[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:1009 CentOS 5 firefox BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1009 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1009.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2016:1008 CentOS 5 sos BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1008 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1008.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

On 10.05.2016 21:08, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Walter H. wrote: On 10.05.2016 18:57, Александр Кириллов wrote: I'm also using ddns and have my zone files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/dynamic. are you using DDNS in DualStack (IPv4 and IPv6 together) or do you have only DHCP or DHCPv6 and not

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 05:15 PM, phil wrote: > This would be a good question for the ubuntu users list . . . > > Ubuntu user technical support, > not for general discussions > I agree :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 11/05/2016 8:12 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev wrote: 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty much on the level of latest release of each of components.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> >> 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty >> much on the level of latest release of each of components. Therefore >> "upgrade" to new release of

[CentOS] test builds on mesa

Hello Guys... I wanne let you know that i recently tested my mesa builds 11.2.2 with libdrm 2.4.8 tested on intel (mesa) and radeon (d3dadapter) http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ mesa is build with llvm-3.8.0 (skylake patch) Fixes all my

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty > much on the level of latest release of each of components. Therefore > "upgrade" to new release of the system is pretty close to just a > regular routine

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/10/2016 01:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > > I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present > from CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 10:44 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > 2. RHEL (and derivatives): you do routine updates, and all is guaranteed > to keep working as it did when you originally configured your machine. *Almost*. exception was 6.5->6.6 upgrade. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7972

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

if a host has IPv4 only or IPv6 only this works fine, but when a host has both - DualStack somethimes it works sometimes only one - can be IPv4 or can be IPv6 works; and in /var/log/messages I get something like May 10 18:51:30 dnssrvr named[2526]: client 192.168.1.2#38618: view wkst:

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 01:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: >>> >>> I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present >>> from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other >>> operating systems.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 12:19 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: Hi, I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating systems. Right now, I am sure that we do

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On Tue, May 10, 2016 2:22 pm, Hakan Peker wrote: > On 05/10/2016 06:44 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> "Other systems" you mention I bet are Debian and its clones (Ubuntu >> being >> one of them). These systems have different update philosophy than that >> of >> RedHat Enterprise Linux (and hence

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

On 10.05.2016 21:36, Александр Кириллов wrote: I'm also using ddns and have my zone files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/dynamic. are you using DDNS in DualStack (IPv4 and IPv6 together) or do you have only DHCP or DHCPv6 and not both? IPv4 only. if a host has IPv4 only or IPv6 only this

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 06:44 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: "Other systems" you mention I bet are Debian and its clones (Ubuntu being one of them). These systems have different update philosophy than that of RedHat Enterprise Linux (and hence what CentOS is, which is derived from RHEL). Namely, these "other

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

I'm also using ddns and have my zone files in /var/named/chroot/var/named/dynamic. are you using DDNS in DualStack (IPv4 and IPv6 together) or do you have only DHCP or DHCPv6 and not both? IPv4 only. By default, SELinux prevents any role from modifying named_zone_t files; this

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

On 05/10/2016 12:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Which assumes that setting selinux to enforcing doesn't break your websites, or the locally-created root directories that have been created before an actual sysadmin came onboard, or That's my biggest problem with SELinux. I suppose at some

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

Walter H. wrote: > On 10.05.2016 18:57, Александр Кириллов wrote: >>> this seems to be relevant in chroot environments; >>> >>> as I noticed when configuring the DDNS-feature, that this is a little >>> bit weired, when running in a chroot environment; I saw the >>> recommendation not >>> to use a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

On 10.05.2016 18:57, Александр Кириллов wrote: this seems to be relevant in chroot environments; as I noticed when configuring the DDNS-feature, that this is a little bit weired, when running in a chroot environment; I saw the recommendation not to use a chroot in the man-page and removed

[CentOS] weird network error

a previously rock solid reliable server of mine crashed last night, the server was still running but eth0, a Intel 82574L using the e1000e driver, went down. The server has a Supermicro X8DTE-F (dual Xeon X5650, yada yada).server is a drbd master, so that was the first thing to notice

Re: [CentOS] weird network error

John R Pierce wrote: > a previously rock solid reliable server of mine crashed last night, the > server was still running but eth0, a Intel 82574L using the e1000e > driver, went down. The server has a Supermicro X8DTE-F (dual Xeon > X5650, yada yada).server is a drbd master, so that was the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

this seems to be relevant in chroot environments; as I noticed when configuring the DDNS-feature, that this is a little bit weired, when running in a chroot environment; I saw the recommendation not to use a chroot in the man-page and removed bind-chroot and then the zone updates worked

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On Tue, May 10, 2016 2:19 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from >> CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other >> operating >> systems. >> >> Right

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 135, Issue 4

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

in no file neither in /etc/named.conf nor in any other file that is included by the main config I can find a reference to /etc/named.root.key is this file really needed or did it become obsolete? (as seen on the URL above, /etc/named.root.key is part of /etc/named.iscdlv.key) # cat

[CentOS] CentOS 6 as DNS-Server

Hello, it has been a while since I had setup a DNS-Server with CentOS 6; these days I added a few zones needed for DDNS; this works but in /etc/ I found quite a strange file, I'm not sure if it was in use at the beginning I used this system as a DNS-Server, and after several 'yum update' not any

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from > CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating > systems. > > Right now, I am sure that we do not have proper update path in

[CentOS] Upgrade path from CentOS 7 to future versions

Hi, I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating systems. Right now, I am sure that we do not have proper update path in CentOS to move from one version to another. -- Thanks & Regards,