Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Jonathan Billings
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > Can you tell us the DNF for:- Get ready to take notes, because this gets complex: > yum update dnf update > yum groupinstall dnf groupinstall > yum reinstall dnf reinstall > yum erase

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 23:22 +0100, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Under Fedora23 issuing a yum command gets you a warning, then it > automatically runs the appropriate dnf command. Can you tell us the DNF for:- yum update yum groupinstall yum reinstall yum erase ?

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Always Learning
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 14:12 -0700, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-08, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. > >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > > > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread J Martin Rushton
On 08/09/16 03:02, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-08, Always Learning wrote: >> >> In any single version of Centos there is only one YUM. Having multiple >> and incompatible versions of Yum in the same software release is >> bonkers. > > Fedora is the place to try out

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Keith Keller
On 2016-09-08, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. Don't we

[CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: glite-lb-logger-msg 1.2.13-5.el7.aarch64 on c7-epel.a64

2016-09-08 Thread buildsys
logs/c7-epel.a64/glite-lb-logger-msg/20160826154044/1.2.13-5.el7.aarch64 logs/c7-epel.a64/glite-lb-logger-msg/20160826154044/1.2.13-5.el7.aarch64/build.log logs/c7-epel.a64/glite-lb-logger-msg/20160826154044/1.2.13-5.el7.aarch64/glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-5.el7.aarch64.rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

2016-09-08 Thread Philipoff, Andrew
> Samba 4.x is an intimidating piece of software. If it can perfrom the same > function and use the same config, I'm willing to try it. Without log messages or process table info, it's hard to advise any further. Generally speaking, Samba4 can do everything that Samba 3.6 does. If your server

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

2016-09-08 Thread isdtor
> 1. What is your output of testparm? No errors or warnings, apart from rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) > 2. If you run top, are any Samba related processes (winbindd, smbd, etc) > consuming excessively high amounts of CPU? I did not observe this,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

2016-09-08 Thread Philipoff, Andrew
> Other than the original 6.8 release version 3.6.23-33, samba has not been > functioning correctly for me under 6.8. > > The symptoms are that about 6-7 days after starting the server, users start > complaining that they can no longer open documents on their share. Upon > inspection, I find

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread William A. Mahaffey III
On 09/08/16 09:51, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Wed, September 7, 2016 9:59 pm, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: Staying with excellent C6 until the end. CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different than

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, September 7, 2016 9:59 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/7/2016 7:02 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >>> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. >> CentOS 7 is yum based, not dnf. > > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. > Your,

[CentOS] CentOS 6.8 and samba

2016-09-08 Thread isdtor
Other than the original 6.8 release version 3.6.23-33, samba has not been functioning correctly for me under 6.8. The symptoms are that about 6-7 days after starting the server, users start complaining that they can no longer open documents on their share. Upon inspection, I find several,

Re: [CentOS] DNF update

2016-09-08 Thread Always Learning
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 19:59 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Staying with excellent C6 until the end. > "Always Learning" seems to have a distaste for anything new or different > than what he already knows. My mind is never ever automatically closed to new 'things'. I continually embrace

[CentOS-virt] xen 4.6.3-2 packages (with XSAs 185-188) making their way through CBS

2016-09-08 Thread George Dunlap
Just a heads-up -- 4.6.3-2, for both CentOS 7 and CentOS 6, are making their way through the build system now and should be in the mirrors hopefully sometime later this afternoon. These contain patches for XSAs 185-188, one of which is a fairly critical update, so please update as soon as they're