[CentOS] Unsubscribe

2016-05-08 Thread Errol Neal
> On May 8, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mike Mohr wrote: > > Speaking from experience (I cannot go into detail on this point), and as > Digimer pointed out, LSI seems to be the only choice for enterprise level, > large scale deployments. > > If your concern is extremely long term

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Mike Mohr
Speaking from experience (I cannot go into detail on this point), and as Digimer pointed out, LSI seems to be the only choice for enterprise level, large scale deployments. If your concern is extremely long term deployments with verifiable data recovery options, software RAID is the only option,

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:42 pm, Digimer wrote: > On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote: >>> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I >> solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still >> exists in close future. > > > predicting the future? yeah, well. > > > there

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Digimer
On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote: >> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come in your estimate. First

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still exists in close future. predicting the future? yeah, well. there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly LSI,

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:55 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote: >> "Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity >> processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible >> benefits. > > Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote: > On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to >>> come >>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have >>>

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote: "Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible benefits. Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides some performance benefit in write intensive workloads.but

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to >> come >> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have >> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread Digimer
On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come >> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have >> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming

Re: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question

2016-05-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and getting bought with LSI, it probably

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID

2016-05-08 Thread Mark Milhollan
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli. StorCli is the replacement, which has differently awful syntax. /mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

2016-05-08 Thread Peter Q.
is there someone update to Firefox 45.1.0? In Mozilla website it shows me than I'm using a older Firefox version and the same for flash plugins. Centos 7 64bits. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread nikos sarantopoulos
i join windows workstations from the computer with the properties and switching it to a domain giving after the credentials of the Administrator and the password of the Administrator to join the active directory domain On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:03 PM, nikos sarantopoulos <

Re: [CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread nikos sarantopoulos
it is a standalone server but what permissions i should set to this image connected to a loop device the selinux is disabled On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/08/2016 10:10 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote: > >> it is active directory my

Re: [CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 05/08/2016 10:10 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote: it is active directory my server setup Is it a standalone AD server or a member of a domain? If it is standalone, how did you join the Windows workstation to the domain? How did you create new users? Are you using those new users on the

Re: [CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread nikos sarantopoulos
i will tell you about my setup my setup is done with the command samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive on the version 4.3.9 that i am thinking for me that version is enough stable the last version doesn't have any more the "Authenticated Users" it is active directory my server

Re: [CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 05/08/2016 06:26 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote: the only way to write there other users except root is setting with chmod o+w /test Yes, that is expected. from windows 7 using samba 4 i can write to folder but i cannot set security setting getting always access denied when i am setting

[CentOS] access denied from windows changing security setting when i use a folder connected to a fake drive made with dd

2016-05-08 Thread nikos sarantopoulos
i make a image file connected to /dev/loop0 formated as ext4 partition and connect it losetup /dev/loop0 /root/disk.img then make format the loop drive with mkfs.ext4 -o rw,usrquota,grpquota /dev/loop0 /disk connected it to /test the only way to write there other users except root is setting

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.1.0 stability

2016-05-08 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-05-07, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2016, Liam O'Toole wrote: > >> On 2016-05-06, Nux! >> wrote: >>> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might >>> not like the old ffmpeg I ship. >>> >>> There is new