Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2

Too busy getting ready for Passover, and not looking carefully enough at the numbers. I better get back to what I should be doing right now. See you all Thursday. On 04/09/2017 08:13 PM, Peter wrote: On 10/04/17 12:08, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This was just posted on the Postfix list.

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2

On 10/04/17 12:08, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > This was just posted on the Postfix list. Centos 7 ships with: > postfix-2.10.1-6.el7 > > Has this cert advisory been applied to the Centos build of Postfix? > > This is an exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2, for a bug that was fixed > 11 years ago in

[CentOS] Fwd: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2

This was just posted on the Postfix list. Centos 7 ships with: postfix-2.10.1-6.el7 Has this cert advisory been applied to the Centos build of Postfix? thank you Forwarded Message Subject:Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:18:06

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On 04/09/2017 04:30 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote: On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote: According to "Arthur Schopenhauer": "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." All ideas, true

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 2:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/8/2017 9:39 PM, Anthony K wrote: > >> >> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you >> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? >> > > I wish the

Re: [CentOS] logwatch customization question

On 04/09/2017 09:42 AM, Richard wrote: Date: Sunday, April 09, 2017 08:36:17 -0400 From: Robert Moskowitz Logwatch is installed, and I am assuming by how empty /etc/logwatch is that it is running from defaults, which I find in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services

Re: [CentOS] logwatch customization question

> Date: Sunday, April 09, 2017 08:36:17 -0400 > From: Robert Moskowitz > > Logwatch is installed, and I am assuming by how empty /etc/logwatch > is that it is running from defaults, which I find in > /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services > > I want to customize ONE

[CentOS] logwatch customization question

Logwatch is installed, and I am assuming by how empty /etc/logwatch is that it is running from defaults, which I find in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services I want to customize ONE service. dovecot. Do I copy /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/dovecot.conf to

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On 4/8/2017 9:39 PM, Anthony K wrote: So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? I wish the documentation was a bit better. systemd and networkmanager definitely change the rules... I

Re: [CentOS] Network configuration: desktop vs. laptop

Le 09/04/2017 à 10:29, Nux! a écrit : > On CentOS it's normal for both wireless and wired to be connected at > the same time, maybe what you are seeing is just the icon's being > confusing or not being replaced with the right thing? > > This is easy to check, just issue an "ip route". On My

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

I'm ok with it as a init system, not much enthused by its ancillary components. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Anthony K" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Sunday, 9 April,

Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll

On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote: > According to "Arthur Schopenhauer": > > "All truth passes through three stages. > First, it is ridiculed. > Second, it is violently opposed. > Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." All ideas, true or false, follow those stages, but one

Re: [CentOS] Network configuration: desktop vs. laptop

Hi Niki, On CentOS it's normal for both wireless and wired to be connected at the same time, maybe what you are seeing is just the icon's being confusing or not being replaced with the right thing? This is easy to check, just issue an "ip route". On My system I can see something like this: