> On May 8, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mike Mohr wrote:
>
> Speaking from experience (I cannot go into detail on this point), and as
> Digimer pointed out, LSI seems to be the only choice for enterprise level,
> large scale deployments.
>
> If your concern is extremely long term
Speaking from experience (I cannot go into detail on this point), and as
Digimer pointed out, LSI seems to be the only choice for enterprise level,
large scale deployments.
If your concern is extremely long term deployments with verifiable data
recovery options, software RAID is the only option,
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:42 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive
On Sun, May 8, 2016 8:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I
>> solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still
>> exists in close future.
>
>
> predicting the future? yeah, well.
>
>
> there
On 08/05/16 09:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
>> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
come
in your estimate. First
On 5/8/2016 6:10 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Can we leave this thread just to thoughts I
solicited about which of hardware RAID card manufacturers will still
exists in close future.
predicting the future? yeah, well.
there are really only two choices today, Adaptec and Avago (formerly
LSI,
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:55 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> "Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity
>> processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible
>> benefits.
>
> Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:31 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
>>> come
>>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>>>
On 5/8/2016 5:31 PM, Digimer wrote:
"Hardware RAID" can very well include a controller with dedicated parity
processing, battery/flash backed write caching and other tangible benefits.
Yes, battery/flash write-back cache provides some performance benefit in
write intensive workloads.but
On Sun, May 8, 2016 7:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to
>> come
>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and
On 08/05/16 08:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
>> in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
>> passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming
On 5/6/2016 2:26 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come
in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have
passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and
getting bought with LSI, it probably
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli.
StorCli is the replacement, which has differently awful syntax.
/mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
is there someone update to Firefox 45.1.0?
In Mozilla website it shows me than I'm using a older Firefox version and
the same for flash plugins.
Centos 7 64bits.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
i join windows workstations from the computer with the properties and
switching it to a domain giving after the credentials of the Administrator
and the password of the Administrator to join the active directory domain
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:03 PM, nikos sarantopoulos <
it is a standalone server but what permissions i should set to this image
connected to a loop device
the selinux is disabled
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 10:10 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote:
>
>> it is active directory my
On 05/08/2016 10:10 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote:
it is active directory my server setup
Is it a standalone AD server or a member of a domain?
If it is standalone, how did you join the Windows workstation to the
domain? How did you create new users? Are you using those new users on
the
i will tell you about my setup
my setup is done with the command samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307
--interactive on the version 4.3.9 that i am thinking for me that version
is enough stable the last version doesn't have any more the "Authenticated
Users"
it is active directory my server
On 05/08/2016 06:26 AM, nikos sarantopoulos wrote:
the only way to write there other users except root is setting with
chmod o+w /test
Yes, that is expected.
from windows 7 using samba 4 i can write to folder but i cannot set
security setting getting always access denied when i am setting
i make a image file connected to /dev/loop0 formated as ext4 partition
and connect it
losetup /dev/loop0 /root/disk.img
then make format the loop drive with
mkfs.ext4 -o rw,usrquota,grpquota /dev/loop0 /disk
connected it to /test
the only way to write there other users except root is setting
On 2016-05-07, Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2016, Liam O'Toole wrote:
>
>> On 2016-05-06, Nux!
>> wrote:
>>> Guys if you are using my repo on CentOS 6 then the new Firefox might
>>> not like the old ffmpeg I ship.
>>>
>>> There is new
21 matches
Mail list logo