date:20160428

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Always Learning

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote:

> This explains the extension signing, and timeline, a bit:
> 
>   
> 
> Note that the unsigned override that you used is going away with FF47.

Thanks for the link.  I like the idea of a so-called non-FF branded
version (USA english only) which does not re-enforce the Mozilla
Approval requirement.

" How will the unbranded versions of Firefox work? 

" They will work just like Firefox, with two differences:
 they will have a setting to disable mandatory signature checks,
 and they will not have the Firefox name and logo (instead using
  a
generic name and logo). They will be available in the en-US
 locale only. "

Perhaps that might form a suitable replacement for ESR versions ?

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.  England's place is in the European Union.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Always Learning

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 03:05 +, Richard wrote:

> The issue for ESR people is that they didn't get eased into it the
> way standard FF users did - over the course of three releases. FF40
> was released in october of last year, so by now hopefully extension
> developers have gotten their code signed.

It was an unexpected major shock.

The problem remains add-ons just won't install after being downloaded.
Perhaps one should revert to FF 38, re-install add-ons and then upgrade
to FF 45 - then start playing about to get those add-ons to be
re-accepted.

Not exactly my chosen method of making a product "user friendly".

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.  England's place is in the European Union.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Always Learning

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0
> 
> Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS
> rebuilt and released it.
> 
> What, exactly, would you like the CentOS maintainers to do
> differently?  Are you volunteering your time to help?

I would really like to help but I lack the time with many many demands
on time I don't have.  

Centos might form a special interests group specifically for the
existing Firefox ESR browser. Another poster recently stated Mozilla was
dropping ESR versions which is likely to jeopardise browser stability. 

Ultimately it would be nice for a Firefox folk removing privacy
breeches, phoning home, allowing web sites to secretly store data
(despite options turned-off) and removal of lots of crap unnecessary for
the vast majority of Enterprise users. It could eliminate the constant
changes - often apparently just to amuse Firefox developers - which
users seem to hate.

When using the yum GUI update notification service, no reasons for
updates are visible.

No good issuing a security improvement when, as Johnny replied in
another posting,

" With respect to CentOS-5, it seems this patch was not
 migrated to the 45.0.1 install:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1025187

from this bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221368 "

essential parts were omitted. Perhaps Up-Stream were pre-occupied with
another fundamental change to the product we know and love ? (well, not
C7 yet)

I use Firefox extensively for a multitude of tasks.

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.  England's place is in the European Union.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Richard

> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016 22:27:16 -0400
> From: Jonathan Billings 
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR
>> 45.1.0
> 
> Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS
> rebuilt and released it.
> 
> What, exactly, would you like the CentOS maintainers to do
> differently?  Are you volunteering your time to help?

Basically all they did was to move from the old ESR base (38) to the
current one (45) so that they could keep current with the (mozilla)
upstream ESR release branch. I don't believe that the 38ESR that
rhel/centos was running was particularly "customized".

The issue of the signed extension requirement has been in the works
for some time, with implementation starting with FF40. Since the
previous ESR branch was based on 38, ESR didn't see this until just
now when the release was based on 45.

The issue for ESR people is that they didn't get eased into it the
way standard FF users did - over the course of three releases. FF40
was released in october of last year, so by now hopefully extension
developers have gotten their code signed.

This explains the extension signing, and timeline, a bit:

Note that the unsigned override that you used is going away with FF47.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Jonathan Billings

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0

Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS
rebuilt and released it.

What, exactly, would you like the CentOS maintainers to do
differently?  Are you volunteering your time to help?

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare

2016-04-28 Thread Always Learning


Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0


* All the add-ons (language dictionaries, Adblock Plus, Classic Theme
Restorer etc.) were disabled with no simple method of reactivating them.
Reason given was they were "unsigned".

* About:config
   xpinstall.signatures.required = false
partially reduced the problem.

* Then possible to reactivate some disabled add-ons, but others
down-loaded OK but would not install

* removing files in ~/.mozilla/firefox/.../extensions.* and restarting
was supposed to help

However the time-wasting problem remains, so too do the down-loaded
extensions in /tmp, example tmp-xxx.xpi

Would be really nice if Centos warned its loyal and grateful users of
possible problems before those users trustingly replaced working
programmes with considerable time-wasting problems.

Time spent on trying to return Firefox to a useful and dependable
working tool is unavailable for other tasks :-(



-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.  England's place is in the European Union.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

2016-04-28 Thread Johnny Hughes

On 04/28/2016 07:51 AM, isdtor wrote:
> Johnny Hughes writes:
> [...] 
>> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a
>> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on
>> https://ci.centos.org/
> 
> Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon download problem that has 
> plagued every new update release in I don't remember how long. File downloads 
> go to 99% and then stop, or don't even start.

With respect to CentOS-5, it seems this patch was not migrated to the
45.0.1 install:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1025187

from this bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221368

Let me build a version with that patch installed for testing.  I'll post
here when it can be tested.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Leon Fauster

Am 28.04.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Albin Otterhäll :
> On 2016-04-28 21:08, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> repository gpg can be found in
>> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
>> 
>> read the repo file(s) in
>> 
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/
>> 
>> cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo 
>> # CentOS-Base.repo
>> #
>> # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the
>> # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and
>> # geographically close to the client.  You should use this for CentOS
>> updates
>> # unless you are manually picking other mirrors.
>> #
>> # If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try
>> the 
>> # remarked out baseurl= line instead.
>> #
>> #
>> 
>> [base]
>> name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
>> mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever=
>> $basearch=os=$infra
>> #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
>> gpgcheck=1
>> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7
> 
> Apparently I wasn't clear enough. I'm using Arch Linux (i.e. I haven't
> access to the gpg key that comes with an installation) and would like to
> verify the ISO I've downloaded. To-do that I need the key used to sign
> the "sha256sum.txt.asc" file.
> 
> I need to import the CentOS Release 7 (and maybe additional keys) from a
> keyserver or download the keyfile to be able do that.



if the mirror is compromised, you should use a different source:

https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=centos.org


--
LF

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Warren Young

On Apr 28, 2016, at 3:15 AM, John R Pierce  wrote:
> 
> On 4/28/2016 2:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21
> 
> 
>> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 
>> Debian-5ubuntu1.8
>> debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.8 pat OpenSSH_5* compat 
>> 0x0c00
> 
> 
> thats not CentOS.
> 
> are you sure you're connecting to the right address ?

Many of the other answers are ignoring this detail by simply recommending that 
the OP remove the offending line from known_hosts and try again.  That’s an 
excellent way to get MITM’d!

When OpenSSH warns you that the remote host’s key is different from the one it 
saw before, you *must not ignore it* unless you know exactly why it changed.

Don’t guess!  Verify.

How?

Log into the intended host over some trusted channel, then say:

   for f in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_*_key ; do ssh-keygen -lf $f ; done

If none of those values exactly matches

   SHA256:KIKE0V+Hm1UW4XtpTAVsl/7QWqJSVoQHfLnjj3vn/nM.

then OpenSSH is right to prevent your login.  It means you aren’t connecting to 
the server you think you are.  It might be a benign misconfiguration or it 
might be a MITM attempt.

This is potentially a game-over scenario.  Don’t ignore it.

See also this article on the TOFU problem:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_on_first_use
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread Aland Laines Calonge

Después de la pruebas realizadas, solo quedaría ver el log de tu servidor de 
correo, o que tu cliente te envie el correo completo del rebote para analizarlo.

Saludos,

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En 
nombre de VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 14:16
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados


perdon la direccion vict...@aagjc.com.mx


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 02:02 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

claro mi direccion es vict...@aagjc.com.mx , y los archivos son pdf




Hola Victor, de casualidad sabes el tipo de archivo que te están enviando y el 
tamaño.. puedes darme la dirección de correo para enviarte un correo y poder 
ver el rebote...


Saludos,

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-bounces en centos.org [mailto:centos-es-bounces en centos.org] En 
nombre de VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ Enviado el: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 
13:14
Para: centos-es en centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados






De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:27 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

el problema es que a nosotros no nos llega este correo , esto lo envio uno de 
mis clientes  por que a ellos le regresa eso


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:13 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,  MARIBEL-SYMETRY 

References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,  BRENDA 

From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes 
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo 
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de 
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me 
> proporcione la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, 
> Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo 
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner* 
>  en busca de virus y otros contenidos 
> peligrosos, y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. # MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453 Sierra Candela 
34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter 


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o 
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n confidencial 
y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n, retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n 
u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por personas o entidades distintas 
al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted 
recibe este mensaje por error, por favor contacte al remitente y elimine el 
material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"

[CentOS] useradd -r doesn't work right in some contexts

2016-04-28 Thread Florin Andrei

"useradd -r testuser" run as root from an interactive ssh session does 
the right thing: it creates a user account with a UID in the system 
users range (< 400).


Running the same command as a cron job (just for testing), also does the 
right thing.


Now I'm trying to accomplish the same result via chef-client. I'm trying 
to run "useradd -r" as a simple command, as a bash command, or as a 
script, from chef-client. It does create the user account, but the UID 
is in the normal range (> 600), not the system range.


It can't be a Chef bug, because it is actually running 
"/usr/sbin/useradd -r username", I'm not using the Chef user resource 
(although I've tried that with "system true" and it also fails to put 
the UID in the correct range). There's something about the context where 
chef-client is running that triggers different results. BTW, chef-client 
is running as a service via /etc/init.d/chef-client


Adding SYS_UID_MAX to /etc/login.defs doesn't help.

Any clue what's going on? Why useradd has different behaviors depending 
on how it's launched?


--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Jay Leafey


On 04/28/2016 02:29 PM, Albin Otterhäll wrote:


Apparently I wasn't clear enough. I'm using Arch Linux (i.e. I haven't
access to the gpg key that comes with an installation) and would like to
verify the ISO I've downloaded. To-do that I need the key used to sign
the "sha256sum.txt.asc" file.

I need to import the CentOS Release 7 (and maybe additional keys) from a
keyserver or download the keyfile to be able do that.

Regards,
Albin


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Open up a browser and go to:


http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/os/x86_64/


The GPG keys used to sign the RPM packages are in that directory.  That 
may also be the key used to sign the checksum files.  Here;s what I did 
on my system to check:



[jleafey@icarus temp]$ gpg --import RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7
gpg: key F4A80EB5: public key "CentOS-7 Key (CentOS 7 Official Signing Key) 
" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:   imported: 1  (RSA: 1)
[jleafey@icarus temp]$ gpg --verify sha256sum.txt.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu 10 Dec 2015 09:41:44 AM CST using RSA key ID F4A80EB5
gpg: Good signature from "CentOS-7 Key (CentOS 7 Official Signing Key) 
"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 6341 AB27 53D7 8A78 A7C2  7BB1 24C6 A8A7 F4A8 0EB5
[jleafey@icarus temp]$


The bit that says "Good signature" seems to indicate that it was OK.

Hope that answers your question!
--
Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN
jay.lea...@mindless.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Albin Otterhäll

On 2016-04-28 21:24, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 11:50 AM, Albin Otterhäll wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find
>> the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file?
>>
>> The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give
>> information where I can find them on an already installed system.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Albin
>>
> 
> You can find the keys in the top directory of any centos mirror
> e.g. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/
> 
Thank for helping me out!

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Albin Otterhäll

On 2016-04-28 21:08, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> repository gpg can be found in
> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
> 
> read the repo file(s) in
> 
> /etc/yum.repos.d/
> 
>  cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo 
> # CentOS-Base.repo
> #
> # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the
> # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and
> # geographically close to the client.  You should use this for CentOS
> updates
> # unless you are manually picking other mirrors.
> #
> # If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try
> the 
> # remarked out baseurl= line instead.
> #
> #
> 
> [base]
> name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
> mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever=
> $basearch=os=$infra
> #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
> gpgcheck=1
> gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7

Apparently I wasn't clear enough. I'm using Arch Linux (i.e. I haven't
access to the gpg key that comes with an installation) and would like to
verify the ISO I've downloaded. To-do that I need the key used to sign
the "sha256sum.txt.asc" file.

I need to import the CentOS Release 7 (and maybe additional keys) from a
keyserver or download the keyfile to be able do that.

Regards,
Albin


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Thomas Eriksson

On 04/28/2016 11:50 AM, Albin Otterhäll wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find
> the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file?
> 
> The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give
> information where I can find them on an already installed system.
> 
> Regards,
> Albin
> 

You can find the keys in the top directory of any centos mirror
e.g. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ


perdon la direccion vict...@aagjc.com.mx


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 02:02 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

claro mi direccion es vict...@aagjc.com.mx , y los archivos son pdf




Hola Victor, de casualidad sabes el tipo de archivo que te están enviando y el 
tamaño.. puedes darme la dirección de correo para enviarte un correo y poder 
ver el rebote...


Saludos,

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-bounces en centos.org [mailto:centos-es-bounces en centos.org] En 
nombre de VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 13:14
Para: centos-es en centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados






De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:27 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

el problema es que a nosotros no nos llega este correo , esto lo envio uno de 
mis clientes  por que a ellos le regresa eso


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:13 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,
 MARIBEL-SYMETRY 
References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,
 BRENDA 
From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me proporcione
> la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner*
> 
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. #
> MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453
Sierra Candela 34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n
confidencial y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n,
retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por
personas o entidades distintas al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta
informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por
favor contacte al remitente y elimine el material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"


--070405020206070706010902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


  

  
  
Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en
cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus
ÃƒÂ³rdenes para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan
  Manuel

Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

repository gpg can be found in
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/

read the repo file(s) in

/etc/yum.repos.d/

 cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo 
# CentOS-Base.repo
#
# The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the
# update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and
# geographically close to the client.  You should use this for CentOS
updates
# unless you are manually picking other mirrors.
#
# If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try
the 
# remarked out baseurl= line instead.
#
#

[base]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever=
$basearch=os=$infra
#baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7





Am Donnerstag, den 28.04.2016, 20:50 +0200 schrieb Albin Otterhäll:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find
> the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file?
> 
> The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give
> information where I can find them on an already installed system.
> 
> Regards,
> Albin
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ



claro mi direccion es vict...@aagjc.com.mx , y los archivos son pdf




Hola Victor, de casualidad sabes el tipo de archivo que te están enviando y el 
tamaño.. puedes darme la dirección de correo para enviarte un correo y poder 
ver el rebote...


Saludos,

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-bounces en centos.org [mailto:centos-es-bounces en centos.org] En 
nombre de VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 13:14
Para: centos-es en centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados






De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:27 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

el problema es que a nosotros no nos llega este correo , esto lo envio uno de 
mis clientes  por que a ellos le regresa eso


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:13 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,
 MARIBEL-SYMETRY 
References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,
 BRENDA 
From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me proporcione
> la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner*
> 
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. #
> MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453
Sierra Candela 34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n
confidencial y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n,
retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por
personas o entidades distintas al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta
informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por
favor contacte al remitente y elimine el material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"


--070405020206070706010902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


  

  
  
Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en
cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus
ÃƒÂ³rdenes para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan
  Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:


  
  Estimada Josefina
  Buenas Tardes
  
  
  
  El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a
Manzanillo proveniente de Filipinas, en

[CentOS] Where can I find the CentOS gpg keys?

2016-04-28 Thread Albin Otterhäll

Hi!

I'm currently using a non-CentOS system, and wondering where I can find
the GPG keys so I can verify the checksum file?

The page on the website (https://www.centos.org/keys/) only give
information where I can find them on an already installed system.

Regards,
Albin

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread Aland Laines Calonge

Hola Victor, de casualidad sabes el tipo de archivo que te están enviando y el 
tamaño.. puedes darme la dirección de correo para enviarte un correo y poder 
ver el rebote... 


Saludos,

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En 
nombre de VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 13:14
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados




este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,  MARIBEL-SYMETRY 

References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,  BRENDA 

From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes 
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo 
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de 
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me 
> proporcione la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, 
> Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo 
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner* 
>  en busca de virus y otros contenidos 
> peligrosos, y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. # MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453 Sierra Candela 
34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter 


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o 
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n confidencial 
y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n, retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n 
u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por personas o entidades distintas 
al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted 
recibe este mensaje por error, por favor contacte al remitente y elimine el 
material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"


--070405020206070706010902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


  

  
  
Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en
cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus
ÃƒÂ³rdenes para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan
  Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:


  
  Estimada Josefina
  Buenas Tardes
  
  
  
  El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a
Manzanillo proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase
encontrar el BL Master de ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su
apoyo para que me proporcione la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
  -Factura comercial del embarque
  -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres,
Patente 3039
  -Carta encomienda firmada
  
  
  EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
  
  
  al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread Ernesto Pérez Estévez

On 04/28/2016 01:27 PM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote:
> el problema es que a nosotros no nos llega este correo , esto lo envio uno de 
> mis clientes  por que a ellos le regresa eso
lo siento, eso no es un rebote, eso es lo que ellos quieren que veas.
Ellos copiaron lo que les interesabe (que es el contenido) y la parte
del rebote (esos mensajitos con números raros) lo obviaron..

pideles el rebote y ahi se puede analizar.
saludos
epe

-- 
CEDIA
La principal herramienta de Investigación en el Ecuador.

Calle La Condamine 12-109 "Casa Rivera".
Cuenca -  Ecuador
Telf: (593) 7405 1000 Ext. 4220/4223
i...@cedia.org.ec
www.cedia.org.ec



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ

el problema es que a nosotros no nos llega este correo , esto lo envio uno de 
mis clientes  por que a ellos le regresa eso


De: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ
Enviado: jueves, 28 de abril de 2016 01:13 p. m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: RE: envios recazados

este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,
 MARIBEL-SYMETRY 
References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,
 BRENDA 
From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me proporcione
> la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner*
> 
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. #
> MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453
Sierra Candela 34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n
confidencial y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n,
retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por
personas o entidades distintas al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta
informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por
favor contacte al remitente y elimine el material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"


--070405020206070706010902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


  

  
  
Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en
cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus
ÃƒÂ³rdenes para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan
  Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:


  
  Estimada Josefina
  Buenas Tardes
  
  
  
  El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a
Manzanillo proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase
encontrar el BL Master de ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su
apoyo para que me proporcione la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
  -Factura comercial del embarque
  -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres,
Patente 3039
  -Carta encomienda firmada
  
  
  EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
  
  
  al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
  
  
  saludos.
  
   
  
  -- 
  Este mensaje ha sido analizado por http://www.mailscanner.info/;>MailScanner
  
  en busca de virus y

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread Ernesto Pérez Estévez

On 04/28/2016 01:13 PM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> este es todo lo que manda
> 
> 
> Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
> To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,
>  MARIBEL-SYMETRY 
> References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
>  <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,
>  BRENDA 
> From: Josefina Flores 
> Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
> Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/38.7.2
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>  boundary="040609040500030500090205"
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --040609040500030500090205
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="070905050300050904050601"
> 
> 
> --070905050300050904050601
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> Buenas tardes:
> Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en 
> cuestiÃƒÂ³n.

la verdad lo que estás enviando no es un rebote, es un mensaje válido
pienso yo. O tu te refieres a cómo lo ves? quizá probando con otro
lector de correos podrías validar.. pero aparentemente es un correo válido


-- 
CEDIA
La principal herramienta de Investigación en el Ecuador.

Calle La Condamine 12-109 "Casa Rivera".
Cuenca -  Ecuador
Telf: (593) 7405 1000 Ext. 4220/4223
i...@cedia.org.ec
www.cedia.org.ec



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ




este es todo lo que manda


Subject: Re: Embarque en Manzanillo
To: Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada ,
 MARIBEL-SYMETRY 
References: <571e9141.8030...@grecargo.com.mx>
 <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Brenda_Isabel_Mart=c3=adnez?= ,
 BRENDA 
From: Josefina Flores 
Message-ID: <571ff4a6.3000...@symetry.com.mx>
Disposition-Notification-To: Josefina Flores 
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:07:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7841ddf7-3d34-cfe6-5670-a43f7734a...@aagjc.com.mx>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus ÃƒÂ³rdenes
para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:
>
> Estimada Josefina
>
> Buenas Tardes
>
>
> El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a Manzanillo
> proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase encontrar el BL Master de
> ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su apoyo para que me proporcione
> la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
>
> -Factura comercial del embarque
>
> -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres, Patente 3039
>
> -Carta encomienda firmada
>
>
> EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
> manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
>
>
> al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
>
>
> saludos.
>
>
> --
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado por *MailScanner*
> 
> en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
> y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio. #
> MailScanner

--

Symetry S.A. de C.V. 

Josefina Flores Lopez / Administracion
/ josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx 

Symetry S.A. de C.V. TelÃƒÂ©fonos: (55) 50953452 (55) 50953453
Sierra Candela 34, Lomas de Chapultepec. MÃƒÂ©xico D.F.
www.symetry.com.mx

Facebook  Twitter


La informaciÃƒÂ³n transmitida estÃƒÂ¡ destinada ÃƒÂºnicamente a la persona o
entidad a quien que va dirigida y puede contener informaciÃƒÂ³n
confidencial y/o material privilegiado. Cualquier revisiÃƒÂ³n,
retransmisiÃƒÂ³n, difusiÃƒÂ³n u otros usos, o cualquier acciÃƒÂ³n tomada por
personas o entidades distintas al destinatario basÃƒÂ¡ndose en esta
informaciÃƒÂ³n estÃƒÂ¡ prohibida. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por
favor contacte al remitente y elimine el material de cualquier computadora.


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="070405020206070706010902"


--070405020206070706010902
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


  

  
  
Buenas tardes:
Anexo carta encomienda, asÃƒÂ como los documentos del embarque en
cuestiÃƒÂ³n.
Espero que esta informaciÃƒÂ³n les sea de utilidad y quedo a sus
ÃƒÂ³rdenes para cualquier comentario al respecto.

Atentamente,

Josefina Flores L.

El 25/04/2016 a las 05:44 p.m., Juan
  Manuel Martinez Estrada escribiÃƒÂ³:


  
  Estimada Josefina
  Buenas Tardes
  
  
  
  El dia de hoy me notificaron la llegada de un embarque a
Manzanillo proveniente de Filipinas, en adjunto sirvase
encontrar el BL Master de ÃƒÂ©ste embarque, atentamente solicito su
apoyo para que me proporcione la siguiente informaciÃƒÂ³n:
  -Factura comercial del embarque
  -Encargo conferido al A.A. Fernando IÃƒÂ±igo Barrenechea Torres,
Patente 3039
  -Carta encomienda firmada
  
  
  EL encargo conferido se debe a que en el puerto de Manzanillo
manejamos una patente diferente a la de Veracruz y Aeropuerto.
  
  
  al pendiente de su respuesta quedo de usted
  
  
  saludos.
  
   
  
  -- 
  Este mensaje ha sido analizado por http://www.mailscanner.info/;>MailScanner
  
  en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
  
  y se considera que estÃƒÂ¡ limpio.
  #
  MailScanner 

-- 
  
  Josefina Flores Lopez
/ Administracion
/ mailto:josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx; style="color:
  #F42434">josefina.flo...@symetry.com.mx

Re: [CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread Ernesto Pérez Estévez

On 04/28/2016 12:23 PM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote:
> Buenas Tardes
> Me estan mandando email pero mi servidor los esta rechazando y al 
> destinatario le manda esto , que puede ser
> tengo instaldo Centos 5.1 con sendnmail
> 
> 

hola, lo que envías es una parte del rechazo, ahi no se puede determinar
mucho... por favor busca la razón del rechazo en la otra parte del mensaje
saludos
epe

-- 
CEDIA
La principal herramienta de Investigación en el Ecuador.

Calle La Condamine 12-109 "Casa Rivera".
Cuenca -  Ecuador
Telf: (593) 7405 1000 Ext. 4220/4223
i...@cedia.org.ec
www.cedia.org.ec



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

[CentOS-es] envios recazados

2016-04-28 Thread VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ

Buenas Tardes
Me estan mandando email pero mi servidor los esta rechazando y al destinatario 
le manda esto , que puede ser
tengo instaldo Centos 5.1 con sendnmail


Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="040609040500030500090205"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040609040500030500090205
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="070905050300050904050601"


--070905050300050904050601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAAKgnCAIUz5TuCXBIWXMAABcSAAAXEgFnn9JS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___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread Pete Travis

On Apr 28, 2016 7:46 AM, "Sergio Belkin"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
> mysql-server rpm.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
> --
> Sergio Belkin
> LPIC-2 Certified - http:// www.l 
pi.o rg 
> ___

The general SOP is to restart mysql, then run mysql_upgrade, so the RPM
script would need to do both.  This brings you into database and
application management territory, and out of package management territory.
The RPM cannot know if it is acceptable and safe for the database to go
down, for  both your environment and organization.   Accordingly, as a
rule, RPMs should not affect running services.

Ubuntu/Debian packages *do* perform these actions on package update, and
I've seen it go horribly wrong. Like, the restart command hangs because of
long running queries, and the tablespace changes happen anyway, leaving the
daemon in a state where it cannot accept new connections because it was
shutting down, but cannot cleanly shut down because of the other actions in
the script.  You really want an admin to do this work, not an unattended
script.

--Pete
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread Sergio Belkin

Thanks folks,


Really convincing answers!

