Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:30:23PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 9, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Michael Hennebry > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could > >> have

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:10:16PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > >>I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > >>can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be

[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (mesa, kernel)

Hello Guys, I really wanted to just update mesa. But the Linux kernel was also done quickly. - Mesa 17.1.2 (remove sanitizy check, otherwise fail to built) - Kernel 4.11.4 can be found at: http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ Unfortunately

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Jun 9, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could >> have alt.religion.systemd >> >> mark >> >> * vi, not emacs!

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On Fri, June 9, 2017 2:00 pm, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi > that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting > PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:44:47 -0400 Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and > > wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and > > hopefully

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: >> > Your current setup does not agree with the instructions. May I suggest >> > you follow the example in the wiki exactly as it is written? If you >>

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 6/9/2017 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:45:26AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smith > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > >> On

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a >

[CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a device :) ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:45:26AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smith > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> >

Re: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Maybe we need another mailing list, like alt.religion.editors*, we could have alt.religion.systemd mark * vi, not emacs! Nya You mean 6, right? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> > Automounting is now done through systemd. >> >> In my use, we continue to

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, June 9, 2017 2:56 am, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >> Automounting is now done through systemd. > > Can be done through systemd, not has to be done via systemd. It'd be news > to > me that there's anything stopping you using autofs. Indeed. At least

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 08:25:31AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > Automounting is now done through systemd. > > In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, > because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > Automounting is now done through systemd. In my use, we continue to use autofs for automounts of CIFS volumes, because as best I can tell, systemd doesn't support using the request-key infrastructure to use a user's kerberos ticket

Re: [CentOS] using autofs on C-7

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Kenneth Porter wrote: Automounting is now done through systemd. Can be done through systemd, not has to be done via systemd. It'd be news to me that there's anything stopping you using autofs. I see no way to replicate most of the functionality of autofs with this. jh