Re: [CentOS] installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop

2016-07-26 Thread geo
On 07/26/16 22:22, Johnny Hughes wrote: <<>> hello Johnny, glad you caught my post. > If you can not get that NIC working with the default kernel, you could > try the experimental kernel per the bottom of: > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/i386 > ---> thank you. just

Re: [CentOS] installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop

2016-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 07/26/2016 02:58 PM, geo wrote: > > hello Ned. > > On 07/26/2016 02:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 26/07/16 19:04, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > <<>> > >>> ]$ lspci|grep Realtek >>> 0e:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. \ >>> RTL8187SE Wireless LAN Controller (rev

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1486 Moderate CentOS 7 samba Security Update

2016-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1486 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1486.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/26/2016 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, well, the thing is, for years I've just been shoving ordinary SATA drives into the same server, to use to copy from other machines via rsync, getting a drive ready to replace in another server. I've never had trouble with SATA. This is the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 2:38 PM, Peter wrote: >> On 27/07/16 09:11,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me >>> >01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS >>> 2008 [Falcon] (rev 03) >>> >so it*should* accept an

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1487 Moderate CentOS 6 samba4 Security Update

2016-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1487 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1487.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2016:1486 Moderate CentOS 7 samba Security Update

2016-07-26 Thread Johnny Hughes
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1486 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1486.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) Source:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/26/2016 2:38 PM, Peter wrote: On 27/07/16 09:11,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me >01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 >[Falcon] (rev 03) >so it*should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread Peter
On 27/07/16 09:11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me > 01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 > [Falcon] (rev 03) > so it *should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a few years > old, and having pulled

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

2016-07-26 Thread m . roth
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] >> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM >> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > >> >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left, >> > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went

[CentOS] CentOS 6 and an SAS drive, hardware

2016-07-26 Thread m . roth
This is... odd. Got a 6.8 box, a Dell R320 lspci tells me 01:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2008 [Falcon] (rev 03) so it *should* accept an SAS drive. I've got a Cheetah that's a few years old, and having pulled it out of another server (in the datecenter), I put

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info

2016-07-26 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
> -Original Message- > From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info > > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Folks, > > > >I am perplexed. I updated

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

2016-07-26 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 07/26/2016 11:21 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: A number of older storage and network drivers were purged from the kernel with the release of el7. If this hardware is old enough, it's entirely possible that it's no longer supported out of the box. This is particularly likely if this same hardware

Re: [CentOS] installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop

2016-07-26 Thread geo
hello Ned. On 07/26/2016 02:04 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 26/07/16 19:04, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: <<>> >> ]$ lspci|grep Realtek >> 0e:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. \ >> RTL8187SE Wireless LAN Controller (rev 22) >> 14:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek

Re: [CentOS] installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop

2016-07-26 Thread Ned Slider
On 26/07/16 19:04, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: greetings one and all. installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop; specs: toshiba satellite l455d-s5976 amd sempron si-42 2 GB ddr2 250 GB hdd ]$ lspci|grep Realtek 0e:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. \ RTL8187SE

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

2016-07-26 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/26/2016 10:20 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: >> I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. >> >> The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI >> SATA MegaRaid PCI. > > which megaraid card? they've made quite a lot. lspci will

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

2016-07-26 Thread Jim Perrin
On 07/26/2016 12:20 PM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > Dear All; > > I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. > > The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI SATA > MegaRaid PCI. > > Centos 5/6 were working fine with this H/W configuration but not

Re: [CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

2016-07-26 Thread John R Pierce
On 7/26/2016 10:20 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI SATA MegaRaid PCI. which megaraid card? they've made quite a lot. lspci will list the card type... linux

[CentOS] installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop

2016-07-26 Thread geo.inbox.ignored
greetings one and all. installing centos 7 32 bit i386 to laptop; specs: toshiba satellite l455d-s5976 amd sempron si-42 2 GB ddr2 250 GB hdd ]$ lspci|grep Realtek 0e:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. \ RTL8187SE Wireless LAN Controller (rev 22) 14:00.0 Ethernet

[CentOS] LSI SATA MegaRaid & Centos 7 build 1511

2016-07-26 Thread Fawzy Ibrhim
Dear All; I want to install Centos 7 latest build on NEC Server 5800/120b-2. The installation wizard fails to detect the storage connected to LSI SATA MegaRaid PCI. Centos 5/6 were working fine with this H/W configuration but not the case with Centos 7. Please; advise. Fawzy Ibrahim

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

2016-07-26 Thread Gabriele Pohl
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:21:00 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors > > the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line > > > > broken_system_clock = 1 > > > > Do you see similiar

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

2016-07-26 Thread John Hodrien
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: Hi, on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line broken_system_clock = 1 I found this because on all of them, the root partition was not checked triggered by interval setting with tune2fs. Do you

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

2016-07-26 Thread Gabriele Pohl
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:03:52 +0200 Gabriele Pohl wrote: > on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors > the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line > > broken_system_clock = 1 > > I found this because on all of them, the > root partition was not checked triggered > by

[CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

2016-07-26 Thread Gabriele Pohl
Hi, on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line broken_system_clock = 1 I found this because on all of them, the root partition was not checked triggered by interval setting with tune2fs. Do you see similiar /default/ settings on your

[CentOS-virt] Updated Xen packages available

2016-07-26 Thread George Dunlap
Due to the nature of XSA-182, we built binaries privately and pushed the signed binaries out as soon as the embargo lifted. Everyone is urged to update as soon as possible. -George ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org