2016-04-28 13:53 GMT-03:00 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn :

> On 28.04.2016 17:58, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
> >> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
> >> mysql-server rpm.
> > Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early
> > in my time as RPM maintainer for the community PostgreSQL.org RPMset, I
> > asked a very similar question of some folks, and I got a canonical
> > answer from Mr. RPM himself, Jeff Johnson.
> >
> > The answer is not very complex, but it was spread across a several
> > message private e-mail thread.  The gist of it is that the RPM
> > scriptlets are very very limited in what they can do.  Trying to do
> > something clever inside an RPM scriptlet is almost never wise.  The key
> > thing to remember is that the scriptlet has to be able to be run during
> > the OS install phase (back when upgrades were actually supported by the
> > OS installer that is now known as anaconda). Quoting this introductory
> > section:
> >
> > On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> The Red Hat install environment is a chroot. That means no daemons,
> >> no network, no devices, nothing. Even sniffing /proc can be problematic
> >> in certain cases.
> >
> > Now, I realize that that is OLD information; however, anaconda is still
> > doing the same basic chrooted install, just with a prettier face.  You
> > cannot start a daemon in the chroot, since many things are simply not
> > available to the scriptlets when installed/upgraded by anaconda.
> > Scriptlets have to work in an environment other than 'yum update.'  And
> > also note that this is a very different situation than Debian packages
> > live in; RPM scriptlets are essentially forbidden from interactivity
> > with the user; Debian's equivalent are not so hindered.  At least that
> > was the rule as long as I was an active packager.
> >
> > Further reference a WayBack Machine archive of a page I wrote long ago:
> >
> https://web.archive.org/web/20010122090200/http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/rpm_upgrade.html
> >
> >
> > And leaving you with this thought, again from Jeff Johnson:
> >
> > On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> Good. Now you're starting to think like a packager  Avoiding MUD is
> >> *much* more important than attempting magic.
> > 
> >
> >> The bottom line is you shouldn't attempt a database conversion as
> >> part of the package install. The package, however, should contain
> > programs
> >> and procedures necessary to do the job.
>
> The real reason something like mysql_upgrade isn't run automatically
> hasn't really much to do with the technicalities of RPM but the fact
> that mysql_upgrade might kill your server if you don't know what you are
> doing.
> If for example you have a big table that takes up 70% of your storage
> and mysql_upgrade needs to convert it to a new format then it will
> create a copy of that table in the new format first and then delete the
> old one...except of course that this would require 140% of disk space to
> work.
>
> So independent of the packaging technology used major changes like these
> should never be done automatically and instead always be handled by an
> admin who knows what he is doing.
>
> Regards,
>   Dennis
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn

On 28.04.2016 17:58, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
>> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
>> mysql-server rpm.
> Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early
> in my time as RPM maintainer for the community PostgreSQL.org RPMset, I
> asked a very similar question of some folks, and I got a canonical
> answer from Mr. RPM himself, Jeff Johnson.
> 
> The answer is not very complex, but it was spread across a several
> message private e-mail thread.  The gist of it is that the RPM
> scriptlets are very very limited in what they can do.  Trying to do
> something clever inside an RPM scriptlet is almost never wise.  The key
> thing to remember is that the scriptlet has to be able to be run during
> the OS install phase (back when upgrades were actually supported by the
> OS installer that is now known as anaconda). Quoting this introductory
> section:
> 
> On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> The Red Hat install environment is a chroot. That means no daemons,
>> no network, no devices, nothing. Even sniffing /proc can be problematic
>> in certain cases.
> 
> Now, I realize that that is OLD information; however, anaconda is still
> doing the same basic chrooted install, just with a prettier face.  You
> cannot start a daemon in the chroot, since many things are simply not
> available to the scriptlets when installed/upgraded by anaconda. 
> Scriptlets have to work in an environment other than 'yum update.'  And
> also note that this is a very different situation than Debian packages
> live in; RPM scriptlets are essentially forbidden from interactivity
> with the user; Debian's equivalent are not so hindered.  At least that
> was the rule as long as I was an active packager.
> 
> Further reference a WayBack Machine archive of a page I wrote long ago:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20010122090200/http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/rpm_upgrade.html
> 
> 
> And leaving you with this thought, again from Jeff Johnson:
> 
> On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Good. Now you're starting to think like a packager  Avoiding MUD is
>> *much* more important than attempting magic.
> 
> 
>> The bottom line is you shouldn't attempt a database conversion as
>> part of the package install. The package, however, should contain
> programs
>> and procedures necessary to do the job.

The real reason something like mysql_upgrade isn't run automatically
hasn't really much to do with the technicalities of RPM but the fact
that mysql_upgrade might kill your server if you don't know what you are
doing.
If for example you have a big table that takes up 70% of your storage
and mysql_upgrade needs to convert it to a new format then it will
create a copy of that table in the new format first and then delete the
old one...except of course that this would require 140% of disk space to
work.

So independent of the packaging technology used major changes like these
should never be done automatically and instead always be handled by an
admin who knows what he is doing.

Regards,
  Dennis


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] DNSSEC deployment stats

2016-04-28 Thread Alice Wonder

Since it was discussed earlier, I thought some might find this link 
interesting :


http://secspider.verisignlabs.com/stats.html

It is a spider that crawls DNS servers counting both DNSSEC and TLSA 
records.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 11:25 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 02:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21
> ...
>> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
>> write: Broken pipe
>> ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21
> ...
>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
>> ssh_packet_read: Connection reset by peer
>
>
> I see one possibility that explains both the key change and the
> connection resets:
>
> You installed a new server and used an IP address that was already in
> use on another server.  That's why you already had an SSH key for that
> address.  The connection resets occur when the client you're using to
> connect updates its ARP table and swaps from the MAC address on the new
> host to the MAC address on the old host (or visa versa).

Oh yes, and bizarre may happen if you have two machines with the same
static IP _simultaneously_ on the network. To check if that is the case
(for particular IP, say 192.168.2.7) from the machine with different IP on
the same subnet 192.168.2.x do

arping 192.168.2.7

you will get ARP responses from all machines, and if there is more than
one, you will see responces coming from different MAC addresses.

Valeri


Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread m . roth

Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
>> mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
>> mysql-server rpm.
> Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early
> in my time as RPM maintainer for the community PostgreSQL.org RPMset, I
> asked a very similar question of some folks, and I got a canonical
> answer from Mr. RPM himself, Jeff Johnson.
>
> The answer is not very complex, but it was spread across a several
> message private e-mail thread.  The gist of it is that the RPM
> scriptlets are very very limited in what they can do.  Trying to do
> something clever inside an RPM scriptlet is almost never wise.  The key
> thing to remember is that the scriptlet has to be able to be run during
> the OS install phase (back when upgrades were actually supported by the
> OS installer that is now known as anaconda). Quoting this introductory
> section:


We have an answer we really like: yum-post-transaction-actions. Great
plugin... and it will do whatever you want... like, say: sed -i
s/sbin\/shutdown/bin\/false/ /etc/apcupsd/apccontrol

 mark "and are there three, or six, servers plugged ino the rackmount
UPS? Yes."

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Gordon Messmer


On 04/28/2016 02:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:

ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21

...

debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
write: Broken pipe
ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21

...

debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
ssh_packet_read: Connection reset by peer



I see one possibility that explains both the key change and the 
connection resets:


You installed a new server and used an IP address that was already in 
use on another server.  That's why you already had an SSH key for that 
address.  The connection resets occur when the client you're using to 
connect updates its ARP table and swaps from the MAC address on the new 
host to the MAC address on the old host (or visa versa).


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread Lamar Owen

On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:

I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
mysql-server rpm.
Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early 
in my time as RPM maintainer for the community PostgreSQL.org RPMset, I 
asked a very similar question of some folks, and I got a canonical 
answer from Mr. RPM himself, Jeff Johnson.

The answer is not very complex, but it was spread across a several 
message private e-mail thread.  The gist of it is that the RPM 
scriptlets are very very limited in what they can do.  Trying to do 
something clever inside an RPM scriptlet is almost never wise.  The key 
thing to remember is that the scriptlet has to be able to be run during 
the OS install phase (back when upgrades were actually supported by the 
OS installer that is now known as anaconda). Quoting this introductory 
section:

On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> The Red Hat install environment is a chroot. That means no daemons,
> no network, no devices, nothing. Even sniffing /proc can be problematic
> in certain cases.

Now, I realize that that is OLD information; however, anaconda is still 
doing the same basic chrooted install, just with a prettier face.  You 
cannot start a daemon in the chroot, since many things are simply not 
available to the scriptlets when installed/upgraded by anaconda.  
Scriptlets have to work in an environment other than 'yum update.'  And 
also note that this is a very different situation than Debian packages 
live in; RPM scriptlets are essentially forbidden from interactivity 
with the user; Debian's equivalent are not so hindered.  At least that 
was the rule as long as I was an active packager.

Further reference a WayBack Machine archive of a page I wrote long ago:
https://web.archive.org/web/20010122090200/http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/rpm_upgrade.html

And leaving you with this thought, again from Jeff Johnson:

On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Good. Now you're starting to think like a packager  Avoiding MUD is
> *much* more important than attempting magic.

> The bottom line is you shouldn't attempt a database conversion as
> part of the package install. The package, however, should contain 
programs

> and procedures necessary to do the job.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-es] Servidor DNS Externo

2016-04-28 Thread Jose Manuel Ajhuacho Vargas

buenos dias 
tengo 2 dias sin dar solucion a mi servidor DNS Externo
 Atte Jose Manuel GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

[CentOS-es] DNS Externo

2016-04-28 Thread Jose Manuel Ajhuacho Vargas

Buenos dias estoy dos dias sin poder levantar mi servidor DNS externo ya no se 
que mas modificar tengo centos 6.0 instaladoalguien puede darme unas pautas 
para encontrar el error, corregir y hacer que funciones

[root@dns1 ~]# dig casagrande.com

; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.7 <<>> cochabamba.gob.bo
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 32546
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;casagrande.com.        IN    A

;; Query time: 165 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Thu Apr 28 11:18:31 2016
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 35

o alguien que me pueda guiar para la hace buena configuracion ??
saludos  Atte Jose Manuel GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 4:04 am, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/28/2016 1:57 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!!
>
> huh.   spill chuck gone a rye ?
>

Thank you, John! You made my day!

