09:01 PM, Always Learning wrote:
I've blocked the spammer's host name (*.loverhearts.com) on my Exim.
Shouldn't your organisation, and others too, do the same or similar ?
That is of course up to the individual organization. I use several
DNSBLs, and I did not receive any of
On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote: Bad news Guys, they've just moved
the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
From: Caylian Curtis caylian@enjoylovef**k.com
not true. she has been at that site for a while.
i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted
On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
maintain.
PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.
nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and
- Original Message -
| Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
|
| building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
| the DNS needs of the AD.
|
| thanks.
|
| Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as
| my AD will not have a GUI;
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way
.
i seriously doubt it.
several of the responses could not have been
Hello Leonard,
Thank you very much for your response.
While it most likely is related the problem description provided at the
link seems a bit vague, and tips on how to resolve the issue seem to be
even more so.
I have done some research and in the process stumbled upon this:
On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way
On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living
On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
|
| building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
| the DNS needs of the AD.
|
| thanks.
|
| Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?)
On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way
.
i seriously doubt it.
g wrote:
On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote: Bad news Guys, they've just
moved
the emails to somewhere else and have started again:
From: Caylian Curtis caylian@enjoylovef**k.com
not true. she has been at that site for a while.
i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:35 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Me too: I started receiving them from different IP (with much longer
delay, so they do add improvements to their setup). This IP, has neither
DNS A record nor DNS PTR record, but has DNS MX record. One can use these
(have your MX stop
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
snip
A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost;
that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then
block the domain. If many domains,
On Thu, August 27, 2015 9:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
snip
A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND
mailhost;
that is, if emails come from a domain, and
On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way
.
i seriously doubt it.
several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.
--
peace out.
Now see, I run a spam filter (run on CentOS, by the way *smiles*) and I have
several friends' domain emails running through it. It has a pretty good filter
rate, too for being all open source.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
maintain.
PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.
.
that is one
On 08/27/15 13:32, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote:
i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?
I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it.
.
fine. end of discussion.
have a great day.
mine has been most enjoyable so far.
--
Hi, folks,
We're having an issue on a server reboot after update; nfs doesn't come
up. systemctl tells us it's enabled, dead. We restart the service with
systemctl, and there's no problem at all.
I was just looking in the logfiles from the reboot (grep -i nfs
/var/log/messages), and the
given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably
still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network
(for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO
networkmanager installed
contents of resolv.conf
search some.domain.here
nameserver
I think that you want to create /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
with this, for more info do a search on dhclient-enter-hooks
# vi /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
make_resolv_conf(){
:
}
Pete
On 08/27/15 15:36, George wrote:
given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and
probably
On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote:
i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?
I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
g wrote:
On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
maintain.
PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.
that is
This seems to be just a stub with 3 READMEs?
# locate bind-sdb
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/INSTALL.ldap
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.ldap
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.sdb_pgsql
Unless it is putting files elsewhere.
These readmes are dated long
Anyone got an HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module working in C6?
Care to give me some pointers about how/where to begin?
Thanks
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
|
|
| On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| - Original Message -
| | Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
| |
| | building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
| | the DNS needs of the AD.
| |
| | thanks.
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1693 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1693.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1690
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1690.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
If I have dhcpd running on my machine,
and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine
How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network
and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use.
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On 08/27/2015 01:43 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
If I have dhcpd running on my machine,
and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine
How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network
and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use.
I'm mostly sure that if you
Hi apache on GNU/Linux is case-sensitive samples:
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
on browser :
(index):1 GET
Hey guys,
Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.
I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.
And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a
On 08/27/2015 07:29 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
snip
A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost;
that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one
Hello,
Any idea when Cisco UCS Firmware Package will be included in centos Patching ?
I had planned for Ontab storage upgarde, hence needed this level firmware
version on CentOS
Any help and leads will help me to plan the upgrade.
Thanks
___
CentOS
Tim Dunphy wrote on 28/08/2015 00:18:
And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
accounted for on the file system.
Put
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1693 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1693.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On 08/28/2015 10:18 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey guys,
Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.
I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.
And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet
On Thursday 27 August 2015 01:40:21 zep wrote:
digital ocean finally replied (at least to me):
Hi there,
I'm sorry about this. We gave our customer time to resolve the issue,
and he hasn't done so, so we've blocked his ability to send email, pending
further action if necessary to
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:11:20 g wrote:
so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder.
That is not the only harm. These people are very good and very effective
confidence tricksters and are experts at getting vulnerable people to send
them money which they usually
Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
Return-path:
014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000...@amazonses.com
Envelope-to: g...@ringways.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100
Received: from
Hey Rodrigo,
Thanks for your reply.
Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.
I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:
[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
On 28/08/15 09:56, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hey Rodrigo,
Thanks for your reply.
Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.
I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:
[root@aozwsls00019la
Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.
I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:
[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1693 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1693.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
49 matches
Mail list logo