Valeri

>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 9:07 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> > Donât flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work
>> for
>> > you.
>>
>> Ubuntu is clone of Debian. Don't flame me, I'm just mentioning.
>
> I'm surprised that no one has suggested Fedora instead of Ubuntu.
> You've got the same bleeding-edge software, but in something that's a
> lot more familiar for CentOS users.  I use Fedora 23 on my laptop, and
> many of out-of-tree packages I maintain build side-by-side with
> CentOS7.

Marvellous! Thank you Jonathan! I always was using Fedora in the past when
CentOS wasn't covering all hardware on laptops. But for long time already
CentOS just works (like mackintosh, only better ;-), so I don't need to
fall back to Fedora...

Valeri


Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 9:25 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the
>>> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted
>>> earlier,
>>> it tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:

 Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of
 this
 message. Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22
>>>
>>> Open up the file /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts and delete line 22.
> 
>> Usually host key (of remote machine) could change for the following
>> reasons:
>>
>> 1. benign reasons: remote machine system was reinstalled and/or ssh
>> server
>> keys were re-generated, or some machine was retired and different
>> machine
>> re-used its IP, or for some other reason, like changes in DNS, you are
>> connecting to _different_ system that has same IP as the one you were
>> connecting to in the past
>>
>> In this case it is indeed safe to delete old known keys resembling this
>> host (there may be more that one), then ssh to it and accept new key
>>
>> 2. Bad reasons: remote machine is hijacked and host keys have changed.
>> Or,
>> as ssh error message says, it may be "man in the middle" attack. If some
>> intermediate malicious machine is able to intercept your traffic, it can
> 
> Just as a side note, here: when we rebuild a machine - say, when we were
> doing CentOS 5 to 6, or when we build a new machine for someone, 6->7, we
> *remove /etc/ssh/ssh_host*, and rsync in the *old* /etc/ssh/ssh_host* from
> backup.
>
> Not doing this does have a tendency to freak out the users

Yes that is true. We do this too sometimes, but for machines that are too
long on the network when we upgrade the system we do follow "good security
practice" and re-generate the keys. Even though there is no reason to
think that secret key may be compromised.

Valeri

>
>  mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread m . roth

Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote:
>> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the
>> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier,
>> it tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:
>>>
>>> Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this
>>> message. Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22
>>
>> Open up the file /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts and delete line 22.

> Usually host key (of remote machine) could change for the following
> reasons:
>
> 1. benign reasons: remote machine system was reinstalled and/or ssh server
> keys were re-generated, or some machine was retired and different machine
> re-used its IP, or for some other reason, like changes in DNS, you are
> connecting to _different_ system that has same IP as the one you were
> connecting to in the past
>
> In this case it is indeed safe to delete old known keys resembling this
> host (there may be more that one), then ssh to it and accept new key
>
> 2. Bad reasons: remote machine is hijacked and host keys have changed. Or,
> as ssh error message says, it may be "man in the middle" attack. If some
> intermediate malicious machine is able to intercept your traffic, it can

Just as a side note, here: when we rebuild a machine - say, when we were
doing CentOS 5 to 6, or when we build a new machine for someone, 6->7, we
*remove /etc/ssh/ssh_host*, and rsync in the *old* /etc/ssh/ssh_host* from
backup.

Not doing this does have a tendency to freak out the users

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

I know how todo. I try it out tomorrow. But it’s the first time with this kind 
of problem
with a fresh installed centos 7.

Thanks 
Valeri.

> Am 28.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb Valeri Galtsev :
> 
> 
> On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com 
>  wrote:
>> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the
>> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier,
>> it
>> tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this
>>> message.
>>> Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22
>> 
>> 
>> Open up the file /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts and delete line 22.
>> 
> 
> (sorry if I repeat what someone already said - it is already long thread,
> and I'm reading my mail from latest messages to oldest...)
> 
> Usually host key (of remote machine) could change for the following reasons:
> 
> 1. benign reasons: remote machine system was reinstalled and/or ssh server
> keys were re-generated, or some machine was retired and different machine
> re-used its IP, or for some other reason, like changes in DNS, you are
> connecting to _different_ system that has same IP as the one you were
> connecting to in the past
> 
> In this case it is indeed safe to delete old known keys resembling this
> host (there may be more that one), then ssh to it and accept new key
> 
> 2. Bad reasons: remote machine is hijacked and host keys have changed. Or,
> as ssh error message says, it may be "man in the middle" attack. If some
> intermediate malicious machine is able to intercept your traffic, it can
> make encrypted ssh tunnel between source machine and itself, and between
> itself and destination machine, having all traffic in clear text on
> itself. The only thing that stops this "man in the middle" is you, as you
> are verifying the host key, and "man in the middle" can not use as host
> key the key of remote machine (he would need both secret and public key of
> the pair for that). This is how ssh is designed to ensure you are talking
> to the machine you think you are talking to.
> 
> If this is the case, you shouldn't continue, instead right thing to do is
> to first make sure that indeed the key of remote machine was changed by
> its admin. Calling remote machine's sysadmin would be right thing to do.
> 
> I hope, this helps.
> 
> Valeri
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Andreas Benzler 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Same machine iMac for the last two weeks.
>>> 
>>> Can work on virtual box  Centos 7
>>> Usb drive installation Centos 7 works
>>> 
>>> Fresh installation not on this laptop.
>>> 
 Am 28.04.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Earl A Ramirez
>>> :
 
 On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
> 
> sure
>> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez
>>> > 
>> On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
 
 what is wrong with the default sshd server.
 
 after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and
>>> never
 had
>> any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
>> including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui
>>> SCP/SFTP
>> utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
>>> 
>>> the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
>> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
>> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
>>> 
>>> 
>>> you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more
 specific
>> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install,
>>> what
>> client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent
>>> background
>> information like was this hostname previously used for a different
>>> OS
>> install, etc etc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
>> You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the
>>> entry
>> from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you
>>> are
>> trying to connect to.
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
>

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 8:56 am, mdubend...@gmail.com wrote:
> The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the
> computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier,
> it
> tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:
>
>>
>> Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this
>> message.
>> Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22
>
>
> Open up the file /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts and delete line 22.
>

(sorry if I repeat what someone already said - it is already long thread,
and I'm reading my mail from latest messages to oldest...)

Usually host key (of remote machine) could change for the following reasons:

1. benign reasons: remote machine system was reinstalled and/or ssh server
keys were re-generated, or some machine was retired and different machine
re-used its IP, or for some other reason, like changes in DNS, you are
connecting to _different_ system that has same IP as the one you were
connecting to in the past

In this case it is indeed safe to delete old known keys resembling this
host (there may be more that one), then ssh to it and accept new key

2. Bad reasons: remote machine is hijacked and host keys have changed. Or,
as ssh error message says, it may be "man in the middle" attack. If some
intermediate malicious machine is able to intercept your traffic, it can
make encrypted ssh tunnel between source machine and itself, and between
itself and destination machine, having all traffic in clear text on
itself. The only thing that stops this "man in the middle" is you, as you
are verifying the host key, and "man in the middle" can not use as host
key the key of remote machine (he would need both secret and public key of
the pair for that). This is how ssh is designed to ensure you are talking
to the machine you think you are talking to.

If this is the case, you shouldn't continue, instead right thing to do is
to first make sure that indeed the key of remote machine was changed by
its admin. Calling remote machine's sysadmin would be right thing to do.

I hope, this helps.

Valeri


> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Andreas Benzler 
> wrote:
>
>> Same machine iMac for the last two weeks.
>>
>> Can work on virtual box  Centos 7
>> Usb drive installation Centos 7 works
>>
>> Fresh installation not on this laptop.
>>
>> > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Earl A Ramirez
>> :
>> >
>> > On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> sure
>> >>> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez
>> > >:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
>> 
>>  On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> >
>> > what is wrong with the default sshd server.
>> >
>> > after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
>> 
>> 
>>  I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and
>> never
>> > had
>> >>> any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
>> >>> including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui
>> SCP/SFTP
>> >>> utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
>> 
>>  the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
>> >>> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
>> >>> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
>> 
>> 
>>  you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more
>> > specific
>> >>> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install,
>> what
>> >>> client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent
>> background
>> >>> information like was this hostname previously used for a different
>> OS
>> >>> install, etc etc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  --
>>  john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>> 
>>  ___
>>  CentOS mailing list
>>  CentOS@centos.org
>>  https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> >>>
>> >>> You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the
>> entry
>> >>> from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you
>> are
>> >>> trying to connect to.
>> >>> ___
>> >>> CentOS mailing list
>> >>> CentOS@centos.org
>> >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> CentOS mailing list
>> >> CentOS@centos.org
>> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> >
>> > I meant the computer you are trying to connect from.
>> > ___
>> > CentOS mailing list
>> > CentOS@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>>

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Jonathan Billings

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> > Donât flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work for
> > you.
> 
> Ubuntu is clone of Debian. Don't flame me, I'm just mentioning.

I'm surprised that no one has suggested Fedora instead of Ubuntu.
You've got the same bleeding-edge software, but in something that's a
lot more familiar for CentOS users.  I use Fedora 23 on my laptop, and
many of out-of-tree packages I maintain build side-by-side with
CentOS7. 

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread mdubend...@gmail.com

The problem is not with your installation of CentOS, it is with the
computer you are connecting from. Read the error log you pasted earlier, it
tells you exactly what the problem is and how to remedy it:

>
> Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this
> message.
> Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22


Open up the file /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts and delete line 22.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Andreas Benzler 
wrote:

> Same machine iMac for the last two weeks.
>
> Can work on virtual box  Centos 7
> Usb drive installation Centos 7 works
>
> Fresh installation not on this laptop.
>
> > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
> >
> > On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
> >>
> >> sure
> >>> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez  >:
> >>>
> >>> On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
> 
>  On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> >
> > what is wrong with the default sshd server.
> >
> > after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
> 
> 
>  I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never
> > had
> >>> any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
> >>> including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP
> >>> utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
> 
>  the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
> >>> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
> >>> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
> 
> 
>  you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more
> > specific
> >>> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what
> >>> client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background
> >>> information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS
> >>> install, etc etc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
> 
>  ___
>  CentOS mailing list
>  CentOS@centos.org
>  https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>>
> >>> You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the entry
> >>> from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you are
> >>> trying to connect to.
> >>> ___
> >>> CentOS mailing list
> >>> CentOS@centos.org
> >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > I meant the computer you are trying to connect from.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] system-config-printer samba broken

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

Ok got it work without realm (domain/workgroup) inside the url and
"DOMAIN//USER" - Domain must be in highletter.

Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 18:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:
> Hello guys…
> 
> while i was working with special printer setup fallow problems are there:
> 
> samba:
> 1. system-config-printer 1.4.1 - printers not browsable. Fixed by fedora.
> 
> can be found here. Patch included
> 
> http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/printing/SRPM/ 
> 
> 
> system-config-printer-1.4.1-20.el7.centos.src.rpm  
> 
> 
> 2. system-config-printer Verify … works as expected
> 
> 3. "Prompt user if authentication is required“ - never happens
> 
> 4. Set authentication details now:
> Fail because of realm
> 
>Only User - fail
>WORKGROUP\User fail
> 
>How to fill the username to get realm passed?
> 
> Thanks for advice
> 
> Andy
> 
> In the meantime i update my gutenprint for more printers. needs to be tested.
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

correct my self: I know how to package rpm and patch files. Sometimes i
develop. The question is what you wanne do. When your machine works with
centos 7 got a lifecycle till 2024.

Sincerely

Andy

Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 22:27 -0400 schrieb Brian Bernard:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm looking at buying a Lenovo Y700 Notebook, and wondering if it would
> work with CentOS 6. Or if anyone has experience with using it under CentOS
> 6. I assume that the WiFi could be an issue as it uses an Intel 8260 card.
> I want to make the correct decision.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Brian Bernard
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 46.0 fails on CentOS 6.7 due to GTK3 requirement

2016-04-28 Thread isdtor

Johnny Hughes writes:
[...] 
> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a
> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on
> https://ci.centos.org/

Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon download problem that has 
plagued every new update release in I don't remember how long. File downloads 
go to 99% and then stop, or don't even start.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Valeri Galtsev


On Thu, April 28, 2016 1:40 am, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> Hello Brain,
>
> for such new software you go with Centos 7. The older version is more
> rocket stable,
> but in case you use such new laptop the newer one is the better / best
> choice.
>
> You need to upgrade the kernel, there is no  way out. Centos  deliver
> âonlyâ
> 2.6 or 3.10.
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt or http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
> can fix this.
>
> - Totem and multimedia isnât work fully. Gstreamer is cut down.
>
> Yesterday I installed my laptop with new hardware and most of it  fully
> work,
> but it was hard to go. Why ? Take a look at my private repo
> http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/
> What it does? Update Kernel, Drivers, Mesa , GStreamer, Gutenprint
> (printers). Iâm
> liite bit of centos 7 and in this parts Iâm on my own.
>
> Donât flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work for
> you.

Ubuntu is clone of Debian. Don't flame me, I'm just mentioning.

Valeri

>
> The new nvidia series 9 will come with kernel 4.5 as i know (open source
> part)
>
> Greatings
>
> Andy
>
>> Am 28.04.2016 um 05:47 schrieb Valeri Galtsev
>> :
>>
>>
>> On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:07 pm, Brian Bernard wrote:
>>> Oh, I wouldn't flame you.
>>>
>>> Hmm, I didn't think of using a virtual machine. The Lenovo has a NVidia
>>> 960MX, so I wonder if it would fully work under a virtual machine.
>>
>> Probably not. Normally virtual machine does not have that level of
>> possession of hardware. At least Sun-Oracle Virtual Box doesn't.
>> Somebody
>> may correct me if I'm wrong here. If I were to do it, I would choose as
>> host system the system your software requiring OpenGL is available for.
>> And add other systems you need in virtual machines. Laptops, though
>> powerful these days, still not the best choice for virtual machines
>> IMHO.
>>
>> Valeri
>>
>>>
>>> The reason why I ask is that I do systems adminstration with
>>> meteorological
>>> software that requires OpenGL 2.0 and at least 2GB of video ram.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your reply, Mike.
>>>
>>> Brian Bernard
>>> On Apr 27, 2016 10:43 PM, "Mike Mohr"  wrote:

 Don't flame me, but I really recommend using Ubuntu on laptops. If you
 really want CentOS, you should go with version 7. Many new laptops
 won't
 work well with that either though.

 CentOS 6 only works well these days on older hardware or on virtual
 machines.
 On Apr 27, 2016 7:27 PM, "Brian Bernard"
 
 wrote:

 Hi all,

 I'm looking at buying a Lenovo Y700 Notebook, and wondering if it
 would
 work with CentOS 6. Or if anyone has experience with using it under
 CentOS
 6. I assume that the WiFi could be an issue as it uses an Intel 8260
 card.
 I want to make the correct decision.

 Thank you,

 Brian Bernard
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> Valeri Galtsev
>> Sr System Administrator
>> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
>> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
>> University of Chicago
>> Phone: 773-702-4247
>> 
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org 
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] About mysql upgrade

2016-04-28 Thread Sergio Belkin

Hi,


I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
mysql-server rpm.

Thanks in advance

-- 
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] systemctl enable httpd failure

2016-04-28 Thread Michael H

On 28/04/16 13:29, Michael H wrote:
> Hi List,
> 
> [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable httpd
> Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument
> 
> I can disable and re-enable other services without issue, I'm also
> seeing the same error when I run
> 
> [root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable mailman
> Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Michael
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 

[root@mail1 ~]# mv
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/httpd.service .
[root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable httpd
Created symlink from
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/httpd.service to
/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service.

[root@mail1 ~]# mv
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/mailman.service .
[root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable mailman
Created symlink from
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/mailman.service to
/usr/lib/systemd/system/mailman.service.

problem solved. Any ideas why this happened?

Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Brian Bernard

Thank you, Andreas and Valeri for your replies.

Brian Bernard

On Apr 28, 2016 2:41 AM, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
>
> Hello Brain,
>
> for such new software you go with Centos 7. The older version is more
rocket stable,
> but in case you use such new laptop the newer one is the better / best
choice.
>
> You need to upgrade the kernel, there is no  way out. Centos  deliver
„only“
> 2.6 or 3.10.
>
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt or http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
> can fix this.
>
> - Totem and multimedia isn’t work fully. Gstreamer is cut down.
>
> Yesterday I installed my laptop with new hardware and most of it  fully
work,
> but it was hard to go. Why ? Take a look at my private repo
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/
> What it does? Update Kernel, Drivers, Mesa , GStreamer, Gutenprint
(printers). I’m
> liite bit of centos 7 and in this parts I’m on my own.
>
> Don’t flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work for
you.
>
> The new nvidia series 9 will come with kernel 4.5 as i know (open source
part)
>
> Greatings
>
> Andy
>
> > Am 28.04.2016 um 05:47 schrieb Valeri Galtsev :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:07 pm, Brian Bernard wrote:
> >> Oh, I wouldn't flame you.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I didn't think of using a virtual machine. The Lenovo has a NVidia
> >> 960MX, so I wonder if it would fully work under a virtual machine.
> >
> > Probably not. Normally virtual machine does not have that level of
> > possession of hardware. At least Sun-Oracle Virtual Box doesn't.
Somebody
> > may correct me if I'm wrong here. If I were to do it, I would choose as
> > host system the system your software requiring OpenGL is available for.
> > And add other systems you need in virtual machines. Laptops, though
> > powerful these days, still not the best choice for virtual machines
IMHO.
> >
> > Valeri
> >
> >>
> >> The reason why I ask is that I do systems adminstration with
> >> meteorological
> >> software that requires OpenGL 2.0 and at least 2GB of video ram.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your reply, Mike.
> >>
> >> Brian Bernard
> >> On Apr 27, 2016 10:43 PM, "Mike Mohr"  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Don't flame me, but I really recommend using Ubuntu on laptops. If you
> >>> really want CentOS, you should go with version 7. Many new laptops
won't
> >>> work well with that either though.
> >>>
> >>> CentOS 6 only works well these days on older hardware or on virtual
> >>> machines.
> >>> On Apr 27, 2016 7:27 PM, "Brian Bernard" 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm looking at buying a Lenovo Y700 Notebook, and wondering if it
would
> >>> work with CentOS 6. Or if anyone has experience with using it under
> >>> CentOS
> >>> 6. I assume that the WiFi could be an issue as it uses an Intel 8260
> >>> card.
> >>> I want to make the correct decision.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>
> >>> Brian Bernard
> >>> ___
> >>> CentOS mailing list
> >>> CentOS@centos.org
> >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>> ___
> >>> CentOS mailing list
> >>> CentOS@centos.org
> >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> > Valeri Galtsev
> > Sr System Administrator
> > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
> > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
> > University of Chicago
> > Phone: 773-702-4247
> > 
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org 
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos <
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] systemctl enable httpd failure

2016-04-28 Thread Michael H

Hi List,

[root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable httpd
Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument

I can disable and re-enable other services without issue, I'm also
seeing the same error when I run

[root@mail1 ~]# systemctl enable mailman
Failed to execute operation: Invalid argument

Any suggestions?

Michael
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 15

2016-04-28 Thread centos-announce-request

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2016:0695 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2016:0695 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:22:07 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0695 Critical CentOS 5 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20160427152207.ga28...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0695 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
72c6e8cc275f769961ec0e7349e27cd04a850cf2b446c87be3199f30bebf83e6  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
72c6e8cc275f769961ec0e7349e27cd04a850cf2b446c87be3199f30bebf83e6  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
6c47031dd9e2de144e681e433f01aee9c58913b829ac00f8189d933a010b8088  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
1cf7031e1734831a5cfcdcb95c11af0447e427cced104533bf6f5ac07d4e2b7f  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:34:55 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:0695 Critical CentOS 6 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20160427153455.ga19...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0695 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
1b99b117160ab472b6f7b02e7daa067de60820352c24b30f9b0d6da90a21a148  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm

x86_64:
1b99b117160ab472b6f7b02e7daa067de60820352c24b30f9b0d6da90a21a148  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
ef5c69545d39336f0e84ea7588841f770dbffde26cfdde9192fd009e2a614a11  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
5d2602205b09daa7e5f1fbde0c84131ceabfcb34a11f5fb3ed43844f652adf71  
firefox-45.1.0-1.el6.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 134, Issue 15

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

2016-04-28 Thread Bill Maltby (C4B)

On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 15:39 -0700, JJB wrote:
> On 04/27/16 15:18, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, JJB  said:
> >> Interesting.  Back in 1980 we called /bin/sh the Mashey shell.  It
> >> did not have command substitution or other things we now take for
> >> granted.  Bourne did that for us.  So there's a version or two
> >> missing in history...
> > Check the history here:
> >
> > https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo
> >
> 
> This history might be that of a particular lineage.  CB UNIX and PWB 
> UNIX existed in the gap between 1975 and 1979.

PWB is the one I started with back in '77ish. Running on Dec 11/70.

When SCO's Unix, which had an IBM-compatible Cobol compiler available,
became available I installed on PC and over time converted our Cobol
development folks to compile, debug, test on the PCs and then install on
mainframe through the PDP 11/70 emulating 3270 terminal into mainframe,
IIRC. Maybe by then it was a VAX 11/780.

When Bourne's shell came around it was a big boost for me - added a lot.

> 

Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

Same machine iMac for the last two weeks.

Can work on virtual box  Centos 7
Usb drive installation Centos 7 works

Fresh installation not on this laptop.

> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
> 
> On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
>> 
>> sure
>>> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
>>> 
>>> On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
 
 On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> 
> what is wrong with the default sshd server.
> 
> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
 
 
 I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never
> had
>>> any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
>>> including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP
>>> utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
 
 the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
>>> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
>>> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
 
 
 you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more
> specific
>>> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what
>>> client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background
>>> information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS
>>> install, etc etc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>> 
>>> You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the entry
>>> from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you are
>>> trying to connect to.
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> I meant the computer you are trying to connect from.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Earl A Ramirez

On 28 Apr 2016 11:24, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
>
> sure
> > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
> >
> > On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> >>>
> >>> what is wrong with the default sshd server.
> >>>
> >>> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
> >>
> >>
> >> I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never
had
> > any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
> > including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP
> > utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
> >>
> >> the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
> > previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
> > installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
> >>
> >>
> >> you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more
specific
> > answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what
> > client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background
> > information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS
> > install, etc etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
> >>
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the entry
> > from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you are
> > trying to connect to.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I meant the computer you are trying to connect from.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

sure
> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
> 
> On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
>> 
>> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>>> 
>>> what is wrong with the default sshd server.
>>> 
>>> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
>> 
>> 
>> I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never had
> any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
> including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP
> utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
>> 
>> the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
>> 
>> 
>> you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more specific
> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what
> client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background
> information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS
> install, etc etc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>> 
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the entry
> from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you are
> trying to connect to.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Earl A Ramirez

On 28 Apr 2016 11:11, "John R Pierce"  wrote:
>
> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>>
>> what is wrong with the default sshd server.
>>
>> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
>
>
> I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never had
any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients,
including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP
utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
>
> the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had
previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous
installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
>
>
> you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more specific
answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what
client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background
information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS
install, etc etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

You installed the server with the same IP, you need to remove the entry
from the known hosts, which is located in .ssh on the computer you are
trying to connect to.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread John R Pierce


On 4/28/2016 2:09 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:

ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvvandy@141.52.135.21




debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 
Debian-5ubuntu1.8
debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.8 pat OpenSSH_5* compat 0x0c00



thats not CentOS.

are you sure you're connecting to the right address ?

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

This never happen to  me,  first time too. This was never happen when i drive 
the machine with the usb drive installation of centos, same state.
As I said: Fresh from yesterday.

Greetings

Andy

> Am 28.04.2016 um 11:11 schrieb John R Pierce :
> 
> On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> what is wrong with the default sshd server.
>> 
>> after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts
> 
> I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never had any 
> issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients, including 
> other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP utilties(they 
> use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.
> 
> the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had 
> previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous 
> installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key
> 
> 
> you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more specific 
> answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what client 
> software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background information 
> like was this hostname previously used for a different OS install, etc etc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread John R Pierce


On 4/28/2016 2:02 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:

what is wrong with the default sshd server.

after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts


I've installed centos a LOT of times, versions 5, 6, and 7, and never 
had any issues with the built in sshd service, and a variety of clients, 
including other linux ssh, putty and securecrt on windows, gui SCP/SFTP 
utilties(they use sshd too), freebsd ssh, solaris ssh, aix ssh.


the "key changed from known_hosts" error happens if your client had 
previously connected with  the same "user@hostname" on a previous 
installation of the server OS with a different ssh_host_key



you need to provide a lot more information if you expect a more specific 
answer from anyone, like what version of CentOS did you install, what 
client software you're using to connect to it, any pertinent background 
information like was this hostname previously used for a different OS 
install, etc etc.






--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh 141.52.135.21
@@@
@WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @
@@@
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
It is also possible that a host key has just been changed.
The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is
SHA256:KIKE0V+Hm1UW4XtpTAVsl/7QWqJSVoQHfLnjj3vn/nM.
Please contact your system administrator.
Add correct host key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.
Offending ECDSA key in /Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts:22
RSA host key for 141.52.135.21 has changed and you have requested strict 
checking.
Host key verification failed.
ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ vi .ssh/
id_rsa   id_rsa.pub   known_hosts  
ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ vi .ssh/known_hosts 
ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvv andy@141.52.135.21
OpenSSH_6.9p1, LibreSSL 2.1.8
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 21: Applying options for *
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 56: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to 141.52.135.21 [141.52.135.21] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
write: Broken pipe
ine-imac-andy:~ andy$ ssh -vvv andy@141.52.135.21
OpenSSH_6.9p1, LibreSSL 2.1.8
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 21: Applying options for *
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 56: Applying options for *
debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to 141.52.135.21 [141.52.135.21] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
debug1: identity file /Users/andy/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.9
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 
Debian-5ubuntu1.8
debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1.8 pat OpenSSH_5* compat 0x0c00
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: Authenticating to 141.52.135.21:22 as 'andy'
debug3: hostkeys_foreach: reading file "/Users/andy/.ssh/known_hosts"
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-dss-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-dss-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521,ssh-ed25519,ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: 
chacha20-poly1...@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,aes128-...@openssh.com,aes256-...@openssh.com,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se
debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Earl A Ramirez

On 28 Apr 2016 10:58, "Andreas Benzler"  wrote:
>
> I don’t know what’s going on
>
> the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!!
>
> Fresh installation.
>
> packet_write_wait: Connection
>
> How can that be!
>
> Andy
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

You will need to provide a little more information, what's the output when
you use ssh -vvv user@host?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread John R Pierce


On 4/28/2016 1:57 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote:

the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!!


huh.   spill chuck gone a rye ?


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

what is wrong with the default sshd server.

after retry to connect sshd - key changed from known hosts

grrr

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Centos hold me back from work - sshd ...bull

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

I don’t know what’s going on

the sushi from the laptop always kick me out!!!

Fresh installation.

packet_write_wait: Connection

How can that be!

Andy

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

2016-04-28 Thread Александр Кириллов


Adrian Jenzer писал 2016-04-28 11:04:

It looks like logrotate changed behaviour and started to delete old
logs instead of compressing them.
As you can see it just wiped away the one from 20160327, and that with
all configs on default.
Does someone know how to fix this??


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171865

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

2016-04-28 Thread Adrian Jenzer

It looks like logrotate changed behaviour and started to delete old logs 
instead of compressing them.
As you can see it just wiped away the one from 20160327, and that with all 
configs on default.
Does someone know how to fix this??

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  357256 Dec 14 03:15 ssl_access_log-20151214.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  354106 Dec 20 03:38 ssl_access_log-20151220.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  204874 Dec 28 03:41 ssl_access_log-20151228.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   13621 Jan  3 03:05 ssl_access_log-20160103.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4345075 Apr  4 03:40 ssl_access_log-20160404
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4743540 Apr 10 03:04 ssl_access_log-20160410
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6064766 Apr 22 17:45 ssl_access_log-20160422
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   35837 Apr 25 11:00 ssl_access_log-20160426

On the prod-server I added now "rotate 300" to /etc/logroate.d/httpd to prevent 
losing more logs. It keeps the logs now but doesn't compress them anymore.

Thanks
Regards Adrian

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
James Washington
Sent: Donnerstag, 21. April 2016 17:16
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

Adrian,

I’ve had huge problems with log rotate recently. For some reason, since the 
period you have mentioned, I have to restart rsyslog on my CentOS 6.7 servers 
after logrotate runs either through a cronjob or manually (even on the standard 
config). I’m not sure if you’ve experienced this to or whether they are linked 
- but there’s definitely been issues since January with logrotate. 

Kindest regards,

James Washington

On 21 April 2016 at 16:00:39, Adrian Jenzer (a.jen...@herzogdemeuron.com) wrote:

Hi all  

I just saw that I miss some log files in /var/log/httpd. There is a gap in 
January/February2016, no logs are available for this period.  
It seemed to work fine with the earlier logs as you can see.  
Has someone an explanation for this?  

It's a Centos 7.2 VM with Apache 2.4 running ownCloud only. Default logrotate 
config.  

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3367604 Apr 20 16:12 ssl_access_log  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67982 Jul 12 2015 ssl_access_log-20150712.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43515 Jul 18 2015 ssl_access_log-20150719.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 36096 Jul 26 2015 ssl_access_log-20150727.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25088 Aug 1 2015 ssl_access_log-20150802.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12733 Aug 9 2015 ssl_access_log-20150810.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89873 Aug 15 2015 ssl_access_log-20150816.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 70627 Aug 23 2015 ssl_access_log-20150823.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 91576 Aug 31 2015 ssl_access_log-20150831.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 218188 Sep 6 2015 ssl_access_log-20150906.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 181084 Sep 14 2015 ssl_access_log-20150914.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 247666 Sep 20 2015 ssl_access_log-20150920.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 221203 Sep 28 2015 ssl_access_log-20150928.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 173962 Oct 4 2015 ssl_access_log-20151004.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131480 Oct 11 2015 ssl_access_log-20151011.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 141485 Oct 19 2015 ssl_access_log-20151019.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89379 Oct 25 03:37 ssl_access_log-20151025.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 149943 Nov 1 13:30 ssl_access_log-20151102.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 150219 Nov 8 03:11 ssl_access_log-20151108.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131524 Nov 14 20:13 ssl_access_log-20151115.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 153841 Nov 22 03:42 ssl_access_log-20151122.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134209 Nov 29 23:41 ssl_access_log-20151130.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 336448 Dec 6 03:11 ssl_access_log-20151206.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 357256 Dec 14 03:15 ssl_access_log-20151214.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 354106 Dec 20 03:38 ssl_access_log-20151220.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 204874 Dec 28 03:41 ssl_access_log-20151228.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13621 Jan 3 03:05 ssl_access_log-20160103.gz  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4385823 Mar 27 04:19 ssl_access_log-20160327  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4345075 Apr 4 03:40 ssl_access_log-20160404  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4743540 Apr 10 03:04 ssl_access_log-20160410  
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6065044 Apr 17 03:20 ssl_access_log-20160417  



Regards  
Adrian Jenzer  

___  
CentOS mailing list  
CentOS@centos.org  
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?

2016-04-28 Thread Brandon Vincent

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Pouar  wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that's a variant of the Almquist Shell

You would be correct. All of the BSDs and some GNU/Linux distributions
use Almquist for sh if not using a symlink to bash or dash.

In fact, the first release of Slackware in 1993 had sh as a symlink to bash.

I'm looking at the source code for the Bourne shell as included with
UNIX SVR4 (circa 1988) and it's obvious that the version which Sun
Microsystems/Oracle shipped with Solaris under the CDDL is a direct
decedent.

The license on the source code for the Bourne shell shipped with SVR4
clearly states:

"THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT"

Brandon Vincent
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any CentOS 6 Issues on Lenovo Y700?

2016-04-28 Thread Andreas Benzler

Hello Brain,

for such new software you go with Centos 7. The older version is more rocket 
stable,
but in case you use such new laptop the newer one is the better / best choice.

You need to upgrade the kernel, there is no  way out. Centos  deliver „only“ 
2.6 or 3.10.

http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt or http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
can fix this.

- Totem and multimedia isn’t work fully. Gstreamer is cut down.

Yesterday I installed my laptop with new hardware and most of it  fully work,
but it was hard to go. Why ? Take a look at my private repo 
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/
What it does? Update Kernel, Drivers, Mesa , GStreamer, Gutenprint (printers). 
I’m
liite bit of centos 7 and in this parts I’m on my own.

Don’t flame me - Ubuntu LTS 16.04 is on the way and this should work for you.

The new nvidia series 9 will come with kernel 4.5 as i know (open source part)

Greatings

Andy

> Am 28.04.2016 um 05:47 schrieb Valeri Galtsev :
> 
> 
> On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:07 pm, Brian Bernard wrote:
>> Oh, I wouldn't flame you.
>> 
>> Hmm, I didn't think of using a virtual machine. The Lenovo has a NVidia
>> 960MX, so I wonder if it would fully work under a virtual machine.
> 
> Probably not. Normally virtual machine does not have that level of
> possession of hardware. At least Sun-Oracle Virtual Box doesn't. Somebody
> may correct me if I'm wrong here. If I were to do it, I would choose as
> host system the system your software requiring OpenGL is available for.
> And add other systems you need in virtual machines. Laptops, though
> powerful these days, still not the best choice for virtual machines IMHO.
> 
> Valeri
> 
>> 
>> The reason why I ask is that I do systems adminstration with
>> meteorological
>> software that requires OpenGL 2.0 and at least 2GB of video ram.
>> 
>> Thank you for your reply, Mike.
>> 
>> Brian Bernard
>> On Apr 27, 2016 10:43 PM, "Mike Mohr"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Don't flame me, but I really recommend using Ubuntu on laptops. If you
>>> really want CentOS, you should go with version 7. Many new laptops won't
>>> work well with that either though.
>>> 
>>> CentOS 6 only works well these days on older hardware or on virtual
>>> machines.
>>> On Apr 27, 2016 7:27 PM, "Brian Bernard" 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I'm looking at buying a Lenovo Y700 Notebook, and wondering if it would
>>> work with CentOS 6. Or if anyone has experience with using it under
>>> CentOS
>>> 6. I assume that the WiFi could be an issue as it uses an Intel 8260
>>> card.
>>> I want to make the correct decision.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Brian Bernard
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Valeri Galtsev
> Sr System Administrator
> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
> University of Chicago
> Phone: 773-702-4247
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org 
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 
> 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

70 matches

Mail list logo